Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma: final overall survival results of the randomized BRIM-3 study.

BACKGROUND: The BRIM-3 trial showed improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for vemurafenib compared with dacarbazine in treatment-naive patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive metastatic melanoma. We present final OS data from BRIM-3. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1 : 1 ratio to receive vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily) or dacarbazine (1000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks). OS and PFS were co-primary end points. OS was assessed in the intention-to-treat population, with and without censoring of data for dacarbazine patients who crossed over to vemurafenib. RESULTS: Between 4 January 2010 and 16 December 2010, a total of 675 patients were randomized to vemurafenib (n = 337) or dacarbazine (n = 338, of whom 84 crossed over to vemurafenib). At the time of database lock (14 August 2015), median OS, censored at crossover, was significantly longer for vemurafenib than for dacarbazine {13.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 12.0-15.4] versus 9.7 months [95% CI 7.9-12.8; hazard ratio (HR) 0.81 [95% CI 0.67-0.98]; P = 0.03}, as was median OS without censoring at crossover [13.6 months (95% CI 12.0-15.4) versus 10.3 months (95% CI 9.1-12.8); HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.68-0.96); P = 0.01]. Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS rates for vemurafenib versus dacarbazine were 56% versus 46%, 30% versus 24%, 21% versus 19% and 17% versus 16% at 1, 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. Overall, 173 of the 338 patients (51%) in the dacarbazine arm and 175 of the 337 (52%) of those in the vemurafenib arm received subsequent anticancer therapies, most commonly ipilimumab. Safety data were consistent with the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Vemurafenib continues to be associated with improved median OS in the BRIM-3 trial after extended follow-up. OS curves converged after ≈3 years, likely as a result of crossover from dacarbazine to vemurafenib and receipt of subsequent anticancer therapies. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT01006980.

Histology and outcomes of newly detected lung lesions in melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma frequently metastasizes to the lung. Improved radiologic techniques may decrease the need for biopsy of such lesions. The aim of this study was to examine factors predictive of a positive biopsy of melanoma. METHODS: Using the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center melanoma database, all patients with melanoma who had undergone biopsy of a suspicious new lung lesion from 1996 to 2009 were identified. Age, date of diagnosis, histology, and stage were obtained. Chart review was carried out to obtain medical history, smoking status, radiological appearance, and histology of lung lesions biopsied. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-nine patients were identified; median age was 63 years; 48% were never smokers; 27% had a prior nonmelanoma cancer; 88% of lung nodules were malignant: 69% melanoma, 19% other cancers. Among 113 patients undergoing positron emission tomography (PET), proportions of benign, melanoma, and nonmelanoma 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-avid nodules did not differ (P = 0.53). On multivariable analysis, >stage I melanoma, negative smoking history, multiple lung nodules, and no prior nonmelanoma cancer were significantly associated with a melanoma biopsy result rather than other cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 31% of lung lesions were not melanoma. In the subset undergoing PET, this did not differentiate between benign and malignant lesions. Biopsy is mandated in melanoma patients with new lung nodules.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant temozolomide in resectable melanoma patients.

BACKGROUND: We treated melanoma patients with temozolomide (TMZ) in the neoadjuvant setting and collected cryopreserved tumor samples before and after treatment. The primary objective was to determine whether the response proportion was higher than previously reported in widely metastatic patients. A secondary objective was to test the feasibility of obtaining adequate tissue before and after treatment for genetic testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive melanoma patients who were candidates for surgical resection were eligible. TMZ was administered orally at 75 mg/m(2)/day for 6 weeks of every 8-week cycle. Cycles were repeated until complete response (CR), progression, or stable disease (SD) for two cycles. RESULTS: Of 19 assessable patients, 2 had CRs and 1 had partial response. Four patients had SD; 12 progressed. Tumor O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter was unmethylated in all nine patients analyzed including from the two CR patients. Pretreatment tumor microarray results were obtained in 16 of 19 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The response proportion to TMZ in the neoadjuvant setting was 16%, not different than in the metastatic setting. Responses were seen even in tumors with a methylated MGMT promoter. Pretreatment cryopreserved tumor adequate for microarray analysis could be obtained in most, but not all, patients. Post-treatment tumor was unavailable in complete responders.

