Limited English Proficiency and Clinical Outcomes After Hospital-Based Care in English-Speaking Countries: a Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Limited English proficiency (LEP) is common among hospitalized patients and may impact care. We synthesized the literature comparing clinical outcomes after in-hospital care for English-proficient(EP) versus LEP patients. METHODS: This systematic review searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from database inception through June 7, 2020, to identify research investigating clinical outcomes in patients receiving hospital-based care (in the emergency department, inpatient ward, surgical/procedural suite, or intensive care unit) that compared patients with LEP to an EP group. We assessed mortality, length of stay (LOS), readmissions/revisits, and complications. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies met eligibility criteria. Study settings and populations were heterogeneous. Determination of primary language varied; a majority of studies (16/26) used patient self-report directly or via hospital records. Of 16 studies examining LEP and all-cause mortality, 13 found no significant association. Of 17 studies measuring LOS, 9 found no difference, 4 found longer LOS, 3 found shorter LOS, and 1 had mixed LOS results among patients with LEP. Several investigations suggested that LOS differences may be mediated at the hospital level. Nine studies evaluated inpatient readmissions. Among patients with LEP, there was evidence for increased readmissions in the setting of chronic medical conditions such as heart failure, but no evidence for increased readmissions among cohorts undergoing surgeries/procedures or with acute medical conditions. Five studies evaluated complications or harm related to a hospitalization, and no differences were found between language groups. DISCUSSION: The research community lacks a standardized definition of LEP. Most studies did not find an association between English proficiency and mortality or complications. LOS findings were mixed and may be influenced at the hospital level. Differences in readmissions by language were concentrated in chronic medical conditions. Given the paucity of studies examining LEP populations, additional research is imperative. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020143477.

Ureteral stenting after routine ureteroscopy: Is earlier stent removal feasible?

INTRODUCTION: Ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy is a common treatment option for upper urinary tract calculi. Currently, ureteral stents are placed after uncomplicated ureteroscopy for up to 1 week, but the optimal length of placement is not well defined. Ureteral stents are associated with significant morbidity, particularly stent discomfort. This study aims to determine differences in postoperative unplanned clinic or ED visits based on duration of stent placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-institution, IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study of 559 ureteroscopy cases with laser lithotripsy for urinary tract calculi performed from 2016 to 2018. The primary outcome was unplanned ED or clinic visits within 30 days following surgery and there. The patients were separated into three groups based on stent duration: 1 (0-3 days), 2 (4-6 days), and 3 (> 6 days). RESULTS: Fifty-eight (10.31%) patients experienced an unplanned visit within 30 days of the procedure. There was no significant difference in unplanned visits among groups for stent duration (p = 0.45). A Clavien grade analysis showed no difference in grades between groups (p = 0.59). A Cox regression model showed no difference in risk of unplanned visit comparing those in groups 2 and 3 to group 1 (p = 0.157 and 0.374, respectively). This also remains to be the case after adjusting for age, sex, and surgeon (p = 0.166 and 0.376, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in unplanned visits in patients based on the duration of stent placement following routine ureteroscopy. Stent removal within 3 days of surgery appears to be sufficient to minimize morbidity after uncomplicated ureteroscopy.

