Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Sante Publique ; 35(2): 159-170, 2023 08 10.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37558621

RESUMO

Introduction: The uptake rate of colorectal cancer screening remains insufficient in France and decreases as the level of deprivation increases. Participants' health literacy appears to be an important determinant of screening uptake. Aim of the study: The aim of this study, nested in our multicenter-randomized controlled trial, was to present the development and acceptability of interventional material (training and a pictorial brochure) for general practitioners and healthcare users in disadvantaged geographical areas using a participatory involvement approach. Methods: The development of the brochure and the training was carried out in three stages, two for the development, usability, and acceptability testing and a third for its evaluation with the target audience. We used a qualitative approach based on focus groups and cognitive interviews. The qualitative analysis was based on Morville's "Honeycomb" conceptual model and the COREQ checklist. Results: The development and test of the acceptability of the material enabled us to adjust the content of the training by proposing examples that were more rooted in professional reality, and to produce a brochure that was easy to read, understand, acceptable and adapted to the intervention's targeted audience. Conclusions: This experience illustrates in a concrete way the feasibility of public participation and its value in the context of interventional research, and more generally in the creation of interventional material.


Introduction: Le taux de participation au dépistage du cancer colorectal reste insuffisant en France et diminue à mesure que le niveau de précarité augmente. La littératie en santé est un déterminant important du recours au dépistage. But de l'étude: Cette étude, nichée dans notre essai randomisé multicentrique, a pour but de présenter la procédure d'élaboration (procédé itératif de test d'utilisabilité et d'acceptabilité) et de vérification de l'acceptabilité de l'intervention (formation et brochure imagée) ciblant les médecins généralistes et usagers du soin dans des zones géographiques défavorisées, selon une approche participative. Méthodes: Le développement de la brochure et de la formation a été réalisé en trois étapes : deux pour l'élaboration et tests itératifs d'utilisabilité et acceptabilité et une troisième pour vérifier l'acceptabilité auprès des publics cibles. Nous avons utilisé une approche qualitative par focus group et entretiens individuels cognitifs dont l'analyse repose sur le « nid d'abeille ¼ de Morville et la grille COREQ. Résultats: Le développement itératif et la vérification de l'acceptabilité du matériel nous ont permis, d'une part, de réaliser des ajustements quant au contenu de la formation, en proposant des exemples plus ancrés dans la réalité professionnelle et, d'autre part, de produire une brochure imagée facile à lire et à comprendre, acceptable et adaptée au public ciblé par l'intervention. Conclusions: Cette expérience illustre, de manière concrète, la faisabilité de cette modalité de participation des publics concernés et son intérêt dans le cadre de la recherche interventionnelle et, plus généralement, dans le matériel interventionnel.


Assuntos
Clínicos Gerais , Saúde Pública , Humanos , Participação da Comunidade , Grupos Focais , França
2.
BMC Public Health ; 22(1): 1628, 2022 08 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36038869

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cannabidiol (CBD), a safe, non-intoxicating cannabis component, is growing in popularity in Europe and worldwide. However, CBD EU regulation is blurry, and consequent labelling and product quality issues may have implications for public health. There is therefore a need to assess the prevalence and perceived harmfulness of CBD use in EU countries, as well as to characterise CBD users. We aimed to do so in the French population. METHODS: In December 2021, an online survey was conducted in a sample respecting the French adult population structure for key demographic variables. Sociodemographic, behavioural and CBD perception data were collected. Three separate regressions were performed to identify correlates of i) having heard of CBD, ii) using CBD, iii) perceived harmfulness of CBD. A hierarchical classification was also performed to identify profiles of CBD users. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 1969 adults, of whom 69.2% had heard of CBD and 10.1% used it. Less than half (46.8%) of the former considered it harmful. Having heard of CBD was associated with younger age, being born in France, tobacco use, and cannabis use. CBD use was associated with younger age, tobacco use, cannabis use, poor self-reported general health status, and positive perception of alternative medicines. Cluster analysis revealed four different CBD user profiles based on socio-demographics and behavioural characteristics. CONCLUSION: Ten percent of the adults in this French study used CBD, and several user profiles emerged. Our results indirectly advocate clearer European CBD regulations to ensure safe and high-quality products.


