Potentially inappropriate medications in older adults living with HIV.

OBJECTIVES: We assessed the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) among older (≥ 65 years) people living with HIV (O-PLWH) in the region of Madrid. METHODS: We analysed the dispensation registry of community and hospital pharmacies from the Madrid Regional Health Service (SERMAS) for the period between 1 January and 30 June 2017, looking specifically at PIMs according to the 2019 Beers criteria. Co-medications were classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system. RESULTS: A total of 6 636 451 individuals received medications. Of these individuals, 22 945 received antiretrovirals (ARVs), and of these 1292 were O-PLWH. Overall, 1135 (87.8%) O-PLWH were taking at least one co-medication, and polypharmacy (at least five co-medications) was observed in 852 individuals (65.9%). A PIM was identified in 482 (37.3%) O-PLWH. Factors independently associated with PIM were polypharmacy [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.16-9.72] and female sex (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.30-2.35). The distribution of PIMs according to ATC drug class were nervous system drugs (n = 369; 28.6%), musculoskeletal system drugs (n = 140; 10.8%), gastrointestinal and metabolism drugs (n = 72; 5.6%), cardiovascular drugs (n = 61; 4.7%), respiratory system drugs (n = 13; 1.0%), antineoplastic and immunomodulating drugs (n = 10; 0.8%), and systemic anti-infectives (n = 2; 0.2%). Five drugs accounted for 84.8% of the 482O PLWH with PIMs: lorazepam (38.2%), ibuprofen (18.0%), diazepam (10.2%), metoclopramide (9.9%), and zolpidem (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Prescription of PIMs is highly prevalent in O-PLWH. Consistent with data in uninfected elderly people, the most frequently observed PIMs were benzodiazepines and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs . Targeted interventions are warranted to reduce inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy in this vulnerable population.

[The impact of an intervention strategy in the prescription of generic drugs in a primary care area]. / Impacto de una estrategia de intervención en la prescripción de genéricos en un área de atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of specific interventions on generic prescribing in general practices. DESIGN: Non randomized controlled study. SETTING: General practices in 2 health areas of Madrid. PARTICIPANTS: 5 general practices (intervention group) and 5 general practices (control group). INTERVENTIONS: In 1994, intervention group received monthly educational seminars on generic drugs and computer-produced prescribing feedback. The control group received not seminars and not feedback. Prescription monitoring of both groups continued during 1994. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Area factor before and during intervention, and intervention factor for both areas (control and intervention) related with prescribing volume and costs of generics were analysis. Prescribing volume of generics in the intervention group was significantly greater than for control group (p < 0.01) by both area and intervention factors. Prescribing costs of generics in the intervention group was significantly greater for control group (p < 0.05) by area factor but both groups were significantly different by intervention factor. CONCLUSION: Educational seminars and feedback information on generics improve generic prescribing but it should be evaluated for broader areas of physicians on prescribing costs.

[Analysis of drug consumption with indicators of prescription quality]. / Análisis del consumo de medicamentos utilizando indicadores de calidad en la prescripción.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical prescription by means of various indicators. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, retrospective study. SETTING: Non-hospital prescription in all the INSALUD provinces, except Ceuta and Melilla, for a year (1997). MEASUREMENTS: Different quality indicators were analysed for the following groups of medicines: oral diabetes drugs, anti-platelet aggregation drugs, anti-hypertension drugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, tranquillisers and hypnotic drugs, antibiotics, anti-asthmatic drugs and the omeprazol efficiency indicator. Consumption was expressed in defined daily doses (DDD) and in DDD per 1000 persons and per day (DID). A prescription quality indicator was indicated on the basis of weighing up the indicators. RESULTS: The sulphonylurea drugs varied greatly (15-56%) and deviated negatively a lot from the standard value. AAS and ticlopidine made up 74% of the anti-platelet aggregation drugs. Consumption of calcium antagonists was three times greater than of beta-blockers. Captopril and enalapril were 65% of the ACE inhibitors. Ibuprofen, naproxen and diclofenac made up between 34 and 50% of the NSAIDs. The DID of hypnotics was 44 against a standard figure of 24. Use of first-level antibiotics was 77%. Inhaled adrenergic drugs came to 80% of total anti-asthmatic drugs. The cost of omeprazol treatment per day was 267 pesetas/DID, which was inefficient in comparison with the standard of 190. All provinces had a prescription quality indicator above six out of ten. CONCLUSIONS: The ACE inhibitors, anti-asthmatic drugs and antibiotics were close to the standard. The use of sulphonylurea drugs, beta-blockers, NSAIDs and hypnotics was a long way from standard. The prescription level was acceptable in the different provinces.