How Does ChatGPT Use Source Information Compared With Google? A Text Network Analysis of Online Health Information.

BACKGROUND: The lay public is increasingly using ChatGPT (a large language model) as a source of medical information. Traditional search engines such as Google provide several distinct responses to each search query and indicate the source for each response, but ChatGPT provides responses in paragraph form in prose without providing the sources used, which makes it difficult or impossible to ascertain whether those sources are reliable. One practical method to infer the sources used by ChatGPT is text network analysis. By understanding how ChatGPT uses source information in relation to traditional search engines, physicians and physician organizations can better counsel patients on the use of this new tool. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) In terms of key content words, how similar are ChatGPT and Google Search responses for queries related to topics in orthopaedic surgery? (2) Does the source distribution (academic, governmental, commercial, or form of a scientific manuscript) differ for Google Search responses based on the topic's level of medical consensus, and how is this reflected in the text similarity between ChatGPT and Google Search responses? (3) Do these results vary between different versions of ChatGPT? METHODS: We evaluated three search queries relating to orthopaedic conditions: "What is the cause of carpal tunnel syndrome?," "What is the cause of tennis elbow?," and "Platelet-rich plasma for thumb arthritis?" These were selected because of their relatively high, medium, and low consensus in the medical evidence, respectively. Each question was posed to ChatGPT version 3.5 and version 4.0 20 times for a total of 120 responses. Text network analysis using term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) was used to compare text similarity between responses from ChatGPT and Google Search. In the field of information retrieval, TF-IDF is a weighted statistical measure of the importance of a key word to a document in a collection of documents. Higher TF-IDF scores indicate greater similarity between two sources. TF-IDF scores are most often used to compare and rank the text similarity of documents. Using this type of text network analysis, text similarity between ChatGPT and Google Search can be determined by calculating and summing the TF-IDF for all keywords in a ChatGPT response and comparing it with each Google search result to assess their text similarity to each other. In this way, text similarity can be used to infer relative content similarity. To answer our first question, we characterized the text similarity between ChatGPT and Google Search responses by finding the TF-IDF scores of the ChatGPT response and each of the 20 Google Search results for each question. Using these scores, we could compare the similarity of each ChatGPT response to the Google Search results. To provide a reference point for interpreting TF-IDF values, we generated randomized text samples with the same term distribution as the Google Search results. By comparing ChatGPT TF-IDF to the random text sample, we could assess whether TF-IDF values were statistically significant from TF-IDF values obtained by random chance, and it allowed us to test whether text similarity was an appropriate quantitative statistical measure of relative content similarity. To answer our second question, we classified the Google Search results to better understand sourcing. Google Search provides 20 or more distinct sources of information, but ChatGPT gives only a single prose paragraph in response to each query. So, to answer this question, we used TF-IDF to ascertain whether the ChatGPT response was principally driven by one of four source categories: academic, government, commercial, or material that took the form of a scientific manuscript but was not peer-reviewed or indexed on a government site (such as PubMed). We then compared the TF-IDF similarity between ChatGPT responses and the source category. To answer our third research question, we repeated both analyses and compared the results when using ChatGPT 3.5 versus ChatGPT 4.0. RESULTS: The ChatGPT response was dominated by the top Google Search result. For example, for carpal tunnel syndrome, the top result was an academic website with a mean TF-IDF of 7.2. A similar result was observed for the other search topics. To provide a reference point for interpreting TF-IDF values, a randomly generated sample of text compared with Google Search would have a mean TF-IDF of 2.7 ± 1.9, controlling for text length and keyword distribution. The observed TF-IDF distribution was higher for ChatGPT responses than for random text samples, supporting the claim that keyword text similarity is a measure of relative content similarity. When comparing source distribution, the ChatGPT response was most similar to the most common source category from Google Search. For the subject where there was strong consensus (carpal tunnel syndrome), the ChatGPT response was most similar to high-quality academic sources rather than lower-quality commercial sources (TF-IDF 8.6 versus 2.2). For topics with low consensus, the ChatGPT response paralleled lower-quality commercial websites compared with higher-quality academic websites (TF-IDF 14.6 versus 0.2). ChatGPT 4.0 had higher text similarity to Google Search results than ChatGPT 3.5 (mean increase in TF-IDF similarity of 0.80 to 0.91; p < 0.001). The ChatGPT 4.0 response was still dominated by the top Google Search result and reflected the most common search category for all search topics. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT responses are similar to individual Google Search results for queries related to orthopaedic surgery, but the distribution of source information can vary substantially based on the relative level of consensus on a topic. For example, for carpal tunnel syndrome, where there is widely accepted medical consensus, ChatGPT responses had higher similarity to academic sources and therefore used those sources more. When fewer academic or government sources are available, especially in our search related to platelet-rich plasma, ChatGPT appears to have relied more heavily on a small number of nonacademic sources. These findings persisted even as ChatGPT was updated from version 3.5 to version 4.0. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Physicians should be aware that ChatGPT and Google likely use the same sources for a specific question. The main difference is that ChatGPT can draw upon multiple sources to create one aggregate response, while Google maintains its distinctness by providing multiple results. For topics with a low consensus and therefore a low number of quality sources, there is a much higher chance that ChatGPT will use less-reliable sources, in which case physicians should take the time to educate patients on the topic or provide resources that give more reliable information. Physician organizations should make it clear when the evidence is limited so that ChatGPT can reflect the lack of quality information or evidence.

