RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Huntington's disease (HD) is an autosomal dominant neurodegenerative disease that predominantly impacts a Caucasian population, but few efforts have explored racial differences in presentation and progression. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to assess the presentation and progression of HD across race groups using the Enroll-HD longitudinal observational study. METHODS: We applied propensity score matching for cytosine-adenine-guanine age product score, and age, to identify White, Hispanic, Asian, and Black participants from the Enroll-HD database. We compared clinical presentations at baseline, and progression over time, using White participants as a control cohort. RESULTS: Black participants were more severe at baseline across all clinical measures. No significant differences in progression were observed between race groups. CONCLUSIONS: We consider the factors driving clinical differences at baseline for Black participants. Our data emphasize the necessary improvement in underrepresented minority recruitment for studies of rare diseases. © 2023 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Assuntos
Doença de Huntington , Doenças Neurodegenerativas , Humanos , Grupos Minoritários , Fatores Raciais , Projetos Piloto , Progressão da DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with job satisfaction and retention, we surveyed a large cohort of clinical research coordinators (CRCs). In recent years, the clinical research coordinator has changed from a semi-permanent role to one that has a high turnover rate. The CRCs are integral to clinical research and instability in this role can cause patient stress and increase the burden on clinical teams through unnecessary delegation of resources toward hiring and retraining new talent. The cultural shift toward CRCs as a temporary position may be driven by the perspective that the role positions an individual for other health care careers, but understanding what influences low retention rates are necessary. METHODS: A survey containing 13 multiple choice or open-ended and 32 Likert scale questions was distributed to previous and current CRCs using REDCap. The questionnaires were self-administered and completed over a 12-month period between October 11, 2017, and September 16, 2018. RESULTS: A total of 85 CRCs completed the study. From the 32 potential predictors of retention, we investigated 9 significant predictors: salary, work setting, understanding the role, level of CRC, understanding protocol development, actively engaged principal investigator (PI), having a collaborative role with PI, feeling respected by PI, and having a close relationship with PI. Adequate salary, greater respect, collaboration, and engagement from the PI were significantly associated with higher retention. Surprisingly, greater workload and lack of opportunity for professional growth were not associated with retention. CONCLUSION: The CRCs who feel respected and engaged by the PI and are adequately compensated are more likely to have higher job satisfaction and retention.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Safer-at-home orders during the COVID-19 pandemic altered the structure of clinical care for Huntington's disease (HD) patients. This shift provided an opportunity to identify limitations in the current healthcare infrastructure and how these may impact the health and well-being of persons with HD. OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to assess the feasibility of remote healthcare delivery in HD patients, to identify socioeconomic factors which may explain differences in feasibility and to evaluate the impact of safer-at-home orders on HD patient stress levels. METHODS: This observational study of a clinical HD population during the 'safer-at-home' orders asked patients or caregivers about their current access to healthcare resources and patient stress levels. A chart review allowed for an assessment of socioeconomic status and characterization of HD severity. RESULTS: Two-hundred and twelve HD patients were contacted with 156 completing the survey. During safer-at-home orders, the majority of HD patients were able to obtain medications and see a physician; however, 25% of patients would not commit to regular telehealth visits, and less than 50% utilized an online healthcare platform. We found that 37% of participants were divorced/single, 39% had less than a high school diploma, and nearly 20% were uninsured or on low-income health insurance. Patient stress levels correlated with disease burden. CONCLUSION: A significant portion of HD participants were not willing to participate in telehealth services. Potential explanations for these limitations may include socioeconomic barriers and caregiving structure. These observations illustrate areas for clinical care improvement to address healthcare disparities in the HD community.