Publication Trends of Residents Accepted for Shoulder and Elbow Fellowships.

This study aims to evaluate the research productivity trends in orthopaedic residents who were selected for shoulder and elbow fellowships from 2010 to 2019. We hypothesize that residents matching into orthopaedic shoulder and elbow fellowships are increasing both their publication number and publication quality from 2010 to 2019. Fellows of orthopaedic shoulder and elbow programs from 2010 to 2019 were identified through publicly accessible information on fellowship programs. Each fellow's publication data during their residency was collected via publicly available search engines, and analyzed to include: fellowship year, residency years, fellowship program and location, total publications, number of publications in high-impact general orthopaedic and shoulder and elbow journals, and authorship position. A total of 176 orthopaedic shoulder and elbow fellows from 17 different programs were identified and included in the study. The fellows produced a total of 668 publications, published 172 articles in high impact journals, and had first authorship on 49% of the studies. On average, there were 3.8 publications per fellow per year from 2010 to 2019. There were 5.7 publications produced per fellow in 2018-2019, compared to just 2.92 publications per fellow in 2010-2011. Overall, there was an increasing trend in publications, publications in high impact journals, and first authorship publications per applicant matching into shoulder and elbow fellowship from 2010 to 2019. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 31(4):205-208, 2022).

Practice Patterns Among Hand Surgeons According to Primary Residency Training: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Study.

INTRODUCTION: Hand surgery fellowships accept applicants from 3 different residencies: general surgery, orthopedic surgery, and plastic surgery. Although all of these specialties culminate into a board-certified hand surgeon, each specialty receives drastically different training in residency, which can have effects on which procedures these surgeons feel comfortable performing in their own practices. This study aims to compare practice patterns and complication rates among hand surgeons by residency training. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried between the years of 2014 and 2018 for all Current Procedural Terminology codes pertaining to upper-extremity surgical procedures performed below the elbow. Procedures not performed by a general, orthopedic, or plastic surgeon were excluded, as well as polytraumas. Procedures were then stratified by anatomic region, tissue type, and primary specialty of the attending surgeon. Data collected included the number of each procedure, patient complexity, and complications. Statistical analysis consisted of a t test for continuous variables, χ2 analysis for categorical variables, and linear regression analysis to compare complications rates between specialties. RESULTS: A total of 76,980 unique cases were included in our analysis: 4979 (6.4%) at the elbow, 43,680 (56.7%) at the forearm/wrist, 23,284 (30.2%) at the hand, 1421 (1.8%) flaps/grafts, 285 (0.4%) vascular, and 3331 (4.3%) neurological. Orthopedics performed most (79.5%) of the procedures, whereas plastic surgeons and general surgeons performed 17.3% and 3.1%, respectively. There were also significant differences by anatomic location/type of procedure, with orthopedic surgeons performing 99.2% of procedures at the elbow but only 67.7% of procedures at the hand. Linear regression analysis showed general surgeons had the lowest complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show significant differences in the number of upper-extremity surgeries performed by surgeons from each specialty at different anatomic locations.This could be due to differences in training during residency or proportionately more orthopedic surgeons being "full-time" hand surgeons. These data could affect hiring patterns in hospitals seeking hand surgeons depending on the variety of pathology encountered at that particular institution.

Primary Repair versus Reverse End-to-Side Coaptation by Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer in Proximal Ulnar Nerve Injuries.

BACKGROUND: Proximal ulnar nerve lacerations are challenging to treat because of the complex integration of sensory and motor function in the hand. The purpose of this study was to compare primary repair and primary repair plus anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) reverse end-to-side (RETS) coaptation in the setting of proximal ulnar nerve injuries. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed of all patients at a single, academic, level I trauma center from 2014 to 2018 presenting with isolated complete ulnar nerve lacerations. Patients underwent either primary repair (PR) only or primary repair and AIN RETS (PR + RETS). Data collected included demographic information; quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score; Medical Research Council score; grip and pinch strength; and visual analogue scale pain scores at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Sixty patients were included in the study: 28 in the PR group and 32 in the RETS + PR group. There was no difference in demographic variables or location of injury between the two groups. Average quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores for the PR and PR + RETS groups were 65 ± 6 and 36 ± 4 at 6 months and 46 ± 4 and 24 ± 3 at 12 months postoperatively, respectively, and were significantly lower in the PR + RETS group at both points. Average grip and pinch strength were significantly greater for the PR + RETS group at 6 and 12 months. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that primary repair of proximal ulnar nerve injuries plus AIN RETS coaptation yielded superior strength and improved upper extremity function when compared with PR alone. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Validity of Using the Scratch Collapse Test in the Lower Extremities.

