Can We Finally Move the Needle on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Nursing?

Much attention has been given to diversity, equity, and inclusion in health care for more than a decade. This has resulted in slow progression in moving the needle. Minority nurses continue to be unrepresented and express higher levels of dissatisfaction in comparison with their White counterparts. Minority nurses report significantly higher odds of being dissatisfied with their independence at work, advancement opportunities, salary, and tuition benefits. This article provides a context for minority nurse underrepresentation and dissatisfaction and suggests actionable interventions to make nursing more inclusive.

Exploring correlation of nurse manager meaning and joy in work with employee engagement.

AIM: To determine the correlation between meaning and joy in work among managers with employee engagement. BACKGROUND: The Institute of Healthcare Improvement and the National Patient Safety Foundation both recognize the link between joy and meaning in work and an optimally performing healthcare system. The relationship between manager joy and employee engagement is unknown. Furthermore, the Meaning and Joy in Work Questionnaire (MJWQ) has not been previously used with nurse managers. METHOD: A descriptive correlational design was used with results from a prospective survey of nurse managers correlated with pre-existing employee engagement quality data. Chronbach's alpha was used to measure internal consistency of the tool in this population. RESULTS: No significant correlation was found between nurse manager meaning and joy in work and employee engagement (r = 0.216; NS (n = 28)) or employee perception of their manager (s = 0.227, NS (n = 28)). A significant strong correlation between employee engagement scores and employee perception of their managers (r = 0.774. p < .001 (n = 28)) was identified. Internal consistency was moderately high: value/connections (alpha = 0.736), meaningful work (alpha = 0.933), caring (alpha = 0.817) and total instrument score (alpha = 0.923). Effect size = 0.28. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: While we did not find significant correlation between manager meaning and joy in work with employee engagement, the MJWQ may be a valuable tool to explore nurse manager's meaning and joy in work and the potential relationship of this construct to employee engagement and associated outcomes. The expansion of the sample size across multiple healthcare systems may lead to different results.

NICHE Recommended Care of the Critically Ill Older Adult.

Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders provides evidence-based best practices for the care of the hospitalized older adult. Older adults are a vulnerable population at greater risk of functional decline during and after hospitalization, safety concerns related to polypharmacy, ineffective pain management, and population-specific physiological responses to medications. Family members of hospitalized older adults are also vulnerable and may experience postintensive care syndrome. This manuscript explores the application of Nurses Improving Care for Healthsystem Elders standards through a case study approach to optimize patient/family-centered care of the critically ill older adult.

Reporting on Neurological Decline as Identified by Hourly Neuroassessments.

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Hourly neurological examinations (neuro exam) have been widely used to monitor for a decline in neurological status, allowing for timely intervention. There are, however, limited data behind this common practice. The objective of this study was to identify how frequently neurological decline occurred across various diagnoses and whether that decline (1) was identified by a scheduled neurocheck and (2) altered management. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was performed in a neurological intensive care unit at a tertiary care academic medical center. Clinical neuroscience nurses caring for patients with hourly neurological assessments completed a brief survey at 12-hour shift completion. RESULTS: Data were collected from 212 nurse's shifts. Neurological changes were identified by nurses in 14% (n = 30) of shifts. The neurological change was identified during a scheduled neurocheck 67% of the time, with the detection of changes more likely to occur during a scheduled neuro exam than at other times ( P < .05). There was no change to the care plan in 55% of the cases of neurological decline. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage were more likely to have a decline detected. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that many patients undergo hourly neurological exams without ever identifying a neurological deterioration. In many instances of neurodeterioration, there was no change to the treatment plan pursued. Primary diagnoses and neurological changes may not be entirely independent, and therefore, hourly neuro exams may have greater yield in some diagnoses than others. Replication is warranted with a larger sample to evaluate the risks and benefits of neuroassessments.

An observational descriptive study of the epidemiology and treatment of neuropathic pain in a UK general population.

