Diabetes, Therapeutic Inertia, and Patients' Medication Experience.

Factors contributing to therapeutic inertia related to patients' medication experiences include concerns about side effects and out-of-pocket costs, stigmatization for having diabetes, confusion about frequent changes in evidence-based guidelines, low health literacy, and social determinants of health. A variety of solutions to this multifactorial problem may be necessary, including integrating pharmacists into interprofessional care teams, using medication refill synchronization programs, maximizing time with patients to discuss fears and concerns, being cognizant of language used to discuss diabetes-related topics, and avoiding stigmatizing patients. Managing diabetes successfully is a team effort, and the full commitment of all team members (including patients) is required to achieve desired outcomes through an individualized approach.

Embracing the Insulin Revolution in the Ambulatory Care Setting.

IN BRIEF Recent additions of various new formulations of insulin to the U.S. marketplace have increased the number of treatment options available to people living with diabetes. However, it is important to take into consideration the implications of these new insulins in terms of patient safety and medication errors, integration with electronic medical records, and financial considerations. This review outlines several considerations for practitioners regarding the implications of these new insulin products for ambulatory care practice.

Recommitting to AACP Engaged Governance for the Common Good: Report of the 50th Anniversary Commission to Reimagine the AACP House of Delegates.

The 50th Anniversary Commission to Reimagine the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) House of Delegates (HOD Commission) was charged to consider and recommend changes to the AACP Board of Directors and AACP HOD regarding a broad range of issues related to the HOD. The 2021-2022 HOD Commission met virtually many times throughout the year as 2 sub-groups and a full commission, using Basecamp for shared documents and timelines, and it provided interim reports to the Board of Directors in November and February. A survey of 2022 delegates was developed and administered; responses from 163 delegates informed final recommendations as described in the report. The HOD Commission affirms the need for and purpose of AACP's HOD and urges that all schools/colleges of pharmacy recommit to engaged governance for the common good.

Part Three: A Brief Primer of Non-Insulin Treatments for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Older People.

Diabetes is a heterogeneous condition that manifests differently in each patient. Fortunately, there are multiple different medication classes that can be used to help patients achieve their treatment goals. Diabetes is highly prevalent in older people, including patients who have been living with the condition for many years and those who are newly diagnosed. It is essential for senior care pharmacists to evaluate patient-specific goals, compelling indications, and risks and benefits of treatment. When evaluating therapy appropriateness, pharmacists must take into consideration the impact of medication therapy beyond glucose-lowering effects, including the overall impact on cardiovascular, renal, heart failure, and weight-related outcomes.

Current and Emerging Trends in Diabetes Care and Education: 2021 National Practice and Workforce Survey.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the National Practice Survey is to understand current trends related to the diabetes care and education specialist's integration into the full care team beyond formal diabetes self-management education and support services. METHODS: The 2021 National Practice Survey (NPS2021) contained 61 questions for all respondents with an additional 56 questions pertaining to specific diabetes care and education segments. An anonymous survey was administered online to respondents who are diabetes care and education specialists or a part of the diabetes care team. Email lists were obtained from the Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists (ADCES) and the Certification Board for Diabetes Care and Education (CBDCE). Approximately 39,258 emails were sent, and 3357 were undeliverable, with 3797 surveys completed between February 9 to April 6, 2021, resulting in an 11% response rate. The response rate may have been affected by the COVID-19 public health emergency. RESULTS: Diabetes care and education specialists represent an interprofessional specialty of nurses, dietitians, physicians, pharmacists, health educators, and others. Many respondents reported holding either certification as a Certified Diabetes Care and Education Specialist (CDCES) or being Board Certified in Advanced Diabetes Management (BC-ADM). In addition, there appears to be a slight increase in those trained as a Lifestyle Coach to provide the National Diabetes Prevention Program (CDC Recognized National DPP) compared to NPS2017. Most respondents reported being Caucasian/White (84%), followed by Hispanic or Latinx (7%) and African American/Black and Asian/Asian American (at 4% each), like in previous surveys. Respondents reported diverse care delivery models, including traditional and nontraditional services, and expanded models of care such as population health/risk stratification models, the Chronic Care Model, Accountable Care Organizations, managed care, and others. CONCLUSION: The NPS2021 describes DCES workforce opportunities and challenges. Identifying and addressing those that impact the specialty's sustainability, diversity, and growth will guide strategies for the future workforce and their practice settings. Opportunities identified include embracing diabetes community care coordinators for person-centered delivery of care and education services and supporting frontline health care team members to increase competence and expertise in the prevention of type 2 diabetes, diabetes care, and education/support for related chronic diseases. In addition, as health care evolves, it creates opportunities for the DCESs to demonstrate a broader, key role as part of the diabetes care team.