BACKGROUND: The scratch collapse test is a provocative test that has been successfully used for peripheral neuropathies. The elbow is the main testing site, but there may be times when use of the upper extremities is contraindicated. This study sought to determine the sensitivity of using the scratch collapse test on the lower extremity for upper extremity neuropathies. METHODS: One hundred patients with an electromyographically confirmed diagnosis of carpal tunnel or cubital tunnel syndrome were prospectively enrolled. As a control, the scratch collapse test was conducted normally using the elbow as a testing site. After a baseline was established, the test was repeated using eversion of the foot and ankle against an inversion force. RESULTS: Of the 100 study patients, 89 had a positive scratch collapse test on the upper extremity and 84 had a positive test on the lower extremity. In the 51 patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, 45 had a positive test on the upper extremity (sensitivity, 88.2 percent; 95 percent CI, 76.13 to 95.56 percent), and 42 had a positive test of the lower extremity (sensitivity, 82.35 percent; 95 percent CI, 69.13 to 91.60 percent). In the 49 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome, 44 had a positive test on the upper extremity (sensitivity, 89.8 percent; 95 percent CI, 77.77 to 96.6 percent), and 42 had a positive test on the lower extremity (sensitivity, 85.7 percent; 95 percent CI, 72.76 to 94.06 percent). CONCLUSION: There were no statistically significant differences in the sensitivities of the scratch collapse test on the upper or lower extremities, suggesting that the lower extremity could serve as an alternative site for the scratch collapse test. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, II.

Medical Management of Septic Arthritis of the Sternoclavicular Joint With Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli: A Case Report.

The sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) is an uncommon location for septic arthritis to occur in. Due to the rarity of the condition and the nonspecific symptoms, SCJ septic arthritis can be missed or mislabeled as osteoarthritis or muscle strain. Accurate history and physical examination is crucial for recognizing this condition. With the potential life-threatening complications that may ensue, SCJ septic arthritis has traditionally been managed surgically. This ranges from simple incision and drainage to resection of the joint. However, in cases where there is not enough fluid for incision and drainage, a trial of medical management with antibiotics can be attempted. We herein describe a case of a 58-year-old male who presented with nonspecific anterior chest wall and neck pain. Chest X-ray and ultrasound of the anterior chest wall was normal; however, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the chest showed a small effusion without other complications. His blood cultures grew extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli, rendering this as his hematogenous source of septic arthritis. The ESBL was from a left-sided obstructing kidney stone that resulted in pyelonephritis, which was confirmed via computed tomography of the abdomen. His effusion was too minimal to drain; therefore, he was managed medically with intravenous (IV) antibiotics along with a left ureteral stent placement, and he had a full recovery. This case represents the ability for SCJ septic arthritis to be managed medically with IV antibiotics, especially when the diagnosis is caught early without complications. The role of MRI is indispensable for coming to the diagnosis, as it is capable of detecting complications that ultimately dictate management. Additionally, this case highlights the unique microorganism, ESBL-producing E. coli causing the SCJ septic arthritis, a finding that has been rarely reported in the literature as the majority of microorganisms that have been previously documented are either Staphylococcus aureus or Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Posterior approach to the elbow for insertion of the internal joint stabilizer.

Management of unstable injuries was revolutionized by the Internal Joint Stabilizer (IJS). When compared to long-term immobilization, transarticular pinning, and hinge external fixation, the IJS results in decreased complications and improved clinical outcomes. Historically, the IJS was applied via a lateral approach; however, this limited intraoperative visualization and, in some cases, resulted in increased operative times. This technical report describes a posterior approach, for IJS application. The posterior approach involves an 8- to 10-cm incision over the posterior elbow through the deep fascia before identifying the olecranon and lateral capitellum, then proceeding with IJS application through manufacturer instructions. The ulnar and radial nerves must be identified as they could be damaged in this approach. Using the posterior approach at our institution, we have noticed a possible decrease in operative times and an increase in intraoperative visualization of the elbow without a subsequent increase in complications.

Hypothenar Hammer Syndrome in an Elderly Caucasian Female: A Case Report.

