[Specialization of Acute Stroke Care in Germany: Structural Changes During 2006-2017]. / Spezialisierung der Schlaganfallversorgung in Deutschland: Strukturveränderungen im Zeitraum von 2006­2017.

HINTERGRUND: Um die Schlaganfallversorgung zu optimieren, wurden in Deutschland in den letzten Jahren verschiedene qualitätsfördernde Maßnahmen (qfM) in regional unterschiedlichem Maß eingeführt. Ob sich diese Maßnahmen über die Jahre flächendeckend etabliert haben, ist unklar. METHODE: Für die strukturbezogenen Analysen der Schlaganfallversorgung in Deutschland wurden alle relevanten dokumentierten Schlaganfälle (ICD-10) aus den Qualitätsberichten (QB) deutscher Krankenhäuser und eine repräsentative Stichprobe von Krankenversicherungsdaten (AOK) im Zeitraum von 2006 (QB)/2007 (AOK) bis 2017 verwendet. Diese Informationen wurden u. a. durch Angaben zu zertifizierten Stroke Units der Deutschen Schlaganfall-Gesellschaft (DSG) und Daten zur Führung von regionalen Schlaganfall-Registern der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Schlaganfall-Register (ADSR) ergänzt. Zur Verfolgung der Veränderungen des Versor-gungsgeschehens im deutschen Bundesgebiet wurden die Daten mit geografischen Daten (Bundesamt für Kartographie und Geodäsie) verknüpft. Es erfolgten univariate Analysen der Daten und eine Trend-Analyse der verschiedenen qfM im Jahresverlauf (Konkordanzkoeffizient nach Kendall). ERGEBNISSE: Die QB Analysen zeigten einen Anstieg kodierter Schlaganfälle in Krankenhäusern mit qfM um 14-20%. In 2006 wurden 80% der Schlaganfälle (QB) in einem Krankenhaus mit min. einer qfM kodiert, in 2017 95%. Diese Entwicklungen spiegelten sich auch in den AOK-Routinedaten wider, wobei in 2007 89% und in 2017 97% der Patient:innen unter mindestens einer qfM behandelt wurden. Dabei waren in 2007 bei 55% der behandelnden Krankenhäuser qfM vorhanden, in 2017 bei 72%. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Patient:innen werden inzwischen signifikant häufiger in Krankenhäusern mit Spezialisierung auf die Schlaganfallversorgung behandelt. Auch die verschiedenen qfM haben sich im Laufe der Jahre im gesamten Bundesgebet verbreitet, jedoch existieren noch Versorgungslücken, die geschlossen werden sollten, damit in Zukunft alle Patient:innen qualitativ hochwertig behandelt werden können. BACKGROUND: In order to optimize stroke care, various quality-enhancing measures (qfM) have been introduced in Germany in recent years to varying degrees across regions, with the aim of achieving the best possible quality of care. It is unclear whether these measures have become established nationwide over the years. METHOD: For the structural analyses of stroke care in Germany, all relevant documented strokes (ICD-10) from the quality reports (QB) of German hospitals and a representative sample of health insurance data (AOK) for the period from 2006 (QB)/2007 (AOK) to 2017 were used. This information was supplemented by data on certified stroke units from the German Stroke Society (DSG) and data on the maintenance of regional stroke registries from the Working Group of German-Speaking Stroke Registers (ADSR), among others. To track changes in patterns of care in Germany, the data were linked with geographic data (Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy). Univariate analyses of the data and a trend analysis of the different qfM over the year (Kendall concordance coefficient) were performed. RESULTS: The analyses (QB) showed an increase in coded strokes in hospitals with qfM between 14-20%. In 2006, 80% of strokes (QB) were coded in hospitals with at least one qfM and 95% in 2017. Comparing years, AOK data showed similar trends: in 2007, 89% of patients were treated in hospitals with at least one qfM and 97% in 2017. In 2007, 55% of treating hospitals had qfM and 72% in 2017. CONCLUSION: Meanwhile, patients are more often treated in hospitals that specialise in stroke care. In addition, the various qfM have spread across the nation over the years, but there are still gaps in care that should be addressed to ensure quality care for all patients in the future.

Associations between structure- and process-orientated measures and stroke long term mortality - an observational study based on routine data.