BACKGROUND: This study updated our knowledge of UK primary care neuropathic pain incidence rates and prescribing practices. METHODS: Patients with a first diagnosis of post-herpetic neuralgia (PHN), painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) or phantom limb pain (PLP) were identified from the General Practice Research Database (2006 - 2010) and incidence rates were calculated. Prescription records were searched for pain treatments from diagnosis of these conditions and the duration and daily dose estimated for first-line and subsequent treatment regimens. Recording of neuropathic back and post-operative pain was investigated. RESULTS: The study included 5,920 patients with PHN, 5,340 with PDN, and 185 with PLP. The incidence per 10,000 person-years was 3.4 (95% CI 3.4, 3.5) for PHN; and 0.11 (95% CI 0.09, 0.12) for PLP. Validation of the PDN case definition suggested that was not sensitive. Incident PHN increased over the study period. The most common first-line treatments were amitriptyline or gabapentin in the PDN and PLP cohorts, and amitriptyline or co-codamol (codeine-paracetamol) in PHN. Paracetamol, co-dydramol (paracetamol-dihydrocodeine) and capsaicin were also often prescribed in one or more condition. Most first-line treatments comprised only one therapeutic class. Use of antiepileptics licensed for neuropathic pain treatment had increased since 2002-2005. Amitriptyline was the only antidepressant prescribed commonly as a first-line treatment. CONCLUSION: The UK incidence of diagnosed PHN has increased with the incidence of back-pain and post-operative pain unclear. While use of licensed antiepileptics increased, prescribing of therapy with little evidence of efficacy in neuropathic pain is still common and consequently treatment was often not in-line with current guidance.

Macrovascular and microvascular outcomes after beginning of insulin versus additional oral glucose-lowering therapy in people with type 2 diabetes: an observational study.

PURPOSE: In type 2 diabetes, the optimal stage to introduce insulin can be unclear. We compared the incidence of subsequent vascular disease between treatment regimens, that is, adding another oral glucose-lowering drug (OGLD) versus starting insulin treatment. METHODS: People with poor control on OGLDs who intensified treatment (2000-2007) were grouped by number of baseline OGLDs. Two composite endpoints, of macrovascular disease (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome and stroke) and of microvascular disease (peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy or retinopathy), together with HbA(1c) and weight change over a year, were compared in those beginning insulin versus an additional OGLD. All data came from The Health Information Network UK primary care database. RESULTS: After exclusions, 14,904 people intensified treatment from one OGLD, 7231 from two and 978 from three, 9, 41 and 90%, respectively, started insulin. Average follow-up was 3.5 years. The adjusted hazard ratios for macrovascular events, OGLD versus insulin, were 0.53 (95%CI 0.42, 0.69) from one baseline treatment, 0.85 (0.70 1.04) from two and 1.07 (0.50, 2.30) from three, with no difference in risk of microvascular disease in any comparison. Mean body weight increased, and mean HbA(1c) fell across groups; the only significant adjusted comparison was greater weight increase when commencing insulin from one OGLD. CONCLUSIONS: Starting insulin rather than adding another OGLD to double or triple oral therapy did not significantly increase the incidence of vascular events. Beginning insulin from one OGLD was uncommon. More incident macrovascular disease in this group may be caused by residual confounding.

The impact and burden of chronic pain in the workplace: a qualitative systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain (CP) poses a diverse and substantial burden for employees, employers, and society. The deleterious consequences of CP in the workplace are frequently underestimated. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the burden of CP in the European workplace. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA statement guidelines was conducted to identify studies reporting work-related outcomes for people with CP. EMBASE, MEDLINE, EconLit, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to 18th August 2010. RESULTS: We identified 91 observational studies. Few were specifically designed to investigate the association between CP, productivity, and employment. The focus for this review was studies clearly reporting outcomes relating to the burden of CP on employment status (n = 37), sickness absence (absenteeism, n = 47), and loss of productivity because of reduced ability at work (presenteeism, n = 8). CONCLUSION: The body of evidence identified from the systematic review indicates that CP has a substantial negative impact on work-related outcomes, supporting the importance of interventions to reduce the burden of CP. Well-designed prospective studies specifically assessing the direct consequences of CP on employment are needed to confirm these findings.

