Clinical and pathological factors predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A single center experience.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer (BC) improves outcomes, especially in patients with locally advanced and inflammatory cancer. Further insight into clinic-pathological factors influencing outcomes is essential to define the optimal therapeutic strategy for each category of patients and to predict the response to the treatment. In total, 117 patients with BC were treated with NAC with or without trastuzumab between 2010 and 2015. The histologic response to NAC was defined as a pathological complete response (pCR) when there was no evidence of residual invasive tumor in the breast or axillary lymph nodes. Relapse-free survival (RFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank analysis. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. The median age of the 117 patients enrolled in the present study was 52 years (age range, 35-85 years). The overall response rate (complete and partial responses) assessed by radiological and pathological evaluation were 76 and 72%, respectively. pCR was achieved in 35 out of 117 patients (~30%). In total, 6 patients (5%) developed progressive disease during chemotherapy. The RFS was 85 months (SE=3; 95% CI 79-91). The median was not reached and the mean follow-up time was 55 months (median 52 months; range 11-100 months). In this time, 20 patients (17%) experienced tumor recurrence. From the univariate analysis, the pathological response was significantly associated with receptor-based subtype, menopausal status and T-stage. From the multivariate analysis by using linear multiple regression and including receptor- menopausal status and T-stage, the model was not significant (P=0.062). However, by using the multiple logistic regression, and including age, pCR was significantly associated with ER+ HER2neg (P=0.006), T2 (P=0.043) and T3 (P=0.018). T-stage, menopausal status and receptor status are significantly associated with the pathological response in patients with inoperable BC treated with NAC.

Liposomal pegylated doxorubicin plus vinorelbine combination as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer in elderly women > or = 65 years of age.

PURPOSE: No standard chemotherapy has been so far definitely settled for elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In order to identify a regimen with acceptable efficacy and low burden of non-overlapping toxic effects, a combination consisting of liposomal pegilated doxorubicin (PLD) with alternating oral and intravenous vinorelbine (NVB) has been investigated in a phase II study. METHODS: Thirty-four consecutive patients (median age 71 years; range 65-82) with MBC have been enrolled. Based on 4-weekly cycles, PLD 40 mg/m(2) plus NVB 25 mg/m(2) i.v., have been administered intravenously on day 1 and oral NVB 60 mg/m(2) on day 15. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. In all, 17 responses were documented with three complete responses (CR) and 14 partial responses, with an overall response rate of 50% (95% CI 36-66). Median overall survival time was 13 months and the median time to progression 8 months. Interestingly, all the patients with CR are still alive with a disease-free survival of more than 1 year. The main toxicity was neutropenia: grade 3 in 15% and grade 4 in 11% of patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia was recorded in three patients not requiring dose reduction. Other frequently reported adverse events included: anemia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, all rarely severe. The evaluation of quality of life (QoL) did not show any significant change during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that this combination is active and well tolerated in elderly patients with MBC and could represent another efficacious chance for the management of this population.

Concomitant treatment of brain metastasis with whole brain radiotherapy [WBRT] and temozolomide [TMZ] is active and improves quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Brain metastases (BM) represent one of the most frequent complications related to cancer, and their treatment continues to evolve. We have evaluated the activity, toxicity and the impact on Quality of Life (QoL) of a concomitant treatment with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and Temozolomide (TMZ) in patients with brain metastases from solid tumors in a prospective Simon two stage study. METHODS: Fifty-nine patients were enrolled and received 30 Gy WBRT with concomitant TMZ (75 mg/m2/day) for ten days, and subsequently TMZ (150 mg/m2/day) for up to six cycles. The primary end points were clinical symptoms and radiologic response. RESULTS: Five patients had a complete response, 21 patients had a partial response, while 18 patients had stable disease. The overall response rate (45%) exceeded the target activity per study design. The median time to progression was 9 months. Median overall survival was 13 months. The most frequent toxicities included grade 3 neutropenia (15%) and anemia (13%), and only one patient developed a grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Age, Karnofsky performance status, presence of extracranial metastases and the recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) were found to be predictive factors for response in patients. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were dependent on age and on the RPA class. CONCLUSION: We conclude that this treatment is well tolerated, with an encouraging objective response rate, and a significant improvement in quality of life (p < 0.0001) demonstrated by FACT-G analysis. All patients answered the questionnaires and described themselves as 'independent' and able to act on their own initiatives. Our study found a high level of satisfaction for QoL, this provides useful information to share with patients in discussions regarding chemotherapy treatment of these lesions.