OBJECTIVES: Various measures are used to improve the quality of stroke care. In Germany, these include concentrating treatment in specialized facilities (stroke units), mandatory quality comparisons of hospitals in some German states, and treatment according to prespecified structure and process specifications (neurological complex treatment 8-981 or 8-98b). These measures have previously only been analyzed individually and regarding short-term patient outcomes. This study analyzes these measures in combination, considering patients' comorbidities as well as stroke severity in a longitudinal perspective. MATERIALS/METHODS: Analyses were based on data from 243,415 insurees of Germany's biggest health insurance (AOK) admitted to hospitals between 2007 and 2017 with cerebral infarction. Mortality risk was calculated using Cox regressions adjusted for various covariates. Kaplan-Meier analyses were differentiated by treatment site (stroke unit/external quality assurance/ Federal State Consortium of Quality Assurance Hesse - LAGQH) were performed, followed by log-rank tests and p-value adjustment. Trend analyses were performed for treatment types in combination with treatment sites. RESULTS: All analyses showed significant advantages for patients who received Neurological Complex Treatment, especially when the treatment was performed under external quality assurance conditions and/or in stroke units. There was an increasing frequency of specialized stroke treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Quality-enhancing structures and processes are associated with a lower mortality risk after stroke. There appears to be evidence of a cascading benefit from the implementation of neurological complex treatment, external quality assurance, and ultimately, stroke units. Consecutively, care should be concentrated in hospitals that meet these specifications. However, since measures are often applied in combination, it remains unclear which specific measures are crucial for patient outcome.

[Comparison between chest pain units and stroke units : Essential components of the vascular emergency care system: comparison of structure, certification process, quality benchmarking and reimbursement]. / Vergleich von Chest Pain Units und Stroke Units : Elementare Bausteine der vaskulären Akutversorgung: Vergleich von Struktur, Zertifizierung, Qualitätserfassung und Vergütung.

BACKGROUND: Chest pain units (CPU) and stroke units (SU) have both become established as essential components of clinical emergency care. For both instances dedicated certification processes are installed. Up to summer 2020, 290 CPUs and 335 SUs have been successfully certified. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review is to compare the structures and the current certification situation of CPUs and SUs. Also, the younger CPU certification process is compared to the long established SU certification standard. MATERIAL UND METHODS: The comparison includes the historical background, the certification process, quality benchmarking, possible additive structures, the current status of certification in Germany, the transfer of the concept to the European level as well as reimbursement issues. RESULTS: Both certification concepts show clear analogies. Evidence for SUs is supported by a positive Cochrane analysis and for CPUs there are many studies from the German CPU registry. The main differences include a uniform CPU system versus a multistep SU system of certification. Furthermore, SU have obligatory elements of quality documentation but only facultative quality indicator assessment for CPUs. From an economic viewpoint operation and procedural key (OPS) numbers guarantee a better reflection of the use of resources in the complex treatment of stroke, which could not yet be established for CPUs. CONCLUSION: The well-established CPU concept could additionally benefit from a superordinate quality control. Adequate quality benchmarking appears to be fundamental for gap analyses and for the establishment of a separate remuneration structure. In this respect the German Society for Cardiology as the certifying institution is required to establish an appropriate mechanism within the framework of regular updates of criteria.

[Certification criteria for stroke units in Germany : Update 2018]. / Zertifizierungskriterien für Stroke-Units in Deutschland : Update 2018.

This article describes the revised criteria for certified stroke units (SU) in Germany that will apply from 1 October 2018. Due to the high level of quality only minor adjustments and specifications were necessary in many places and the majority of criteria remained unchanged. For the first time a uniform personnel quota of ≥1.75 full-time staff per monitor bed is defined, which is a better reflection of the treatment reality. The evidence-based process of acute vascular imaging using computed tomography angiography (CTA) and alternatively magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is now defined as a minimum rate of≥20 % of all brain infarcts. In this way the timely identification of suitable candidates for endovascular thrombectomy (ET) should be accomplished. Ultrasound diagnostics of arteries supplying the brain remain an integral part of additional diagnostics after cerebral ischemia because this generates supplementary information. The extended detection of atrial fibrillation is newly included as a diagnostic minimum standard and necessitates measures that go beyond a single long-term electrocardiograph (ECG). In order to facilitate the certification of telemedically supplied SU (Tele-SU), the minimum standard of stroke patients was reduced to ≥200 per year. A Tele-SU in the immediate catchment area of a certified SU (<20 km) must provide proof of a regional treatment need in order for certification to be approved. Quality criteria in the audit reports have now a greater importance. They require a concrete plan of action, which must be tracked within the framework of the interim report and must be presented for the recertification. Furthermore, the SU are called upon not to limit the endeavors for quality only to the minimum requirements.