Peer review of presentations through examination software.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Peer evaluations are often utilized to allow student pharmacists practice in giving and receiving feedback. In a small class setting, these can easily be completed and feedback distributed quickly. However, in the larger class setting, reviewing and disseminating peer feedback can be quite cumbersome, especially if using paper format. The purpose of this educational activity was to create a process for peer evaluations that allows for efficient collection and dissemination of peer feedback of presentations of student pharmacists and describe the student experience with this new format. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: In Research Topics in Pharmacy II, an electronic peer-evaluation tool was created using electronic examination software to collect and distribute this peer review in a timely fashion during and after each class session. At the completion of this course, a survey was distributed to collect student pharmacists' perception of this electronic peer-review process. FINDINGS: A total of 63 of 91 students (69%) completed the survey. The majority of the students (98.4%) "strongly agreed" or "agreed" the peer-evaluation items made it easy to provide feedback to their peers and 79% preferred this electronic method of feedback vs. paper format. Overall, 93.6% of student pharmacists felt they were more engaged during the presentations as a result of providing electronic feedback. SUMMARY: Maximizing our resources by creating an electronic peer evaluation with our current examination software, allowed for an efficient means of obtaining and disseminating peer review that was timely and well-received by students.

WITHDRAWN. Anticonvulsant drugs for acute and chronic pain.

BACKGROUND: Anticonvulsant drugs have been used in the management of pain since the 1960s. The clinical impression is that they are useful for chronic neuropathic pain, especially when the pain is lancinating or burning. Readers are referred to reviews of carbamazepine and gabapentin in T he Cochrane Library which replace the information on those drugs in this review. Other drugs remain unchanged at present in this review OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the analgesic effectiveness and adverse effects of anticonvulsant drugs for pain management in clinical practice . Migraine and headache studies are excluded in this revision. SEARCH STRATEGY: Randomised trials of anticonvulsants in acute, chronic or cancer pain were identified by MEDLINE (1966-1999), EMBASE (1994-1999), SIGLE (1980 to 1999) and the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 1999). In addition, 41 medical journals were hand searched. Additional reports were identified from the reference list of the retrieved papers, and by contacting investigators. Date of most recent search: September 1999. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials reporting the analgesic effects of anticonvulsant drugs in patients, with subjective pain assessment as either the primary or a secondary outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two independent review authors, and trials were quality scored. Numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs) were calculated from dichotomous data for effectiveness, adverse effects and drug-related study withdrawal, for individual studies and for pooled data. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-three trials of six anticonvulsants were considered eligible (1074 patients).The only placebo-controlled study in acute pain found no analgesic effect of sodium valproate.Three placebo-controlled studies of carbamazepine in trigeminal neuralgia had a combined NNT (95% confidence interval (CI)) for effectiveness of 2.5 (CI 2.0 to 3.4). A single placebo-controlled trial of gabapentin in post-herpetic neuralgia had an NNT of 3.2 (CI 2.4 to 5.0). For diabetic neuropathy NNTs for effectiveness were as follows: (one RCT for each drug) carbamazepine 2.3 (CI 1.6 to 3.8), gabapentin 3.8 (CI 2.4 to 8.7) and phenytoin 2.1 (CI 1.5 to 3.6).Numbers-needed-to-harm (NNHs) were calculated where possible by combining studies for each drug entity irrespective of the condition treated. The results were, for minor harm, carbamazepine 3.7 (CI 2.4 to 7.8), gabapentin 2.5 (CI 2.0 to 3.2), phenytoin 3.2 (CI 2.1 to 6.3). NNHs for major harm were not statistically significant for any drug compared with placebo.Phenytoin had no effect in irritable bowel syndrome, and carbamazepine little effect in post-stroke pain. Clonazepam was effective in one study of temporomandibular joint dysfunction. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Although anticonvulsants are used widely in chronic pain surprisingly few trials show analgesic effectiveness. Only one study identified considered cancer pain. There is no evidence that anticonvulsants are effective for acute pain. In chronic pain syndromes other than trigeminal neuralgia, anticonvulsants should be withheld until other interventions have been tried. While gabapentin is increasingly being used for neuropathic pain the evidence would suggest that it is not superior to carbamazepine.

