Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Community Ment Health J ; 54(6): 831-841, 2018 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29159496

RESUMO

Poor vocational engagement is well documented among young people experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP). The aim of the present study was to establish and compare rates of vocational engagement across young people with first-episode psychosis, depression, and borderline personality pathology. A file audit was used to collect vocational data of young people aged 15-25 entering tertiary mental health treatment in 2011. Rates of vocational engagement were similar across groups, indicating that like those with FEP, young people with depression and borderline personality pathology experience impaired vocational engagement and are in need of targeted vocational interventions. Post hoc analysis indicated that that the depression group had significantly more people who were partially vocationally engaged compared with the psychosis group, suggesting that vocational interventions might need to be targeted differently across different diagnostic groups. Future research should explore risk factors for vocational disengagement across diagnostic groups in order to inform intervention development.


Assuntos
Transtorno da Personalidade Borderline/epidemiologia , Depressão/epidemiologia , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Psicóticos/epidemiologia , Educação Vocacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Transtorno da Personalidade Borderline/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo , Emprego/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Ocupações , Transtornos Psicóticos/psicologia , Distribuição por Sexo , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Vitória/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Infect Dis Now ; 53(4): 104707, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37044246

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this study was to analyze French general practitioners' (GP) online prescriptions for suspected acute cystitis using a single nationwide teleconsultation platform. PATIENTS AND METHODS: First, a descriptive study of management for suspected cystitis was conducted from the 1st of January to the 31st of December 2020. After which, following pedagogical intervention, a pre/post descriptive analysis of the antibiotics prescribed was carried out. RESULTS: Some 496,041 teleconsultations (TCs) were carried out in 2020 on the Qare platform. Among them, 15,089 TCs for cystitis with ICD-10 encoding (N30) were analyzed. Fosfomycin trometamol was the most prescribed antibiotic (n = 10297, 69%), while fluoroquinolones (n = 1568, 10.6%) were the second. Urine test strip was prescribed in 3157 (20%) and urine culture in 7033 (47%) of the TCs. July-August 2020 and July-August 2021 were compared and while a significant drop in fluoroquinolone prescriptions and a major increase in Fosfomycin trometamol were observed, there was no change in the prescriptions of urine culture. An average antibiotic conformity rate of 61.5% was observed before the intervention, and 68.8% afterwards. CONCLUSIONS: Cystitis is a recurrent reason for remote consultation. The study demonstrated sizable over-prescription of urine culture, ultrasound, and fluoroquinolones. Intervention should be improved and strengthened to guarantee continuous training and awareness of GP's on appropriate cystitis prescriptions in telemedicine.


Assuntos
Cistite , Fosfomicina , Clínicos Gerais , Consulta Remota , Adulto , Humanos , Trometamina , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cistite/diagnóstico , Cistite/tratamento farmacológico , Cistite/urina , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda
4.
Physiother Res Int ; 23(2): e1701, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29405502

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The impact of staffing model providing weekend physiotherapy rehabilitation has not been evaluated. This study aims to determine the impact of staffing a weekend rehabilitation service with physiotherapists currently working in rehabilitation compared to acute hospital physiotherapists, on length of stay (LOS), functional independence and gait and balance, and to determine the impact on neurological, orthopaedic, and reconditioning diagnostic groups. METHODS: A prospective cohort study with historical control was completed in a private, metropolitan Australian rehabilitation unit. All participants admitted to the rehabilitation unit over two, 20-week periods in 2011 and 2012 were included. Weekend physiotherapy was provided by physiotherapists working in rehabilitation in 2012 (intervention) and physiotherapists working in the acute wards in 2011 (control). Outcomes included LOS, Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and gait and balance measures. RESULTS: Overall, there were 504 participants; 234 in 2012 and 270 in 2011. No difference was found in LOS between staffing models (mean difference-1.5 days, 95%CI -4.4 to 1.3). Greater FIM change (mean difference 3.5, 95%CI 0.3 to 6.7) and efficiency (FIM change/LOS: mean difference 0.3, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.5) were found with rehabilitation compared to acute staffing. There was no between-group difference in gait or balance performance. When diagnostic groups were compared, no difference in LOS was found between staffing models. Participants with an orthopaedic diagnosis had a significantly greater FIM change (mean difference 3.8, 95%CI 0.4 to 7.1), whereas FIM efficiency was improved in neurological (mean difference 0.4, 95%CI 0.1 to 0.7) and orthopaedic populations (mean difference 0.3, 95%CI 0.03 to 0.5) with rehabilitation staffing. DISCUSSION: Staffing a weekend rehabilitation service with physiotherapists currently working in rehabilitation influences functional independence. Different diagnostic groups appear to respond differently.


