RESUMO
The Canadian Domestic Substances List (DSL) contains chemicals that have not been tested for genotoxicity as their use pre-dates regulatory requirements. In the present study, (quantitative) structure-activity relationships ((Q)SAR) model predictions and in vitro tests were conducted for genotoxicity assessment of 13 data-poor chemicals from the DSL (i.e. CAS numbers 19286-75-0, 13676-91-0, 2478-20-8, 6408-20-8, 74499-36-8, 26694-69-9, 29036-02-0, 120-24-1, 84696-48-9, 4051-63-2, 5718-26-3, 632-51-9, and 600-14-6). First, chemicals were screened by (Q)SAR models in Leadscope® and OASIS TIMES; two chemicals were excluded from (Q)SAR as they are complex mixtures. Six were flagged by (Q)SAR as potentially mutagenic and were subsequently confirmed as mutagens using the Ames assay. Of nine chemicals with clastogenic (Q)SAR flags, eight induced micronuclei in TK6 cells. Benchmark dose analysis was used to evaluate the potency of the chemicals. Four chemicals were bacterial mutagens with similar potencies. Three chemicals were more potent in micronuclei induction than the prototype alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate and three were equipotent to the mutagenic carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene in the presence of rat liver S9. Overall, 11 of the 13 DSL chemicals demonstrated at least one type of genotoxicity in vitro. This study demonstrates the application of genotoxic potency analysis for prioritizing further investigations.
Assuntos
Modelos Teóricos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Simulação por Computador , Cricetulus , Humanos , Testes de Mutagenicidade , Mutagênicos/química , Relação Quantitativa Estrutura-AtividadeRESUMO
The use of short-term toxicogenomic tests to predict cancer (or other health effects) offers considerable advantages relative to traditional toxicity testing methods. The advantages include increased throughput, increased mechanistic data, and significantly reduced costs. However, precisely how toxicogenomics data can be used to support human health risk assessment (RA) is unclear. In a companion paper ( Moffat et al. 2014 ), we present a case study evaluating the utility of toxicogenomics in the RA of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), a known human carcinogen. The case study is meant as a proof-of-principle exercise using a well-established mode of action (MOA) that impacts multiple tissues, which should provide a best case example. We found that toxicogenomics provided rich mechanistic data applicable to hazard identification, dose-response analysis, and quantitative RA of BaP. Based on this work, here we share some useful lessons for both research and RA, and outline our perspective on how toxicogenomics can benefit RA in the short- and long-term. Specifically, we focus on (1) obtaining biologically relevant data that are readily suitable for establishing an MOA for toxicants, (2) examining the human relevance of an MOA from animal testing, and (3) proposing appropriate quantitative values for RA. We describe our envisioned strategy on how toxicogenomics can become a tool in RA, especially when anchored to other short-term toxicity tests (apical endpoints) to increase confidence in the proposed MOA, and emphasize the need for additional studies on other MOAs to define the best practices in the application of toxicogenomics in RA.
Assuntos
Benzo(a)pireno/toxicidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Toxicogenética/métodos , Animais , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Humanos , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Testes de ToxicidadeRESUMO
Toxicogenomics is proposed to be a useful tool in human health risk assessment. However, a systematic comparison of traditional risk assessment approaches with those applying toxicogenomics has never been done. We conducted a case study to evaluate the utility of toxicogenomics in the risk assessment of benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), a well-studied carcinogen, for drinking water exposures. Our study was intended to compare methodologies, not to evaluate drinking water safety. We compared traditional (RA1), genomics-informed (RA2) and genomics-only (RA3) approaches. RA2 and RA3 applied toxicogenomics data from human cell cultures and mice exposed to BaP to determine if these data could provide insight into BaP's mode of action (MOA) and derive tissue-specific points of departure (POD). Our global gene expression analysis supported that BaP is genotoxic in mice and allowed the development of a detailed MOA. Toxicogenomics analysis in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells demonstrated a high degree of consistency in perturbed pathways with animal tissues. Quantitatively, the PODs for traditional and transcriptional approaches were similar (liver 1.2 vs. 1.0 mg/kg-bw/day; lungs 0.8 vs. 3.7 mg/kg-bw/day; forestomach 0.5 vs. 7.4 mg/kg-bw/day). RA3, which applied toxicogenomics in the absence of apical toxicology data, demonstrates that this approach provides useful information in data-poor situations. Overall, our study supports the use of toxicogenomics as a relatively fast and cost-effective tool for hazard identification, preliminary evaluation of potential carcinogens, and carcinogenic potency, in addition to identifying current limitations and practical questions for future work.
Assuntos
Benzo(a)pireno/toxicidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Toxicogenética/métodos , Animais , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Água Potável/análise , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Genômica/métodos , Humanos , Camundongos , Especificidade da EspécieRESUMO
We previously demonstrated that in ovo exposure to the flame retardant tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCPP) decreased plasma thyroxine levels, reduced growth parameters, and decreased gallbladder size in chicken embryos. In the current study DNA microarrays were used to evaluate global mRNA expression in liver tissue of male chicken embryos that exhibited the above mentioned effects. Injected doses were dimethyl sulfoxide vehicle control, 7.6 or 45 µg TDCPP/g egg. TDCPP caused significant changes in the expression of five genes at the low dose and 47 genes at the high dose (False Discovery Rate p ≤ 0.1, fold change ≥ 1.5). The gene expression analysis suggested a compromised immune function, a state of cholestatic liver/biliary fibrosis, and disrupted lipid and steroid metabolism. Circulating bile acid levels were elevated, which is an indication of liver dysfunction, and plasma cholesterol levels were reduced; however, hepatic bile acid and cholesterol levels were unaltered. Interactome analyses identified apolipoprotein E, hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha as key regulatory molecules involved in the effects of TDCPP. Our results demonstrate a targeted effect of TDCPP toxicity on lipid metabolism, including cholesterol, that helps explain the aforementioned phenotypic effects, as chicken embryos are highly dependent on yolk lipids for growth and maintenance throughout development. Finally, our results are in concordance with the literature that describes TDCPP as a cancer-causing agent, since the majority of dysregulated genes were involved in cancer pathways.
Assuntos
Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos/efeitos dos fármacos , Compostos Organofosforados/toxicidade , Esteroides/metabolismo , Animais , Apolipoproteínas E/genética , Apolipoproteínas E/metabolismo , Ácidos e Sais Biliares/sangue , Embrião de Galinha , Colesterol/sangue , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Fibrose , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Fator 4 Nuclear de Hepatócito/genética , Fator 4 Nuclear de Hepatócito/metabolismo , Sistema Imunitário/efeitos dos fármacos , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Fígado/metabolismo , Fígado/patologia , Masculino , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , PPAR alfa/genética , PPAR alfa/metabolismo , RNA Mensageiro/genética , RNA Mensageiro/metabolismo , Tiroxina/sangueRESUMO
Arsenobetaine (ASB) is the major form of arsenic (As) in seafood sources such as molluscs and fish. Limited data demonstrated that ASB toxicity in mammals is minimal; however, data on possible reproductive effects are lacking. This study investigated the tissue distribution and developmental effects of ASB during pregnancy, early postnatal life, and development to adulthood. Pregnant rats were randomly assigned to 3 cohorts and gavaged daily from gestational day 8 (GD8) with ASB in deionized water at 0, 0.1, 1, or 10 mg/kg body weight (bw)/d. Cohort 1 dams were sacrificed on GD20 (n = 6 per dose group), cohort 2 dams and pups were sacrificed on postnatal day 13 (PND13; n = 4 dams per dose group), and cohort 3 pups (n = 2 dams per dose group) were sacrificed on PND90. Residue analysis detected significant levels of ASB in livers of cohort 1 dams and lower levels in cohort 1 GD20 fetuses, as well as in cohort 2 male and female offspring, indicating placental transfer from the maternal circulation in utero. Trace amounts of ASB in dams' milk were found only in the 10-mg/kg bw/d dose cohort 2 (PND13), demonstrating that lactational transfer was limited. ASB levels in liver varied during pregnancy, lactation, and postweaning, with levels falling rapidly as these physiological states progress. Although transfer of ASB through the placenta to the fetuses and to a limited extent through milk was confirmed, ASB exposure during pregnancy and lactation appeared to produce no teratogenic or deleterious effects on reproductive development.