Efficacy and safety of cetuximab/irinotecan in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal adenocarcinomas: a clinical practice setting, multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan/cetuximab administered as third- or fourth-line therapy in a retrospective series of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to oxaliplatin and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Most patients (90%) had been previously treated with adjuvant 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin, and all had received oxaliplatin-based regimens before receiving irinotecan-based second-line treatment. Sixty patients with irinotecan-refractory colorectal cancer received a regimen comprising weekly irinotecan 120 mg/m2 as a 1-hour intravenous infusion and cetuximab 400 mg/m2 infused over 2 hours as the initial dose and 250 mg/m2 infused over 1 hour for the subsequent administrations. A single treatment cycle comprised 4 weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks of rest. RESULTS: According to an intent-to-treat analysis, a partial response was exhibited in 12 of 60 enrolled patients (20%; 95% confidence interval, 11%-32%) with a median duration of 5.1 months (range, 3-7.4 months). The tumor growth control rate was 50% (95% confidence interval, 37%-63%). Objective responses did not correlate with performance status, number of sites of disease, and pretreatments or epidermal growth factor receptor status. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (range, 1.2-9 months), whereas median overall survival was 6 months (range, 2-13 months). Both survival parameters correlated with performance status at the beginning of treatment. The main grade 3/4 toxicities were nausea (33%), diarrhea (27%), leukopenia (18%), asthenia (13%), and acne-like reaction (13%). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the weekly irinotecan/cetuximab regimen is feasible in an outpatient setting and tolerated by most patients. At present, combinations of chemotherapy with cetuximab are being evaluated in patients with earlier-stage disease in a number of ongoing studies.

Low-dose metronomic oral administration of vinorelbine in the first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The concept of metronomic chronic administration of low-dose chemotherapy has become relevant for the treatment of cancer in the last several years. This study sought to determine the safety and activity of oral vinorelbine (VNB), using a metronomic schedule of administration, in elderly patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: From October 2004 to March 2007, 34 patients with MBC (median age, 74 years; range, 70-84 years) were treated with oral VNB at 70 mg/m2, fractionated on days 1, 3, and 5, for 3 weeks on and 1 week off, every 4 weeks, for a maximum of 12 cycles. The objective response rate was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: All 34 patients received at least 3 cycles of therapy and were evaluable. Two achieved complete responses (6%), and 11 achieved partial responses (32%). Median progression-free survival and median overall survival entailed 7.7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.9-9.05 months) and 15.9 months (95% CI, 13.1-15.91 months), respectively, for all patients. CONCLUSION: The fractionated administration of oral VNB is well tolerated and presents promising activity in elderly patients with metastatic cancer, warranting further investigation in combination with other chemotherapy agents.

Zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases by hepatocellular carcinoma: a case series.

