RESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy (NST) in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Four hundred and nine patients were identified between January 1999 and December 2011. All patients received NST followed by surgery, adjuvant treatments and radiotherapy, as appropriate. RESULTS: At Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with surgical stage III disease were more likely to develop distant metastasis and die from breast cancer (p < 0.001). Luminal A and luminal B/HER2-negative patients had better prognosis; moreover, patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive tumors had a significantly longer DRFS (p < 0.0049) and OS (p < 0.0001) compared with patients with HR-negative tumors as well as patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery (DRFS and OS: p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, HR negativity (p < 0.001 for both DRFS and OS), mastectomy (DRFS: p = 0.009; OS: p = 0.05) and stage III disease (DRFS: p < 0.001; OS: p = 0.003) were associated with shorter DRFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: HR negativity, mastectomy and pathological stage III disease are the variables independently associated with a worse outcome in our cohort of patients. These data are of high interest since they derive from a very heterogeneous group of patients, treated with different neoadjuvant/adjuvant regimens outside of clinical trials and with a long follow-up period.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Terapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The human DNA mismatch repair (hMMR) system plays an important role in reducing mutation and maintaining genomic stability. The MMR system in human cells is composed of at least six genes (hMSH2, hMLH1, hMSH3, hPMS1, hPMS2 and GTBP/hMSH6). In particular, hMSH2 and hMLH1 are expressed in cells undergoing rapid renewal; their reduced expression has been reported in several tumors. METHODS: We examined the expression of hMSH2 and hMLH1 by immunohistochemistry in tumor specimens from 43 patients with primary tumors. RESULTS: All carcinomas (n = 20) expressed these proteins. In addition, when compared to pleomorphic adenomas, malignant tumors contained significantly (P < 0.01) higher proportions of hMSH2 (56.1 +/- 31.5 vs. 31.1 +/- 22.6) and hMLH1 (27.9 +/- 26.0 vs. 14.0 +/- 12.6) positive cells. Warthin's tumors showed no specific nuclear staining of tumor cells for both hMSH2 and hMLH1. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest a minor, if any, role for a defect in the hMMR system in the pathogenesis of malignant salivary gland tumors.