Assuntos
Arsenicais/efeitos adversos , Fígado/metabolismo , Exposição Materna/efeitos adversos , Leite/química , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Espermátides/efeitos dos fármacos , Testosterona/sangue , Administração Oral , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Cromatografia Líquida , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Feto , Lactação , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/metabolismo , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/fisiopatologia , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização por ElectrosprayRESUMO
Genotoxicity testing relies on the detection of gene mutations and chromosome damage and has been used in the genetic safety assessment of drugs and chemicals for decades. However, the results of standard genotoxicity tests are often difficult to interpret due to lack of mode of action information. The TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker provides mechanistic information on the DNA damage-inducing (DDI) capability of chemicals to aid in the interpretation of positive in vitro genotoxicity data. The CometChip® assay was developed to assess DNA strand breaks in a higher-throughput format. We paired the TGx-DDI biomarker with the CometChip® assay in TK6 cells to evaluate three model agents: nitrofurantoin (NIT), metronidazole (MTZ), and novobiocin (NOV). TGx-DDI was analyzed by two independent labs and technologies (nCounter® and TempO-Seq®). Although these anti-infective drugs are, or have been, used in human and/or veterinary medicine, the standard genotoxicity testing battery showed significant genetic safety findings. Specifically, NIT is a mutagen and causes chromosome damage, and MTZ and NOV cause chromosome damage in conventional in vitro tests. Herein, the TGx-DDI biomarker classified NIT and MTZ as non-DDI at all concentrations tested, suggesting that NIT's mutagenic activity is bacterial specific and that the observed chromosome damage by MTZ might be a consequence of in vitro test conditions. In contrast, NOV was classified as DDI at the second highest concentration tested, which is in line with the fact that NOV is a bacterial DNA-gyrase inhibitor that also affects topoisomerase II at high concentrations. The lack of DNA damage for NIT and MTZ was confirmed by the CometChip® results, which were negative for all three drugs except at overtly cytotoxic concentrations. This case study demonstrates the utility of combining the TGx-DDI biomarker and CometChip® to resolve conflicting genotoxicity data and provides further validation to support the reproducibility of the biomarker.
RESUMO
Higher-throughput, mode-of-action-based assays provide a valuable approach to expedite chemical evaluation for human health risk assessment. In this study, we combined the high-throughput alkaline DNA damage-sensing CometChip® assay with the TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker (DDI = DNA damage-inducing) using high-throughput TempO-Seq®, as an integrated genotoxicity testing approach. We used metabolically competent differentiated human HepaRG™ cell cultures to enable the identification of chemicals that require bioactivation to cause genotoxicity. We studied 12 chemicals (nine DDI, three non-DDI) in increasing concentrations to measure and classify chemicals based on their ability to damage DNA. The CometChip® classified 10/12 test chemicals correctly, missing a positive DDI call for aflatoxin B1 and propyl gallate. The poor detection of aflatoxin B1 adducts is consistent with the insensitivity of the standard alkaline comet assay to bulky lesions (a shortcoming that can be overcome by trapping repair intermediates). The TGx-DDI biomarker accurately classified 10/12 agents. TGx-DDI correctly identified aflatoxin B1 as DDI, demonstrating efficacy for combined used of these complementary methodologies. Zidovudine, a known DDI chemical, was misclassified as it inhibits transcription, which prevents measurable changes in gene expression. Eugenol, a non-DDI chemical known to render misleading positive results at high concentrations, was classified as DDI at the highest concentration tested. When combined, the CometChip® assay and the TGx-DDI biomarker were 100% accurate in identifying chemicals that induce DNA damage. Quantitative benchmark concentration (BMC) modeling was applied to evaluate chemical potencies for both assays. The BMCs for the CometChip® assay and the TGx-DDI biomarker were highly concordant (within 4-fold) and resulted in identical potency rankings. These results demonstrate that these two assays can be integrated for efficient identification and potency ranking of DNA damaging agents in HepaRG™ cell cultures.
Assuntos
Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Transcriptoma , Técnicas de Cultura de Células , Linhagem Celular , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Mutagênicos/toxicidadeRESUMO
CONTEXT: Human studies consistently show an association between exposure to persistent organic pollutants, including 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD, aka "dioxin"), and increased diabetes risk. We previously showed that a single high-dose TCDD exposure (20 µg/kg) decreased plasma insulin levels in male and female mice in vivo, but effects on glucose homeostasis were sex-dependent. OBJECTIVE: The current study assessed whether prolonged exposure to a physiologically relevant low-dose of TCDD impacts glucose homeostasis and/or the islet phenotype in a sex-dependent manner in chow-fed or high-fat diet (HFD)-fed mice. METHODS: Male and female mice were exposed to 20 ng/kg/d TCDD 2×/week for 12 weeks and simultaneously fed standard chow or a 45% HFD. Glucose homeostasis was assessed by glucose and insulin tolerance tests, and glucose-induced plasma insulin levels were measured in vivo. Histological analysis was performed on pancreas from male and female mice, and islets were isolated from females for TempO-Seq transcriptomic analysis. RESULTS: Low-dose TCDD exposure did not lead to adverse metabolic consequences in chow-fed male or female mice, or in HFD-fed males. However, TCDD accelerated the onset of HFD-induced hyperglycemia and impaired glucose-induced plasma insulin levels in females. TCDD caused a modest increase in islet area in males but reduced the percent beta cell area within islets in females. TempO-Seq analysis suggested abnormal changes to endocrine and metabolic pathways in female TCDDHFD islets. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that prolonged low-dose TCDD exposure has minimal effects on glucose homeostasis and islet morphology in chow-fed male and female mice but promotes maladaptive metabolic responses in HFD-fed females.