Semiautomated CT-Based Quantification of Donor Kidney Volume Applied to a Predictive Model of Outcomes in Renal Transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the use of semiautomated CT-based quantification of renal graft volume as a preoperative predictor of graft function. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All transplants over a 3-year period in which donors underwent CT and for which recipient outcomes were available were included. Two blinded readers used a commercially available reconstruction tool to independently measure donated kidney cortical volume and total parenchymal kidney volume. Transplant characteristics obtained by chart review included subject demographics, recipient pretransplant weight, immunologic matching, and recipient creatinine values at multiple time points. Intraclass correlation of measurements by the two readers was calculated. The ratios between donated kidney cortical volume and recipient pretransplant weight were correlated with graft function over 24 months and used in logistic regression models to calculate the odds of development of diminished renal function. RESULTS: After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 153 transplants were included in the study. Donated kidney cortical and total parenchymal volume measurements had high correlation (R > 0.9) and high reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93-0.94). Unadjusted correlations existed between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and the ratio between donated kidney cortical volume and recipient pretransplant weight 12 months (R = 0.8489) and 24 months (R = 0.6839) after transplant. After adjustment for transplant parameters, recipients in the highest tertile for ratio between donated kidney cortical volume and recipient pretransplant weight (2.7 mL/kg) had higher mean eGFR values at all time points in the 24 months than did recipients in the lower tertiles (1.2 and 1.6 mL/kg). Recipients in the highest tertile had a significantly lower risk of development of diminished renal function 12 and 24 months after transplant (adjusted odds ratios, 0.25 at 12 months [95% CI, 0.09-0.66]; 0.27 at 24 months [95% CI, 0.10-0.71]). CONCLUSION: The CT-derived ratio between donated kidney cortical volume and recipient pretransplant weight is a noninvasively and readily obtained reproducible biomarker that is predictive of 12- and 24-month renal transplant outcomes.

The Changing Roles of Urologists, Radiologists, and Advanced Practice Providers in Uroradiology Procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Urology has seen shifts in the management of many urologic conditions with the advent of noninvasive procedures that rely on multidisciplinary radiological modalities. This study seeks to analyze changes in urologists, radiologists, and advanced practice providers (APPs) performing uroradiology procedures over time. METHODS: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician/Procedure Summary data from 2010 to 2021 were utilized to examine uroradiology Current Procedural Terminology codes billed by urologists, radiologists, and APPs. Percent of total reimbursement and higher volume procedure count (after excluding providers with <11 procedures by per year) by each provider field was calculated and analyzed for changes in distribution from 2010 to 2021. RESULTS: There were significant changes in all procedures when examining procedure reimbursement distribution in 2010 to 2021 (P < .001). During the period, urology saw decreases in reimbursement proportion as large as 28.7% for kidney cryoablation and increases as large as 14.2% for nephrostomy tube removals. Radiology saw the largest decreases in reimbursement proportion with an 18.9% decrease for nephrostograms, while the largest increase was 23.6% for suprapubic tube placements. APPs saw the largest increase in suprapubic tube changes reimbursement proportion, which rose 14.2% from 2010 to 2021. There were significant changes in proportion in all procedures, except for antegrade stent, renal cryoablation, renal biopsy, and renal thermoablation. CONCLUSIONS: Uroradiology procedures have seen shifts in the distribution of which provider type performs each procedure. Most large changes in reimbursement and procedure proportion were shifted between urology and radiology, with APPs seeing smaller changes.

Gender Disparities in Quality of Life Outcomes Among Kidney Stone Formers.

Purpose: This study investigates gender-based disparities in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among kidney stone patients and explores potential contributing factors. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records at the University of Rochester Medical Center was conducted on 2199 new urolithiasis patients who completed the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire (WISQOL) standardized on a 0 to 100 scale. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Statistical analyses included univariate tests, chi-squared tests, and multivariate linear regression. Results: Of the 2199 kidney stone patients, 1085 (49.3%) were women. Women reported significantly lower quality of life (QoL) scores compared with men (71.6 vs 80.7; p < 0.001), and this persisted across all domains, including social impact (80.2 vs 86.9; p < 0.001), emotional impact (67.3 vs 77.1; p < 0.001), disease impact (67.3 vs 77.1; p < 0.001), and impact vitality (62.6 vs 72.9; p < 0.001). Female gender was identified as an independent predictor of diminished QoL scores, along with younger age, symptomatic status, number of surgeries, and presence of a psychosocial comorbidity. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that women with kidney stones experience lower HRQOL compared with men, even accounting for clinical and demographic factors. Although this study provides preliminary insights, additional research is needed to validate these findings in broader and more varied populations.

