RESUMO
Hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood (G-PB), bone marrow (BM), or umbilical cord blood (CB) have differing biological properties and differing kinetics of engraftment post-transplantation, which might be explained, at least in part, by differing gene and miRNA expression patterns. To assess the differences in gene and miRNA expression, we analyzed whole genome expression profiles as well as the expression of 384 miRNAs in CD34(+) cells isolated from 18 healthy individuals (6 individuals per subtype of HPC source). We identified 43 genes and 36 miRNAs differentially expressed in the various CD34(+) cell sources. We observed that CD34(+) cells from CB and BM showed similar gene and miRNA expression profiles, whereas CD34(+) cells from G-PB had a very different expression pattern. Remarkably, 20 of the differentially expressed genes are targets of the differentially expressed miRNAs. Of note, the majority of genes differentially expressed in CD34(+) cells from G-PB are involved in cell cycle regulation, promoting the process of proliferation, survival, hematopoiesis, and cell signaling, and are targets of overexpressed and underexpressed miRNAs in CD34(+) cells from the same source. These data suggest significant differences in gene and miRNA expression among the various HPC sources used in transplantation. We hypothesize that the differentially expressed genes and miRNAs involved in cell cycle and proliferation might explain the differing kinetics of engraftment observed after transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells obtained from these different sources.
Assuntos
Células da Medula Óssea/metabolismo , Sangue Fetal/metabolismo , Regulação da Expressão Gênica , Genoma Humano , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/metabolismo , MicroRNAs/genética , Antígenos CD34/genética , Antígenos CD34/metabolismo , Células da Medula Óssea/citologia , Ciclo Celular/genética , Proliferação de Células , Sangue Fetal/citologia , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/citologia , Humanos , MicroRNAs/metabolismo , Transdução de SinaisRESUMO
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is the most commonly used cytokine for the mobilization of hematopoietic progenitor cells from healthy donors for allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Although the administration of this cytokine is considered safe, knowledge about its long-term effects, especially in hematopoietic progenitor cells, is limited. On this background, the aim of our study was to analyze whether or not granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces changes in gene and microRNA expression profiles in hematopoietic progenitor cells from healthy donors, and to determine whether or not these changes persist in the long-term. For this purpose, we analyzed the whole genome expression profile and the expression of 384 microRNA in CD34(+) cells isolated from peripheral blood of six healthy donors, before mobilization and at 5, 30 and 365 days after mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Six microRNA were differentially expressed at all time points analyzed after mobilization treatment as compared to the expression in samples obtained before exposure to the drug. In addition, 2424 genes were also differentially expressed for at least 1 year after mobilization. Of interest, 109 of these genes are targets of the differentially expressed microRNA also identified in this study. These data strongly suggest that granulocyte colony-stimulating factor modifies gene and microRNA expression profiles in hematopoietic progenitor cells from healthy donors. Remarkably, some changes are present from early time-points and persist for at least 1 year after exposure to the drug. This effect on hematopoietic progenitor cells has not been previously reported.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD34 , Doadores de Sangue , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos e Macrófagos/farmacologia , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/metabolismo , MicroRNAs/biossíntese , Adulto , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Estudo de Associação Genômica Ampla , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/citologia , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The standard practice in allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) is to infuse peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) the same day or the day after collection once the patient has received conditioning regimen. To obtain and freeze PBSC prior to SCT would be desirable to get a better logistic and to confirm the quality of the product. Unfortunately, studies comparing both approaches are lacking. AIM: In this retrospective study, we analyze the impact of using fresh (N: 107) or previously frozen PBSC (N: 224) on overall outcomes among patients consecutively undergoing alloPBSCT from a matched related donor. RESULTS: Granulocyte engraftment (>500/mcl × 3 days) was faster in the frozen group (14 vs. 16 days, respectively; P = 0.001), while no significant differences on platelet recovery were observed. Patients receiving frozen PBSC had a higher incidence of global acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) (63 vs. 44%, P < 0.001) mostly involving skin and had an earlier onset (13 vs. 30 days, P < 0.001). Response to first-line treatment with corticoids was similar in both groups. No statistically significant differences were found regarding overall chronic GVHD (58 vs. 66%) nor global survival (44 vs 48%), disease-free survival (39 vs. 33%), non-relapse mortality (24 vs. 16% at 1 year), and relapse rates in the frozen vs. fresh group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Infusion of previously frozen stem cells may achieve similar overall outcomes compared to fresh infusion, allowing to program donor apheresis and transplantation. However, cryopreservation might influence on the different pattern of aGVHD, issue that deserves further studies.