Assuntos
Adaptação Fisiológica/efeitos dos fármacos , Dieta Hiperlipídica/efeitos adversos , Dioxinas/farmacologia , Animais , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Glicemia/metabolismo , Doença Crônica , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Metabolismo Energético/efeitos dos fármacos , Exposição Ambiental/efeitos adversos , Poluentes Ambientais/farmacologia , Feminino , Insulina/metabolismo , Células Secretoras de Insulina/efeitos dos fármacos , Células Secretoras de Insulina/metabolismo , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Dibenzodioxinas Policloradas/farmacologia , Caracteres Sexuais , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Modern testing paradigms seek to apply human-relevant cell culture models and integrate data from multiple test systems to accurately inform potential hazards and modes of action for chemical toxicology. In genetic toxicology, the use of metabolically competent human hepatocyte cell culture models provides clear advantages over other more commonly used cell lines that require the use of external metabolic activation systems, such as rat liver S9. HepaRG™ cells are metabolically competent cells that express Phase I and II metabolic enzymes and differentiate into mature hepatocyte-like cells, making them ideal for toxicity testing. We assessed the performance of the flow cytometry in vitro micronucleus (MN) test and the TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker to detect DNA damage-inducing (DDI) chemicals in human HepaRG™ cells after a 3-day repeat exposure. The biomarker, developed for use in human TK6 cells, is a panel of 64 genes that accurately classifies chemicals as DDI or non-DDI. Herein, the TGx-DDI biomarker was analyzed by Ion AmpliSeq whole transcriptome sequencing to assess its classification accuracy using this more modern gene expression technology as a secondary objective. METHODS: HepaRG™ cells were exposed to increasing concentrations of 10 test chemicals (six genotoxic chemicals, including one aneugen, and four non-genotoxic chemicals). Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity were measured using the In Vitro MicroFlow® kit, which was run in parallel with the TGx-DDI biomarker. RESULTS: A concentration-related decrease in relative survival and a concomitant increase in MN frequency were observed for genotoxic chemicals in HepaRG™ cells. All five DDI and five non-DDI agents were correctly classified (as genotoxic/non-genotoxic and DDI/non-DDI) by pairing the test methods. The aneugenic agent (colchicine) yielded the expected positive result in the MN test and negative (non-DDI) result by TGx-DDI. CONCLUSIONS: This next generation genotoxicity testing strategy is aligned with the paradigm shift occurring in the field of genetic toxicology. It provides mechanistic insight in a human-relevant cell-model, paired with measurement of a conventional endpoint, to inform the potential for adverse health effects. This work provides support for combining these assays in an integrated test strategy for accurate, higher throughput genetic toxicology testing in this metabolically competent human progenitor cell line.
RESUMO
Gene expression biomarkers are now available for application in the identification of genotoxic hazards. The TGx-DDI transcriptomic biomarker can accurately distinguish DNA damage-inducing (DDI) from non-DDI exposures based on changes in the expression of 64 biomarker genes. The 64 genes were previously derived from whole transcriptome DNA microarray profiles of 28 reference agents (14 DDI and 14 non-DDI) after 4 h treatments of TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells. To broaden the applicability of TGx-DDI, we tested the biomarker using quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR), which is accessible to most molecular biology laboratories. First, we selectively profiled the expression of the 64 biomarker genes using TaqMan qPCR assays in 96-well arrays after exposing TK6 cells to the 28 reference agents for 4 h. To evaluate the classification capability of the qPCR profiles, we used the reference qPCR signature to classify 24 external validation chemicals using two different methods-a combination of three statistical analyses and an alternative, the Running Fisher test. The qPCR results for the reference set were comparable to the original microarray biomarker; 27 of the 28 reference agents (96%) were accurately classified. Moreover, the two classification approaches supported the conservation of TGx-DDI classification capability using qPCR; the combination of the two approaches accurately classified 21 of the 24 external validation chemicals, demonstrating 100% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 91% balanced accuracy. This study demonstrates that qPCR can be used when applying the TGx-DDI biomarker and will improve the accessibility of TGx-DDI for genotoxicity screening. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60: 122-133, 2019. © 2018 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis.
