[Geriatric assessment and treatment of nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer in patients over 75 years of age. Retrospective and multicentric study of 121 cases]. / Pratique de l'évaluation oncogériatrique et traitements du cancer de vessie infiltrant localisé des patients âgés de plus de 75 ans. Étude rétrospective multicentrique de 121 cas.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to assess prevalence of geriatric assessment (GA) in patients over 75years with nonmetastatic invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective study between 2000 and 2015. We assessed comobidity by Charlson score and ASA score, geriatric assessement (GA) and treatments. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty one patients were inclued. Median age was 81 (73-95) at diagnosis. Thirty nine patients (32%) were evaluated by GA, G8 screening tool was performed in 16% of patients. Patients without GA were older (82 vs. 81years) and had less comorbidities (Charlson≥2 à 61% vs. 69%). Seventy-four percent of patients received a curarive therapy: 60% were treated by RC, 9% by chemoradiotherapy, 26% received palliative therapy and 15% were only in observation. CONCLUSION: Patients with MIBC over 75years were less evaluated and less treated. Patients in pallative care received mostly observation. Although practices have improved, GA was underused. Care of these patients needs standardization in order to adapt therapeutic to their comorbidities and to treat them with curative intent. LEVEL OF PROOF: 4.

[Prostate cancer of elderly patients: Place and role of geriatric assessment]. / Cancer de prostate des sujets âgés : place et rôle de l'évaluation gériatrique.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to appreciate the place and role of geriatric assessment in elderly patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients who underwent geriatric assessment during the therapeutic management from 2008 to 2014. Patient, tumor, treatment characteristics and their associated toxicity as well as the parameters of geriatric assessment were studied. The occurrence of geriatric assessment within the 3 months preceding a therapeutic decision was reviewed. RESULTS: Data of seventy-four patients were analyzed with a median follow-up of 15.6 years. The average age at diagnosis was 74.3 and 80.6 at the geriatric assessment. At the time of the geriatric assessment 64 patients had metastatic disease, 39 were in poor condition more than 50% of patients had walking ability disorders. Thirteen patients underwent radical surgery, 28 received radiotherapy, 30 patients had chemotherapy and hormonotherapy was prescribed for 72 patients. The geriatric assessment, requested on average 15 years after diagnosis, was not carried out within the 3 months preceding treatment decision for 55 patients. CONCLUSION: The recourse to geriatric assessment is predominantly used to endorse a decision of supportive care for elderly patients with prostate cancer. An early intervention by a geriatrician consultant for the initial management and then at each therapeutic event is a sine qua non condition for efficient personalized therapeutic management suitable to every patient according to physiological age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.