Novel anti-idiotype antibody therapy for lipooligosaccharide-induced experimental autoimmune neuritis: use relevant to Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Campylobacteriosis is a frequent antecedent event in Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), inducing high-titer serum antibodies for ganglioside antigens in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). Molecular mimicry between the lipooligosaccharide (LOS) component of Campylobacter jejuni and human peripheral nerve gangliosides is believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of GBS. Conventional treatment strategies for patients with GBS include plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and immunosuppression, which are invasive or relatively ineffective. In this study, we used our animal model of GBS, in which Lewis rats were immunized with GD3-like LOS isolated from C.jejuni. The animals developed anti-GD3 ganglioside antibodies and manifested neuromuscular dysfunction. To develop novel therapeutic strategies, we treated the animals by intraperitoneal administration of an anti-GD3 antiidiotype monoclonal antibody (BEC2) that specifically interacts with the pathogenic antibody. The treated animals had a remarkable reduction of anti-GD3 antibody titers and improvement of motor nerve functions. The results suggest that ganglioside mimics, such as antiidiotype antibodies, may be powerful reagents for therapeutic intervention in GBS by neutralizing specific pathogenic antiganglioside antibodies.

Antibody response to GD3 ganglioside is independent of NKT cells.

BACKGROUND: NKT cells recognize glycolipids presented by CD1d on antigen-presenting cells (APC) and have been largely characterized by their ability to be activated by alpha-galactosylceramide, a glycolipid not expressed on mammalian cells. We have shown previously that GD3 can be cross-presented by CD1d to NKT cells and is the first tumor-derived glycolipid recognized by NKT cells. But the ability of NKT cells to modulate B-cell responses to tumor glycolipids that are themselves recognized by NKT cells has not been explored. METHODS: We tested whether NKT cells are required for antibody (Ab) responses to GD3. We immunized wild-type mice, mice deficient in invariant chain NKT cells (iNKT cells) and mice deficient in total NKT cells against GD3. Ab titer against GD3 was measured by ELISA. RESULTS: We found the IgM and IgG responses against GD3 were similar among the three strains of mice, including the IgG isotypes induced. Pre-expanded NKT cells to GD3 did not affect the anti-GD3 Ab response. DISCUSSION: We conclude that Ab responses to GD3 are independent of NKT cells and that strategies to manipulate NKT cells in vivo are not likely to enhance the anti-GD3 Ab response induced by vaccines.

Induction of IgG antibodies against GD3 ganglioside in rabbits by an anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody.

Anti-idiotypic MAb were raised in syngeneic mice against a mouse MAb recognizing GD3 ganglioside (MAb R24). Two anti-idiotypic MAb, designated BEC2 and BEC3, recognized distinct determinants on MAb R24 that mapped near or within the GD3-binding site. New Zealand white rabbits, which express GD3 on normal tissues, were immunized with either BEC2, BEC3, or control MAb FLOPC-21. All rabbits developed high and equivalent titers of antibodies against mouse immunoglobulins. Immunization with BEC2 and BEC3 induced rabbit antibodies expressing R24 idiotype as demonstrated by their ability to inhibit BEC2 binding to R24. Antibodies (IgG and IgM) reacting with GD3 developed in five of eight rabbits immunized with BEC2 but not in rabbits immunized with BEC3 or with control MAb. Serum antibodies against GD3 did not cross-react with other gangliosides. These results show that MAb BEC2 can mimic GD3 ganglioside and can induce antibodies against GD3 ganglioside despite expression of GD3 on normal rabbit tissue.

Non-antibody immunotherapy of cancer.

Immunotherapeutic agents have become important additions to the list of anti-cancer treatments; further progress will require more information about how the immune system can respond to tumor cells. Tumor cells can avoid eliciting an immune response through several mechanisms. Understanding these mechanisms may suggest strategies to manipulate tumor cells so that they trigger an effective immune response. Another strategy being developed is to improve the therapeutic index of cytokines so that better anti-tumor effects can be elicited with less toxicity.

Light chain variants of an IgG3 anti-GD3 monoclonal antibody and the relationship among avidity, effector functions, tumor targeting, and antitumor activity.

R24 is an IgG3 mouse monoclonal antibody which recognizes the ganglioside GD3. Two variants of R24, in which one (V2-R24) or both (V1-R24) light chains were substituted by MOPC-21 light chains, were isolated and characterized. R24 had a 40-fold higher avidity for GD3 than either variant, suggesting that high avidity binding required the presence of two R24 light chains and, thus, divalency. R24 and both variants mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity but antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity mediated by variants was weak compared to R24. The presence of at least one R24 light chain was required for complement-dependent cytotoxicity; complement-dependent cytotoxicity was mediated by R24 and weakly by V2-R24 but not by V1-R24. R24, but not V1-R24 or V2-R24, inhibited attachment of melanoma cells to plastic and activated T-lymphocytes, suggesting a threshold of avidity required for these biological effects. In a human melanoma xenograft model in nu/nu mice, radiolabeled R24, variants, and isotype-matched control monoclonal antibodies all appeared to localize in tumors (based on tumor:normal tissue ratios), but specific tumor targeting by R24 was generally 3- to 6-fold higher. R24 prevented melanoma outgrowth in nu/nu mice, while V2-R24 induced partial tumor protection. V1-R24 and the negative control monoclonal antibody did not inhibit tumor outgrowth. Antitumor activity of R24 corresponded to avidity and ability to mediate complement-dependent cytotoxicity in vitro.

Phase I evaluation of a combination of monoclonal antibody R24 and interleukin 2 in patients with metastatic melanoma.

A combination of recombinant human interleukin 2 (rhIL-2) and mouse monoclonal antibody R24 (recognizing the ganglioside GD3) was evaluated in patients with metastatic melanoma in a phase I trial. rhIL-2 was given at a constant daily dose of 1 x 10(6) units/m2 i.v. over 6 h on days 1-5 and 8-12. R24 was given on days 8-12 at four dose levels (1, 3, 8, and 12 mg/m2 daily). Twenty patients were evaluable for toxicity and response, five at each dose level. The toxicity of the combination was not overlapping and generally mild. There was a rebound peripheral blood T-lymphocytosis at the end of treatment increasing with the dose of R24. The median lymphocyte count on day 12 of treatment was 3108 +/- 554/ml in patients treated at R24 doses of 8 and 12 mg/m2 versus 2239 +/- 672/ml at doses of 1 and 3 mg/m2. This evidence and other data suggested that R24 enhanced IL-2-mediated T-cell activation in vivo. Two patients demonstrated increases in R24-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity for GD3-expressing cells during treatment. rhIL-2 appeared to accelerate the development of human anti-mouse antibody; three patients developed human anti-mouse antibody by the fifth day of R24 treatment, earlier than observed in prior studies using R24 alone and one patient during the first week of rhIL-2 alone, prior to R24 treatment. One patient had a partial response in soft tissue sites lasting 6 months and two patients had minor responses. This clinical trial extends the previous observation that R24 enhances lymphocyte proliferation in vitro.

High-dose interferon alfa-2b does not diminish antibody response to GM2 vaccination in patients with resected melanoma: results of the Multicenter Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Trial E2696.

PURPOSE: High-dose interferon alfa-2b (IFNalpha2b) is the only established adjuvant therapy of resectable high-risk melanoma. GM2-KLH/QS-21 (GMK) is a chemically defined vaccine that is one of the best developed of a range of vaccine candidates for melanoma. A single-institution phase III trial conducted at Memorial Hospital served as the impetus for an intergroup adjuvant E1694/S9512/C509801 trial, which recently completed enrollment of 880 patients. To build on the apparent benefit of IFNalpha2b in resectable high-risk American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIB or III melanoma, this phase II study was designed to evaluate the combination of GMK and IFNalpha2b. The E2696 trial was undertaken to evaluate the toxicity and other effects of the established adjuvant high-dose IFNalpha2b regimen in relation to immune responses to GMK and to evaluate the potential clinical and immunologic effects of the combined therapies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This trial enrolled 107 patients with resectable high- or very high-risk melanoma (AJCC stages IIB, III, and IV). RESULTS: The results demonstrate that IFNalpha2b does not significantly inhibit immunoglobulin M or G serologic responses to the vaccine and that the combination of high-dose IFNalpha2b and GMK is well tolerated in this patient population. CONCLUSION: Cox analysis of the results of the combination with IFNalpha2b show improvement in the relapse-free survival of patients with very high-risk melanoma (including those with resectable M1 disease).

Clinical pharmacology of recombinant human tumor necrosis factor in patients with advanced cancer.

Twenty-six patients with advanced cancer refractory to standard therapy were treated with recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (rTNF) in a study aimed at determining the toxicity and tolerance of rTNF and at seeking evidence of antitumor activity. The study design involved two treatments per week for 4 weeks with alternating subcutaneous and intravenous (IV) administration, and weekly dose escalation through four levels in each patient. The dose range was 1 to 200 micrograms/m2 for IV bolus injection, and 5 to 250 micrograms/m2 for subcutaneous injection. Thirteen patients completed the full course. Early discontinuation of treatment was related to rTNF toxicity in seven cases. The major side effects were rigors, fever, headache, fatigue, and hypotension. Acute changes in granulocyte, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts, changes in serum zinc levels and plasma cortisol levels consistent with an acute phase response, and inflammation at the site of subcutaneous injection were also seen. At doses of 125 to 250 micrograms/m2, inflammation at the subcutaneous injection site was unacceptably severe. Minor changes were seen in hemostatic parameters. Hypotension was corrected by fluid administration and did not require treatment with vasopressors. Initial serum concentrations of rTNF were measured at five minutes after IV administration and were found to range from 2.5 ng/mL after a dose of 35 micrograms/m2 to 80 ng/mL after a dose of 200 micrograms/m2. The half-life of rTNF in the blood was 20 minutes. A decrease in lymph node size was observed in a patient with B cell lymphoma.

Phase III multicenter randomized trial of the Dartmouth regimen versus dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma.

PURPOSE: Several single-institution phase II trials have reported that the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine, cisplatin, carmustine, and tamoxifen) can induce major tumor responses in 40% to 50% of stage IV melanoma patients. This study was designed to compare the overall survival time, rate of objective tumor response, and toxicity of the Dartmouth regimen with standard dacarbazine treatment in stage IV melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter phase III trial, 240 patients with measurable stage IV melanoma were randomized to receive the Dartmouth regimen (dacarbazine 220 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) days 1 to 3, carmustine 150 mg/m(2) day 1 every other cycle, and tamoxifen 10 mg orally bid) or dacarbazine 1, 000 mg/m(2). Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Patients were observed for tumor response, survival time, and toxicity. RESULTS: Median survival time from randomization was 7 months; 25% of the patients survived > or = 1 year. There was no difference in survival time between the two treatment arms when analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis or when only the 231 patients who were both eligible and had received treatment were considered. Tumor response was assessable in 226 patients. The response rate to dacarbazine was 10.2% compared with 18.5% for the Dartmouth regimen (P =.09). Bone marrow suppression, nausea/vomiting, and fatigue were significantly more common in the Dartmouth arm. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in survival time and only a small, statistically nonsignificant increase in tumor response for stage IV melanoma patients treated with the Dartmouth regimen compared with dacarbazine. Dacarbazine remains the reference standard treatment for stage IV melanoma.

Immunization of melanoma patients with BEC2 anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody that mimics GD3 ganglioside: enhanced immunogenicity when combined with adjuvant.

