Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Tissue Viability ; 26(4): 226-240, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29030056

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: At present there is no established national minimum data set (MDS) for generic wound assessment in England, which has led to a lack of standardisation and variable assessment criteria being used across the country. This hampers the quality and monitoring of wound healing progress and treatment. AIM: To establish a generic wound assessment MDS to underpin clinical practice. METHOD: The project comprised 1) a literature review to provide an overview of wound assessment best practice and identify potential assessment criteria for inclusion in the MDS and 2) a structured consensus study using an adapted Research and Development/University of California at Los Angeles Appropriateness method. This incorporated experts in the wound care field considering the evidence of a literature review and their experience to agree the assessment criteria to be included in the MDS. RESULTS: The literature review identified 24 papers that contained criteria which might be considered as part of generic wound assessment. From these papers 68 potential assessment items were identified and the expert group agreed that 37 (relating to general health information, baseline wound information, wound assessment parameters, wound symptoms and specialists) should be included in the MDS. DISCUSSION: Using a structured approach we have developed a generic wound assessment MDS to underpin wound assessment documentation and practice. It is anticipated that the MDS will facilitate a more consistent approach to generic wound assessment practice and support providers and commissioners of care to develop and re-focus services that promote improvements in wound care.


Assuntos
Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto/tendências , Exame Físico/métodos , Ferimentos e Lesões/classificação , Consenso , Inglaterra , Humanos , Exame Físico/tendências
3.
J Tissue Viability ; 21(3): 72-83, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22704905

RESUMO

Pressure ulcers are considered to be a key quality indicator and healthcare providers in England are required to report local pressure ulcer rates. However, there is a lack of standardisation in reporting due to lack of national guidance. The Tissue Viability Society has sought to develop consensus amongst all concerned parties on the most useful and robust methods of data collection. This document has been developed following a consensus meeting and consultation with the majority of Tissue Viability Nurses across England and provides guidance on reporting pressure ulcer rates. It is intended for use all organisations that are involved in the reporting of pressure ulcers. It represents the consensus view of a large number of Tissue Viability Nurses from across England and we recommend its adoption.


Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/métodos , Notificação de Abuso , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Úlcera por Pressão/epidemiologia , Úlcera por Pressão/prevenção & controle , Coleta de Dados/normas , Humanos , Incidência , Úlcera por Pressão/enfermagem , Sociedades de Enfermagem , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA