Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical and Microbiological Signs in Patients With Skin Lesions Resembling Buruli Ulcer in an Endemic Region.

Background: The diagnosis of the neglected tropical skin and soft tissue disease Buruli ulcer (BU) is made on clinical and epidemiological grounds, after which treatment with BU-specific antibiotics is initiated empirically. Given the current decline in BU incidence, clinical expertise in the recognition of BU is likely to wane and laboratory confirmation of BU becomes increasingly important. We therefore aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical signs and microbiological tests in patients presenting with lesions clinically compatible with BU. Methods: A total of 227 consecutive patients were recruited in southern Benin and evaluated by clinical diagnosis, direct smear examination (DSE), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), culture, and histopathology. In the absence of a gold standard, the final diagnosis in each patient was made using an expert panel approach. We estimated the accuracy of each test in comparison to the final diagnosis and evaluated the performance of 3 diagnostic algorithms. Results: Among the 205 patients with complete data, the attending clinicians recognized BU with a sensitivity of 92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 85%-96%), which was higher than the sensitivity of any of the laboratory tests. However, 14% (95% CI, 7%-24%) of patients not suspected to have BU at diagnosis were classified as BU by the expert panel. The specificities of all diagnostics were high (≥91%). All diagnostic algorithms had similar performances. Conclusions: A broader clinical suspicion should be recommended to reduce missed BU diagnoses. Taking into consideration diagnostic accuracy, time to results, cost-effectiveness, and clinical generalizability, a stepwise diagnostic approach reserving PCR to DSE-negative patients performed best.

Subcutaneous Granulomatous Inflammation due to Basidiobolomycosis: Case Reports of 3 Patients in Buruli Ulcer Endemic Areas in Benin.

BACKGROUND: Basidiobolomycosis is a rare subcutaneous mycosis, which can be mistaken for several other diseases, such as soft tissue tumors, lymphoma, or Buruli ulcer in the preulcerative stage. Microbiological confirmation by PCR for Basidiobolus ranarum and culture yield the most specific diagnosis, yet they are not widely available in endemic areas and with varying sensitivity. A combination of histopathological findings, namely, granulomatous inflammation with giant cells, septate hyphal fragments, and the Splendore-Hoeppli phenomenon, can confirm basidiobolomycosis in patients presenting with painless, hard induration of soft tissue. CASE PRESENTATIONS: We report on three patients misdiagnosed as suffering from Buruli ulcer, who did not respond to Buruli treatment. Histopathological review of the tissue sections from these patients suggests basidiobolomycosis. All patients had been lost to follow-up, and none received antifungal therapy. On visiting the patients at their homes, two were reported to have died of unknown causes. The third patient was found alive and well and had experienced local spontaneous healing. CONCLUSION: Basidiobolomycosis is a rare subcutaneous fungal disease mimicking preulcerative Buruli ulcer. We stress the importance of the early recognition by clinicians and pathologists of this treatable disease, so patients can timely receive antifungal therapy.