Previous attempts to immunize melanoma patients against GD3 ganglioside have been unsuccessful because of the poor immunogenicity of GD3. BEC2, an anti-idiotypic monoclonal antibody that mimics GD3, can induce anti-GD3 IgG in rabbits. Since clinical trials with BEC2 in melanoma patients demonstrated that BEC2 alone is not highly immunogenic, we have carried out sequential clinical trials exploring the use of two immunological adjuvants, BCG and QS21, administered with BEC2. Melanoma patients free of disease after surgical resection but at high risk for recurrence were immunized either with BEC2/BCG (14 patients) or BEC2/QS21 (6 patients). All patients developed high-titer IgG antibodies against BEC2, demonstrating that both adjuvants effectively enhanced the immunogenicity of BEC2. Anti-GD3 antibodies were induced in 3 of 14 patients immunized with BEC2/BCG; no patient immunized with BEC2/QS21 developed detectable anti-GD3 antibodies. After a median follow-up of 2.4 years, 71% of the patients immunized with BEC2/BCG remain alive and 64% are free of disease. In patients immunized with BEC2/BCG, no apparent association was observed between class II HLA type and either development of anti-GD3 antibodies or survival. We are encouraged by the results with BEC2/BCG, which suggest that further enhancement of the immune response to BEC2 will result in more frequent anti-GD3 antibody responses among immunized patients.

Long survival of patients with small cell lung cancer after adjuvant treatment with the anti-idiotypic antibody BEC2 plus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin.

Despite active therapies for small cell lung cancer (SCLC), most patients relapse and die of the disease. The present study evaluates immunization using the anti-idiotypic antibody BEC2, which mimics the ganglioside GD3 expressed on the surface of most SCLC tumors, combined with Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) as an immune adjuvant. We hypothesized that active immunization could alter the natural history of the disease. Fifteen patients who had completed standard therapy for SCLC received a series of five intradermal immunizations consisting of 2.5 mg of BEC2 plus BCG over a 10-week period. Blood was collected for serological analysis, and outcome was monitored. All patients developed anti-BEC2 antibodies, despite having received chemotherapy with or without thoracic radiation. We detected anti-GD3 antibodies in five patients, including those with the longest relapse-free survival. The median relapse-free survival for patients with extensive stage disease is 11 months and has not been reached for patients with limited stage disease (>47 months), with only one of seven patients having relapsed after a median follow-up of 47 months. Immunization of patients with SCLC after standard therapy using BEC2 plus BCG can induce anti-GD3 antibodies and is safe. The survival and relapse-free survival in this group of patients are substantially better than those observed in a prior group of similar patients. A Phase III trial is being conducted to evaluate BEC2 plus BCG as adjuvant therapy after chemotherapy and irradiation.

Immunization of melanoma patients with BEC2-keyhole limpet hemocyanin plus BCG intradermally followed by intravenous booster immunizations with BEC2 to induce anti-GD3 ganglioside antibodies.

BEC2 is an anti-idiotypic mouse monoclonal antibody that mimics GD3 ganglioside. Previous clinical trials demonstrated that intradermal immunization using 2.5 mg of BEC2 with BCG or i.v. immunization with 10 mg of BEC2 can induce anti-GD3 antibodies in a subset of patients. We hypothesized that combining these two immunization strategies might be more effective in inducing anti-GD3 antibodies and that conjugation of BEC2 to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) would further enhance the immunogenicity of BEC2. In this clinical trial, 18 melanoma patients who were free of disease after complete surgical resection within 1-6 months received intradermal immunizations on weeks 0, 2, 4, 6, and 10 with 2.5 mg of BEC2 conjugated to KLH and mixed with BCG (BEC2-KLH/BCG). Booster immunizations of 10 mg of unconjugated BEC2 were administered i.v. on weeks 24, 37, and 50. Four of 18 patients (22%) developed IgM anti-GD3 antibodies. No IgG anti-GD3 antibodies were detected. All four responding patients developed anti-GD3 IgM during immunization with BEC2-KLH/BCG; only one patient demonstrated a reboost of the IgM anti-GD3 titer during the i.v. immunizations. Thirteen of the patients are free of melanoma (3 after undergoing re-resection for local relapse); 14 patients (78%) remain alive with a median follow-up of 28 months. These results confirm our previous trial, showing that BEC2 with BCG can induce anti-GD3 antibodies in patients. The data do not provide evidence that conjugation to KLH increases the immunogenicity of BEC2 when it is administered with BCG.

Vaccination with a bivalent G(M2) and G(D2) ganglioside conjugate vaccine: a trial comparing doses of G(D2)-keyhole limpet hemocyanin.

Immunization with GMK vaccine (G(M2) ganglioside conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin mixed with QS-21 adjuvant) induces anti-G(M2) antibodies in close to 100% of patients. We found previously that anti-G(D2) antibodies could be induced in some patients using G(D2)-keyhole limpet hemocyanin + QS-21 (GDK). In this trial, we wished: (a) to determine whether immunization with both GMK and GDK vaccines could induce antibodies against both G(M2) and G(D2); and (b) to determine the optimal dose of GDK. Thirty-one patients with melanoma or sarcoma who had no evidence of disease after complete surgical resection were immunized with both GMK (30 microg of G(M2)) and GDK on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24, and 36. Patients were assigned to one of five GDK dose levels (3, 10, 30, 70, or 130 microg of G(D2)). Anti-G(M2) IgM or IgG were induced in 97% of patients. The dose of GDK did not affect the anti-G(M2) response, although at the highest GDK dose level, 3 of 7 patients did not make anti-G(M2) IgG. GDK was less immunogenic; overall 45% of patients developed either IgM or IgG against G(D2). At GDK doses of 30 or 70 microg, 8 of 11 patients (73%) made either IgM or IgG anti-G(D2) antibodies. We conclude that both GMK and GDK vaccines can induce antibodies against G(M2) and G(D2) in a majority of patients and are safe. The optimal dose of GDK appears to be either 30 or 70 microg when administered with GMK vaccine.

Paucity of functional T-cell memory to melanoma antigens in healthy donors and melanoma patients.

The functional characteristics of CD8+ T cells specific for melanoma antigens (MAs) have often been defined after in vitro culture using nonprofessional antigen-presenting cells. We have examined CD8+ T-cell immunity to MAs and a viral antigen (influenza) in uncultured T cells of healthy donors and melanoma patients using autologous, mature, monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DCs) pulsed with peptide antigens and viral vectors. Antigen-specific IFN-gamma-producing T cells reactive with HLA-A*0201-restricted peptides from four melanoma antigens (MelanA/MART-1, MAGE-3, tyrosinase, and gp100) were detected only at low frequencies (<30 per 2 x 10(5) peripheral blood mononuclear cells for each of the MAs) from HLA-A2.1-positive healthy donors (n = 12) and patients with stages III/IV melanoma (n = 8). Detection of MA-specific, but not influenza matrix peptide (Flu-MP)-specific, T cells required a high concentration (10 microg/ml) of the peptide in this assay. Furthermore, these T cells did not recognize endogenously processed antigen on tumor cell lines or cells infected with viral vectors capable of expressing MAs. The use of autologous, mature DCs led to a significant increase in the number of Flu-MP, but not MA-specific, T cells in 16-h ELISPOT assays for both melanoma patients and healthy donors. In 1-week cocultures with DCs pulsed with 10 microg/ml peptide, MelanA/MART-1-specific T cells did not readily proliferate or differentiate into lytic effectors, in contrast to strong influenza-specific lytic responses. Therefore, despite distinct memory responses to influenza antigens, melanoma patients and healthy controls have a paucity of MA-reactive memory T cells, failing to rapidly generate IFN-gamma-secreting lytic effectors in short-term assays, even when stimulated by DCs.

Induction of antibodies against GM2 ganglioside by immunizing melanoma patients using GM2-keyhole limpet hemocyanin + QS21 vaccine: a dose-response study.

