Immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in older patients: prognosis and long-term survival.

Older age is associated with increased mortality in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP). Yet, data are scarce regarding iTTP occurring among older patients. To assess clinical features and long-term impact of iTTP on mortality in older patients (>60 years old), characteristics and prognoses of adult iTTP patients enrolled in the French Reference Center for Thrombotic Microangiopathies registry between 2000 and 2016 were described according to age (<60 years old or ≥60 years old). Long-term mortality of iTTP older survivors was compared with that of non-iTTP geriatric subjects. Comparing, respectively, older iTTP patients (N = 71) with younger patients (N = 340), time from hospital admission to diagnosis was longer (P < .0001); at diagnosis, delirium (P = .034), behavior impairment (P = .045), renal involvement (P < .0001), and elevated troponin level (P = .025) were more important whereas cytopenias were less profound (platelet count, 22 × 103/mm3 [9-57] vs 13 × 103/mm3 [9-21], respectively [P = .002]; hemoglobin level, 9 g/dL [8-11] vs 8 g/dL [7-10], respectively [P = .0007]). Short- and mid-term mortalities were higher (P < .0001) and increased for every 10 years of age range. Age ≥60 years, cardiac involvement, increased plasma creatinine level, and total plasma exchange volume were independently associated with 1-month mortality. Compared with a non-iTTP geriatric population, older survivors showed an increased long-term mortality (hazard ratio = 3.44; P < .001). In conclusion, older iTTP patients have atypical neurological presentation delaying the diagnosis. Age negatively impacts short-term but also long-term mortality.

Preemptive rituximab prevents long-term relapses in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.

Preemptive rituximab infusions prevent relapses in immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) by maintaining normal ADAMTS13 activity. However, the long-term outcome of these patients and the potential adverse events of this strategy need to be determined. We report the long-term outcome of 92 patients with iTTP in clinical remission who received preemptive rituximab after identification of severe ADAMTS13 deficiency (activity <10%) during the follow-up. Thirty-seven patients had >1 iTTP episode, and the median cumulative relapse incidence before preemptive rituximab was 0.33 episode per year (interquartile range [IQR], 0.23-0.66). After preemptive rituximab, the median cumulative relapse incidence in the whole population decreased to 0 episodes per year (IQR, 0-1.32; P < .001). After preemptive rituximab, ADAMTS13 activity recovery was sustained in 34 patients (37%) during a follow-up of 31.5 months (IQR, 18-65), and severe ADAMTS13 deficiency recurred in 45 patients (49%) after the initial improvement. ADAMTS13 activity usually improved with additional courses of preemptive rituximab. In 13 patients (14%), ADAMTS13 activity remained undetectable after the first rituximab course, but retreatment was efficient in 6 of 10 cases. In total, 14 patients (15%) clinically relapsed, and 19 patients (20.7%) experienced benign adverse effects. Preemptive rituximab treatment was associated with a change in ADAMTS13 conformation in respondent patients. Finally, in the group of 23 historical patients with iTTP and persistently undetectable ADAMTS13 activity, 74% clinically relapsed after a 7-year follow-up (IQR, 5-11). In conclusion, persistently undetectable ADAMTS13 activity in iTTP during remission is associated with a higher relapse rate. Preemptive rituximab reduces clinical relapses by maintaining a detectable ADAMTS13 activity with an advantageous risk-benefit balance.

Real-life effectiveness of carfilzomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma receiving treatment in the context of early access: The CARMYN study.

The real-life retrospective observational study CARMYN aimed at investigating the long-term efficacy and safety of carfilzomib in combination with dexamethasone and lenalidomide (KRd, 159 patients). These patients (62% in first and 38% in second relapse, median age 62 yo) were treated between 02/2014 and 02/2017. Most had been pre-exposed to bortezomib (98.2%) and to an IMID (75.4%). At the time of collection, 90% had permanently discontinued carfilzomib. Data collection was conducted from January to July 2021 in 27 participating sites, after a median of 39 months follow-up. For patients treated with KRd, an overall response rate of 78.4% translated in a median progression free survival (PFS) of 24.0 months (95% CI 18.8-27.6) and a median overall survival (OS) of 51.1 months (95% CI 41.3-not reached). Results were poorer but difficult to interpret in the small cohort of Kd recipients. The study is one of the longest real-life studies of carfilzomib treatment in patients in first or second relapse. CARMYN confirmed the real-life long-term efficacy of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone with results similar to those of clinical trials. The KRd regimen is thus an option to consider for late relapses in the current context of MM management.

Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura prognosis is affected by blood pressure.

Background: The prevalence, prognostic role, and diagnostic value of blood pressure in immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) and other thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) remain unclear. Methods: Using a national cohort of iTTP (n = 368), Shigatoxin-induced hemolytic uremic syndrome (n = 86), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (n = 84), and hypertension-related thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 25), we sought to compare the cohort's blood pressure profile to assess its impact on prognosis and diagnostic performances. Results: Patients with iTTP had lower blood pressure than patients with other TMAs, systolic (130 [interquartile range (IQR) 118-143] vs 161 [IQR 142-180] mmHg) and diastolic (76 [IQR 69-83] vs 92 [IQR 79-105] mmHg, both p < 0.001). The best threshold for iTTP diagnosis corresponded to a systolic blood pressure <150 mmHg. iTTP patients presenting with hypertension had a significantly poorer survival (hazard ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.04), and this effect remained significant after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio = 1.14, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.30). Addition of a blood pressure criterion modestly improved the French clinical score to predict a severe A disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 deficiency in patients with an intermediate score (i.e., either platelet count <30 × 109/L or serum creatinine <200 µM). Conclusions: Elevated blood pressure at admission affects the prognosis of iTTP patients and may help discriminate them from other TMA patients. Particular attention should be paid to blood pressure and its management in these patients.