Assuntos
Plantão Médico/organização & administração , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal/organização & administração , Fisioterapeutas/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Centros de Reabilitação/organização & administração , Adulto , Idoso , Austrália , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inovação Organizacional , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo
5.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 24(11): 1171-1176, 2018 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29964229

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether treatment with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime is associated with lower in-hospital mortality than amoxicillin-clavulanate in pati0ents hospitalized in medical wards for community-onset pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective and multicentre study of patients hospitalized in French medical wards for community-onset pneumonia between 2002 and 2015. Treatments with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime or amoxicillin-clavulanate were defined by their start in the emergency department for a duration of 5 days or more with no other ß-lactam. A logistic regression analysis was performed on the overall population, and a propensity score analysis was restricted to patients treated with either ceftriaxone/cefotaxime or amoxicillin-clavulanate. RESULTS: 1698 patients (median age, 80 y) were included, of which 716 and 198 were treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate and ceftriaxone/cefotaxime, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 10% (9-12%). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were treatment with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime (aOR 2.9; (1.4-5.7)), pneumonia severity index class 4 or 5 (aOR 7.8 (4.3-15.7)), do-not-resuscitate order (aOR 8.7 (5.2-14.6)) and fluid therapy (aOR 6.3 (2.5-15.1)). The propensity score analysis was performed on 178 patients treated with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime matched with 178 patients treated with amoxicillin-clavulanate; no significant association between treatment with ceftriaxone/cefotaxime and in-hospital mortality was found (OR 1.5 (0.7-3.0)). CONCLUSION: In the largest study aiming to compare amoxicillin-clavulanate and ceftriaxone/cefotaxime in community-onset pneumonia, ceftriaxone/cefotaxime was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality than amoxicillin-clavulanate. Our results suggest that ceftriaxone/cefotaxime should not be preferred over amoxicillin-clavulanate for patients hospitalized in medical wards with community-onset pneumonia.


Assuntos
Combinação Amoxicilina e Clavulanato de Potássio/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Cefalosporinas/classificação , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Bacteriana/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Stat Methods Med Res ; 25(5): 1938-1954, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24201469

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Propensity score matching is typically used to estimate the average treatment effect for the treated while inverse probability of treatment weighting aims at estimating the population average treatment effect. We illustrate how different estimands can result in very different conclusions. STUDY DESIGN: We applied the two propensity score methods to assess the effect of continuous positive airway pressure on mortality in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure. We used Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the important differences in the two estimates. RESULTS: Continuous positive airway pressure application increased hospital mortality overall, but no continuous positive airway pressure effect was found on the treated. Potential reasons were (1) violation of the positivity assumption; (2) treatment effect was not uniform across the distribution of the propensity score. From simulations, we concluded that positivity bias was of limited magnitude and did not explain the large differences in the point estimates. However, when treatment effect varies according to the propensity score (E[Y(1)-Y(0)|g(X)] is not constant, Y being the outcome and g(X) the propensity score), propensity score matching ATT estimate could strongly differ from the inverse probability of treatment weighting-average treatment effect estimate. We show that this empirical result is supported by theory. CONCLUSION: Although both approaches are recommended as valid methods for causal inference, propensity score-matching for ATT and inverse probability of treatment weighting for average treatment effect yield substantially different estimates of treatment effect. The choice of the estimand should drive the choice of the method.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Método de Monte Carlo , Pontuação de Propensão , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pressão Positiva Contínua nas Vias Aéreas/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA