Systematic appraisal of the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Hirschsprung's disease.

BACKGROUND: Some guidelines for management of Hirschsprung's disease (HSCR, HD) have been developed, but their quality is vague. This study will systematically assess the quality of guidelines and analyze the key recommendations and the best evidence for guidelines. METHODS: Applicable guidelines were retrieved using a systematic search of databases. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool was used to assess the quality of the guidelines. Then, the recommendations and evidence for the included guidelines were extracted and compared. RESULTS: A total of nine guidelines were included in this study, and only one had an overall standardized score of more than 60%, indicating that it is worthy of recommendation. The problems identified included ambiguous and low-quality evidence; obvious distributional heterogeneity among the recommendations; a lack of in-depth discussion on the interpretation of staging, diagnostic methods, conservative treatment, and surgical staging of disease. CONCLUSION: The quality of guidelines varies widely, and there is a lack of high-quality professional opinions and supporting evidence for the main recommendations. At present, only comprehensive guidelines can be considered high-quality and there is still room for improvement.

Quality assessment of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions and ascites.

OBJECTIVES: To fully assess the quality of the guidelines for the management of malignant pleural effusions (MPE) and ascites and reveal the heterogeneity of recommendations and possible reasons among guidelines. METHODS: A systematic search was performed in the database to obtain guidelines for the management of MPE and ascites. The AGREE IIGtool was used to assess the quality of these guidelines. The Measurement Scale of Rate of Agreement (MSRA) was introduced to assess the scientific agreement of formulated recommendations for the management of MPE and ascites among guidelines, and evidence supporting these recommendations was extracted and analyzed. RESULTS: Nine guidelines were identified. Only 4 guidelines scored more than 60% and are worth recommending. Recommendations were also heterogeneous among guidelines for the management of MPE, and the main reasons were the different emphases of the recommendations for the treatment of MPE, the contradictions in recommendations, and the unreasonably cited evidence for MPE. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the management guidelines for patients with MPE and malignant ascites was highly variable. Specific improvement of the factors leading to the heterogeneity of recommendations will be a reasonable and effective way for developers to upgrade the recommendations in the guidelines for MPE.

Comparison of multi-modal early oral nutrition for the tolerance of oral nutrition with conventional care after major abdominal surgery: a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Early oral nutrition (EON) has been shown to improve recovery of gastrointestinal function, length of stay and mortality after abdominal surgery; however, early oral nutrition often fails during the first week after surgery. Here, a multi-modal early oral nutrition program is introduced to promote recovery of gastrointestinal function and tolerance of oral nutrition. METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for abdominal surgery were randomized to the multimodal EON group or a group receiving conventional care. The primary endpoint was the time of first defecation. The secondary endpoints were outcomes and the cost-effectiveness ratio in treating infectious complications. The rate of infectious-free patients was regarded as the index of effectiveness. RESULTS: One hundred seven patients were randomly assigned to groups. Baseline characteristics were similar for both groups. In intention-to-treat analysis, the success rate of oral nutrition during the first week after surgery in the multimodal EON group was 44 (83.0%) versus 31 (57.4%) in the conventional care group (P = 0.004). Time to first defecation, time to flatus, recovery time of bowel sounds, and prolonged postoperative ileus were all less in the multimodal EON group (P < 0.05). The median postoperative length of stay in the multimodal EON group was 8 days (6, 12) versus 10 days (7, 18) in the conventional care group (P < 0.001). The total cost of treatment and nutritional support were also less in the multi-modal early oral nutrition group (P < 0.001). The effectiveness was 84.9 and 79.9% in the multimodal EON and conventional care group, respectively (P = 0.475). However, the cost-effectiveness ratio was USD 537.6 (506.1, 589.3) and USD 637.8 (593.9, 710.3), respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The multi-modal early oral nutrition program was an effective way to improve tolerance of oral nutrition during the first week after surgery, decrease the length of stay and improve cost-effectiveness after abdominal surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number: ChiCTR-TRC-14004395 . Registered 15 March 2014.

Impact of nutritional support that does and does not meet guideline standards on clinical outcome in surgical patients at nutritional risk: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of nutritional support on clinical outcomes in patients at nutritional risk who receive nutritional support that meets guideline standards and those who do not. METHODS: This prospective cohort study enrolled hospitalized patients from the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from February 2010 to June 2012. The research protocols were approved by the university's ethics committee, and the patients signed informed consent forms. The clinical data were collected based on nutritional risk screening, administration of enteral and parenteral nutrition, surgical information, complications, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: During the study period, 525 patients at nutritional risk were enrolled in the cohorts. Among patients who received nutritional support that met the guideline standards (Cohort 1), the incidence of infectious complications was lower than that in patients who did not meet guideline standards (Cohort 2) (17.1 % vs. 26.9 %, P = 0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that individuals who received a combination of parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN) for 7 or more days had a significantly lower incidence of infectious complications (P = 0.001) than those who received only PN for 7 or more days or those who received nutritional support for less than 7 days or at less than 10 kcal/kg/d. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that, after adjusting for confounding factors, nutritional support that met guideline standards for patients with nutritional risk was a protective factor for complications (OR: 0.870, P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: In patients at nutritional risk after abdominal surgery, nutritional support that meets recommended nutrient guidelines (especially regimens involving PN + EN ≥ 7 days) might decrease the incidence of infectious complications and is worth recommending; however, well-designed trials are needed to confirm our findings. Nutritional support that does not meet the guideline standards is considered clinically undesirable.

Screening and combining serum biomarkers to improve their diagnostic performance in the detection of intestinal barrier dysfunction in patients after major abdominal surgery.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective study was to screen and combine effective biomarkers to improve their diagnostic performance in detecting intestinal barrier dysfunction in patients after major abdominal surgery. METHODS: Patients undergoing major abdominal surgery were enrolled after signing informed consent in this study. The serum concentrations of α-GST, DAO, D-lactate, citrulline and I-FABP were detected 24 hours before and after surgery. The diagnostic performance of five biomarkers on intestinal barrier dysfunction was assessed using logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients with major abdominal surgery were enrolled in and successfully completed this study. ROC analysis revealed that the sensitivities of D-lactate, citrulline and I-FABP were very high (0.91, 0.91 and 1.00, respectively), but the specificities of these biomarkers were less than 0.70. The sensitivity of DAO was very low [0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.05-0.57], but its specificity was high (0.92; 95% CI, 0.75-0.99). The accuracies of D-lactate and I-FABP were very high, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) of the biomarkers were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.68-0.93) and 0.81 (95% CI, 0.65-0.92), respectively. Different combinations of five biomarkers were also analysed. The sensitivity, specificity and AUC values of the combination of I-FABP, citrulline and D-lactate were 1.00, 0.74 and 0.89, respectively. These results were similar to those derived from the combination of α-GST, DAO, D-lactate, citrulline and I-FABP (P=1.000). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of serum D-lactic acid, citrulline and I-FABP greatly improved the diagnostic performance for identifying intestinal barrier dysfunction in patients after major abdominal surgery.

Accuracy of using serum D-dimer for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this meta-analysis is to comprehensively assess the accuracy of serum D-dimer for the diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia. METHODS: Diagnostic studies of D-dimer for accurate diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia were extracted from 6 databases, and prospective and retrospective studies that provided adequate data on sensitivity and specificity were included here. Sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. The overall diagnostic performance of D-dimer was assessed by plotting a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and calculating the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 1300 patients with suspected acute intestinal ischemia from 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. The combined sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, and DOR were 0.94 (95% CI: 0.87-0.97), 0.50 (95% CI: 0.40-0.61), 1.9 (95% CI: 1.5-2.3), 0.12 (95% CI: 0.05-0.26), and 16 (95% CI: 7-39), respectively. The AUC was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84). CONCLUSION: The results of this meta-analysis suggested that plasma D-dimer detection might be a useful means of identifying patients with acute intestinal ischemia of the abdomen.

Accuracy of the serum intestinal fatty-acid-binding protein for diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia: a meta-analysis.

Numerous studies have investigated the utility of serum intestinal fatty-acid binding protein (I-FABP) in differentiating acute intestinal ischemia from acute abdomen. However, the results remain controversial. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the overall accuracy of serum I-FABP in the diagnosis of acute intestinal ischemia. Publications addressing the accuracy of serum I-FABP in the diagnosis of ischemic bowel diseases were selected from databases. The values of true-positive (TP), true-negative (TN), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) were extracted or calculated for each study. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. The overall diagnostic performance was assessed using a summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) and area under curve (AUC). Nine studies that collectively included 1246 patients met the eligible criteria. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, DOR, PLR, and NLR were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72-0.86), 0.85 (95% CI: 0.73-0.93), 24 (95% CI: 9-65), 5.5 (95% CI: 2.8-10.8) and 0.23 (95% CI: 0.15-0.35), respectively. The AUC was 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.89). The meta-analysis carried out in this report suggests that the I-FABP may be a useful diagnostic tool to confirm acute intestinal ischemia in acute abdomen, but better-designed trials are still required to confirm our findings.