PURPOSE: The survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has improved with advancements in various diagnostic tools and treatment modalities. Consequently, bone metastases from HCC are diagnosed more frequently. The aims of the present study was to describe the clinical features and treatment of HCC patients presenting with bone metastases. In particular, we evaluated the role of zoledronic acid in these patients especially with regard to pain reduction, analgesic drug consumption and safety. METHODS: Between December 2006 and July 2008, we recruited 17 (male:female, 12:5, median age, 68 years; age range, 62-85 years) consecutive patients. Spinal metastases were present in 11 patients (64.7%). Zoledronic acid was administered in all patients (total number of administrations, 107; mean number of administrations, 6.29). RESULTS: A total of 15 patients received at least three administrations of zoledronic acid and reported clinical benefit with pain reduction and tapering of analgesic drugs. Before starting treatment, the mean VAS for patients who received at least three administrations (15/17 patients) of zoledronic acid was 7.1 (+/-0.24), and after 3 months 5.3 (+/-0.20). This improvement was independent of the sex, the extent of metastasis and the concomitant anticancer treatment. No significant side effects were registered in this series of patients. Median survival was 10 months (CI 6,353-13,647). CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid may be helpful in treating bone metastases in HCC patients. Patients regularly receiving zoledronic acid showed significant pain relief.

Sorafenib plus octreotide is an effective and safe treatment in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: multicenter phase II So.LAR. study.

PURPOSE: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not eligible for local therapies has limited chances of cure. Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with proven activity in advanced HCC. Octreotide is used in this setting with conflicting results. Treatment with sorafenib and long-acting octreotide was tested in advanced HCC to evaluate safety and activity. METHODS: Fifty patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A or B, received sorafenib at a dosage of 800 mg/day for 28 days with a following week of rest and long-acting octreotide at a dose of 40 mg, administered every 28 days. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for safety and efficacy. Sixteen patients out of 50 (34%) were naïve from other therapies, while all the others were previously treated with local and/or systemic treatments. We achieved 5 partial responses (10%), 33 stable diseases (66%) and 12 progressions of disease (24%). Median time to progression was 7.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-10.9 months), and median overall survival was 12 months (95% CI, 6.3-17.4 months). Treatment was well tolerated. Diarrhoea (6%) and hypertension (4%) were the most frequent grade 3 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the combination between sorafenib and long-acting octreotide is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced HCC and could represent another efficacious chance for the management of this population.

Zoledronic acid in metastatic chondrosarcoma and advanced sacrum chordoma: two case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Chondrosarcomas and chordomas are usually chemoresistant bone tumors and may have a poor prognosis when advanced. They are usually associated with worsening pain difficult to control. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Zoledronic acid was used in a 63-year-old man with metastatic chondrosarcoma and in a 66-year-old woman with a diagnosis of sacrum chordoma both reporting severe pain related to tumor. RESULTS: In the first case, zoledronic acid was able to maintain pain control despite disease progression following chemotherapy, in the other case, zoledronic acid only produced significant clinical benefit. CONCLUSION: Control of pain associated with bone tumors such as chondrosarcoma and chondroma may significantly improve from use of zoledronic acid, independently from tumor response to other treatments. Evaluation on larger series are needed to confirm the clinical effect of this bisphosphonate on such tumors.

Management of pain in elderly patients receiving infusion of zoledronic acid for bone metastasis: a single-institution report.

GOALS OF WORK: Bone metastases are a common cause of morbidity in elderly patients with solid tumors and myeloma. We studied the safety and the effect of a new bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid (ZA), on pain and on quality of life (QoL) in elderly patients with bone metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2005, we have enrolled elderly patients with bone metastasis for receiving ZA administration. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire were used to assess potential benefits of ZA therapy. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients were included; the median age was 75.5 years. Before starting treatment, the mean VAS was 6.8 (+/-0.24), after three infusions 5.4 (+/-0.3), and after six courses 4.5 (+/-0.3) with a significant improvement of bone pain. Moreover, we found a statistically significant improvement of QoL measured by FACT-G questionnaire after six courses (p = 0.010). Median baseline and final value of serum creatinine were 0.73 and 0.72 mg/dl, respectively (p = 0.11); creatinine clearance was also normal for most patients. Osteonecrosis of the jaw was diagnosed in one patient who received a prolonged ZA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: These data confirm the benefits of ZA on pain and QoL also in elderly patients with bone metastasis from solid tumors.