RESUMO
This article summarizes the published results of the Employment Intervention Demonstration Program (EIDP), a federally-funded, multi-site study examining the effectiveness of supported employment programs for 1273 unemployed individuals with psychiatric disabilities in the U.S. Findings confirm the effectiveness of supported employment across different models, program locations, and participant populations. The study's results are discussed in the context of public policies designed to encourage return to work for those with a severe mental illness.
Assuntos
Readaptação ao Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Emprego/legislação & jurisprudência , Transtornos Mentais/reabilitação , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/legislação & jurisprudência , Política Pública , Readaptação ao Emprego/legislação & jurisprudência , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoas Mentalmente Doentes/psicologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Obtaining funding for qualitative research remains a challenge for many researchers, more so than for most quantitative research. In this article, the authors describe useful approaches to planning qualitative research and writing an application. Included is information on exploring funding sources that are likely to be receptive, developing a research plan and a team, and suggestions on the language to be used in the application.
Assuntos
Pesquisa Qualitativa , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Humanos , Técnicas de Planejamento , Estados Unidos , RedaçãoRESUMO
Effects of co-occurring disorders on work outcomes were explored among individuals with severe mental illness who were participating in a multisite randomized study of supported employment. At seven sites, 1,273 people were randomly assigned to an experimental supported employment program or a control condition and followed for 2 years. Multivariate regression analysis examined work outcomes including earnings, hours worked, and competitive employment, as well as whether psychiatric disability was disclosed to coworkers and supervisors. Individuals with any comorbidity had lower earnings and were less likely to work competitively. Those with physical comorbidities had lower earnings, worked fewer hours, and were less likely to work competitively. Disclosure was more likely among those with both cognitive and physical comorbidities, as well as those with learning disabilities. Competitive employment was less likely among those with intellectual disability, visual impairment, and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immuno-deficiency syndrome. The experimental condition was positively related to all outcomes except disclosure. The results suggest that, with some exceptions, comorbidities affect employment outcomes, requiring tailored services and supports to promote vocational success.
Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Readaptação ao Emprego/métodos , Transtornos Mentais/reabilitação , Reabilitação Vocacional/métodos , Educação Vocacional/métodos , Adulto , Assistência Ambulatorial , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Seleção de Pacientes , Estados UnidosRESUMO
People with psychiatric disabilities experience disproportionately high rates of unemployment. As research evidence is mounting regarding effective vocational programs, interest is growing in identifying subgroup variations. Data from a multisite research and demonstration program were analyzed to identify demographic characteristics associated with employment outcomes, after adjusting for the effects of program, services, and study site. Longitudinal analyses found that people with more recent work history, younger age, and higher education were more likely to achieve competitive employment and to work more hours per month, while race and gender effects varied by employment outcome. Results provide strong evidence of demographic subgroup variation and need.