Hypothenar hammer syndrome (HHS) is a vascular disorder characterized by ulnar artery thrombosis or aneurysmal formation. It is most commonly reported in middle-aged males who suffer from repetitive trauma to the palm secondary to occupational or recreational activities. Most cases of HHS can be managed conservatively; however, surgical management is typically indicated for persistent symptoms following conservative measures, imminent vascular compromise, those who fail conservative treatment, or those in imminent danger of rupture. Here we present the case of a right-handed 74-year-old female with HHS who presented with a three-week history of a mass in the hypothenar eminence of the left hand. Reportedly, the mass had appeared slowly and had no associated pain, ischemia of the distal hand, numbness, paresthesia, or changes in the overlying skin. She denied any history of a blunt or penetrating hand injury. The patient was treated surgically by removing a 2.0-cm thrombosed pseudoaneurysm of a collateral branch of the ulnar artery within the left hypothenar eminence. On follow-ups at 1, 2, and 12 weeks postoperatively, the patient's pain was found to be well-controlled. Her normal range of motion was restored, and her digits remained neurovascularly intact. This was an atypical presentation of HHS, and our review of the disorder emphasizes the importance of diagnostic reasoning in rare conditions with unusual presentations of HHS.

Bilateral Congenital Absence of Small Finger Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Tendons in a Trauma Patient.

The flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) is the only muscle in the intermediate layer of the flexor compartment of the forearm. Its main function is flexion of the proximal interphalangeal (IP) joint. Variations of the FDS are common, and knowledge of these variations is necessary for hand surgeons because the little finger tendon of the FDS is commonly used in hand reconstruction surgery. Here we present a case of bilateral absence of the little finger tendon of the FDS in an 11-year-old Hispanic female trauma patient presenting to the Emergency Department with multiple traumatic injuries including bilateral hand lacerations sustained in a motor vehicle accident. On physical examination, flexion of the IP joint of the thumb, and metacarpal phalangeal, proximal IP, and distal IP joints of the little finger were absent bilaterally. In the operating theater, the lacerations were extended to evaluate the status of the tendons of the FDS and flexor digitorum profundus (FDP). On the right, a complete transection of the FDP tendons to the ring and little fingers were found and repaired. Upon further exploration, the FDS tendon to the ring finger was identified and repaired, whereas the little finger tendon was found to be absent. On the left, the FPL tendon was identified and repaired along with the FDP tendon to the little finger. The FDS was subsequently identified and found to be lacking the tendon to the little finger. Clinically, the absence of the FDS could lead to problems in hand reconstruction surgery and functional testing of the hand.

Incidence of Pelvic Ring Fractures in the U.S. Military Population.

Introduction  Pelvic ring fractures occur frequently among the elderly population, but some studies demonstrate a bimodal distribution where the incidence is elevated among younger age groups as well. The mechanisms of injury also vary based on age groups. Previous studies are specific to trauma registries and centers, but epidemiological data within the U.S. military are sparse. In the U.S. military population, pelvic ring fractures can be related to high-energy trauma including motor vehicle accidents and combat warfare. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of pelvic ring fractures among active duty U.S. military service members between 2006 and 2015, while also describing the demographics associated with the findings. Materials and Methods All data were collected from the U.S. Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED). To calculate the incidence rates, only first-time occurrences for pelvic ring fractures among military members were used. Each point was identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9), clinical modification code 808 for "fractures of the pelvis." A multivariate Poisson regression analysis was used to estimate the incidence rate per 1,000 person-years and 95% confidence intervals while controlling for sex, race, age, rank, and service. Rate ratios were calculated using different referent factors based on differences in sex, race, age, rank, and service branch. This study was IRB exempt as all the data used were de-identified patient data from the DMED system. Results Over the 10-year study period, a total of 4,802 incident cases of pelvic ring fractures, and a total of 13,748,429 person-years were documented. The overall incidence rate of pelvic ring fractures was 0.35 per 1,000 person-years. The incidence of pelvic ring fractures was highest among the youngest age group (<20 years) and among the lower-ranking service members. Additionally, other demographic groups such as the White race, female sex, and Army service members showed the highest incidence rates. Conclusion Our study determined baseline epidemiological data on incidence rates of pelvic ring fractures in the U.S. military. Patient demographics may be contributing factors, and the present analysis was able to elucidate associated underlying demographics. We demonstrated that the incidence was highest among the younger age groups, and that incidence rates may be specific to age cohorts. This study also found that lower-ranking service members had the highest incidence in all service branches, suggesting a form of occupational risk. Furthermore, our findings suggest that females, White race groups, and Army enlisted service members show a significantly higher incidence rate and may be at a greater risk. Our findings are important as they broaden the understanding of the patterns of pelvic ring fractures in the U.S. military population and occupational risks associated with this population.

Genome Sequence of a Newly Isolated Mycobacteriophage, ShedlockHolmes.

Mycobacteriophage ShedlockHolmes is a newly isolated phage infecting Mycobacterium smegmatis mc(2)155. It has a 61,081-bp genome containing 99 predicted protein-coding genes and one tRNA gene. ShedlockHolmes is closely related to mycobacteriophages Pixie, Keshu, and MacnCheese and is a new member of subcluster K3.