"The Equipoise Ruler:" A National Survey on Surgeon Judgment about the Value of Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand professional norms regarding the value of surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Agreed-upon professional norms may improve surgical decision making by contextualizing the nature of surgical treatment for patients. However, the extent to which these norms exist among surgeons practicing in the US is not known. METHODS: We administered a survey with 30 exemplar cases asking surgeons to use their best judgement to place each case on a scale ranging from "Definitely would do this surgery" to "Definitely would not do this surgery." We then asked surgeons to repeat their assessments after providing responses from the first survey. We interviewed respondents to characterize their rationale. RESULTS: We received 580 responses, a response rate of 28.5%. For 19 of 30 cases there was consensus (≥60% agreement) about the value of surgery (range 63% - 99%). There was little within-case variation when the mode was for surgery and more variation when the mode was against surgery or equipoise. Exposure to peer response increased the number of cases with consensus. Women were more likely to endorse a non-operative approach when treatment had high mortality. Specialists were less likely to operate for salvage procedures. Surgeons noted their clinical practice was to withhold judgment and let patients decide despite their assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Professional judgment about the value of surgery exists along a continuum. While there is less variation in judgment for cases that are highly beneficial, consensus can be improved by exposure to the assessments of peers.

Making Choices: A Multi-institutional, Longitudinal Cohort Study Assessing Changes in Treatment Outcome Valuation for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relative importance of treatment outcomes to patients with low-risk thyroid cancer (TC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Overuse of total thyroidectomy (TT) for low-risk TC is common. Emotions from a cancer diagnosis may lead patients to choose TT resulting in outcomes that do not align with their preferences. METHODS: Adults with clinically low-risk TC enrolled in a prospective, multi-institutional, longitudinal cohort study from 11/2019-6/2021. Participants rated treatment outcomes at the time of their surgical decision and again 9 months later by allocating 100 points amongst 10 outcomes. T-tests and Hotelling's T 2 statistic compared outcome valuation within and between subjects based on chosen extent of surgery (TT vs. lobectomy). RESULTS: Of 177 eligible patients, 125 participated (70.6% response) and 114 completed the 9-month follow-up (91.2% retention). At the time of the treatment decision, patients choosing TT valued the risk of recurrence more than those choosing lobectomy and the need to take thyroid hormone less ( P <0.05). At repeat valuation, all patients assigned fewer points to cancer being removed and the impact of treatment on their voice, and more points to energy levels ( P <0.05). The importance of the risk of recurrence increased for those who chose lobectomy and decreased for those choosing TT ( P <0.05). CONCLUSION: The relative importance of treatment outcomes changes for patients with low-risk TC once the outcome has been experienced to favor quality of life over emotion-related outcomes. Surgeons can use this information to discuss the potential for asthenia or changes in energy levels associated with total thyroidectomy.

Thyroid Cancer-Related Fear & Anxiety in Patients With Benign Thyroid Nodules: A Mixed-Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Thyroid cancer diagnosis often evokes strong negative emotions in patients, yet little is understood about such responses in those with benign thyroid nodules. This study explored the impact of a hypothetical cancer diagnosis, the provision of treatment information, and emotional support from surgeons on patients with benign nodules. METHODS: Patients within 30 d of a thyroid nodule biopsy were asked to imagine their nodule was cancerous and write down their feelings about this diagnosis. They then viewed a video depicting a patient-surgeon discussion of thyroid cancer treatment options, with or without added emotional support (1:1 randomized allocation). Validated measures assessed anxiety and thyroid cancer-related fear before and after video-viewing. Thematic analysis evaluated participants' feelings about the hypothetical diagnosis. RESULTS: Of 221 eligible patients, 118 participated (53.4%). While participants state anxiety increased after performing the thought exercise and watching the video (9 [6, 11]-12 [8, 14]; P < 0.001), thyroid cancer-related fear decreased over the same period (27 [22, 30]-25 [20, 29]; P < 0.001). Emotional support by the surgeon in the video did not affect anxiety or fear. Themes that emerged from participants imagining they have thyroid cancer included information seeking, trust in medicine, cancer experience, thyroid cancer knowledge, apprehension about surgery, and impact on family. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with recently diagnosed benign thyroid nodules experience heightened anxiety when contemplating thyroid cancer. Provision of treatment and disease information mitigates cancer-related fear, while emotional support does not. Offering patients with thyroid nodules information about thyroid cancer before biopsy may offer emotional benefits.

Surgeon Preference for Maximizing Medical Care Is Associated with Recommending More Extensive Surgery for Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer.

Background: While patient-level determinants of total thyroidectomy use have been well described, surgeon-level drivers of more extensive surgery are present and less well described. This survey sought to examine the associations between surgeons' operative recommendations, their beliefs about cancer, and their attitudes about medical maximizing-minimizing. Methods: A mixed-mode, cross-sectional survey was administered in September 2020 via mail and email to 222 thyroid surgeons identified in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Provider Utilization and Payment Physician and Other Practitioners dataset. Participants were asked their treatment recommendation for a healthy 45-year-old woman with a solitary 2.0-cm papillary thyroid cancer. Surgeons were assessed with the Brief Worry Scale and a validated, single-item measure of cancer-related worry. The Clinician Maximizer-Minimizer scale was used to assess the extent of medical care that physicians tend to favor with their patients. Participants were categorized into terciles based on their responses to the Maximizer-Minimizer scale. The highest scoring tercile ("Maximizers") was compared with the two lower terciles by Student's t-tests, chi-square, ANOVA, and logistic regression. Results: Of the 149 surgeons (response rate 67.1%), 34.9% recommended total thyroidectomy with or without central neck dissection (CND), and 65.1% recommended lobectomy. Overall, the medical Maximizer-Minimizer scale had an average score of 24.6 (SD 6.8). There were no differences between surgeons' age, race, annual thyroidectomy volume, or practice setting by their Maximizer-Minimizer classification. Participants who recommended total thyroidectomy with or without CND had significantly higher Maximizer-Minimizer scores than those recommending lobectomy (25.9 ± 7.2 vs. 23.8 ± 6.4, p = 0.03). Those classified as maximizers also had more cancer-related worry on both the single-item and Brief Worry Scales (p = 0.02). On logistic regression controlling for age, sex, race, specialty training, practice setting, and annual thyroidectomy volume, maximizers were still more likely to recommend total thyroidectomy with or without a CND (OR 2.4, [CI 1.01-5.55], p = 0.047). Conclusions: Medical maximizing-minimizing tendencies represent one of potentially many unmeasured surgeon characteristics that may explain persistent patterns of over-diagnosis, over-treatment, and over-screening. Surgeons may benefit from awareness of how their own tendencies influence their surgical recommendations in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer.

Systems Forces Leading to Feeding Tube Placement in Patients with Advanced Dementia: A Qualitative Exploration of Clinical Momentum.

Background: Older adults with serious illness near the end-of-life often receive invasive treatments. We developed a conceptual model called clinical momentum that describes system-level forces producing a trajectory of care that is difficult to modify and contributes to overtreatment. We sought to evaluate the empirical fit of our model by examining an event with clear guidelines against intervention: permanent feeding tube placement in patients with advanced dementia. Methods: We screened three hospitals and identified patients 65 years and older with advanced dementia who received a permanent feeding tube. We interviewed 34 family members and clinicians. We coded transcripts and characterized factors that arose during the course of care and their relationships to feeding tube placement. We used abductive analysis to compare the data with theory and identify areas of discordance and alignment. Results: We found that the course of care started with a temporary tube to correct an acute problem. As problems were identified, multiple clinicians were consulted to address a specific problem without collective discussion of the patient's health trajectory. Eventually, clinicians had to address the temporary tube, which was framed to families as a decision to place a permanent feeding tube or withdraw treatment. Conclusion: Elements of the model-including recognition-primed decision-making, "fix-it," and sunk costs-contributed to placement of a feeding tube, which set in motion a path toward intervention long before a goals-of-care conversation occurs. Clinical momentum expands our understanding of overtreatment at the end-of-life and may reveal opportunities to reduce other nonbeneficial interventions.