Stroke unit care in germany: the german stroke registers study group (ADSR).

BACKGROUND: Factors influencing access to stroke unit (SU) care and data on quality of SU care in Germany are scarce. We investigated characteristics of patients directly admitted to a SU as well as patient-related and structural factors influencing adherence to predefined indicators of quality of acute stroke care across hospitals providing SU care. METHODS: Data were derived from the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR), a voluntary network of 9 regional registers for monitoring quality of acute stroke care in Germany. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate characteristics influencing direct admission to SU. Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) were used to estimate the influence of structural hospital characteristics (percentage of patients admitted to SU, year of SU-certification, and number of stroke and TIA patients treated per year) on adherence to predefined quality indicators. RESULTS: In 2012 180,887 patients were treated in 255 hospitals providing certified SU care participating within the ADSR were included in the analysis; of those 82.4% were directly admitted to a SU. Ischemic stroke patients without disturbances of consciousness (p < .0001), an interval onset to admission time ≤3 h (p < .0001), and weekend admission (p < .0001) were more likely to be directly admitted to a SU. A higher proportion of quality indicators within predefined target ranges were achieved in hospitals with a higher proportion of SU admission (p = 0.0002). Quality of stroke care could be maintained even if certification was several years ago. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in demographical and clinical characteristics regarding the probability of SU admission were observed. The influence of structural characteristics on adherence to evidence-based quality indicators was low.

Impact of standardized MONitoring for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation in Ischemic Stroke (MonDAFIS): Rationale and design of a prospective randomized multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is estimated to account for approximately every fifth ischemic stroke. In routine clinical practice, detection of undiagnosed, clinically silent AF represents a major diagnostic challenge, and in up to 30% of patients with ischemic stroke, AF remains undetected. The MonDAFIS study has been designed to quantify the diagnostic yield and clinical relevance of systematic electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring for patients with acute ischemic stroke during the subsequent in hospital stay. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized multicenter study in 3,470 patients with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and without known AF on hospital admission. Over a period of approximately 2years, patients will be enrolled in about 30 German-certified stroke units and randomized 1:1 to receive either usual stroke unit diagnostic procedures for detection of AF (control group) or usual stroke unit diagnostic procedures plus standardized and centrally analyzed Holter ECG recording for up to 7days in hospital (intervention group). Results of the ECG core laboratory analysis will be provided to the patients and treating physicians. All patients will be followed up for treatment and cardiovascular outcomes at 6, 12, and 24months after enrollment. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome of the randomized MonDAFIS study is the proportion of patients who receive anticoagulation therapy 12months after the index stroke. Secondary outcomes include the number of stroke patients with newly detected AF in hospital and the rate of recurrent stroke, major bleedings, myocardial infarction, or death 6, 12, and 24months after the index event. MonDAFIS will also explore patient-reported adherence to anticoagulants, the clinical relevance of short atrial tachycardia, or excessive supraventricular ectopic activity as well as cost-effectiveness of prolonged, centrally analyzed ECG recordings. CONCLUSION: MonDAFIS will be the largest study to date to evaluate whether a prolonged and systematic ECG monitoring during the initial in hospital stay has an impact on secondary stroke prevention. In addition, prognosis as well as adherence to medication up to 2 years after the index stroke will be analyzed. The primary results of the MonDAFIS study may have the potential to change the current guidelines recommendations regarding ECG workup after ischemic stroke.

Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) for neurogenic dysphagia: training curriculum of the German Society of Neurology and the German stroke society.