Assuntos
Dano ao DNA/genética , Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Marcadores Genéticos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Canadá , Linhagem Celular , Dano ao DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Análise de Sequência com Séries de Oligonucleotídeos , Transcriptoma/efeitos dos fármacos , Transcriptoma/genéticaRESUMO
In vitro gene expression signatures to predict toxicological responses can provide mechanistic context for regulatory testing. We previously developed the TGx-28.65 genomic biomarker from a database of gene expression profiles derived from human TK6 cells exposed to 28 well-known compounds. The biomarker comprises 65 genes that can classify chemicals as DNA damaging or non-DNA damaging. In this study, we applied the TGx-28.65 genomic biomarker in parallel with the in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay to determine if two chemicals of regulatory interest at Health Canada, disperse orange (DO: the orange azo dye 3-[[4-[(4-Nitrophenyl)azo]phenyl] benzylamino]propanenitrile) and 1,2,4-benzenetriol (BT: a metabolite of benzene) are genotoxic or non-genotoxic. Both chemicals caused dose-dependent declines in relative survival and increases in apoptosis. A strong significant increase in MN induction was observed for all concentrations of BT; the top two concentrations of DO also caused a statistically significant increase in MN, but these increases were <2-fold above controls. TGx-28.65 analysis classified BT as genotoxic at all three concentrations and DO as genotoxic at the mid and high concentrations. Thus, although DO only caused a small increase in MN, this response was sufficient to induce a cellular DNA damage response. Benchmark dose modeling confirmed that BT is much more potent than DO. The results strongly suggest that follow-up work is required to assess whether DO and BT are also genotoxic in vivo. This is particularly important for DO, which may require metabolic activation by bacterial gut flora to fully induce its genotoxic potential. Our previously published data and this proof of concept study suggest that the TGx-28.65 genomic biomarker has the potential to add significant value to existing approaches used to assess genotoxicity.
Assuntos
Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Compostos Azo/efeitos adversos , Biomarcadores/análise , Citometria de Fluxo/métodos , Hidroquinonas/efeitos adversos , Linfócitos/patologia , Testes para Micronúcleos/métodos , Corantes/efeitos adversos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Humanos , Linfócitos/efeitos dos fármacos , Linfócitos/metabolismo , Transcriptoma/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
In vitro transcriptional signatures that predict toxicities can facilitate chemical screening. We previously developed a transcriptomic biomarker (known as TGx-28.65) for classifying agents as genotoxic (DNA damaging) and non-genotoxic in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells. Because TK6 cells do not express cytochrome P450s, we confirmed accurate classification by the biomarker in cells co-exposed to 1% 5,6 benzoflavone/phenobarbital-induced rat liver S9 for metabolic activation. However, chemicals may require different types of S9 for activation. Here we investigated the response of TK6 cells to higher percentages of Aroclor-, benzoflavone/phenobarbital-, or ethanol-induced rat liver S9 to expand TGx-28.65 biomarker applicability. Transcriptional profiles were derived 3 to 4 hr following a 4 hr co-exposure of TK6 cells to test chemicals and S9. Preliminary studies established that 10% Aroclor- and 5% ethanol-induced S9 alone did not induce the TGx-28.65 biomarker genes. Seven genotoxic and two non-genotoxic chemicals (and concurrent solvent and positive controls) were then tested with one of the S9s (selected based on cell survival and micronucleus induction). Relative survival and micronucleus frequency was assessed by flow cytometry in cells 20 hr post-exposure. Genotoxic/non-genotoxic chemicals were accurately classified using the different S9s. One technical replicate of cells co-treated with dexamethasone and 10% Aroclor-induced S9 was falsely classified as genotoxic, suggesting caution in using high S9 concentrations. Even low concentrations of genotoxic chemicals (those not causing cytotoxicity) were correctly classified, demonstrating that TGx-28.65 is a sensitive biomarker of genotoxicity. A meta-analysis of datasets from 13 chemicals supports that different S9s can be used in TK6 cells, without impairing classification using the TGx-28.65 biomarker.
