RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to compare postoperative pain between single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SPA-TLH) using a transumbilical single-port system and conventional multi (three)-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy (MPA-TLH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 women who underwent SPA-TLH and MPA-TLH for benign gynecologic diseases between March 2014 and January 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo SPA-TLH (n = 30) or MPA-TLH (n = 30). The variables measured included surgical outcomes and postoperative pain at 30 min and 1, 12, 24, and 48 h after surgery, assessed by the visual analog scale, bolus requirement of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and additional analgesic use. RESULTS: The two study groups did not differ in terms of patient demographics or surgical outcomes except for operative time. The SPA-TLH group had a longer operative time (p < 0.0001) compared with the MPA-TLH groups. There were no differences in pain scores between the two groups. The SPA-TLH group had significantly more intravenous analgesia requests during the 12-24 h after surgery (2.17 ± 3.05 vs. 0.79 ± 1.99; p = 0.047), more 24-48 h postoperative analgesics (0.21 ± 0.41 vs. 0.03 ± 0.19; p = 0.045), and more total additional analgesics (0.97 ± 0.94 vs. 0.45 ± 0.87; p = 0.034). CONCLUSION: SPA-TLH was feasible compared with MPA-TLH but the SPA-TLH group had a longer operative time. Although there is no difference in pain based on the visual analog scale pain score, the SPA-TLH group required more analgesia to give the same postoperative pain control.