Effect of IV Acetaminophen Usage on Opioid Requirements, Outcomes and Costs of Care for Postoperative Children in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Children admitted to the ICU are commonly treated with opioids for postoperative pain. We hypothesized that administration of IV acetaminophen in the immediate postoperative period is effective in lowering cumulative opioid use leading to other benefits. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the PICU between December 2016 and April 2019. For each patient, data including demographics, cumulative opioid usage per kilogram, oral or rectal acetaminophen, x-ray findings, hospital costs, and surgical procedure were collected. Cumulative opioid usage was determined by converting all opioids to morphine equivalents (MEs) per kg. Standard descriptive and comparative analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC). RESULTS: A total of 200 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria (N = 92 in IV acetaminophen group and N = 108 in no IV acetaminophen group). There was no significant difference in ME per kilogram between the groups (0.3 ME/kg in IV acetaminophen group, IQR 0.5 ME/kg versus 0.4 ME/kg in no IV acetaminophen group, IQR 0.5 ME/kg, adjusted p = 0.38). Rate of atelectasis was not significant between the groups (47.8% in IV acetaminophen versus 45.4% in no acetaminophen group, p = 0.28). There was a significant difference in median total hospital costs between the groups ($22,456 in IV acetaminophen group, IQR $18,650 versus $18,552 in no IV acetaminophen group, IQR $13,361, adjusted p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: IV acetaminophen in the immediate postoperative period did not lead to a decrease in cumulative opioid usage or rate of atelectasis. IV acetaminophen usage was associated with increase in overall hospital costs per patient.

Failure to thrive: The socioeconomics of pediatric gastrostomy complications.

PURPOSE: One of the most common procedures in the pediatric population is the placement of a gastrostomy tube. There are significant medical, emotional, and social implications for both patients and caregivers. We hypothesized that socioeconomic status had a significant impact on gastrostomy complications. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. Patient and census data including median household income, unemployment rate, health insurance status, poverty level, and caregiver education level were merged. Statistical tests were conducted against a 2-sided alternative hypothesis with a 0.05 significance level. Outcomes examined were minor and major complications in association with socioeconomic variables. RESULTS: Patients with mechanical complications were younger, weighed less, and had a 72% greater chance of having commercial insurance. Patients with Medicare/self-pay were three times more likely to have a minor complication. The average unemployment rate was 23% greater in families with a major complication. Individuals with a minor complication came from community tracts with a lower percentage of families below the poverty level. CONCLUSION: An association between socioeconomic factors and gastrostomy complications was identified. Insurance status and employment status were more significant predictors than poverty level. Further work with variables for targeted interventions to provide specific family support will allow these children and families to thrive. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II prognosis study.

Low socioeconomic status and formula feeding directly correlate with increased incidence of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this analysis was to determine if a correlation exists between socioeconomic status (SES) and pyloric stenosis (PS) as well as between PS and feeding method. METHODS: Data was collected retrospectively from the electronic medical record. Patients were included if they resided in a county in Illinois where our institution maintains >10% visit share, were < 1 year in age, and received a pyloromyotomy from January 2011 to May 2018. Patient addresses were geocoded and merged with county and tract-level census data. A control group was matched on gender, race, tract level, median household income (MHI), and age. Feeding method for each group was collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate analyses were employed. RESULTS: SES was explored using MHI. After controlling for gender, age, race, and institution adjusted tract size, the association between MHI and pyloromyotomy remained significant. As MHI decreased, the odds of having a PS case increased. Additionally, the PS incidence rate increased as MHI decreased. Patients who were exclusively formula fed were more likely to have PS. CONCLUSION: Pyloric stenosis had a direct correlation with SES as defined by MHI. As MHI decreased, the rates of PS increased. In addition, breastfeeding was protective, independent of MHI. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Adopting Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children: Is It Safe During the Learning Curve?

Introduction: Laparoscopic appendectomy is the gold standard for treatment of acute appendicitis. The single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) approach has gained widespread acceptance. This study evaluates the learning curve of contemporarily trained surgeons adopting SILS appendectomy and, more specifically, the safety of the operation during the early phase of this learning curve. Methods: A retrospective review of 974 consecutive pediatric patients younger than 18 years of age, who underwent an appendectomy at a single institution from 2005 to 2018, was performed. Nonperforated and perforated appendicitis cases were included. A subgroup analysis was performed on SILS appendectomy. Outcomes measured included length of operating room and anesthesia time, as well as complication rate. A log-logistics and a Loess smoothing model were used. Results: A total of 438 single-incision laparoscopic appendectomies were reviewed. A trend toward faster operative times was observed for all surgeons as case numbers increased. The odds of still being operated on decreased by 0.997 for each additional case. Based on a 95% confidence band and this experienced time as the standard, we expect adopting surgeons to reach this experienced level after 51 cases. During the early SILS appendectomy learning curve, there was no significant difference in complication rate compared with multiport laparoscopy. Conclusion: As expected, the more single-incision cases were performed, the shorter the operative times. More importantly, there was no increase in complication rate during the learning stage of single-incision appendectomies in either perforated or nonperforated appendicitis.