Assuntos
Canabidiol , Cannabis , Adulto , Cannabis/química , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Rotulagem de Produtos , Autorrelato
3.
BMC Public Health ; 21(1): 1684, 2021 09 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34530800

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer burden worldwide. In France, it is the second most common cause of cancer death after lung cancer. Systematic uptake of CRC screening can improve survival rates. However, people with limited health literacy (HL) and lower socioeconomic position rarely participate. Our aim is to assess the impact of an intervention combining HL and CRC screening training for general practitioners (GPs) with a pictorial brochure and video targeting eligible patients, to increase CRC screening and other secondary outcomes, after 1 year, in several underserved geographic areas in France. METHODS: We will use a two-arm multicentric randomized controlled cluster trial with 32 GPs primarily serving underserved populations across four regions in France with 1024 patients recruited. GPs practicing in underserved areas (identified using the European Deprivation Index) will be block-randomized to: 1) a combined intervention (HL and CRC training + brochure and video for eligible patients), or 2) usual care. Patients will be included if they are between 50 and 74 years old, eligible for CRC screening, and present to recruited GPs. The primary outcome is CRC screening uptake after 1 year. Secondary outcomes include increasing knowledge and patient activation. After trial recruitment, we will conduct semi-structured interviews with up to 24 GPs (up to 8 in each region) and up to 48 patients (6 to 12 per region) based on data saturation. We will explore strategies that promote the intervention's sustained use and rapid implementation using Normalization Process Theory. We will follow a community-based participatory research approach throughout the trial. For the analyses, we will adopt a regression framework for all quantitative data. We will also use exploratory mediation analyses. We will analyze all qualitative data using a framework analysis guided by Normalization Process Theory. DISCUSSION: Limited HL and its impact on the general population is a growing public health and policy challenge worldwide. It has received limited attention in France. A combined HL intervention could reduce disparities in CRC screening, increase screening rates among the most vulnerable populations, and increase knowledge and activation (beneficial in the context of repeated screening). TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2020-A01687-32 . Date of registration: 17th November 2020.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais , Clínicos Gerais , Letramento em Saúde , Idoso , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Humanos , Área Carente de Assistência Médica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
4.
Sante Publique ; 30(5): 601-610, 2018.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30767476

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The misuse of alcohol has harmful social and health impacts within a population. The French military must be particularly vigilant with alcohol, due to specificities linked with weaponry. This study was designed to explore social representations of alcohol based on a sample of the French Navy in order to prioritize prevention focuses on alcohol misuses in a military environment. METHODS: A semi-directed interview-based exploratory study was conducted in the south of France at the end of 2015. Data was submitted to manual categorical analysis and textual analysis (Iramuteq software). RESULTS: Sixty-two marines from the French Navy were interviewed including 30 Navy and 32 Marine Firefighters. Data analysis indicated that the motivation to consume alcohol comes more from a social influence (extrinsic motivations) than for pleasure induced by alcohol effects (intrinsic motivations). For Navy personnel, the sense of belonging to the Navy is strengthened by drinking habits with a strong social cohesion. In contrast, the Marine Firefighters had a negative perception of alcohol because of a possible degradation of their professional image for the civilian population. CONCLUSION: The identification of social representations of alcohol allows for a better apprehension of drinking behavior within a French military population, particularly by focusing on content and organization of discourses about alcohol. Following this survey, a quantitative study is currently being drawn up among military personnel from the French Navy in order to clarify some of the elements identified and presented within this article.


Assuntos
Consumo de Bebidas Alcoólicas/psicologia , Militares/psicologia , Comportamento Social , França , Humanos , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Motivação , Pesquisa Qualitativa
5.
Curr Oncol ; 30(3): 2812-2824, 2023 02 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36975427

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a therapeutic de-escalation option in older women with low-risk early breast cancer (EBC). A qualitative study was implemented to describe EBC physicians' points of view on IORT as a de-escalation option. METHODS: Recorded face-to-face and telephone semi-structured interviews were conducted among diverse physicians from seven French comprehensive cancer centers. Interview transcripts were grouped as corpus to construct a typology. Thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Positions toward IORT were contrasted between the 16 participating physicians. Five fully supported IORT as a de-escalation option, four were not in favor, and seven had a more reserved or neutral opinion. Points of divergence concerned treatment efficacy, treatment duration, side effects and sequelae, psychological impact, compliance with adjuvant endocrine therapy, logistical constraints, financial cost, and availability of other techniques of partial breast irradiation. Physicians in favor of IORT emphasized direct benefits for the patient, and those against pointed the lack of specific guidelines, risk of lost opportunity in older women with long life expectancy, and challenges of shared decision making. CONCLUSIONS: Despite national policies to preserve cancer patients' quality of life and increase their participation in medical decision making, therapeutic de-escalation using IORT is not consensual among physicians. Further efforts are needed to promote patient-centered care.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Radioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Mastectomia Segmentar/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA