Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 50(2): 155-158, 2022 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34562527

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Large inrush of patients through Emergency Department during influenza season can be dramatic. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of an emergency preventive strategy, namely admission of patients with influenza in multiple-bed room with patients free from influenza, on the occurrence of hospital-acquired influenza (HAI). METHODS: When a patient with an influenza RT-PCR diagnosis was hospitalized in a multiple-bed room, the emergency preventive strategy was applied: selection of non-immunocompromised neighbor, implementation of physical barriers (rigid screen pulled between beds, surgical mask for healthcare workers and visitors), preemptive Oseltamivir therapy for the neighbor. RESULTS: From 29/11/2017 to 10/05/2018 a total of 464 hospitalized influenza patients were included; 318 were placed in multiple-bed room and 141 in single room. Emergency preventive strategy was correctly applied for 75.1% of patients in multiple-bed room. A total of 8 exposed neighbors matched HAI definition despite strategy. 7 were already exposed to the case before the set-up of the strategy. Only one case of documented transmission of influenza occurred after application of an incorrect emergency preventive strategy: preventive posology of Oseltamivir was not correct. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results suggest that the occurrence of HAI in multiple-bed rooms can be limited by the implementation of maximum precautions and urge us to promote further evaluation of the strategy. A detection bias should be considered without a systematic neighbors monitoring.


Assuntos
Influenza Humana , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Leitos , Pessoal de Saúde , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 5(4): e226574, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35394509

RESUMO

Importance: Rates of 30-day readmissions following hospitalization for pneumonia are used to publicly report on hospital performance and to set financial penalties for the worst-performing hospitals. However, the rate of avoidable readmission following hospitalization for pneumonia is undefined. Objective: To assess how often 30-day readmissions following hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are avoidable. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed the results of an independent review of readmissions following hospitalization for CAP within 30 days among patients discharged from 2 large hospitals in France in 2014. Structured clinical records including clinical information (ie, baseline characteristics, physical examination, laboratory findings, x-ray or computed tomography scan findings, discharge plan, and treatments) for both index and readmission stays were independently reviewed by 4 certified board physicians. All consecutive adult patients hospitalized in 2014 with a diagnosis of CAP in our 2 eligible hospitals were eligible. All analyses presented were performed in March 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: Avoidable readmission within 30 days of discharge from index hospitalization. The likelihood that a readmission was avoidable was quantified using latent class analysis based on the independent reviews. A readmission was considered avoidable if Bayes posterior probability exceeded 50%. Results: The total analytical sample consisted of 1150 index hospital stays with a diagnosis of CAP, which included 651 (56.6%) male patients. The median (IQR) age for all patients was 77.8 (IQR, 62.7-86.4) years. Out of the 1150 index hospital stays, 98 patients (8.5%) died in hospital, and 108 (9.4%) unplanned readmissions were found. Overall, 15 readmissions had a posterior probability of avoidability exceeding 0.50 (13.9% of the 108 unplanned readmissions; 95% CI, 8.0%-21.9%). The median (IQR) delay between the hospital discharge index and readmission was considerably shorter when readmission was deemed avoidable (4 [6-21] days vs 12 [2-18] days; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Only a small number of readmissions following hospitalization for CAP were deemed avoidable, comprising less than 10% of all readmissions. Shorter time interval between hospitalization discharge and readmission was associated with avoidability.


Assuntos
Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas , Pneumonia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teorema de Bayes , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/terapia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA