RESUMO
This exploratory study aimed to identify communication trends typical of pharmacists' clinical communication in the context of hospital consultations. A cross-sectional design was used to investigate the pharmacist-patient exchange, applying the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS). Communication variables and RIAS composites were assessed, including therapeutic information complexity, estimated through the ad-hoc score CTICS (Cancer Therapy Information Complexity Score). The study comprised 13 consultations of cancer patients with one female pharmacist, of which 6 included a patient family member, lasting on average 22.74 minutes and presenting repeated or overlapping consultation phases. The pharmacist's talk dominance reached 53.49%, slightly higher in dyadic consultations (U = 6.0, p = .032), and with an overall predominance of closed-ended questioning (W = 81.0, p = .013). Patients' questioning on biomedical issues was higher in dyadic consultations. The level of the pharmacist's rapport-building with the relative was higher when the patient's age was ≥80 years. Several strong correlations, both positive and negative, were found between composites, including between patient positive rapport-building and relative lifestyle/psychosocial information giving (Rho = -0.971, p = .001). Pharmaceutical consultations seem to be lengthier than other hospital practitioners' interviews, indicating a lack of clear organization and flow, thus challenging their efficiency regarding therapy management. Still, several positive communication features were found regarding the pharmaceutical care of older cancer patients. Further studies are needed, involving larger samples and other hospital consultation settings.
Assuntos
Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Farmacêuticos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Comunicação , Preparações FarmacêuticasRESUMO
Although immune checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of several advanced solid cancers, in colorectal cancer, the transformative benefit of these innovative medicines is currently limited to those with deficient mismatch repair or high microsatellite instability. Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has emerged as a potential predictor of immunotherapy benefit, but the lack of standardization in its assessment and reporting has hindered the introduction of this biomarker in routine clinical practice. Here, we compiled 45 colorectal cancer studies utilizing numerical thresholds for high-TMB. In this group of studies, TMB cut-offs ranged from 6.88 to 41 mut/Mb and were most often set at 10, 17, or 20 mut/Mb. Additionally, we observed divergent TMB definitions and inconsistent disclosure of specific methodological details, which collectively emphasize the substantial lack of harmonization within the field. Ongoing efforts to harmonize TMB assessment will be critical to validate TMB as a predictive marker of immunotherapy response.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias Colorretais , Mutação , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Neoplasias Colorretais/tratamento farmacológico , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Imunoterapia/métodos , Instabilidade de Microssatélites , Inibidores de Checkpoint Imunológico/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Background and objective The use of herbal medicines has been increasing among cancer patients, as a way to control cancer and treatment-related symptoms; however, many patients are reluctant to disclose this use to their medical practitioners. The fact that oncological treatments have a narrow therapeutic margin, associated with the lack of control and clinical evidence concerning these supplements, makes medication-herbal interactions a reality. These interactions could lead to increased toxicity or a decreased effectiveness of oncological treatment. In light of this, we aimed to assess the prevalence of herbal medicine use in a patient population at a Portuguese central hospital: Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental. Materials and methods Patients with breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer diagnoses between August 2022 and July 2023 and undergoing oncological treatment were included. Data were collected through a survey during their first appointment, as well as by consulting the patients' clinical files. An interaction evaluation was carried out to assess potential medication-herbal interactions. Finally, a statistical analysis was performed to identify predictive factors for the use of herbal medicines. Results Among the 65 patients included in the study, 52% were females, and the median age of the cohort was 65 years. Breast cancer was the most prevalent diagnosis and the majority of the patients were undergoing palliative treatment. We found that 46% of patients used herbal medicines regularly: to strengthen the immune system, detoxification of the body, and treat insomnia and constipation. A medication-herbal interaction was found in 37% of the cases, the most frequent being doxorubicin-vitamin C, through an antioxidant mechanism. The univariable analysis failed to show any predictive factors associated with the use of herbal medicines. Conclusions This study sheds light on herbal medicine use among cancer patients and the reality of medication-herbal interactions. There is an urgent need for further research and evidence-based medical protocols regarding herbal medicine use, especially in complex cases such as cancer patients, to provide better and safer care.
RESUMO
P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1 (PSGL-1) is a membrane-bound glycoprotein expressed in lymphoid and myeloid cells. It is a ligand of P-, E- and L-selectin and is involved in T cell trafficking and homing to lymphoid tissues, among other functions. PSGL-1 expression has been implicated in different lymphoid malignancies, so here we aimed to evaluate the involvement of PSGL-1 in T cell lymphomagenesis and dissemination. PSGL-1 was highly expressed at the surface of human and mouse T cell leukemia and lymphoma cell lines. To assess its impact on T cell malignancies, we stably expressed human PSGL-1 (hPSGL-1) in a mouse thymic lymphoma cell line, which expresses low levels of endogenous PSGL-1 at the cell surface. hPSGL-1-expressing lymphoma cells developed subcutaneous tumors in athymic nude mice recipients faster than control empty vector or parental cells. Moreover, the kidneys, lungs and liver of tumor-bearing mice were infiltrated by hPSGL-1-expressing malignant T cells. To evaluate the role of PSGL-1 in lymphoma cell dissemination, we injected intravenously control and hPSGL-1-expressing lymphoma cells in athymic mice. Strikingly, PSGL-1 expression facilitated disease infiltration of the kidneys, as determined by histological analysis and anti-CD3 immunohistochemistry. Together, these results indicate that PSGL-1 expression promotes T cell lymphoma development and dissemination to different organs.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Since the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), the pressure to minimise its impact on public health has led to the implementation of different therapeutic strategies, the efficacy of which for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was unknown at the time. Remdesivir (REM) was granted its first conditional marketing authorisation in the EU in June 2020. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) and local health authorities all across the EU have since strongly recommended the implementation of pharmacovigilance activities aimed at further evaluating the safety of this new drug. The objective of this study was to evaluate adverse drug reactions (ADRs) attributed to either REM or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in patients hospitalised for COVID-19 in Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Ocidental, a Portuguese hospital centre based in Lisbon. We present the preliminary results reporting plausible adverse effects of either HCQ or REM. METHODS: An observational cohort study was carried out between 16 March and 15 August 2020. Participants were divided into two cohorts: those prescribed an HCQ regimen, and those prescribed REM. Suspected ADRs were identified using an active monitoring model and reported to the Portuguese Pharmacovigilance System through its online notification tool. The ADR cumulative incidence was compared between the two cohorts. RESULTS: The study included 149 patients, of whom 101 were treated with HCQ and the remaining 48 with REM. The baseline characteristics were similar between the two cohorts. A total of 102 ADRs were identified during the study period, with a greater incidence in the HCQ cohort compared with the REM cohort (47.5% vs 12.5%; p<0.001). Causality was assessed in 81 ADRs, all of which were considered possible. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data are crucial to further establish the safety profile for REM. HCQ is no longer recommended for the treatment of COVID-19.