Assuntos
Criopreservação , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/patologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico/métodos , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Doença Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro/mortalidade , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Neoplasias Hematológicas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hematológicas/patologia , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Agonistas Mieloablativos/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Doadores de Tecidos , Transplante Homólogo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Bone marrow mononuclear cell (BM-MNC) intra-arterial transplantation improves recovery in experimental models of ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess the safety, feasibility, and biological effects of autologous BM-MNC transplantation in patients with stroke. METHODS: A single-blind (outcomes assessor) controlled Phase I/II trial was conducted in patients with middle cerebral artery stroke. Autologous BM-MNCs were injected intra-arterially between 5 and 9 days after stroke. Follow-up was done for up to 6 months and blood samples were collected for biological markers. The primary outcome was safety and feasibility of the procedure. The secondary outcome was improvement in neurological function. RESULTS: Ten cases (BM-MNC-treated) and 10 control subjects (BM-MNC-nontreated) were consecutively included. Mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale before the procedure was 15.6. Mean BM-MNCs injected were 1.59×10(8). There was no death, stroke recurrence, or tumor formation during follow-up, although 2 cases had an isolate partial seizure at 3 months. After transplantation, higher plasma levels of beta nerve growth factor (ß-nerve growth factor) were found compared with control subjects (P=0.02). There were no significant differences in neurological function at 180 days. A trend to positive correlation between number of CD34+ cells injected and Barthel Index was found (r=0.56, P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial BM-MNC transplantation in subacute ischemic stroke is feasible and seems to be safe. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm the safety and elucidate the efficacy of BM-MNC transplantation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00761982.
Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antígenos CD34 , Transplante de Medula Óssea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/sangue , Hemodinâmica/fisiologia , Humanos , Infarto da Artéria Cerebral Média/complicações , Infarto da Artéria Cerebral Média/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fator de Crescimento Neural/sangue , Exame Neurológico , Projetos Piloto , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
UNLABELLED: Background The number of CD34(+) cells mobilized from bone marrow to peripheral blood after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor varies greatly among healthy donors. This fact might be explained, at least in part, by constitutional differences in genes involved in the interactions tethering CD34(+) cells to the bone marrow. DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed genetic characteristics associated with CD34(+) cell mobilization in 112 healthy individuals receiving granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim; 10 µg/kg; 5 days). RESULTS: Genetic variants in VCAM1 and in CD44 were associated with the number of CD34(+) cells in peripheral blood after granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration (P = 0.02 and P = 0.04, respectively), with the quantity of CD34(+) cells ×106/kg of donor (4.6 versus 6.3; P < 0.001 and 7 versus 5.6; P = 0.025, respectively), and with total CD34(+) cells ×106 (355 versus 495; P = 0.002 and 522 versus 422; P = 0.012, respectively) in the first apheresis. Of note, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration was associated with complete disappearance of VCAM1 mRNA expression in peripheral blood. Moreover, genetic variants in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor (CSF3R) and in CXCL12 were associated with a lower and higher number of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized CD34(+) cells/µL in peripheral blood (81 versus 106; P = 0.002 and 165 versus 98; P=0.02, respectively) and a genetic variant in CXCR4 was associated with a lower quantity of CD34(+) cells ×106/kg of donor and total CD34(+) cells ×106 (5.3 versus 6.7; P = 0.02 and 399 versus 533; P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions In conclusion, genetic variability in molecules involved in migration and homing of CD34(+) cells influences the degree of mobilization of these cells.
Assuntos
Antígenos CD34/genética , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Mobilização de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Receptores de Hialuronatos/genética , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único/genética , Molécula 1 de Adesão de Célula Vascular/genética , Células Cultivadas , Quimiocina CXCL12/genética , Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Receptores de Fator Estimulador de Colônias/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa , Doadores de TecidosRESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2016/8657173.].
RESUMO
Background and Purpose. BM-MNC transplantation improves recovery in experimental models of ischemic stroke. Clinical trials are ongoing to test efficacy in stroke patients. However, whether cell dose is related to outcomes is not known. Methods. We performed a pooling data analysis of two pilot clinical trials with autologous BM-MNCs transplantation in ischemic stroke patients. Cell dose and route were analyzed to evaluate their relation to good outcome (m-Rankin scale [mRS] score 0-2) at 6 months. Results. Twenty-two patients were included. A median of 153 × 10(6) (±121 × 10(6)) BM-MNCs was injected. Intra-arterial route was used in 77.3% of cases. A higher number of cells injected were associated with better outcomes at 180 days (390 × 10(6) [320-422] BM-MNCs injected in those patients with mRS of 0-2 at 6 months versus 130 × 10(6) [89-210] in those patients with mRS 3-6, p = 0.015). In the intra-arterially treated patients, a strong correlation between dose of cells and disability was found (r = -0.63, p = 0.006). A cut point of 310 × 10(6) injected cells predicted good outcome with 80% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity. Conclusions. Similar to preclinical studies, a higher dose of autologous BM-MNC was related to better outcome in stroke patients, especially when more than 310 × 10(6) cells are injected. Further interventional studies are warranted to confirm these data.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Optimal haemostasis management can improve patient outcomes and reduce blood loss and transfusion volume in orthotopic-liver-transplant (OLT). METHODS: We performed a prospective study including 200 consecutive OLTs. The first 100 patients were treated according to the clinic's standards and the next 100 patients were treated using the new point-of-care (POC)-based haemostasis management strategy. Transfusion parameters and other outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Transfusion requirements were reduced in the POC group. The median and IQR of red-blood-cells (RBC) transfusion units were reduced from 5 [2-8] to 3 [0-5] (p < 0.001), plasma from 2 [0-4] to 0 (p < 0.001), and platelets from 1 [0-4] to 0 [0-1] (p < 0.001), into the POC group only four patients received tranexamic acid and fibrinogen transfusion rate was 1.13 ± 1.44 g (p = 0.001). We also improved the incidence of transfusion avoidance, 5% vs. 24% (p < 0.001) and reduced the incidence of massive transfusion (defined as the transfusion of more than 10 RBC units), 13% vs. 2% (p = 0.005). We also observed a relationship between RBC transfusion requirements and preoperative haemoglobin, and between platelet transfusion and preoperative fibrinogen levels. The incidence of postoperative complications, such as, reoperation for bleeding, acute-kidney-failure or haemodynamic instability was significantly lower (13.0% vs. 5%, p = 0.048, 17% vs. 2%, p < 0.001, and 29% vs. 16%, p = 0.028). Overall, blood product transfusion was associated with increased risk of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: A haemostatic therapy algorithm based on POC monitoring reduced transfusion and improved outcome in OLT.
Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Transplante de Fígado/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Injúria Renal Aguda/etiologia , Injúria Renal Aguda/patologia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/economia , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Hemoglobinas/metabolismo , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hemorragia/patologia , Hemorragia/terapia , Hemostasia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transfusão de Plaquetas/economia , Transfusão de Plaquetas/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
RATIONALE: No neuroprotective or neurorestorative therapies have been approved for ischemic stroke. Bone marrow mononuclear cell intra-arterial transplantation improves recovery in experimental models of ischemic stroke. AIMS: This trial aims to test safety and efficacy of intra-arterial injection of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell in ischemic stroke patients. DESIGN: Multicenter, prospective, phase II, randomized, controlled (non-treated group as control), assessor-blinded clinical trial. Seventy-six stroke patients will be enrolled. Patients fulfilling clinical and radiological criteria (e.g. age between 18 and 80 years, middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6-20 within one- to seven-days from stroke onset and no lacunar stroke) will be randomized to intervention or control group (1 : 1). Bone marrow harvest and intra-arterial injection of autologous bone marrow mononuclear cell will be done in the intervention group with two different doses (2 × 10(6) /kg or 5 × 10(6) /kg in 1 : 1 proportion). Patients will be stratified at randomization by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score. Patients will be followed up for two-years. STUDY OUTCOMES: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale scores of 0-2 at 180 days. Secondary outcomes include National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale and Barthel scores at six-months, infarct volume, mortality, and seizures. DISCUSSION: This is the first trial to explore efficacy of different doses of intra-arterial bone marrow mononuclear cell in moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke patients. The trial is registered as NCT02178657.
Assuntos
Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Isquemia Encefálica/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Arteriais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Método Simples-Cego , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Bone marrow mononuclear cell (BM-MNC) intra-arterial transplantation improves recovery in experimental models of ischemic stroke through secretion of cytokines and growth factors (GFs), enhancing neoangiogenesis, and enhancing neuroplasticity. In this study, we tested whether BM-MNC transplantation in stroke patients induces changes in serum levels of cytokines and GFs. A phase I/II trial was conducted in middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke patients with autologous intra-arterial BM-MNC transplantation between 5 and 9 days after stroke. Follow-up was done for up to 6 months. Eight cases and nine controls were included, and the serum levels of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), ß nerve growth factor (ß-NGF), and matrix metalloproteinases 2 (MMP-2) and 9 (MMP-9) were measured before and 4, 8, and 90 days after transplantation. The correlation of these serum levels with dose of cells and clinical outcomes was studied. A total of 1.59 × 10(8) (±1.21 × 10(8)) BM-MNCs were injected in cases; of them 3.38 × 10(6) (±2.33 × 10(6)) were CD34(+) cells. There was a positive correlation between total BM-MNCs injected and levels of GM-CSF and PDGF-BB at 90 days after transplantation (r = 0.929, p = 0.001 and r = 0.714, p = 0.047, respectively), and a negative correlation between total CD34(+) cells injected and MMP-2 levels at 4 days after transplantation (r = -0.786, p = 0.036). Lower plasma levels of MMP-2 at 4 days and higher levels of PDGF-BB at 90 days were associated with better functional outcomes during follow-up (p = 0.019 and p = 0.037, respectively). When administered intra-arterially in subacute MCA stroke patients, BM-MNCs seem to induce changes in serum levels of GM-CSF, PDGF-BB, and MMP-2, even 3 months after transplantation, which could be associated with better functional outcomes. This manuscript is published as part of the International Association of Neurorestoratology (IANR) special issue of Cell Transplantation.