Is there a relation between sudden sensorineural hearing loss and white matter lesions?

PURPOSE: Sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) has similarities to conditions with vascular etiologies such as myocardial infarction and cerebral stroke. Thus, it could be considered as an early sign of a vascular disease and not only a specific local condition. Chronic hypoperfusion in the brain districts leads to a chronic ischemic damage, called cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD), detectable with brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: The authors used CSVD to establish the presence of vascular risk factors in individuals with SSNHL and used the Fazekas score scale to classify them. RESULTS: Our study showed that individuals with SSNHL aged between 48 and 60 years have 26% more probability to have a Fazekas score higher than 1 compared to the general population. Individuals younger than 28 years showed a statistically significant negative correlation to have a Fazekas score higher than 0. The higher is the Fazekas score, the less is the probability of hearing recovery. The medium hearing-recovery probability is 46%. This decreases by 16% for every increase of score in the Fazekas scale. In the present study, the recovery probability decreased from 80% in individuals younger than 48 years with a score of 0 to 14% in individuals with a Fazekas scores of 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: The authors assessed a higher prevalence of CSVD compared to the general population in patients aged between 48 and 60 years with SSNHL. Moreover, they assessed that the presence of CSVD is related to a decreased probability of recovery, as it has already been demonstrated for stroke.

Correction to: Is there a relation between sudden sensorineural hearing loss and white matter lesions?

In the original publication, fifth author's surname was incorrectly published as "Diacinto". The correct surname should read as "Diacinti".

Real-world evidence for the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in patients with CRSwNP after 1 year of therapy.

Objectives: For nearly 3 years, the monoclonal antibody dupilumab has been approved in Germany for the treatment of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Although efficacy has been demonstrated in large double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, few reports of real-world data on this therapy have been published to date. Methods: Patients with an indication for treatment with dupilumab for CRSwNP were included in the study and followed up every 3 months for a period of 1 year. At the baseline visit, demographic data, medical history, comorbidities, nasal polyp score, disease-related quality of life (SNOT-22), nasal congestion, and sense of smell (VAS and Sniffin Sticks test) were recorded. In addition, total blood eosinophil counts and serum total IgE were measured. During follow-up, all of the described parameters and possible adverse events were recorded. Results: Eighty-one patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 68 patients were still receiving dupilumab after 1 year of follow-up. Eight patients discontinued therapy, with only 1 patient discontinuing due to severe side effects. The Polyp score decreased substantially during follow-up, and parameters for disease-related quality of life and sense of smell increased significantly. Total IgE levels decreased significantly, and eosinophils leveled off at baseline after an initial increase after three months of therapy. No clinical data could be identified to a priori predict a treatment response. Conclusions: Dupilumab shows effectiveness and safety in the treatment of CRSwNP under real-world conditions. More research on systemic biomarkers and clinical parameters to predict treatment response is necessary.