In a previous randomized Phase III trial (P. O. Livingston et al, J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 1036-1044, 1994), we demonstrated that immunization with GM2 and bacille Calmette-Guerin reduced the risk of relapse in stage III melanoma patients who were free of disease after surgical resection and who had no preexisting anti-GM2 antibodies. That vaccine formulation induced IgM anti-GM2 antibodies in 74% but induced IgG anti-GM2 antibodies in only 10% of the patients. To optimize the immune response against GM2, a reformulated vaccine was produced conjugating GM2 to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and using the adjuvant QS21 (GM2-KLH/QS21). In pilot studies, 70 microg of vaccine induced IgG anti-GM2 antibodies in 76% of the patients. We wished to define the lowest vaccine dose that induced consistent, high-titer IgM and IgG antibodies against GM2. Fifty-two melanoma patients who were free of disease after resection but at high risk for relapse were immunized with GM2-KLH/QS21 vaccine at GM2 doses of 1, 3, 10, 30, or 70 ILg on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24, and 36. Serum collected at frequent and defined intervals was tested for anti-GM2 antibodies. Overall, 88% of the patients developed IgM anti-GM2 antibodies; 71% also developed IgG anti-GM2 antibodies. GM2-KLH doses of 3-70 microg seemed to be equivalent in terms of peak titers and induction of anti-GM2 antibodies. At the 30-microg dose level, 50% of the patients developed complement fixing anti-GM2 antibodies detectable at a serum dilution of 1:10. We conclude that the GM2-KLH/QS21 formulation is more immunogenic than our previous formulation and that 3 microg is the lowest dose that induces consistent, high-titer IgM and IgG antibodies against GM2.

Administration of R24 monoclonal antibody and low-dose interleukin 2 for malignant melanoma.

R24 is a monoclonal antibody that recognizes the disialoganglioside GD3 expressed on the surface of malignant melanoma cells. Once bound, it can mediate destruction of these cells through both complement-mediated lysis and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Agents such as interleukin 2 (IL-2), which can augment effector cell function and promote destruction of antibody-coated tumor cells, might produce improved antitumor responses when combined with R24. In this series, we evaluated the combination of R24 and IL-2 in a Phase 1b study in patients with metastatic melanoma. Twenty-eight patients with metastatic melanoma were entered into the protocol at two institutions. Patients received 8 weeks of IL-2 by continuous i.v. infusion at a dose (4.5 x 10(5) Amgen units/m2/day) designed to selectively expand natural killer (NK) cells. In weeks 5 and 6, patients received R24 for a total of four doses. Twenty-four h after each R24 infusion, patients received a 2-h bolus dose of IL-2 to help promote activity of NK effectors against antibody-coated melanoma targets. Additional IL-2 boluses were administered in weeks 7 and 8. Doses were escalated through two bolus doses of R24 (5 or 15 mg/m2) and two bolus doses of IL-2 (2.5 or 5.0 x 10(5) units/m2). Although one patient experienced severe capillary leak syndrome during IL-2, therapy was otherwise well tolerated. At the higher dose level of R24, two of four patients experienced transient but severe abdominal and chest discomfort, necessitating dose reduction. One patient with ocular melanoma and liver metastases had a partial response. Two additional patients had minor responses. A dramatic increase in NK cell number was noted as a result of treatment, as was augmentation of cytolytic activity against cultured NK-sensitive targets. Antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against cultured melanoma cells in the presence of exogenous R24 or in the presence of serum obtained from patients following R24 infusion also increased during treatment. Our experience indicates that R24 and low-dose IL-2 can be safely combined in patients with metastatic melanoma and that this combination can promote destruction of cultured melanoma cells. The clinical activity of this combination against ocular melanoma may merit further investigation.

Phase I study of continuous-infusion recombinant macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) is a lineage-specific, homodimeric growth factor that supports the proliferation and maturation of bone marrow progenitors and the survival and function of mononuclear/macrophage cells. In vitro studies have demonstrated antitumor activity of macrophage colony-stimulating factor-treated monocytes against melanoma target cells. A Phase I study was conducted by administering the glycosylated form of the protein to patients with metastatic melanoma as two 7-day continuous i.v. infusions separated by a 2-week rest. Cohorts of three patients per dose level received escalating doses of 10-160 microgram/kg/day. Safety, clinical, and biological effects were evaluated. The infusions were well tolerated with occasional maximum grade 2 nonhematological toxicity. Rapidly reversible thrombocytopenia was the major hematological adverse effect. Its etiology may in part be explained by proliferation and activation of monocyte/macrophage cells in bone marrow samples. Evidence for a biological effect on tumors was suggested by the delayed, complete disappearance of multiple lesions in one patient and a decrease in the size of one marker lesion in a second patient with a mixed response. Fasting serum cholesterol levels decreased during the infusions and may represent an additional therapeutic application for this growth factor.