RESUMO
Current calls to correct the perturbed ecosystems and nutrient imbalances of the Laurentian Great Lakes focus on setting target nutrient levels that will be met by environmental and economic regulations to reduce the flow of excess nutrients into the lakes. While these standard types of regulations have been successful in the past, it is unclear whether they will achieve similar ecological and economic successes now amid possible ecosystem regime shifts triggered by invasive mussels. We compute the bioeconomic costs and benefits of hypothetical regulations designed to target nutrient loads in present-day Lake Michigan through agricultural operations, which are known to be nonpoint source polluters of the aquatic ecosystem network. Our results show how reducing nutrient loads may exacerbate spatially disparate ecosystem issues that generate overall economic losses. Conversely, and counterintuitively, allowing for more nutrient loading could generate economic gains over our assessment timeframe. We determine that implementation of standard nutrient target policies are costly and likely inadequate for current dreissenid-affected aquatic ecosystems experiencing nutrient imbalances because they disregard the interactive role of invasive mussels in nutrient cycling.