Cancer-related Fear and Worry in Patients with Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

CONTEXT: Little is known about how patients' emotions impact the choice between hemi- and total thyroidectomy (TT) for low-risk thyroid cancer (LR-TC) and how these emotions change after treatment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate thyroid cancer-specific fear and worry both before and after treatment of LR-TC with hemi- or TT. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled adults with confirmed or likely LR-TC at 15 institutions. Participants completed measures of thyroid cancer-related fear and worry at the time of their treatment decision and 9-months later. Participants were categorized as having low, medium, or high levels of fear and worry in accordance with the literature. Those choosing hemi-thyroidectomy were compared to those choosing TT. RESULTS: Of 177eligible patients, 125 (70.6%) enrolled and 114 completed both surveys (91.2% retention). Overall, 41 (36.0%) participants chose hemi-thyroidectomy and 73 (64.0%) chose TT. Across all participants, thyroid cancer-related fear and worry both decreased significantly after surgery (fear 25.8±6.4 to 23.1±7.4; worry 8.2±2.4 to 5.4±2.1, p<0.001). The proportion of participants with high fear decreased from 64.9% to 50.9%, while the proportion with high worry decreased from 75.4% to 41.2% (p<0.001 for both). At both time points, no differences existed between those choosing hemi- and TT in levels of worry or fear. CONCLUSION: Patients with LR-TC report lower levels of fear and worry 9-months after surgery regardless of the extent of surgery, suggesting that both surgeries provide an emotional benefit to some patients. Thyroid cancer-related fear and worry do not appear to influence patients' decisions to undergo hemi- or TT.

Embedding an Education Intervention about Shared Decision Making into an RCT: Ensuring competency and fidelity.

Objective: To describe the outcomes of training nephrology clinicians and clinical research participants, to use the Best Case/Worst Case Communication intervention, for discussions about dialysis initiation for patients with life-limiting illness, during a randomized clinical trial to ensure competency, fidelity to the intervention, and adherence to study protocols and the intervention throughout the trial. Methods: We enrolled 68 nephrologists at ten study sites and randomized them to receive training or wait-list control. We collected copies of completed graphic aids (component of the intervention), used with study-enrolled patients, to measure fidelity and adherence. Results: We trained 34 of 36 nephrologists to competence and 27 completed the entire program. We received 60 graphic aids for study-enrolled patients for a 73% return rate in the intervention arm. The intervention fidelity score for the graphic aid reflected completion of all elements throughout the study. Conclusion: We successfully taught the Best Case/Worst Case Communication intervention to clinicians as research participants within a randomized clinical trial. Innovation: Decisions about dialysis are an opportunity to discuss prognosis and uncertainty in relation to consideration of prolonged life supporting therapy. Our study reveals a strategy to evaluate adherence to a communication intervention in real time during a clinical study.

Best Case/Worst Case-ICU: protocol for a multisite, stepped-wedge, randomised clinical trial of scenario planning to improve communication in the ICU in US trauma centres for older adults with serious injury.

INTRODUCTION: Poor communication about serious injury in older adults can lead to treatment that is inconsistent with patient preferences, create conflict and strain healthcare resources. We developed a communication intervention called Best Case/Worst Case-intensive care unit (ICU) that uses daily scenario planning, that is, a narrative description of plausible futures, to support prognostication and facilitate dialogue among patients, their families and the trauma ICU team. This article describes a protocol for a multisite, randomised, stepped-wedge study to test the effectiveness of the intervention on the quality of communication (QOC) in the ICU. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will follow all patients aged 50 and older admitted to the trauma ICU for 3 or more days after a serious injury at eight high-volume level 1 trauma centres. We aim to survey one family or 'like family' member per eligible patient 5-7 days following their loved ones' admission and clinicians providing care in the trauma ICU. Using a stepped-wedge design, we will use permuted block randomisation to assign the timing for each site to begin implementation of the intervention and routine use of the Best Case/Worst Case-ICU tool. We will use a linear mixed-effects model to test the effect of the tool on family-reported QOC (using the QOC scale) as compared with usual care. Secondary outcomes include the effect of the tool on reducing clinician moral distress (using the Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals scale) and patients' length of stay in the ICU. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Institutional review board (IRB) approval was granted at the University of Wisconsin, and all study sites ceded review to the primary IRB. We plan to report results in peer-reviewed publications and national meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05780918.