BACKGROUND: Neurogenic dysphagia is one of the most frequent and prognostically relevant neurological deficits in a variety of disorders, such as stroke, parkinsonism and advanced neuromuscular diseases. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is now probably the most frequently used tool for objective dysphagia assessment in Germany. It allows evaluation of the efficacy and safety of swallowing, determination of appropriate feeding strategies and assessment of the efficacy of different swallowing manoeuvres. The literature furthermore indicates that FEES is a safe and well-tolerated procedure. In spite of the huge demand for qualified dysphagia diagnostics in neurology, a systematic FEES education has not yet been established. RESULTS: The structured training curriculum presented in this article aims to close this gap and intends to enforce a robust and qualified FEES service. As management of neurogenic dysphagia is not confined to neurologists, this educational programme is applicable to other clinicians and speech-language therapists with expertise in dysphagia as well. CONCLUSION: The systematic education in carrying out FEES across a variety of different professions proposed by this curriculum will help to spread this instrumental approach and to improve dysphagia management.

Diagnostic work-up for detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after acute ischemic stroke: cross-sectional survey on German stroke units.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple methods to detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) in patients with acute stroke are available. However, it is unknown which approaches are currently used in clinical routine and guidelines remain vague to the extent of cardiac monitoring. We characterize diagnostic efforts for pAF detection on German stroke units (SU). METHODS: A standardized anonymous questionnaire was sent to all clinical leads of certified SUs in Germany. The questionnaire focused on basic characteristics of SUs, procedures to detect AF, and estimates on AF detection. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-nine SU leads participated (response rate 71.6%). All patients undergo continuous bedside ECG monitoring. A percentage of 77.6 SUs initiate additional 24-hour Holter ECG in >50% of patients without known AF. Patients with transient ischemic attack are monitored significantly shorter than patients with ischemic stroke. Independent of SU type or size, 67.6% of leads assumed to fail detecting pAF in 5% to 20% of patients. In cryptogenic stroke, additional ECG monitoring is recommended by 90.2% but only 13.8% of SUs perform routine ECG follow-up visits. The use of implanted event recorders is low (1-10 patients/y by 60.7% of SUs; 28.1%: no use). A percentage of 83.9 do not use external event recorders. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates substantial heterogeneity among German SUs on diagnostic work-up for pAF. Future prospective multicenter studies should systematically evaluate the impact of different methods to uncover pAF.

Intensified secondary prevention intending a reduction of recurrent events in TIA and minor stroke patients (INSPiRE-TMS): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recent stroke or TIA are at high risk for new vascular events. Several evidence based strategies in secondary prevention of stroke are available but frequently underused. Support programs with multifactorial risk factor modifications after stroke or TIA have not been investigated in large-scale prospective controlled trials so far. INSPiRE-TMS is a prospective, multi-center, randomized open intervention trial for intensified secondary prevention after minor stroke and TIA. METHODS/DESIGN: Patients with acute TIA or minor stroke admitted to the participating stroke centers are screened and recruited during in-hospital stay. Patients are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to intervention (support program) and control (usual care) arms. Inclusion of 2.082 patients is planned. The support program includes cardiovascular risk factor measurement and feedback, monitoring of medication adherence, coaching in lifestyle modifications, and active involvement of relatives. Standardized motivational interviewing is used to assess and enhance patients' motivation. Primary objective is a reduction of new major vascular events defined as nonfatal stroke and myocardial infarction or vascular death. Recruitment time is planned for 3.5 years, follow up time is at least 2 years for every patient resulting in a total study time of 5 years (first patient in to last patient out). DISCUSSION: Given the high risk for vascular re-events in acute stroke and the available effective strategies in secondary prevention, the INSPIRE-TMS support program has the potential to lead to a relevant reduction of recurrent events and a prolongation of the event-free survival time. The trial will provide the basis for the decision whether an intensified secondary prevention program after stroke should be implemented into regular care. A cost-effectiveness evaluation will be performed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov: 01586702.

