Dual vs Single Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Obesity: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Atrial fibrillation and obesity are common, and both are increasing in prevalence. Obesity is associated with failure of cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a standard single set of defibrillator pads, even at high output. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of dual direct-current cardioversion (DCCV) using 2 sets of pads, with each pair simultaneously delivering 200 J, with traditional single 200-J DCCV using 1 set of pads in patients with obesity and atrial fibrillation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective, investigator-initiated, patient-blinded, randomized clinical trial spanning 3 years from August 2020 to 2023. As a multicenter trial, the setting included 3 sites in Louisiana. Eligibility criteria included body mass index (BMI) of 35 or higher (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), age 18 years or older, and planned nonemergent electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation. Patients who met inclusion criteria were randomized 1:1. Exclusions occurred due to spontaneous cardioversion, instability, thrombus, or BMI below threshold. Interventions: Dual DCCV vs single DCCV. Main Outcomes and Measures: Return to sinus rhythm, regardless of duration, immediately after the first cardioversion attempt of atrial fibrillation, adverse cardiovascular events, and chest discomfort after the procedure. Results: Of 2079 sequential patients undergoing cardioversion, 276 met inclusion criteria and were approached for participation. Of these, 210 participants were randomized 1:1. After exclusions, 200 patients (median [IQR] age, 67.6 [60.1-72.4] years; 127 male [63.5%]) completed the study. The mean (SD) BMI was 41.2 (6.5). Cardioversion was successful more often with dual DCCV compared with single DCCV (97 of 99 patients [98%] vs 87 of 101 patients [86%]; P = .002). Dual cardioversion predicted success (odds ratio, 6.7; 95% CI, 3.3-13.6; P = .01). Patients in the single cardioversion cohort whose first attempt failed underwent dual cardioversion with all subsequent attempts (up to 3 total), all of which were successful: 12 of 14 after second cardioversion and 2 of 14 after third cardioversion. There was no difference in the rating of postprocedure chest discomfort (median in both groups = 0 of 10; P = .40). There were no cardiovascular complications. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with obesity (BMI ≥35) undergoing electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation, dual DCCV results in greater cardioversion success compared with single DCCV, without any increase in complications or patient discomfort. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04539158.

Case report of two siblings with type 2A von Willebrand disease involving a novel mutation within the calcium-binding site of the A2 domain of von Willebrand factor.

: Calcium-binding at the A2 domain protects von Willebrand factor (VWF) from cleavage by a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTS13) and is coordinated by five important residues (p.Asp1596, p.Arg1597, p.Ala1600, p.Asn1602, and p.Asp1498). Only variants of p.Arg1597 resulting in type 2A von Willebrand disease have been reported. We report a novel VWF variant, a heterozygous single nucleotide change, c.4493A>G, occurring at the p.Asp1498 residue of the calcium-binding site of the A2 domain in two sisters with type 2A von Willebrand disease. Modest increase in the VWF propeptide/VWF:Ag ratio (2.4 and 2.7) supports increased clearance of VWF. A literature review provided insight into the integral role of p.Asp1498 residue in calcium-binding and its role in the stabilization of other residues including p.Arg1597 and p.Asn1602. Studies done by other groups on engineered mutations involving p.Asp1498 reported increased susceptibility to ADAMTS13 proteolysis. Cellular studies are needed to confirm these mechanisms.

Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide as initial treatment for advanced ovarian carcinoma: a Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network phase II trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide in the first-line treatment of patients with stage III or IV adenocarcinoma of the ovary. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients entering this trial received paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2), 1 h IV infusion, day 1; carboplatin AUC 6.0 IV, day 1; etoposide 50 mg alternating with 100 mg orally, days 1-10. Patients received 6 courses of treatment, administered at 21-day intervals. All patients were assigned a response category using clinical restaging criteria. The primary endpoints for this trial were progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS: Between October 1996 and April 2001, 52 patients were treated. The overall objective response rate for the 48 evaluable patients was 75%, with 46% complete responses. Amongst the 36 patients with suboptimal disease, median progression-free and overall survivals were 12 and 24 months, respectively. After a median follow-up of 64 months, the median progression-free and overall survival has not been reached for the optimal patients; 5-year progression-free survival is 57% for this group. Treatment-related myelosuppression was common, but myelosuppression-related complications were uncommon, as was grade 3/4 non-hematologic toxicity. No episodes of acute myelogenous leukemia have developed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and oral etoposide was feasible and effective in this patient population. Unlike previous reports, no episodes of acute leukemia were seen following this treatment. Definitive conclusions regarding the benefit of adding etoposide to a taxane/platinum combination will require a comparative trial.