Primary care incidence and treatment of four neuropathic pain conditions: a descriptive study, 2002-2005.

BACKGROUND: Between 1992 and 2001 the UK general practice incidence of post-herpetic neuralgia and trigeminal neuralgia declined, whilst the incidence of painful diabetic neuropathy increased. The most common first line treatments were compound analgesics. As therapeutic options have subsequently changed, this study presents updated data on incidence and prescribing patterns in neuropathic pain. METHODS: A descriptive analysis of the epidemiology and prescription treatment at diagnosis of incident post-herpetic neuralgia (n = 1,923); trigeminal neuralgia (1,862); phantom limb pain (57) and painful diabetic neuropathy (1,444) using computerised UK general practice records (THIN): May 2002 to July 2005. RESULTS: Primary care incidences per 100,000 person years observation of 28 (95% confidence interval (CI) 27-30) for post-herpetic neuralgia, 27 (95%CI 26-29) for trigeminal neuralgia, 0.8 (95%CI 0.6-1.1) for phantom limb pain and 21 (95%CI 20-22) for painful diabetic neuropathy are reported. The most common initial treatments were tricyclic antidepressants (post-herpetic neuralgia) or antiepileptics (trigeminal neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy) and opioid analgesics (phantom limb pain). The mean number of changes before a stable drug regimen was 1.2 to 1.5 for trigeminal neuralgia, painful diabetic neuropathy and post-herpetic neuralgia, and 2.4 for phantom limb pain. CONCLUSION: The incidence of phantom limb pain and post-herpetic neuralgia are decreasing whilst painful diabetic neuropathy plateaued and trigeminal neuralgia remained constant. Despite more frequent use of antidepressants and antiepileptics for first line treatment, as opposed to conventional non-opioid analgesics, changes to therapy are common before a stable regimen is reached.

A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of a single session of nurse administered massage for short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain.

BACKGROUND: Massage is increasingly used to manage chronic pain but its benefit has not been clearly established. The aim of the study is to determine the effectiveness of a single session of nurse-administered massage for the short term relief of chronic non-malignant pain and anxiety. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial design was used, in which the patients were assigned to a massage or control group. The massage group received a 15 minute manual massage and the control group a 15 minute visit to talk about their pain. Adult patients attending a pain relief unit with a diagnosis of chronic pain whose pain was described as moderate or severe were eligible for the study. An observer blind to the patients' treatment group carried out assessments immediately before (baseline), after treatment and 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours later. Pain was assessed using 100 mm visual analogue scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain Relief was assessed using a five point verbal rating scale. Anxiety was assessed with the Spielberger short form State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. RESULTS: 101 patients were randomised and evaluated, 50 in the massage and 51 in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups at baseline interview. Patients in the massage but not the control group had significantly less pain compared to baseline immediately after and one hour post treatment. 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean pain reduction at one hour post treatment between the massage and control groups is 5.47 mm to 24.70 mm. Patients in the massage but not the control group had a statistically significant reduction in anxiety compared to baseline immediately after and at 1 hour post treatment. CONCLUSION: Massage is effective in the short term for chronic pain of moderate to severe intensity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: [ISRCTN98406653].

Variation in the placebo effect in randomised controlled trials of analgesics: all is as blind as it seems.

The objective was to investigate the relationship between pain relief scores produced by placebo and by active interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Individual patient categorical pain relief scores from 5 placebo-controlled single-dose parallel-group RCTs in acute postoperative pain were used to calculate the percentage of the maximum possible pain relief score (%maxTOTPAR) for the different treatments. One hundred and thirty of the 525 patients in the 5 trials had a placebo. Individual patients' scores with placebo varied from 0 to 100% of the maximum possible pain relief. The proportion who obtained more than 50% of the maximum possible pain relief with placebo varied from 7% to 37% across the trials; with the active drugs the variation was from 5 to 63%. Mean placebo scores were related to the mean score for the active treatments in each study; the higher the mean active score, the higher the mean placebo score. This relationship disappeared when median values were used. Medical folklore has it that the amount of relief obtained with placebo is one-third of the maximum possible (and does not vary), and that one-third of patients respond to placebo. The results show that the amount of relief obtained with placebo varies considerably between patients, that 38% of patients obtained more than 10% of the maximum possible relief, and 16% obtained greater than 50%. In double-blind, randomised parallel-group studies of high quality placebo scores should not vary. Despite these conditions being met the placebo scores did vary. The previous explanation, of a relationship between the mean placebo scores and the mean scores for the active treatments was not supported.

Postoperative orthopaedic pain--the effect of opiate premedication and local anaesthetic blocks.

The postoperative analgesic effect of opiate premedication and local anaesthetic blocks was studied in 929 patients having orthopaedic surgery. The median time to first request for postoperative analgesia was less than 2 h when neither opiate premedication nor block was used; opiate premedication increased the time significantly to more than 5 h; local anaesthetic block produced a further significant increase to 8 h and opiate premedication used with local anaesthetic block extended the median time further to more than 9 h. Women requested analgesia significantly earlier than men, independent of treatment. Age had no significant effect. Prolonging the time before more pain relief is required may be worthwhile for both patients and staff.

Dextromethorphan for the treatment of neuropathic pain: a double-blind randomised controlled crossover trial with integral n-of-1 design.

The aim was to compare the analgesic effectiveness and adverse effect incidence of oral dextromethorphan (DM) with placebo in patients with neuropathic pain. The first 10-day treatment period was a multiple-dose double-blind randomised controlled cross-over comparison of 13.5 mg of DM 3 times a day (t.d.s.) with placebo t.d.s.: 5 treatment pairs, each pair 1 day DM and 1 day placebo. The second 10-day treatment period used 27 mg of DM t.d.s. vs. placebo, with the same design. The study incorporated a 5 pair n-of-1 design for each of the 2 doses of DM. Patients took the study medication in addition to any pre-existing analgesic regime. Patients who reported benefit could continue with DM after the study. Nineteen patients with chronic neuropathic pain were studied over two 10-day treatment periods. Outcome measures were pain intensity, pain relief, adverse effects, mood, sleep and global rating of treatment. These were recorded by daily patient diaries and by clinic assessments before and after each treatment period. There were no significant differences between DM and placebo on any of the clinic assessment outcome measures. Two patients had significantly better analgesia on more than one outcome measure on within-patient testing. One had better analgesia with DM. The other had better analgesia with placebo. Ten patients had no adverse effects on either dose of DM. Two patients withdrew during the first treatment period because of adverse effects (which included increased pain intensity), and 5 during the second period. Five patients continued with DM after the study for 1-3 months. No long-term clinical benefit was apparent in those who continued with open DM. Dextromethorphan at either 40.5 or 81 mg daily did not relieve neuropathic pain.

Oral aspirin in postoperative pain: a quantitative systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: A systematic review of the analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of single-dose aspirin compared with placebo in postoperative pain. DESIGN: Published studies were identified from systematic searching of bibliographic databases and reference lists of retrieved reports. Summed pain intensity and pain relief data were extracted and converted into dichotomous information to yield the number of patients with at least 50% pain relief. This was used to calculate the relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat for one patient to achieve at least 50% pain relief. For adverse effects, relative risk and number-needed-to-harm were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were planned to test the impact of different pain models, pain measurements, sample sizes, quality of study design, and study duration on the results. RESULTS: Seventy-two randomized single-dose trials met our inclusion criteria, with 3253 patients given aspirin, and 3297 placebo. Significant benefit of aspirin over placebo was shown for aspirin 600/650 mg, 1000 mg and 1200 mg, with numbers-needed-to-treat for at least 50% pain relief of 4.4 (4.0-4.9), 4.0 (3.2-5.4) and 2.4 (1.9-3.2) respectively. Single-dose aspirin 600/650 mg produced significantly more drowsiness and gastric irritation than placebo, with numbers-needed-to-harm of 28 (19-52) and 38 (22-174) respectively. Type of pain model, pain measurement, sample size, quality of study design, and study duration had no significant impact on the results. CONCLUSIONS: There was a clear dose-response for pain relief with aspirin, even though these were single dose studies. Adverse effects, drowsiness and gastric irritation were also evident in the single dose studies. The pain relief achieved with aspirin was very similar milligram for milligram to that seen with paracetamol.

The burden associated with neuropathic pain in Western Europe.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess the burden of neuropathic pain (NeP) on health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), health status, employment status, absenteeism and presenteeism, and direct medical costs in Western Europe. METHODS: Data are from the 2010 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) for five countries in western Europe: the UK, France, Spain, Germany, and Italy. Among subjects who reported experiencing pain in the past month, those who attributed their pain to NeP were compared with those who attributed their pain to another chronic pain condition other than NeP (the latter was the reference group). These two groups were compared on demographic and both pain and non-pain related comorbidities. Generalized linear models were used to estimate the independent contribution of the presence of NeP on: (a) HRQoL (using the SF-12v2); (b) self-reported health status (the first item of the SF-12v2); (c) employment status; (d) absenteeism and presenteeism (using the WPAI questionnaire); and (e) direct medical costs (estimated from self-reported healthcare resource use and unit costs from the literature). RESULTS: Relative to the chronic pain reference group, subjects with NeP reported a higher prevalence of severe daily pain (38.12% vs 12.67%, p < 0.05), lower labor force participation (39.68% vs 55.56%; p < 0.05), higher prevalence of sleep difficulties (59.14% vs 46.73%; p < 0.05), insomnia (45.61% vs 29.78%; p < 0.05) anxiety (42.42% vs 31.99%; p < 0.05), and depression (35.25% vs 24.03%; p < 0.05). NeP subjects reported higher rates of absenteeism (39.78% vs 21.47%; p < 0.05) and presenteeism (86.48% vs. 66.70%; p < 0.050). Direct medical costs were approximately twice as high compared to non-NeP controls. In addition, >80% of NeP patients reported having other pain conditions. Regression results amplified these findings by indicating the independent contribution of confounding factors on the presence of NeP. LIMITATIONS: The NHWS is an Internet-based survey and may not be representative of the respective country populations if Internet access is limited. Second, respondents are asked to report their experience of pain. Although respondents are asked if their pain condition has been diagnosed by a physician there is no separate clinical confirmation of the presence of pain, pain conditions reported, and the presence of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of NeP is associated with an increased disease burden in the chronic pain population. This is seen in terms of HRQoL, health status, employment experience, and direct medical costs.

Observational study of the association of first insulin type in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes with macrovascular and microvascular disease.

AIMS: To compare the risk of vascular disease, HbA1c and weight change, between first prescribed insulins in people with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: People included in THIN United Kingdom primary care record database who began insulin (2000-2007) after poor control on oral glucose-lowering agents (OGLD) were grouped by the number of OGLDs in their treatment regimen immediately before starting insulin (n = 3,485). Within OGLD group, Cox regression compared macrovascular (all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome and stroke) and microvascular disease (peripheral neuropathy, nephropathy, and retinopathy) between insulin type (basal, pre-mix or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn, NPH) while ANCOVAs compared haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) and weight change. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 3.6 years. Rates of incident macrovascular events were similar when basal insulin was compared to pre-mix or NPH, adjusted hazard ratio versus basal: pre-mix 1.08 (95% CI 0.73, 1.59); NPH 1.00 (0.63, 1.58) after two OGLDs, and pre-mix 0.97 (0.46, 2.02); NPH 0.77 (0.32, 1.86) after three OGLDs. An increased risk of microvascular disease in NPH versus basal after 3 OGLDs, adjusted hazard ratio 1.87 (1.04, 3.36), was not seen after two agents or in comparisons of basal and pre-mix. At one year, after two OGLDs, weight increase was less with basal compared with pre-mix. After three OGLDs, mean HbA(1c) had reduced less in basal versus pre-mix or NPH at 6-8 and at 9-11 months, and versus pre-mix at 12-14 months. CONCLUSION: We found no difference in the risk of macrovascular events between first insulins in the medium term when started during poor glycaemia control. The increased risk of microvascular events with NPH warrants further study. In certain groups, first use of basal insulin was associated with less gain in weight and decrease in HbA(1c) compared to other insulins.

Relationship between patient-reported disease severity and other clinical outcomes in osteoarthritis: a European perspective.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how patient-rated osteoarthritis (OA) severity correlates with other patient-reported and clinical outcomes in the European clinical setting. METHODS: We used the Adelphi Arthritis VII (2008) Disease Specific Program (DSP). OA severity was patient-rated using the question 'How bad would you say your arthritis is now?' with responses of 'mild,' 'moderate,' and 'severe.' Patient-reported outcomes included a 0-100 mm pain visual analogue scale (VAS); questions on daily functioning; Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) scale; and EuroQoL (EQ-5D). Regression models and chi-square analyses evaluated relationships between self-rated OA severity and other outcomes. RESULTS: Patient-reported data were available from 1739 individuals (63.1% female, mean age 64.4 [standard deviation 11.9] years) from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the UK. With increasing OA severity; mild (24.5%), moderate (56.3%), severe (19.2%), statistically significant differences (p<0.05) were observed with higher pain VAS scores (28.3, 49.9, 69.2, respectively), reduced function, and greater overall work impairment due to OA (24.3%, 38.5%, 68.6%, respectively). Significant associations of patient-reported OA severity with function and health status were indicated, including the EQ-5D health state index; 0.77 (mild), 0.62 (moderate), 0.30 (severe) (p<0.0001). Physicians tended to overestimate patients who rated their OA as mild, and underrate patients who rated their OA as severe. CONCLUSIONS: In five European countries, patient-rated OA severity was associated with other patient-reported outcomes, and may be of benefit in the clinical setting when choosing treatment options aimed at improving pain, function and productivity, providing an accurate and tangible assessment of patient's perceptions of their disease.

Epidemiology and treatment of neuropathic pain: the UK primary care perspective.

The true incidence of neuropathic pain is unknown, but it is believed to be under-diagnosed and treated inadequately, despite the availability of drugs with proven efficacy. Our objective was to report the epidemiology and drug treatment of neuropathic pain as managed by UK primary care physicians. A descriptive analysis of the epidemiology of incident post-herpetic neuralgia (n=12,386); trigeminal neuralgia (8268); phantom limb pain (451) and painful diabetic neuropathy (4719) and prescription treatment at diagnosis from computerised UK general practice records (GPRD): January 1992 to April 2002. Incidences per 100,000 person years observation of 40 (95% CI 39-41) for post-herpetic neuralgia, 27 (26-27) for trigeminal neuralgia, 1 (1-2) for phantom limb pain and 15 (15-16) for painful diabetic neuropathy are reported, with rates decreasing over time for phantom limb pain and post-herpetic neuralgia and increasing for painful diabetic neuropathy. Drugs were initiated at first diagnosis record for 46-66% of conditions, usually one item, with antidepressants included in 30% of prescriptions, anticonvulsants in 20% and opioid analgesics in 20%. The most commonly prescribed items were the same across conditions; amitriptyline, carbamazepine, coproxamol, codydramol and codeine+paracetamol. Carbamazepine was prescribed to 58% of the trigeminal neuralgia cohort. In 2600 patients followed to stable therapy, there was a median of one to two drug changes. We provide the primary care managed incidence of four neuropathic pain conditions. For commonly prescribed treatments, changes in therapy are less frequent when initial therapy was with antidepressants or anticonvulsants rather than conventional analgesics.