Economic impact and health care utilization outcomes of diabetes self-management education and support interventions for persons with diabetes: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review is to summarize and synthesize existing research on the economic impact of diabetes self-management education and support. INTRODUCTION: Diabetes self-management education and support is an essential component of diabetes care, yet it continues to be underutilized. A gap exists regarding the true measured economic impact of this intervention. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies that report the measured economic impact and health care utilization of diabetes self-management education and support for persons with diabetes or their caregivers. The inclusion criteria are as follows: quantitative studies providing measured data on the economic outcomes and health care utilization of diabetes self-management education and support interventions that include at least one of the Association for Diabetes Care and Education Specialists Seven Self-Care Behaviors. METHODS: The review will search the following databases: MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Daily and Versions; Embase; Scopus; CINAHL; ERIC, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews; and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials. Additionally, a search of gray literature will be performed using Google Scholar. Date limitations will be from January 2006 to May 2020. Two members of the research team will independently screen abstracts and full texts, and extract data. The screening process will be described using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles will be assessed for risk of bias using the JBI critical appraisal tools. Data will be narratively summarized. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (CRD42020166743).

Advancing Pharmacy Education and Workforce Development Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report of the 2020-2021 AACP Academic Affairs Committee.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2020-2021 Academic Affairs Committee was charged to (1) Read all six reports from the 2019-20 AACP standing committees to identify elements of these reports that are relevant to your committee's work this year; (2) Determine what changes made in colleges and schools of pharmacy during the COVID-19 pandemic should be continued to advance pharmacy education; (3) Develop a realistic model for colleges and schools of pharmacy to share resources to meet the curricular needs of member schools; (4) Create strategies by which colleges and schools of pharmacy can meet current and future workforce development needs particularly in light of the changes in healthcare delivery as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic; (5) Identify salient activities for the Center To Accelerate Pharmacy Practice Transformation and Academic Innovation (CTAP) for consideration by the AACP Strategic Planning Committee and AACP staff. This report provides an overview of changes made in schools and colleges of pharmacy implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic that may be continued to advance pharmacy education; a realistic model for colleges and schools of pharmacy to share resources to meet the curricular needs of member schools; and strategies by which schools and colleges of pharmacy can meet current and future workforce development needs, particularly in light of the changes in healthcare delivery as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The committee is proposing one policy statement for consideration by the 2021 AACP House of Delegates, four suggestions for consideration by schools and colleges of pharmacy (including two endorsements for suggestions from the 2020-21 Argus Commission), and one recommendation for consideration by AACP for CTAP to implement and oversee.

Economic Impact and Health Care Utilization Outcomes of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Interventions for Persons With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research.

PURPOSE: Value-driven outcomes are important because health systems determine sustainability of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) programming. Health care utilization and clinical outcomes are critical factors when considering the impact of DSMES programs. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to describe studies that report on the economic and health care utilization outcomes of diabetes self-management programs. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed in multiple databases. Studies reporting economic and health care utilization outcomes related to DSMES and including 1 or more of the ADCES7 Self-Care BehaviorsTM from January 2006 to May 2020 were included. Eligible articles needed to compare the intervention and comparison group and report on economic impact. The methodological quality was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist specific to each individual study design. RESULTS: A total of 22 of 14 556 articles published between 2007 and 2020 were included. Cost benefits varied, and there were considerable methodological heterogeneity among design, economic measures, population, perspective, intervention, and biophysical outcomes. CONCLUSION: DSMES interventions may positively impact economic outcomes and/or health care utilization, although not all studies showed consistent benefit. This review highlights an evidence gap, and future health economic evaluations are warranted.

Public perception of pharmacist-prescribed self-administered non-emergency hormonal contraception: An analysis of online social discourse.

