Potentially inappropriate end-of-life care and its association with relatives' well-being: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Potentially inappropriate end-of-life cancer care (e.g., frequent hospital admission and emergency room visits in the last month of life) is known to be associated with a poorer quality of life of patients, but research on its association with the well-being of relatives is scarce. The aim of this systematic literature review was to evaluate the association between potentially inappropriate end-of-life cancer care and relatives' well-being. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search and review, and reported according to the PRISMA guideline, on the association between potentially inappropriate end-of-life cancer care and well-being of relatives before and after the death of their loved one. Pubmed, PsycInfo, Embase, and CINAHL were searched for studies published from January 2000 to July 2022. Studies' quality was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Checklists from the Joanne Briggs Institute (JBI). RESULTS: We identified eight studies including 10,062 relatives (59-79% female, mean age 46-61 years, 29-72% partner). Potentially inappropriate end-of-life cancer care was associated with poorer well-being of relatives including lower quality of life, higher burden of depressive symptoms, more regret, and more feelings of unpreparedness for the patient's death. CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate cancer care at the end-of-life is associated with poorer well-being of relatives before and after the death of their loved one. This emphasizes the importance of avoiding potentially inappropriate end-of-life cancer care, as it is both associated with poorer outcomes for relatives and patients. However, the number of studies examining this association is small, and more research is needed in this area.

The Association Between Timely Documentation of Advance Care Planning, Hospital Care Consumption and Place of Death: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: (1) To describe ACPT implementation frequency in practice. (2) To assess associations of ACPT documentation with a) hospital care consumption, including systemic anti-tumor treatment in the last month(s) of life, and b) match between preferred and actual place of death, among oncology patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Data concerning ACPT documentation, hospital care consumption, and preferred and actual place of death were extracted from electronic patient records. Patients with completely documented ACPT (cACPT) and no ACPT were compared using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: ACPT was implemented in 64.5% (n = 793) of all deceased patients (n = 1230). In 17.6% (n = 216), preferred place of care or death was documented at least three months before death (cACPT). A cACPT was not associated with systemic anti-tumor treatment (Adjusted OR (AOR): 0.976; 95% CI: 0.642-1.483), but patients with cACPT had fewer diagnostic tests (AOR: 0.518; CI: 0.298-0.903) and less contacts with hospital disciplines (AOR: 0.545; CI: 0.338-0.877). In patients with cACPT, a match between preferred and actual place of death was found for 83% of the patients for whom the relevant information was available (n = 117/n = 141). In patients without ACPT, this information was mostly missing. Conclusion: Although the ACPT was implemented in two thirds of patients, timely documentation of preferred place of care or death is often missing. Yet, timely documentation of these preferences may promote out-hospital-death and save hospital care consumption.

Benefits of Structured Advance Care Plan in end-of-Life Care Planning among Older Oncology Patients: A Retrospective Pilot Study.

Objectives: Studies suggest that advance care planning (ACP) results in improved quality of life and reduced healthcare consumption. We assessed how the use of a structured advance care planning tool (ACPT) in oncology patients relates to their healthcare consumption before death, and to the match between preferred and actual place of death. Methods: We performed a pilot study at a teaching hospital in the Netherlands. Endpoints were 1) healthcare consumption at three and one month(s) before death, and 2) the match between preferred and actual place of death. Results: The study included 75 patients without an ACPT (group 1) and 59 patients with an ACPT (group 2) of whom the preferred place of care or death were documented at least three months before death in 15 patients (subgroup 2b). Compared to group 1, patients in group 2 had significantly more healthcare consumption. However, compared to group 1, patients in subgroup 2b underwent significantly less diagnostic (33.3% (n = 5) versus 69.3% (n = 52), p < 0.05) and laboratory tests (33.3% (n = 5) versus 62.7% (n = 47), p < 0.05) one month before death. Patients in subgroup 2b died at their preferred place more often (76.9%, n = 10) compared to patients in group 1 (58.3%, n = 7) (NS), which meant more deaths at home and less in-hospital-deaths. Conclusions: The results suggest that timely documentation of the preferred place of care or death in a structured ACPT may result in less healthcare consumption and a better match between the preferred and actual place of death.