Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 35(8): 1469-1474, 2022 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349575

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is a trend in reproductive-aged women to live with more chronic conditions, likely resulting in pregnancies complicated by one or more pre-gestational diagnoses. The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of women with pre-gestational diagnoses and pregnancy-related complications, and assess the trends of pre-gestational diagnoses between two time-points, ten-years apart from 2006 to 2016. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We abstracted pregnant patients from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in 2006 and 2016. We classified diagnosis codes, ICD 9 for 2006 and ICD 10 for 2016, as pre-gestational diagnoses or as pregnancy-related complications. Descriptive statistics were presented as frequencies and proportions for categorical variables. Chi-square analysis was performed. All statistical analyses were two-sided and p-value < .05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Between 2006 and 2016, the percentage of patients with at least one pre-gestational diagnoses increased from 35.3% in 2006 to 53.8% in 2016 (p < .0001) and the percentage of patients with at least one pregnancy-related complication increased from 62.6% to 69.1% (p < .0001). We found a trend of increasing pregnancy-related complications with an increasing number of pre-gestational diagnoses. The prevalence of asthma and obesity, either alone or in combination were found to rise over the ten-year time span. CONCLUSION: The percent of patients entering pregnancy with any pre-gestational diagnosis has increased, along with the number of pregnancy-related complications. Future research is needed to understand the effects of these diagnoses in combination and the possible impact on pregnancy outcomes.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Adulto , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
2.
Cureus ; 13(11): e19239, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34877216

RESUMO

Objective Single pregestational diagnoses have been demonstrated to be associated with pregnancy-related complications. But, the effect of multiple diagnoses is understudied. The objective of this study is to determine the most common combinations of pregestational diagnoses and to determine if specific combinations increase the risk of pregnancy-related complications. Study design We performed a cross-sectional study of the 2016 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample (HCUP NIS) database. Inclusion criteria were: Diagnosis-related groups assumed to be associated with delivery, and three or fewer International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), clinical modification codes with a prevalence greater than or equal to 0.5%, or clinically important risk factors in Bateman's co-morbidity index. Chi-squared analysis of combinations of pregestational diagnoses was performed to assess the relative risk of pregnancy-related complications. Results The 2016 database included 255,233 delivered pregnancies. The most common combinations of pregestational diagnoses involved advanced maternal age, prior cesarean delivery, obesity, and tobacco use. Most combinations did not demonstrate an increased risk for complications greater than the risk with a single diagnosis. In those with statistically significant risk, all were 3-fold or less except we noted a 4.4-fold higher risk (95% CI: 3.16-6.15) of preeclampsia in obese patients of advanced maternal age compared to patients who were only of advanced maternal age. Conclusion Our results revealed that common combinations of pregestational diagnoses, in general, do not increase the risk for common pregnancy-related complications greater than the risk with a single diagnosis. This is reassuring, given that women entering pregnancy with multiple co-morbidities are becoming more common.

3.
Cureus ; 13(11): e19817, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34956796

RESUMO

Objective To determine if outpatient cervical ripening with daily misoprostol can reduce admission to delivery time in women with low-risk pregnancies at 39 or more weeks of gestation. Study design This is a retrospective cohort study of a convenience sample of low-risk pregnancies that underwent elective outpatient cervical ripening compared to matched controls for parity (nulliparous vs. parous) and gestational age. Time from admission to delivery, induction agents, presence of tachysystole, mode of delivery, length of hospitalization, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and low Apgar scores were compared. Results Fifty-six patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening with daily dosing of misoprostol were compared to 56 patients matched for parity and gestational weeks who underwent inpatient cervical ripening/induction of labor with misoprostol. We found the time from admission to delivery in the outpatient cervical ripening cohort was significantly lesser than the inpatient cohort (17.5 ± 11.5 hours outpatient vs. 26.6 ± 15.6 hours inpatient, P=0.001). More patients (N=18, 32%) were able to deliver within 12 hours of admission in the outpatient induction group compared to the inpatient group (N=8, 11%, P=0.010). There were no differences in frequency of cesarean delivery, uterine tachysystole with or without fetal heart rate changes, NICU admission, low Apgar scores, or low umbilical artery pH values between the two groups. Conclusion Outpatient cervical ripening with misoprostol may be a feasible alternative to inpatient cervical ripening in low-risk pregnancies, may help improve patient experience, and reduce the operational burden that elective induction confers upon labor and delivery units.

