Sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with one to two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: sub-analysis of the SINODAR-ONE multicentre randomized clinical trial and reopening of enrolment.

BACKGROUND: The initial results of the SINODAR-ONE randomized clinical trial reported that patients with T1-2 breast cancer and one to two macrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes treated with breast-conserving surgery, sentinel lymph node biopsy only, and adjuvant therapy did not present worse 3-year survival, regional recurrence, or distant recurrence rates compared with those treated with axillary lymph node dissection. To extend the recommendation of axillary lymph node dissection omission even in patients treated with mastectomy, a sub-analysis of the SINODAR-ONE trial is presented here. METHODS: Patients with T1-2 breast cancer and no more than two metastatic sentinel lymph nodes undergoing mastectomy were analysed. After sentinel lymph node biopsy, patients were randomly assigned to receive either axillary lymph node dissection followed by adjuvant treatment (standard arm) or adjuvant treatment alone (experimental arm). The primary endpoint was overall survival. The secondary endpoint was recurrence-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 218 patients were treated with mastectomy; 111 were randomly assigned to the axillary lymph node dissection group and 107 to the sentinel lymph node biopsy-only group. At a median follow-up of 33.0 months, there were three deaths (two deaths in the axillary lymph node dissection group and one death in the sentinel lymph node biopsy-only group). There were five recurrences in each treatment arm. No axillary lymph node recurrence was observed. The 5-year overall survival rates were 97.8 and 98.7 per cent in the axillary lymph node dissection treatment arm and the sentinel lymph node biopsy-only treatment arm, respectively (P = 0.597). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 95.7 and 94.1 per cent in the axillary lymph node dissection treatment arm and the sentinel lymph node biopsy treatment arm, respectively (P = 0.821). CONCLUSION: In patients with T1-2 breast cancer and one to two macrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes treated with mastectomy, the overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates of patients treated with sentinel lymph node biopsy only were not inferior to those treated with axillary lymph node dissection. To strengthen the conclusion of the trial, the enrolment of patients treated with mastectomy was reopened as a single-arm experimental study. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05160324 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

A Rare Case of Duodenal Metastasis from Lobular Breast Cancer: From Diagnosis to Surgery.

Gastrointestinal tract breast cancer (BC) metastases represent a rare event and generally originate from the lobular subtype. Duodenal involvement was rarely described in previous case series. Abdominal symptoms are extremely unspecific and misleading. Diagnosis is challenging, and it consists of a few mandatory steps from radiological examinations to histological and immunohistochemical analyses. Here, we presented the clinical case of a 54-year-old postmenopausal woman who was hospitalized for vomiting and jaundice, presenting increased level of liver enzymes and minimal main bile duct and choledocus dilatation at abdominal ultrasonography. She underwent breast-conserving surgery and axillary lymph node dissection for stage IIIB lobular BC, 5 years before. Metastatic infiltration of the duodenal bulb originating from lobular BC was proven histologically, through fine-needle aspiration during endoscopic ultrasonography. Treatment was established after multidisciplinary team evaluation, based on the clinical status and prognosis of the patient. Pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, and final histological examination confirmed the secondary localization of lobular BC, infiltrating the duodenal and gastric wall, pancreas parenchyma, and surrounding tissues. No metastatic lymph nodes were found. After surgery, the patient underwent first line of adjuvant systemic treatment with fulvestrant and ribociclib. After a follow-up of 21 months, the patient was in good clinical condition, without signs of locoregional or distant recurrence. This report stressed on the importance of a tailored therapeutic approach. Although systemic therapy generally represents the preferred option, surgery should not be excluded if an oncological radical resection can be performed achieving acceptable locoregional disease control.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neo-Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Clinical Experience with Node-Negative and Node-Positive Disease Prior to Systemic Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has emerged as the standard procedure to replace axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). SLNB is accepted in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients; however, its role in clinically node-positive (cN+) patients is debatable. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of BC patients undergoing NAC and SLNB. Our aim was to evaluate the clinical significance of SLNB in the setting of NAC. This was accomplished by comparing the characteristics and oncological outcomes between cN0 and cN+ patients prior to NAC and type of axillary surgery. RESULTS: A total of 291 patients were included in the analysis: 131 were cN0 and 160 were cN+ who became ycN0 after NAC. At a median follow-up of 43 months, axillary recurrence occurred in three cN0 (2.3%) and two cN+ (1.3%) patients. However, there were no statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes (disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, overall survival, and breast-cancer-specific survival) between cN0 and cN+ patients nor between patients treated with SLNB only or ALND. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB in the setting of NAC is an acceptable procedure with a general good prognosis and low axillary failure rates for both cN0 and cN+ patients.