Neighborhood Social Vulnerability Impacts Quality of Life in Kidney Stone Patients.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the association between social vulnerability, as measured by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), and the quality of life (QoL) of kidney stone patients using the validated Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life Questionnaire (WISQOL). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on medical records of new urolithiasis patients who completed the WISQOL at the University of Rochester Medical Center kidney stone clinic. The primary outcome was WISQOL score, which was measured across multiple domains. SVI was used to assess social vulnerability. Neighborhoods with high SVI were defined by a threshold greater than or equal to the 75th percentile nationally. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Statistical analyses, including univariate tests and multivariate linear regression, were performed to evaluate the relationships between social vulnerability and disease-specific QoL. RESULTS: A total of 1718 patients were included in the study. One hundred five subjects (6.1%) were from neighborhoods of high social vulnerability. Patients residing in neighborhoods with high social vulnerability (SVI quartile) reported significantly lower QoL scores (69.1 vs 77.2; P = .001) and this persisted across all domains, including social impact (32.6 vs 35.1; P = .002), emotional impact (25.2 vs 27.5; P = .006), disease impact (28.5 vs 31.4; P = .001), and vitality (10.3 vs 11.2; P = .015). Younger age, female sex, and higher number of comorbidities were identified as independent predictors of lower QoL scores. However, non-White race and Latinx ethnicity did not exhibit a significant association with QoL scores. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the negative impact of high social vulnerability on QoL, emphasizing the importance of considering socioeconomic factors in patient care. These results emphasize the need for targeted interventions to support vulnerable populations. While this study offers initial insights, further research is essential to corroborate these outcomes across larger and more diverse populations.

Obesity and Male Infertility: True, True, and Unrelated?

While the prevalence of obesity has rapidly increased worldwide, there has also been a notable decline in semen parameters over the last several decades. While obesity can negatively impact reproductive hormones, many studies have sought a link between rising obesity and decreased male fertility potential. Nonetheless, few data support a direct link between the two. The focus on obesity as a causative factor in male infertility can potentially result in patient harm through delayed fertility treatment and missed diagnoses. This review investigates the associations between obesity and male infertility and why a potential direct link has been elusive and may not exist. Additionally, indirect mechanisms that may link the two will be reviewed and treatment options for obese infertile men presenting for evaluation will briefly be discussed.

5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors and Prostate Cancer Mortality among Men with Regular Access to Screening and Health Care.

BACKGROUND: How 5-alpha reductase inhibitor (5-ARI) use influences prostate cancer mortality is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine whether men taking 5-ARIs with regular health care access have increased prostate cancer mortality. METHODS: We undertook two analyses in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study examining 5-ARI use, determined by biennial questionnaires, and prostate cancer. A cohort analysis followed 38,037 cancer-free men for prostate cancer incidence from 1996 through January 2017 and mortality through January 2019. A case-only analysis followed 4,383 men with localized/locally advanced prostate cancer for mortality over a similar period. HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for prostate cancer incidence and mortality. RESULTS: Men using 5-ARIs underwent more PSA testing, prostate exams and biopsies. Over 20 years of follow-up, 509 men developed lethal disease (metastases or prostate cancer death). Among men initially free from prostate cancer, 5-ARI use was not associated with developing lethal disease [HR, 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-1.46], but was associated with reduced rates of overall and localized disease (HR, 0.71; 0.60-0.83). Among men diagnosed with prostate cancer, there was no association between 5-ARI use and cancer-specific (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48-1.27) or overall survival (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.72-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: Men using 5-ARIs were less likely to be diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer, without increasing long-term risk of lethal prostate cancer or cancer-specific death after diagnosis. IMPACT: Our results provide evidence that 5-ARI use is safe with respect to prostate cancer mortality in the context of regular health care access. See related commentary by Hamilton, p. 1259.