Assuntos
Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Testes de Mutagenicidade/métodos , Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Ativação Metabólica/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Arocloros/toxicidade , Benzoflavonas/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular , Etanol/toxicidade , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenobarbital/toxicidade , Ratos , Transcriptoma/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the molecular pathways involved in the response, is becoming more common. In a companion article, a genomic biomarker was developed in human TK6 cells to classify chemicals as genotoxic or nongenotoxic. Because TK6 cells are not metabolically competent, we set out to broaden the utility of the biomarker for use with chemicals requiring metabolic activation. Specifically, chemical exposures were conducted in the presence of rat liver S9. The ability of the biomarker to classify genotoxic (benzo[a]pyrene, BaP; aflatoxin B1, AFB1) and nongenotoxic (dexamethasone, DEX; phenobarbital, PB) agents correctly was evaluated. Cells were exposed to increasing chemical concentrations for 4 hr and collected 0 hr, 4 hr, and 20 hr postexposure. Relative survival, apoptosis, and micronucleus frequency were measured at 24 hr. Transcriptome profiles were measured with Agilent microarrays. Statistical modeling and bioinformatics tools were applied to classify each chemical using the genomic biomarker. BaP and AFB1 were correctly classified as genotoxic at the mid- and high concentrations at all three time points, whereas DEX was correctly classified as nongenotoxic at all concentrations and time points. The high concentration of PB was misclassified at 24 hr, suggesting that cytotoxicity at later time points may cause misclassification. The data suggest that the use of S9 does not impair the ability of the biomarker to classify genotoxicity in TK6 cells. Finally, we demonstrate that the biomarker is also able to accurately classify genotoxicity using a publicly available dataset derived from human HepaRG cells.
Assuntos
Mutagênicos/toxicidade , Toxicogenética/métodos , Ativação Metabólica , Aflatoxina B1/toxicidade , Animais , Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Benzo(a)pireno/toxicidade , Linhagem Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Cisplatino/toxicidade , Dexametasona/toxicidade , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Marcadores Genéticos , Humanos , Testes para Micronúcleos , Fenobarbital/toxicidade , Ratos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
Genotoxicity testing is a critical component of chemical assessment. The use of integrated approaches in genetic toxicology, including the incorporation of gene expression data to determine the DNA damage response pathways involved in response, is becoming more common. In companion papers previously published in Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Li et al. (2015) [6] developed a dose optimization protocol that was based on evaluating expression changes in several well-characterized stress-response genes using quantitative real-time PCR in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells in culture. This optimization approach was applied to the analysis of TK6 cells exposed to one of 14 genotoxic or 14 non-genotoxic agents, with sampling 4 h post-exposure. Microarray-based transcriptomic analyses were then used to develop a classifier for genotoxicity using the nearest shrunken centroids method. A panel of 65 genes was identified that could accurately classify toxicants as genotoxic or non-genotoxic. In Buick et al. (2015) [1], the utility of the biomarker for chemicals that require metabolic activation was evaluated. In this study, TK6 cells were exposed to increasing doses of four chemicals (two genotoxic that require metabolic activation and two non-genotoxic chemicals) in the presence of rat liver S9 to demonstrate that S9 does not impair the ability to classify genotoxicity using this genomic biomarker in TK6cells.
RESUMO
Cigarette smoking leads to various detrimental health outcomes. Tobacco companies produce different brands of cigarettes that are marketed as reduced harm tobacco products. Early examples included "light" cigarettes, which differ from regular cigarettes due to filter ventilation and/or differences in chemical constituents. In order to establish baseline similarities and differences among different tobacco brands available in Canada, the present study examined the cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, clastogenicity, and gene expression profiles of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) from three tobacco products, encompassing a full-flavor, blonde, and "light" variety. Using the Salmonella mutagenicity assay, we confirmed that the three CSCs are mutagenic, and that the potency is related to the presence of aromatic amines. Using the Muta™Mouse FE1 cell line we determined that the CSCs were clastogenic and cytotoxic, but nonmutagenic, and the results showed few differences in potencies among the three brands. There were no clear brand-specific changes in gene expression; each brand yielded highly similar expression profiles within a time point and concentration. The molecular pathways and biological functions affected by exposure included xenobiotic metabolism, oxidative stress, DNA damage response, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, as well as inflammation. Thus, there was no appreciable difference in toxicity or gene expression profiles between regular brands and products marketed as "light," and hence no evidence of reduced harm. The work establishes baseline CSC cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and expression profiles that can be used as a point of reference for comparison with data generated for products marketed as reduced harm and/or modified risk tobacco products.