RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) along with emergent carotid stenting (eCAS) have been suggested to have a greater benefit in patients with tandem lesion (TL), compared to other strategies of treatment. Nonetheless, there is no agreement on whether the intracranial occlusion should be treated before the cervical ICA lesion, or vice versa. In this retrospective multicenter study, we sought to compare clinical and procedural outcomes of the two different treatment approaches in patients with TL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective databases of 17 comprehensive stroke centers were screened for consecutive patients with TL who received MT and eCAS. Patients were divided in two groups based on whether they received MT before eCAS (MT-first approach) or eCAS before MT (eCAS-first approach). Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to estimate the effect of the retrograde versus the anterograde approach on procedure-related and clinical outcome measures. These included the mTICI score 2b-3, other procedure-related parameters and adverse events after the endovascular procedure, and the ordinal distribution of the 90-day mRS scores. RESULTS: A total of 295 consecutive patients were initially enrolled. Among these, 208 (70%) received MT before eCAS. After PSM, 56 pairs of patients were available for analysis. In the matched population, the MT-first approach resulted in a higher rate of successful intracranial recanalization (91% versus 73% in the eCAS-first approach, p=0.025) and shorter groin-to-reperfusion time (72 ± 38 minutes versus 93 ± 50 minutes in the anterograde approach, p=0.017). Despite a higher rate of efficient recanalization in the MT-first group, we did not observe a significant difference concerning the ordinal distribution of the 90-day mRS scores. Rates of procedure-related adverse events and occurrence of both parenchymal hemorrhage type 1 and type 2 were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that in patients with TL undergoing endovascular treatment, prioritizing the intracranial occlusion is associated with an increased rate of efficient MT and faster recanalization time. However, this strategy does not bring an advantage in long-term clinical outcome. Future controlled studies are needed to determine the optimal treatment technique. ABBREVIATIONS: AIS = acute ischemic stroke; eCAS = emergent carotid stenting; ICA = internal carotid artery; GTR = groin-torecanalization; IVT = intravenous thrombolysis; LVO = large vessel occlusion; MCA, middle cerebral artery; MT = mechanical thrombectomy; PSM = propensity score matching; SMD = standardized mean difference; STROBE = STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology; TL = tandem lesion.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study investigates the impact of general anesthesia (GA) versus conscious sedation/local anesthesia (CS/LA) on the outcome of patients with minor stroke and isolated M2 occlusion undergoing immediate mechanical thrombectomy (iMT). METHODS: The databases of 16 comprehensive stroke centers were retrospectively screened for consecutive patients with isolated M2 occlusion and a baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score ≤5 who received iMT. Propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of GA versus CS/LA on clinical outcomes and procedure-related adverse events. The primary outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1. Secondary outcome measures were a 90-day mRS score of 0-2 and all-cause mortality, successful reperfusion, procedural-related symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, intraprocedural dissections, and new territory embolism. RESULTS: Of the 172 patients who were selected, 55 received GA and 117 CS/LA. After propensity score matching, 47 pairs of patients were available for analysis. We found no significant differences in clinical outcome, rates of efficient reperfusion, and procedural-related complications between patients receiving GA or LA/CS (mRS score 0-1, P = 0.815; mRS score 0-2, P = 0.401; all-cause mortality, P = 0.408; modified Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score 2b-3, P = 0.374; symptomatic subarachnoid hemorrhage, P = 0.082; intraprocedural dissection, P = 0.408; new territory embolism, P = 0.462). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with minor stroke and isolated M2 occlusion undergoing iMT, the type of anesthesia does not affect clinical outcome or the rate of procedural-related complications. Our results agree with recent data showing no benefit of one specific anesthesiologic procedure over the other and confirm their generalizability also to patients with minor baseline symptoms.
Assuntos
Isquemia Encefálica , Embolia , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea , Humanos , Isquemia Encefálica/etiologia , Anestesia Local/efeitos adversos , Sedação Consciente/métodos , Hemorragia Subaracnóidea/complicações , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Anestesia Geral/métodos , Trombectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Embolia/complicaçõesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent randomized trials have shown the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) also in patients with an established large ischemic core. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to define baseline predictors of clinical outcome in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the anterior circulation and an Alberta Stroke Program Early CT score (ASPECTS) ⩽ 5, undergoing MT. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The databases of 16 comprehensive stroke centers were retrospectively screened for patients with LVO and ASPECTS ⩽5 that received MT. Baseline clinical and neuroradiological features, including the differential contribution of all ASPECTS regions to the composite score, were collected. Primary clinical outcome measure was a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. Statistical analysis used a logistic regression model and random forest algorithm. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients were available for analysis. In multivariate model, among baseline features, lower age (odd ratio (OR) = 0.962, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.943-0.982) and lower National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (OR = 0.911, 95% CI = 0.862-0.963) were associated with the mRS score 0-2. Involvement of the M2 (OR = 0.398, 95% CI = 0.206-0.770) or M4 (OR = 0.496, 95% CI = 0.260-0.945) ASPECTS regions was associated with an unfavorable outcome. Random forest analysis confirmed that age and baseline NIHSS score are the most important variables influencing clinical outcome, whereas involvement of cortical regions M5, M4, M2, and M1 can have a negative impact. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective analysis shows that, along with age and baseline clinical impairment, presence of early ischemic changes involving cortical areas has a role in clinical outcome in patients with large ischemic core undergoing MT. DATA ACCESS STATEMENT: The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request.
Assuntos
AVC Isquêmico , Trombectomia , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Idoso , Trombectomia/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , AVC Isquêmico/cirurgia , AVC Isquêmico/diagnóstico por imagem , AVC Isquêmico/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/cirurgia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagem , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to find predictors of parenchymal hematoma (PH) and clinical outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) and baseline large infarct. METHODS: The databases of 16 stroke centers were retrospectively screened for patients with anterior circulation LVO and baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) ≤5 that received MT. Procedural parameters, including the number of passes during first and second technique of MT, were recorded. Outcome measures were occurrence of PH type 2 and any type of PH after MT, and the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3 and 0-2. RESULTS: In total, 408 patients were available for analysis. A higher number of passes in the second technique was predictive of PH type 2 (odds ratio (OR) - 3.204, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.140 to 9.005), whereas procedure conducted under general anesthesia was associated with lower risk (OR 0.127, 95% CI 0.002 to 0.808). The modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction grade 2c-3 was associated with the mRS score 0-3 (OR 3.373, 95% CI 1.891 to 6.017), whereas occurrence of PH type 2 was predictive of unfavorable outcome (OR 0.221, 95% CI 0.063 to 0.773). Similar results were found for the mRS score 0-2 outcome measure. CONCLUSION: In patients with large ischemic core, a higher number of passes during MT and procedure not conducted under general anesthesia are associated with increased rate of PH type 2, that negatively impact the clinical outcome. Our data outline a delicate balance between the need of a complete recanalization and the risk of PH following MT.