Echocardiography in acute stroke patients: a nationwide analysis in departments with certified stroke units in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is highly relevant in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA. Utilization of routine echocardiographic examinations [transthoracic (TTE) or transesophageal (TEE)] on stroke units remains however unknown. To representatively examine echocardiographic rates on stroke units in Germany and to evaluate structural factors that may influence the decision to conduct echocardiography. METHODS: A nationwide analysis was performed by using certification audit data of all primary and comprehensive stroke centers (pSC and cSC) in Germany. RESULTS: Structural and organizational requirements of 310 departments (cSCs: 42.6%) were extracted. Median TTE rate was 63.3% (IQR 39.3-80.8), median TEE rate 21.3% (IQR 16.4-29.5). A cardiological department on site was present in 74.2%, and they were associated with higher TEE rates. TTE rates decreased with increasing numbers of patients (p = 0.026). Likewise, TEE rates decreased with increasing numbers of patients (p = 0.006), mediated by departments with cSCs (p = 0.008 for cSCs vs p = 0.230 for pSCs). TTE rates were far more inhomogeneously distributed than TEE rates and higher in pSCs (p = 0.011). Overall, 12.9% of centers did not perform any echocardiographic examination in at least 50% of all stroke patients. CONCLUSION: More detailed recommendations regarding echocardiography should be included in future guidelines. Moreover, evaluating the impact of echocardiographic examinations on long-term prognosis in stroke patients should be focus of further evaluations.

A support programme for secondary prevention in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (INSPiRE-TMS): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with recent stroke or transient ischaemic attack are at high risk for a further vascular event, possibly leading to permanent disability or death. Although evidence-based treatments for secondary prevention are available, many patients do not achieve recommended behavioural modifications and pharmaceutical prevention targets in the long-term. We aimed to investigate whether a support programme for enhanced secondary prevention can reduce the frequency of recurrent vascular events. METHODS: INSPiRE-TMS was an open-label, multicentre, international randomised controlled trial done at seven German hospitals with acute stroke units and a Danish stroke centre. Patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack within 2 weeks from study enrolment and at least one modifiable risk factor (ie, arterial hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, or smoking) were included. Computerised randomisation was used to allocate patients (1:1) either to the support programme in addition to conventional care or to conventional care alone. The support programme used feedback and motivational interviewing strategies with eight outpatient visits over 2 years aiming to improve adherence to secondary prevention targets. The primary outcome was the composite of major vascular events consisting of stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and vascular death, assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who underwent randomisation, did not withdraw study participation, and had at least one follow-up). Outcomes were assessed at annual follow-ups using time-to-first-event analysis. All-cause death was monitored as a safety outcome. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01586702. FINDINGS: From Aug 22, 2011, to Oct 30, 2017, we enrolled 2098 patients. Of those, 1048 (50·0%) were randomly assigned to the support programme group and 1050 (50·0%) patients were assigned to the conventional care group. 1030 (98·3%) patients in the support group and 1042 (99·2%) patients in the conventional care group were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean age of analysed participants was 67·4 years and 700 (34%) were women. After a mean follow-up of 3·6 years, the primary outcome of major vascular events had occurred in 163 (15·8%) of 1030 patients of the support programme group and in 175 (16·8%) of 1042 patients of the conventional care group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·92, 95% CI 0·75-1·14). Total major vascular event numbers were 209 for the support programme group and 225 for the conventional care group (incidence rate ratio 0·93, 95% CI 0·77-1·12; p=0·46) and all-cause death occurred in 73 (7·1%) patients in the support programme group and 85 (8·2%) patients in the conventional care group (HR 0·85, 0·62-1·17). More patients in the support programme group achieved secondary prevention targets (eg, in 1-year-follow-up 52% vs 42% [p<0·0001] for blood pressure, 62% vs 54% [p=0·0010] for LDL, 33% vs 19% [p<0·0001] for physical activity, and 51% vs 34% [p=0·0010] for smoking cessation). INTERPRETATION: Provision of an intensified secondary prevention programme in patients with non-disabling stroke or transient ischaemic attack was associated with improved achievement of secondary prevention targets but did not lead to a significantly lower rate of major vascular events. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of support programmes in selected patients who do not achieve secondary prevention targets soon after discharge. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Pfizer, and German Stroke Foundation.

Position paper: ability to drive in cerebrovascular diseases.