BACKGROUND: Increasing access to hormonal contraception reduces unintended pregnancies. One strategy gaining momentum is allowing patients to access hormonal contraception directly from pharmacists. Commentary on online news articles provides a naturalistic and real-time data source to assess public perceptions on timely and often controversial issues. OBJECTIVE: Characterize public perceptions of pharmacist-prescribed self-administered non-emergency hormonal contraception using comments posted in response to online news articles. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional, mixed methods analysis of public comments posted in response to articles published by major media outlets between January 1 to December 31, 2015 on pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception. Comments were then extracted and reviewed through a two-step process to identify emerging themes using a thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1060 public online comments were collected from eight articles. Of these, 757 comments (71.4%) were not related to pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception. Thematic analysis of the 303 relevant comments (28.6%) identified three overarching messages. First, a wide variety of reasons for how pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception improves healthcare and/or supports patient preferences were cited, but there was no consensus on the primary vantage. Second, individuals have varying opinions about the role of the pharmacist which creates both opportunities and challenges for pharmacist-prescribed hormonal contraception. Third, practical and logistical considerations will need to be addressed by healthcare systems, pharmacies, and payers prior to and alongside implementation. CONCLUSION: Commenters were generally positive and cited several benefits, such as increasing access to healthcare, reducing unintended pregnancies, and supporting individual autonomy. However, it was acknowledged that these benefits would need to be balanced with potential safety concerns and logistical issues associated with delivering clinical services in a community pharmacy setting. Study results can help understand public concerns and may be useful in addressing barriers hindering public acceptance of expanded pharmacist roles.

Leveraging the Electronic Medical Record to Identify Predictors of Nonattendance to a Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Program.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to identify patient-specific factors, easily obtainable from the electronic medical record (EMR), that are associated with nonattendance to a group Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) program among an adult population with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This study used a retrospective cohort design, with attendance to a group DSMES session as the primary outcome. The study included adult patients with diagnosed type 2 diabetes who were scheduled for a group DSMES session between March 1, 2013, and June 30, 2017. Patients who were pregnant or who had other types of diabetes (eg, type 1 diabetes, prediabetes, gestational diabetes) were excluded. RESULTS: A higher A1C, required copay for DSMES, low socioeconomic status, increased number of diabetes medications prescribed, the presence of a prescription for any insulin, and a higher calculated total daily dose of insulin were all associated with a decreased likelihood of attendance. Only older age was associated with an increased likelihood of attendance. CONCLUSION: Using the EMR to identify patients who need more intensive intervention strategies can help programs direct resources to those who need them most. Having identified these at-risk individuals, a targeted communication and outreach strategy can be developed to assist these individuals with overcoming barriers to attending DSMES.

Inviting manuscripts to Leadership Experience and Development Reports (LEADeR).

The Journal announces a new section called "Leadership Experience and Development Reports" within our Short Communications manuscript category. Manuscripts in this section seek to share scholarly activities and experiences within the area of leadership development that are rooted in a leadership framework, model, or theory. Submissions can include work related to student pharmacists, pharmacy residents, fellows, graduate students and faculty/staff development.

Hypersensitivity reactions to human insulin analogs in insulin-naïve patients: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to raise awareness of hypersensitivity reactions to human insulin analogs (HIAs) in insulin-naïve patients and encourage consistent and detailed reporting of HIA reactions. DATA SOURCES: A search of PubMed, MEDLINE and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts using the terms 'insulin' and 'hypersensitivity' was completed with English language, humans, and publication date after 1 January 1990 as limits. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: The initial search identified 598 articles. These titles and abstracts were reviewed for relevance (e.g. mention of HIA) resulting in the exclusion of 477 articles. The full texts of the remaining titles were evaluated in addition to each article's references to identify additional reports meeting criteria (n = 14). Upon extensive review, 118 articles were excluded for not meeting prespecified inclusion criteria, resulting in 17 articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: Evidence supporting hypersensitivity reactions to HIAs was variable, potentially due to a variety of causes (e.g. difficulty identifying a true case of hypersensitivity reaction to HIAs). Inconsistencies were noted for the identification, confirmatory testing, management, and reporting of these reactions. Management strategies included use of insulin desensitization protocols, antihistamines, steroids, immunosuppressant/immunomodulator therapies, conversion to noninsulin therapies, and pancreas transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Complete and consistent identification, evaluation, management, and reporting of these reactions is essential. Specific aspects of the patient's history should be reported, including previous insulin exposure, the specific HIAs used, duration of use prior to the reaction, a clear timeline of the reaction, and discussion of precipitating events or confounding factors.

Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development.

Objectives. To identify peer reviewer and peer review characteristics that enhance manuscript quality and editorial decisions, and to identify valuable elements of peer reviewer training programs. Methods. A three-school, 15-year review of pharmacy practice and pharmacy administration faculty's publications was conducted to identify high-publication volume journals for inclusion. Editors-in-chief identified all editors managing manuscripts for participation. A three-round modified Delphi process was used. Rounds advanced from open-ended questions regarding actions and attributes of good reviewers to consensus-seeking and clarifying questions related to quality, importance, value, and priority. Results. Nineteen editors representing eight pharmacy journals participated. Three characteristics of reviews were rated required or helpful in enhancing manuscript quality by all respondents: includes a critical analysis of the manuscript (88% required, 12% helpful), includes feedback that contains both strengths and areas of improvement (53% required, 47% helpful), and speaks to the manuscript's utility in the literature (41% required, 59% helpful). Hands-on experience with review activities (88%) and exposure to good and bad reviews (88%) were identified as very valuable to peer reviewer development. Conclusion. Reviewers, individuals involved in faculty development, and journals should work to assist new reviewers in defining focused areas of expertise, building knowledge in these areas, and developing critical analysis skills.

Evaluating the Impact of Educational Interventions on Patients and Communities: A Conceptual Framework.

Health professions education programs can have direct effects on patients and communities as well as on learners. However, few studies have examined the patient and community outcomes of educational interventions. To better integrate education and health care delivery, educators and researchers would benefit from a unifying framework to guide the planning of educational interventions and evaluation of their impact on patients.The authors of this Perspective mirrored approaches from Miller's pyramid of educational assessment and Moore and colleagues' framework for evaluating continuing professional development to propose a conceptual framework for evaluating the impact of educational interventions on patients and communities. This proposed framework, which complements these existing frameworks for evaluating the impact of educational interventions on learners, includes four levels: (1) interaction; (2) acceptability; (3) individual outcomes (i.e., knowledge, skills, activation, behaviors, and individual health indicators); and (4) population outcomes (i.e., community health indicators, capacity, and disparities). The authors describe measures and outcomes at each level and provide an example of the application of their new conceptual framework.The authors encourage educators and researchers to use this conceptual framework to evaluate the impact of educational interventions on patients and to more clearly identify and define which educational interventions strengthen communities and enhance overall health outcomes.

Deliberate Integration of Student Leadership Development in Doctor of Pharmacy Programs.

The CAPE 2013 Outcomes answered the call for increased student leadership development (SLD) by identifying leadership as a desired curricular goal. To meet this outcome, colleges and schools of pharmacy are advised to first identify a set of SLD competencies aligned with their institution's mission and goals and then organize these competencies into a SLD framework/model. Student leadership development should be integrated vertically and horizontally within the curriculum in a deliberate and longitudinal manner. It should include all student pharmacists, begin at the point of admission, and extend beyond extracurricular activities. The school's assessment plan should be aligned with the identified SLD competencies so student learning related to leadership is assessed. To accomplish these recommendations, a positive environment for SLD should be cultivated within the school, including administrative backing and resources, as well as support among the broader faculty for integrating SLD into the curriculum.

A consensus definition and core competencies for being an advocate for pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a consensus definition for "advocacy for the profession of pharmacy" and core competencies for doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) graduates to be effective advocates for the profession. METHODS: A 3-round modified Delphi process was conducted using a panel of 9 experts. Participants revised a definition for "advocacy for the profession" and ultimately rated their agreement using a 5-point Likert scale. Competency statements were developed and subsequently rated for importance for being an advocate and importance to address in PharmD curricula. RESULTS: A consensus-derived definition was developed. Two competency statements achieved consensus for both measures of importance. Four competency statements achieved consensus for only 1 measure and another 4 did not reach consensus for either measure. CONCLUSION: A consensus-derived definition was developed describing advocacy for the profession of pharmacy and began laying the groundwork for the knowledge and skills necessary to be an effective advocate for the profession of pharmacy.