Co-activation of sternocleidomastoid muscles during maximum clenching.

In an attempt to determine the degree of co-activation present in selected cervical muscles during clenching, we instructed 12 male subjects to produce four brief maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) efforts (clenching) in a position of maximum intercuspation. Surface EMG activity was recorded bilaterally from the masseter and sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles. The contraction level for the SCM during clenching was reported as a percentage of the SCM's maximum activity achieved during maximum neck flexion against resistance. All EMG signals for the masseter and SCM were converted to a true RMS voltage signal and digitized at a 100-Hz sampling rate. Mean peak EMG voltage levels were determined for the activity recorded during each brief MVC task. All subjects demonstrated co-activation of the SCM during strong abrupt clenching efforts. The mean levels (+/- S.D.) of SCM activity were 11.8 +/- 9.6% (right) and 14.2 +/- 9.4% (left) of the MVC capacity. Fifty percent of masseter activity was required to achieve 5% activity of the SCM bilaterally, and there was a progressive development of the SCM co-activation which paralleled the masseter activation.

Sternocleidomastoid muscle inhibition induced by trigeminal stimulation.

Among numerous reports of anatomical and functional coupling between the trigeminal and cervical systems is the demonstration that the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscles may become activated along with the masseter muscles during forceful abrupt biting maneuvers. Whether the co-activated SCM is also inhibited by stimuli that produce masseter inhibition is not known. This study evaluated the SCM for the presence of inhibition during mechanically-elicited (chin or forehead tap) and electrically-elicited (anterior maxillary gingiva stimulation) inhibition of the masseter muscle in ten healthy men. Surface EMG data were recorded bilaterally from the masseter and SCM muscles. The data for each muscle were converted to ratios of the pre-stimulus maximum voluntary contraction activity for each subject and averaged across subjects. Means of these percentages were determined at several defined pre- and post-stimulus intervals. The results indicate that masseter inhibition was clearly elicited by the electrical and both forms of mechanical stimulation. SCM co-inhibition could be evoked by electrical and chin tap stimulation but not by forehead tap. The responses to these stimuli varied among subjects, from trial to trial, and within subjects depending on the experimental condition. The fact that it was possible for this co-inhibition to be evoked is presented as further indication of the functional coupling of the trigeminal and cervical systems.

Concurrent cervical and craniofacial pain. A review of empiric and basic science evidence.

Because many patients present themselves for treatment with both craniofacial and craniocervical pain, 2 questions arise: (1) What are the sensory and motor consequences of dysfunction in either of these areas on the other? (2) Do craniofacial and craniocervical pain have a similar cause? These questions formed the impetus for this review article. The phenomenon of concurrent pain in craniofacial and cervical structures is considered, and clinical reports and opinions are presented regarding theories of cervical-to-craniofacial and craniofacial-to-cervical pain referral. Because pain referral between these 2 areas requires anatomic and functional connectivity between trigeminally and cervically innervated structures, basic neurophysiologic and neuroanatomic literature is reviewed. The published data clearly demonstrate neurophysiologic and structural convergence of cervical sensory and muscle afferent inputs onto trigeminal subnucleus caudalis nociceptive and non-nociceptive neurons. Moreover, changes in metabolic activity and blood flow in the brainstem and cervical dorsal horn of the spinal cord in both monkeys and cats have been demonstrated after electric stimulation of the V1-innervated superior sagittal sinus. In conclusion, the animal experimental data support the findings of human empiric and experimental studies, which suggest that strong connectivity exists between trigeminal and cervical motor and sensory responses.

Oral motor disorders in humans.

Motor disorders affecting the orofacial musculature include bruxism, chronic orofacial muscle pain affecting the jaw and neck muscles and the involuntary waking period disorders such as orofacial dyskinesia, oral mandibular dystonia, tremor and others. Research at UCLA has touched these and many other areas. Current results have indicated the usefulness of contingent afferent electrical stimulation of the lip to control bruxism; provided information regarding the fatigue, endurance and recovery faculties of the protrusive jaw muscles; explored the issue of chronic muscle hyperactivity inducing headache pain; and worked with botulin toxin as a method to treat orofacial dystonia and dyskinesia.

Extensor digitorum brevis manus: a case report review.

A detailed description of bilateral extensor digitorum brevis manus (EDBM) present in a female cadaver is presented. The need for clinical recognition is emphasized. Prevalence, morphological variability and theories of ontogeny are reviewed. Clinical significance and possible function are discussed. Since misdiagnosis may result from the anatomical variability and lack of clinical awareness, the need for further study is emphasized.