The regulations for fitness to drive after a cerebrovascular accident in the German Driving License Regulations (FeV) and the German Evaluation Guidelines for Driving Ability (BGL). are not up to date with the current medical knowledge and not consistent with regulations regarding cardiovascular diseases. This position paper presented by six medical and neuropsychological societies in Germany provides a guideline for the assessment of driving ability after diagnosis of a cerebrovascular disease and addresses three major questions: If there is a functional limitation, how can it be compensated for? What is the risk of sudden loss of control while driving in the future? Are there behavioral or personality changes or cognitive deficiencies interfering with safety while driving? Recommendations for the assessment of driving ability in different cerebrovascular diseases are presented. This article is a translation of the position paper published in Nervenarzt: Marx, P., Hamann, G.F., Busse, O. et al. Nervenarzt 90(4): 388-398.

Familial cervical artery dissections: clinical, morphologic, and genetic studies.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Genetic risk factors are thought to play a role in the etiology of spontaneous cervical artery dissections (CAD). However, familial CAD is extremely rare. In this study we analyzed patients with familial CAD and asked the question whether familial CAD has particular features. METHODS: Seven families with 15 CAD patients were recruited. All patients were carefully investigated by a neurologist, a neuroradiologist, and a dermatologist for clinical characteristics. From 11 patients a skin biopsy was performed to study the morphology of the connective tissue and to analyze the coding sequences of COL3A1, COL5A1, COL5A2, and part of COL1A1. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients (n=15, 9 women) at their first dissection was 36.2 years (median age 32 years, range 18 to 59). Two patients had bilateral CAD. One patient had a right and a left internal carotid artery dissection in successive weeks, another patient had 5 dissections over a period of 8 years. A high intrafamilial correlation was found between the affected vessels (ie, the carotid and the vertebral arteries) and between ages at the first dissection. In 1 patient we found clear and reproducible ultrastructural abnormalities in the skin biopsy, but the second patient from the family was not studied, because he died as a result of CAD before this study. The dermal connective tissue aberrations in the examined patient were similar to mild findings in patients with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS type IV), but might be iatrogenic and related to long-term corticosteroid inhalation therapy. All other analyzed patients showed normal connective tissue morphology. In patients from 6 families we analyzed the whole coding sequence of COL3A1, COL5A1, and COL5A2, and from part of COL1A1. A missense mutation in the COL3A1 gene (leading to a G157S substitution in type III procollagen) was detected in both patients from 1e family. Two patients from another family carried a rare nonsynonymous coding polymorphism in COL5A1 (D192N); 1 of them carried also a rare variant in COL5A2 (T12337). CONCLUSIONS: Familial CAD patients are young and probably are at high risk for recurrent or multiple CAD. Ultrastructural alterations of the dermal connective tissue might not be an important risk factor for familial CAD. However, the finding of a COL3A1 mutation revealed the presence of an inherited connective tissue disorder in 1 family.

Genetic analysis of familial connective tissue alterations associated with cervical artery dissections suggests locus heterogeneity.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cervical artery dissections (CAD) can be associated with connective tissue aberrations in skin biopsies. The analysis of healthy relatives of patients suggested that the connective tissue phenotype is familial with an autosomal dominant inheritance. METHODS: We performed genetic linkage studies in 3 families of patients with CAD. Connective tissue phenotypes for the patients and all family members were assessed by electron microscopic study of skin biopsies. A genome-wide linkage analysis of 1 family (1 patient with 8 healthy relatives) indicated 2 candidate loci. Three genes were subsequently studied by sequence analysis. Part of the genome was also studied by linkage analysis in 2 further families. RESULTS: The genome-wide scan in a single family suggested linkage between the hypothetical mutation causing the connective tissue phenotype and informative genetic markers on chromosome 15q24 (logarithm of the odds score: Z= +2.1). A second possible candidate locus (Z=+1.9) was found on chromosome 10q26. Sequence analysis of 3 candidate genes in the suggestive locus (chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan4 [CSPG4], lysyl oxidase-like1 [LOXL1] and fibroblast growth factor receptor2 [FGFR2]) did not lead to the identification of a mutation responsible for connective tissue alterations. In 2 additional smaller families the loci on chromosome 15q24 and 10q26 were excluded by linkage analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Linkage analysis of a large family with CAD-associated connective tissue alterations suggested the presence of a candidate locus on chromosome 15q2 or on chromosome 10q26. Sequence analysis did not lead to the identification of a mutated candidate gene in 1 of these loci. The study of 2 additional pedigrees indicated locus heterogeneity for the connective tissue phenotype of CAD patients.

