A national trauma data bank analysis of large animal-related injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Large animal-related injuries (LARI) are relatively uncommon, but, nevertheless, a public hazard. The objective of this study was to better understand LARI injury patterns and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the 2016 National Trauma Data Bank and used ICD-10 codes to identify patients injured by a large animal. The primary outcome was severe injury pattern, while secondary outcomes included mortality, hospital length of stay, ICU admission, and mechanical ventilation usage. RESULTS: There were 6,662 LARI included in our analysis. Most LARI (66%) occurred while riding the animal, and the most common type of LARI was fall from horse (63%). The median ISS was 9 and the most severe injuries (AIS ≥ 3) were to the chest (19%), head (10%), and lower extremities (10%). The overall mortality was low at 0.8%. Compared to non-riders, riders sustained more severe injuries to the chest (21% vs. 16%, p<0.001) and spine (4% vs. 2%, p<0.001). Compared to motor vehicle collisions (MVC), riders sustained fewer severe injuries to the head (10% vs. 12%, p<0.001) and lower extremity (10% vs. 12%, p=0.01). Compared to auto-pedestrian accidents, non-riders sustained fewer severe injuries to the head (11% vs. 19%, p<0.001) and lower extremity (10% vs. 20%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients involved in a LARI are moderately injured with more complex injuries occurring in the chest, head, and lower extremities. Fall from horse was the most common LARI mechanism. Overall mortality was low. Compared to non-riders, riders were more likely to sustain severe injuries to the chest and spine. Severe injury patterns were similar when comparing riders to MVC and, given that most LARI are riding injuries, we recommend trauma teams approach LARI as they would an MVC.

Risk scoring models fail to predict pulmonary embolism in trauma patients.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to identify risk factors and risk scoring models to help identify post-traumatic pulmonary embolisms (PE). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review (2014-2019) of all adult trauma patients admitted to our Level I trauma center that received a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) for a suspected PE. A systematic literature search found eleven risk scoring models, all of which were applied to these patients. Scores of patients with and without PE were compared. RESULTS: Of the 235 trauma patients that received CTPA, 31 (13%) showed a PE. No risk scoring model had both a sensitivity and specificity above 90%. The Wells Score had the highest area under the curve (0.65). After logistic regression, no risk scoring model variables were independently associated with PE. CONCLUSIONS: In trauma patients with clinically suspected PE, clinical variables and current risk scoring models do not adequately differentiate patients with and without PE.

Does preoperative magnetic resonance imaging alter the surgical plan in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury?

BACKGROUND: Whether magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) adds value to surgical planning for patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (ATCSCI) remains controversial. In this study, we compared surgeons' operative planning decisions with and without preoperative MRI. We had two hypotheses: (1) the surgical plan for ATCSCI would not change substantially after the MRI and (2) intersurgeon agreement on the surgical plan would also not change substantially after the MRI. METHODS: We performed a vignette-based survey study that included a retrospective review of all adult trauma patients who presented to our American College of Surgeons-verified level 1 trauma center from 2010 to 2019 with signs of acute quadriplegia and underwent computed tomography (CT), MRI, and subsequent cervical spine surgery within 48 hours of admission. We abstracted patient demographics, admission physiology, and injury details. Patient clinical scenarios were presented to three spine surgeons, first with only the CT and then, a minimum of 2 weeks later, with both the CT and MRI. At each presentation, the surgeons identified their surgical plan, which included timing (none, <8, <24, >24 hours), approach (anterior, posterior, circumferential), and targeted vertebral levels. The outcomes were change in surgical plan and intersurgeon agreement. We used Fleiss' kappa (κ) to measure intersurgeon agreement. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients met the criteria and were included. Ninety-three percent of the surgical plans were changed after the MRI. Intersurgeon agreement was "slight" to "fair" both before the MRI (timing, κ = 0.22; approach, κ = 0.35; levels, κ = 0.13) and after the MRI (timing, κ = 0.06; approach, κ = 0.27; levels, κ = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Surgical plans for ATCSCI changed substantially when the MRI was presented in addition to the CT; however, intersurgeon agreement regarding the surgical plan was low and not improved by the addition of the MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level II.