Comparison of catalase, glutathione peroxidase and malondialdehyde levels in tears among diabetic patients with and without diabetic retinopathy.

Background: Various studies suggest that oxidative stress has a role in the etiology of diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications. Detection of antioxidant enzymes and malondialdehyde (MDA) level in ocular fluid may provide the possible biomarkers for monitoring the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). The aim of this study was to compare catalase, glutathione peroxidase (GPx) and MDA levels in tears among diabetic patients with and without DR. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among type 2 DM patients. The patients were divided into three groups: no DR, non-proliferative DR (NPDR) and proliferative DR (PDR). Tears samples were collected using Schirmer strips for measurement of catalase, GPx and MDA. Results: A total of 171 patients were recruited in this study (no DR, 58 patients; NPDR, 57 patients; PDR, 56 patients). There was significant difference in the mean level of GPx in tears between the three groups (no DR, 658.08 ± 115.70 U/L; NPDR, 653.78 ± 87.90 U/L; PDR, 605.31 ± 107.47 U/L, respectively) before and after adjustment for covariates (p = 0.013 and p = 0.001, respectively). Bonferroni post-hoc analysis showed PDR group had significantly lower mean GPx level than in no DR (p=0.001) and NPDR (p=0.037) after adjustment for covariates. There was no significant difference of mean catalase and MDA in the tears between the three groups before and after adjustment for covariates. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that diabetic patient with DR is associated with low level of GPx in tears, suggesting that this antioxidant enzyme is a potential biomarker for predicting the presence of DR.

Tear cytokine levels in allergic rhinitis without ocular symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: To compare cytokine levels in the pre-corneal tear film between patients with allergic rhinitis, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and the normal population. DESIGN: A comparative cross sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were divided into Group 1 (allergic rhinitis without conjunctivitis), Group 2 (allergic rhinoconjunctivitis), and Group 3 (normal population). METHODS: A comparative cross-sectional study was conducted. Patients were divided into; Group 1 (allergic rhinitis without conjunctivitis), Group 2 (allergic rhinoconjunctivitis), and Group 3 (normal controls). Tears were collected using Schirmer strips and cytokine analysis performed using enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. RESULTS: There were a total of 68 subjects. Median values of cytokines in the allergic rhinitis group were as follows; TNFa (45.34 pg/ml), IL-4 (61.91 pg/ml), IL-5 (8.92 pg/ml), IL-6 (538.37 pg/ml) and IL-8 (1438.72 pg/ml). Cytokine levels in the group with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis were approximately two-fold higher than in the group with allergic rhinitis only. The median cytokine level in the control group was lowest. A significant inter-group difference was observed for TNF-alpha, IL-4, IL-6 and IL-8 levels, with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis patients demonstrating significantly elevated cytokines compared to those with allergic rhinitis only (p<0.001). These four cytokines were also significantly higher in those with allergic rhinitis than in controls (p<0.005). Although the group with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis had the highest levels of IL-5, no statistically significant inter-group difference was noted (p=0.479). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the presence of raised tear film inflammatory cytokines even in allergic rhinitis patients without ocular symptoms. These patients may be at increased risk of developing allergic conjunctivitis. These findings not only substantiate the immunological theory of the naso-ocular reflex, but have clinical and therapeutic implications for the holistic management of allergic rhinitis and conjunctivitis.

Anti-nucleosome antibodies as a disease activity marker in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.

AIM: To measure the level of anti-nucleosome antibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients, to determine the sensitivity and the specificity of these antibodies in the diagnosis of the disease and to evaluate the relationship between the levels of anti-nucleosome antibodies, anti-dsDNA (double-stranded DNA) and SLE disease activity. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. All patients attended either a medical specialist clinic or were admitted to the medical wards of Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia with the diagnosis of SLE (n = 90), other connective tissue diseases (n = 45) or were normal controls (n = 90) within the period from July 2004 until September 2005. They were tested for anti-nucleosome antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and anti-DNA antibodies by immunofluorescence. SLE disease activity was evaluated by SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) score. RESULTS: Out of 90 SLE patients, anti-nucleosome antibodies were positive in 47 (52.2%) patients, whereas these antibodies were positive in three (6.7%) patients with other connective tissue diseases. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were positive in 33 (36.7%) SLE patients, whereas these antibodies were positive in four (8.9%) patients with other connective tissue diseases. Anti-nucleosome antibodies were positive in 40 (97.6%) patients with active SLE, whereas these antibodies were positive in seven (14.3%) patients with inactive SLE. Anti-nucleosome antibodies had a stronger correlation than anti-dsDNA antibodies with SLEDAI score. There was a significant association between anti-nucleosome antibodies and disease activity. CONCLUSION: Anti-nucleosome antibodies test is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of SLE, especially when the anti-dsDNA antibodies are absent. They are additional disease activity markers in the assessment of SLE disease activity.