4.
Cureus ; 12(5): e8261, 2020 May 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32596079

RESUMO

Colorectal cancer during pregnancy is rare. Because of a pattern of delay in childbearing and because colorectal cancer is now diagnosed more often in young adults, the incidence is expected to rise. Diagnosis during pregnancy is challenging as many of the symptoms mimic common pregnancy symptoms. Colonoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis, but pregnancy is a relative contraindication to colonoscopy. Once diagnosed, pregnant women often have more advanced disease. Due to its rarity, treatment is often based on case reports and limited studies. A multidisciplinary team is important in the optimization of treatment. We present a case of a 29-year-old African-American primigravid with chronic gastrointestinal symptoms diagnosed with colorectal adenocarcinoma at 17 weeks of gestation. She delayed surgical intervention for several weeks due to fear of miscarriage, and ultimately underwent exploratory laparotomy with hemicolectomy and colostomy placement at 20 weeks. Abdominal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging revealed non-specific hepatic lesions concerning for metastatic disease, but the patient refused biopsy due to concern for radiation harm to the fetus. Chemotherapy was considered, but postponed until the postpartum period, for fear of fetal harm. Computed tomography imaging after delivery noted an increased number of hepatic lesions, representing progression of her disease. She received two rounds of chemotherapy in the postpartum period, but remained non-compliant with treatment recommendations and ultimately was lost to follow-up.  This case presents a delayed diagnosis of colorectal cancer in pregnancy, as well as delayed treatment due to concerns for fetal harm with current therapies. It emphasizes the diagnostic challenges and the complexity and ethical issues involved when a pregnant patient faces a life-threatening terminal illness. This case adds to the growing body of literature on colorectal cancer in pregnancy and highlights the importance of clinical suspicion, informed patient centered decision making, and tailored treatment goals.

5.
Am J Case Rep ; 20: 739-742, 2019 May 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31127078

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Multifetal pregnancies are at high risk for preterm delivery. Under certain circumstances, delayed vaginal delivery of the second twin is performed to improve morbidity and mortality. Most of the information on optimal management of delayed-interval delivery comes from published case reports in which the first twin was delivered vaginally. This case report is unique in that twin A was delivered via cesarean section. CASE REPORT Our patient was a 21-year-old G2P1, with dichorionic diamniotic twins of unknown gestational age, with prenatal care at a different facility, who presented with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes and cord prolapse. Twin A, with an estimated weight by ultrasound of 528 g, was delivered via cesarean section and twin B was left in utero until the patient went into preterm labor 10 days later. Obstetrical management included tocolytic protocol from the Management of Myelomeningocele Study trial, preterm prelabor rupture of membrane antibiotics with broad-spectrum coverage, and judicious use of fetal lung maturity steroids and magnesium sulfate. CONCLUSIONS This case is important as we have demonstrated that cesarean section in the setting of delayed-interval delivery may be an option to improve survival at the limits of viability. We also discussed our treatment approach and how we delayed delivery of the second twin by 10 days. Unexpectedly, the surviving twin was the one born first, at 22 4/7 weeks determined 2 days after birth by prenatal records.


Assuntos
Cesárea , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/terapia , Trabalho de Parto Prematuro/terapia , Gravidez de Gêmeos , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
6.
AJP Rep ; 8(4): e362-e364, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30591842

RESUMO

Background Although rare, familial hypertriglyceridemia can cause acute and life-threatening complications in pregnancy. Cases The first patient's pregnancy was complicated by multiple admissions for pancreatitis due to hypertriglyceridemia and noncompliance with gemfibrozil. In her second pregnancy, she was compliant with gemfibrozil and only experienced pancreatitis episodes toward the end of pregnancy. The second patient had diabetes mellitus and familial hypertriglyceridemia. She required multiple hospitalizations for diabetic ketoacidosis secondary to insulin noncompliance. In both pregnancies, she was compliant with gemfibrozil and had no complications related to hypertriglyceridemia. Conclusion Treatment with gemfibrozil in pregnancies complicated by hypertriglyceridemia may prevent complications without adverse maternal or fetal effects and could be considered in treating pregnant patients with severe hypertriglyceridemia. These cases also demonstrate the importance of medication compliance in the prevention of poor outcomes.

7.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 30(3): 291-292, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28670059

RESUMO

Between 1947 and 1971, the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) was prescribed to pregnant women to prevent spontaneous abortions. Many studies have demonstrated adverse consequences of prenatal DES exposure. This report describes a DES daughter treated for uterine cancer who presented with a foreshortened vagina of 4 cm and stage III pelvic organ prolapse. She underwent successful vaginal native tissue reconstructive surgery with uterosacral colpopexy and anterior and posterior repair to lengthen her vagina and treat her prolapse. She then developed stress incontinence and underwent periurethral bulking 5 months later. She has been followed for 2 years with no recurrence of prolapse or incontinence.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA