Exercise training decreases dyspnea and the distress and anxiety associated with it. Monitoring alone may be as effective as coaching.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine whether exercise training with coaching is more effective than exercise training alone in reducing dyspnea and the anxiety and distress associated with it and improving exercise performance, self-efficacy for walking, and dyspnea with activities of daily living. DESIGN: Randomized clinical trial of 51 dyspnea-limited patients with COPD assigned to monitored (n = 27) or coached (n = 24) exercise groups. SETTING: Outpatient area of university teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: Both groups completed 12 supervised treadmill training sessions (phase 1) over 4 weeks followed by 8 weeks of home walking (phase 2). The CE group also received coaching during training. MEASUREMENTS: Perceived work of breathing, dyspnea intensity, distress associated with dyspnea, and anxiety associated with dyspnea were rated on a visual analog scale during incremental treadmill testing and after 6-min walks before and after phase 1. Dyspnea with activities of daily living, self-efficacy for walking, state anxiety, and 6-min walks were measured before and after both phases. RESULTS: Dyspnea and the associated distress and anxiety improved significantly for both groups relative to work performed and in relation to ventilation (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between groups in any outcomes. The phase 1 improvement in laboratory dyspnea was accompanied by improvements in dyspnea with activities of daily living (p < 0.01) and self-efficacy for home walking (p < 0.01) that were sustained during the home phase. CONCLUSIONS: Coaching with exercise training was no more effective than exercise training alone in improving exercise performance, dyspnea, and the anxiety and distress associated with it, dyspnea with activities, and self-efficacy for walking.

Ethnic differences: word descriptors used by African-American and white asthma patients during induced bronchoconstriction.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine if African-American and white patients with asthma (1) differ in the words they use to describe their breathlessness, and (2) differ in their perception of breathlessness. DESIGN: Descriptive cross-sectional design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study setting was located in Northern California, an ethnically and economically diverse area. A total of 32 subjects, 16 per group, completed the study. MEASUREMENTS: All had a provocation concentration of methacholine chloride causing a 30% fall in FEV(1) (PC(30)) of

Frequency, manifestations, and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein harvest incisions.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency, manifestations, and correlates of impaired healing of saphenous vein (SV) harvest incisions in hospitalized patients who had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). DESIGN: Prospective, descriptive, correlational. SETTING: West Coast university-affiliated medical center. PATIENTS: Thirty-two English-speaking adults who had undergone CABG. OUTCOME MEASURES: Impaired wound healing of SV-harvest incisions. RESULTS: The overall incidence of impaired healing was 43.8%. The most frequent manifestations of impaired wound healing at discharge were prolonged erythema (8/32), prolonged drainage (8/32), and both prolonged erythema and drainage (2/32). Correlates of impaired healing of SV-harvest incisions were body mass index (product-moment correlation = 0.39, p = 0.026) and preoperative use of diuretics (point biserial correlation = 0.42, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Impaired healing of SV-harvest incisions in this sample occurred more frequently than previously indicated in the literature. Although severe wound infections were infrequent, a high degree of impaired healing occurred (43.8% of patients who had undergone CABG). Future studies need to explore the long-term effects of impaired healing and test interventions to mitigate impaired healing in this population.

Desensitization and guided mastery: treatment approaches for the management of dyspnea.

Dyspnea is a frequent and distressing symptom for people with cardiopulmonary disease. Activity tolerance with presumably less dyspnea has been shown to increase after patients have been exposed to higher than usual dyspnea in a safe, monitored environment. Authors have suggested this decrease in dyspnea with activity may be due to a process of "desensitization" to the anxiety associated with the shortness of breath. The use of desensitization for other symptoms and phobias has evolved over time from an exposure-anxiety approach to a coping-mastery paradigm, labeled by some as guided mastery. This article reviews selected research studies that have used desensitization and guided mastery to treat other symptoms and phobias. Components of these two approaches are described and clinical strategies incorporating the two techniques with pulmonary patients during exercise-induced dyspnea are presented. A conceptual model that relates the two treatment approaches to the perception of the symptom and health outcomes is proposed.

Development and testing of the Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire (PFSDQ).

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire (PFSDQ) that measures both intensity of dyspnea with activities and changes (reductions or improvements) in the ability of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary, disease to perform daily activities. DESIGN: Instrument development and initial testing for validity and reliability. SETTING: Hospital-based pulmonary rehabilitation program. PATIENTS: One hundred thirty-one adult male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Mean age was 63.7 +/- 6.2 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire, pulmonary function and exercise parameters. RESULTS: The PFSDQ is a 164-item paper and pencil self-administered questionnaire and consists of two components measuring dyspnea intensity with activities and changes in functional ability related to 79 activities of daily living. Activities are grouped into scales of self-care, mobility, eating, home management, social, and recreational. The dyspnea component measures the level of dyspnea patients report with these activities. The functional abilities component evaluates the degree to which the performance of activities has changed as the result of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The activities are relevant for adults of both sexes and reflect various energy workload requirements. Normative data for both components were described. Content and initial construct validity of the PFSDQ was supported by clinical experts and findings related related to expected theoretical relationships. Internal consistency reliability for both the dyspnea and functional abilities components was 0.91. The alpha coefficients for the scales ranged from 0.88 to 0.94. A case study was used to describe the clinical application of the PFSDQ. CONCLUSION: The PFSDQ can be used clinically and in research studies to assess dyspnea and changes in the functional ability of patients with pulmonary disease. Although further testing is warranted, initial evaluation supports the validity and reliability of the PFSDQ.

Differentiation between dyspnea and its affective components.

This study investigated whether people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) can differentiate distress and anxiety associated with dyspnea from the intensity of dyspnea and the perceived effort of breathing. Fifty-two subjects with COPD rated their perception of the individual components of dyspnea on a 200 mm visual analog scale at rest, after a 6-min walk (6MD), and every 2 min during an incremental treadmill test (ET). Subjects differentiated among the four dyspnea components at the end of the 6MD (p < .0001) and during ET (at rest, p < 0.001; at 75% VO2 max, p < 0.0001; and at end exercise, p < 0.0001). Intensity was significantly related to perceived effort of breathing (p < .0001), as distress was to anxiety (p < .0001), suggesting that each pair measures similar components. Subjects were able to differentiate their affective response to dyspnea from the intensity of the symptom. Measurement of a patient's affective response to dyspnea may improve the selection of specific treatments and validity of outcomes.

Dyspnea in the weaning patient: assessment and intervention.

Dyspnea, the subjective sensation of uncomfortable breathing, is frequently experienced by patients during weaning from mechanical ventilation. As the clinical manifestation of increased work of breathing, dyspnea can be a valuable predictor and indicator of changes in patient respiratory status during the weaning process. The importance of measuring dyspnea is emphasized and the numerical rating and visual analog scales as direct measures of dyspnea are described. The most reliable physiologic variables that can be used to indirectly estimate dyspnea are discussed. Strategies such as positioning, coaching, "bagging," inspiratory muscle training, pressure support ventilation, oxygen, and relaxation/biofeedback techniques that can be used by the critical care nurse to decrease dyspnea are suggested.

Accuracy of recall of dyspnea after exercise training sessions.

BACKGROUND: Although clinicians often rely on patients' retrospective reporting of dyspnea, it is not known if dyspnea scores recalled after exercise are equivalent to dyspnea scores during exercise. The objective of this study was to determine whether patients could accurately recall after exercise the maximum ratings of the intensity of dyspnea and the anxiety associated with it that they experienced during exercise. METHODS: Forty-nine patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (forced expiratory volume in 1 second 0.92 +/- 0.23 L) participating in a randomized clinical trial of the impact of coached versus monitored exercise training on dyspnea rated dyspnea intensity (shortness of breath [SOB]) and dyspnea-related anxiety (DA) on a visual analog scale every 2 minutes during treadmill exercise. After each of 12 training sessions each subject was asked to rate the worst level of the two sensations that they recalled having experienced during exercise. RESULTS: For the groups as a whole, actual maximum scores for SOB and DA during exercise were highly correlated with recalled maximum values after exercise (r > or = 0.85, P < 0.0001) and the average differences were small (0-10.9 mm on a 200-mm scale). However, individual variation was substantial, limiting predictability for individual ratings. CONCLUSIONS: After exercise, patients with COPD as a group can accurately recall the worst SOB and DA that they experienced during exercise. This finding supports the further study and use of retrospective symptom ratings as a method for dyspnea assessment during exercise training in pulmonary rehabilitation.

Dyspnea and the affective response during exercise training in obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Dyspnea (SOB), dyspnea-related anxiety (DA), and exercise performance have been shown to improve after exercise training in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). However, there are no published descriptions of the changes in dyspnea intensity or dyspnea-related anxiety during or across the exercise training sessions. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the differences in the patterns of change in SOB, DA, and exercise performance during 12 exercise training sessions with and without nurse coaching. METHODS: Forty-five dyspnea-limited patients with COPD were randomly assigned to nurse-monitored (ME) or nurse-coached exercise (CE). SOB and DA were rated on a 200 mm VAS every 2 minutes during each of 12 treadmill training sessions. RESULTS: Warm-up, peak, cool-down, mean SOB, and peak SOB/stage remained constant over the exercise sessions, with increasing exercise performance for both groups over the 12 sessions (p < .001). There was a significant difference in the pattern of mean SOB over time between the ME and CE group (p < . 05). Mean, peak DA, and peak DA/stage showed a rapid decrease within the first 4 sessions (p < . 05) with no significant differences between the groups. Warm-up and cool-down DA remained constant. There were large intra- and inter-subject variations in the rating of dyspnea and dyspnea-related anxiety within and across sessions. CONCLUSIONS: As theoretically proposed, both groups significantly decreased their DA over the training sessions. This decrease was early in the sessions and was not accompanied by a decrease in the SOB. In contrast, subjects maintained a nearly constant mean and peak SOB with increasing exercise performance, suggesting that people may have a dyspnea threshold above which they are unable to tolerate greater dyspnea. Description of the changes in dyspnea and the affective response during training need to be expanded, while studying the type and timing of strategies to enhance the improvement in dyspnea and dyspnea-related anxiety.