Development and implementation of evidence-based indicators for measuring quality of acute stroke care: the Quality Indicator Board of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no consensus about indicators for measuring quality of acute stroke care in Germany. Therefore, a standardized process was initiated recently to develop and implement evidence-based indicators for the measurement of quality of acute hospital stroke care. METHODS: Quality indicators were developed by a multidisciplinary board between November 2003 and December 2005. The process was initiated by the German Stroke Registers Study Group in cooperation with the German Stroke Society, the German Society of Neurology, the German Stroke Foundation, Regional Offices for Quality Assurance and other experts proven in the field. National and international recommendations were considered during the development process. The process was based on a systematic literature review, an independent external evaluation of the process and its results, and a prospective pilot study to evaluate the defined indicators in clinical practice. RESULTS: Overall a set of 24 indicators was developed to measure performance of acute care hospitals in the 3 health care dimensions structure, process and outcome as well as in 3 treatment phases prehospital, in-hospital/acute and postacute. Practicability of the derived indicators was tested in a prospective pilot study. During a 2-month period, 1006 patients in 13 hospitals were documented. Application of the new indicator set was found to be feasible by participating physicians and hospitals. Median time to document the required information for 1 patient was 5 minutes. Nationwide implementation of the new indicator set within regional registers in Germany started since April 2006. CONCLUSIONS: The development of indicators to measure hospital performance in stroke care is an important step toward improving stroke care on a national level. The chosen standardized evidence-based approach ensures maximal transparency, acceptance and sustainability of the developed indicators in Germany.

Assessment of functioning and disability after ischemic stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Functioning and disability after ischemic stroke are clinically meaningful and of major relevance to patients. Despite many instruments available to assess these outcomes, little is known about their interrelation and predictive factors. METHODS: We prospectively identified 4264 patients with acute ischemic stroke from 30 hospitals in Germany during a 1-year period between 1998 and 1999 and registered them in a common data bank. The patients were centrally followed up via telephone interview after 100 days and 1 year to assess various scales such as the Barthel Index (BI), modified Rankin Scale (MRS), extended Barthel Index (EBI), Short Form-36 Physical Functioning (SF-36 PF), and Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression short form (CES-D). RESULTS: Outcome status could be assessed in 67.2% of patients 100 days after hospital admission. Of these, 13.9% had died, 53.7% had regained functional independence (BI <95), 46.3% had no or mild residual symptoms (MRS < or =1), and 44.6% had no higher cognitive deficits on the EBI. Of the patients who personally answered the follow-up questions, 67% had no major physical disability (SF-36 PF <60), and 32.9% reported symptoms classified as depression (CES-D > or =10). The high percentage of patients reaching the maximum score (ceiling effect) in the BI was less pronounced in the MRS and SF-36 PF. The predictive factors for dichotomized outcomes on each scale were similar for adverse functioning and disability but varied considerably for depression. CONCLUSIONS: To avoid ceiling effects in outcome distribution of patients treated in specialized stroke centers, the MRS and SF-36 PF instruments are preferable to the BI. Parametric use of the SF-36 PF could further improve outcome measurement by considering individual treatment effects.

Ultrastructural connective tissue aberrations in patients with intracranial aneurysms.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: An unknown connective tissue defect might predispose for the development and rupture of intracranial aneurysms in some patients. This study of connective tissue samples of a series of patients with intracranial aneurysms investigates the morphology of the extracellular matrix with methods that are currently used in the routine diagnosis of inherited connective tissue disorders. METHODS: Skin biopsies from 21 patients with intracranial aneurysms, many with multiple aneurysms, were studied by electron microscopy. None of the patients included in this study showed clinical signs of a known connective tissue disorder. RESULTS: In 7 patients (33%), we observed repetitive aberrations in the morphology of collagen fibrils and elastic fibers of the reticular dermis. The observed ultrastructural findings were somewhat similar to those typically observed in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) and in a subgroup of patients with spontaneous cervical artery dissections. The patterns of abnormalities fell into 2 classes: 4 patients displayed abnormalities that resembled those found in patients with EDS type III, and the electron microscopic findings in the skin biopsies from 3 patients resembled those of EDS type IV patients. The sequence of the COL3A1 gene from the patients with EDS type IV-like alterations of the connective tissue morphology was analyzed. No mutation was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Connective tissue alterations were found in skin biopsies from a minority of patients with intracranial aneurysms. Electron microscopic investigation of skin biopsies from patients and their relatives might become valuable for clinical diagnostics, identification of persons at risk, and basic studies of the pathogenesis of this vascular disease.

Treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with the low-affinity, use-dependent NMDA antagonist AR-R15896AR. A safety and tolerability study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A low-affinity, use-dependent N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) antagonist AR-R15896AR has neuroprotective properties in animal models of ischaemic stroke. The aim of the present study was to examine the safety and tolerability of a new and higher dosage regimen that would enable acute stroke patients to achieve and maintain neuroprotective plasma concentrations. METHODS: A randomised, multi-centre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was carried out at 19 centres in France, Germany and the Netherlands in patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute ischaemic stroke, and onset of symptoms within 12 hours before start of study drug administration. Two loading doses of 3.5 mg/kg of AR-R15896AR over 60 minutes, followed by a 2.5 mg/kg infusion over the next 120 minutes were given. Eight hours after the start of the loading dose infusion, the first maintenance dose (120 mg) was administered over 60 minutes. Eight further maintenance infusions were administered at intervals of 8 hours over a total treatment period of 3 days. Main variables were safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics. Follow-up assessments also included the Barthel Index (BI) and the NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 4-7 days after the end of the last infusion and at 30 days after the onset of stroke. RESULTS: 103 patients with acute ischaemic stroke were randomised to either treatment with AR-R15896AR (70 patients) or placebo (33 patients). Mortality was not significantly different in the AR-R15896AR group compared with the placebo group (10 % vs. 6 %). Serious adverse events during treatment due to psychiatric conditions were associated with AR-R15896AR (3 vs. 0). Other side effects were more common in the group treated with AR-R15896AR: vomiting (29 % vs. 9 %), nausea (23 % vs. 12 %), fever (17 % vs. 12 %), agitation (7 % vs. 3 %), dizziness (7 % vs. 0 %), and hallucinations (6 % vs. 0 %). No significant difference between the two groups (with respect to the proportions of patients with favourable outcome) was detected in either the analysis of the BI or the NIHSS. Pharmacokinetic data showed that plasma concentrations of AR-R15896AR were in the expected neuroprotective range. CONCLUSION: In most of the patients with acute stroke receiving AR-R15896AR the intended high plasma levels were reached within a short time period. However, active treatment produced more side effects than placebo, thus indicating safety concerns and tolerability issues for use in high doses in an acute stroke population.

The quality of acute stroke care- an analysis of evidence-based indicators in 260 000 patients.

BACKGROUND: Stroke patients should be cared for in accordance with evidence-based guidelines. The extent of implementation of guidelines for the acute care of stroke patients in Germany has been unclear to date. METHODS: The regional quality assurance projects that cooperate in the framework of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutscher Schlaganfall-Register, ADSR) collected data on the care of stroke patients in 627 hospitals in 2012. The quality of the acute hospital care of patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) was assessed on the basis of 15 standardized, evidence-based quality indicators and compared across the nine participating regional quality assurance projects. RESULTS: Data were obtained on more than 260 000 patients nationwide. Intravenous thrombolysis was performed in 59.7% of eligible ischemic stroke patients patients (range among participating projects, 49.7-63.6%). Dysphagia screening was documented in 86.2% (range, 74.8-93.1%). For the following indicators, the defined targets were not reached for all of Germany: anti-aggregation within 48 hours, 93.4% (range, 86.6-96.4%); anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, 77.6% (range, 72.4-80.1%); standardized dysphagia screening, 86.2% (range, 74.8-93.1%); oral and written information of the patients or their relatives, 86.1% (range, 75.4-91.5%). The rate of patients examined or treated by a speech therapist was in the target range. CONCLUSION: The defined targets were reached for most of the quality indicators. Some indicators, however, varied widely across regional quality assurance projects. This implies that the standardization of care for stroke patients in Germany has not yet been fully achieved.