Complications and Unplanned Reoperation After Thumb Metacarpophalangeal Arthrodesis.

PURPOSE: Arthrodesis of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint of the thumb is a common procedure to treat arthritis or instability. Studies reporting hardware complications and nonunion rates after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis report on small sample sizes. We aimed to describe the hardware complication rate, the nonunion rate, and the number of thumbs that achieve union among patients undergoing thumb MCP joint arthrodesis. METHODS: A database spanning 5 urban hospitals in a single metropolitan region in the United States was searched for patients who underwent thumb MCP joint arthrodesis between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2020. After reviewing patient records, we identified 122 thumbs that underwent MCP joint arthrodesis and had a minimum follow-up of 90 days. The primary outcome was unplanned reoperation after hardware complications and nonunion. Second, the number of thumbs that achieved radiographic union was reported for the tension band and screw fixation arthrodesis group. RESULTS: Twenty-two (18%) out of 122 thumbs had hardware complications after thumb MCP joint arthrodesis, and 11 (9%) out of 122 thumbs developed a nonunion. Patients who underwent screw fixation arthrodesis had no events of hardware complications and subsequent hardware removal. The nonunion rate was 9/65 (14%) in the tension band arthrodesis group and 2 (4%) of 45 in the screw fixation arthrodesis group. Of the thumbs that had available radiographs to assess the healing of the arthrodesis, 34 (81%) of 42 were radiographically united in the tension band arthrodesis group and 29 (91%) of 32 in the screw fixation group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that screw fixation has fewer hardware complications and a lower reoperation rate than tension band arthrodesis. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis IV.

Quantitative Analysis of the Volar Ulnar Corner of the Distal Radius: A Reference for Intraoperative Distal Radius Fracture Reduction.

PURPOSE: The reduction of distal radius fractures using volar locking plate fixation can be performed by securing the plate to the distal fragments and then levering the plate to the radial shaft. Oblique placement of the plate on the radial shaft may lead to malreduction. The aim of this study was to evaluate parameters that can be used for the assessment of intraoperative distal radius fracture reduction using "distal-first" volar plate fixation, especially the geometry of the ulnar corner. The prevalence of Tolat distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) types was determined, and the angles of the volar corner were quantitatively described. METHODS: Three hundred seventy-five adult patients with a conventional wrist radiograph in their medical chart were identified. From this cohort, 50 radiographs of each Tolat DRUJ type were quantitatively analyzed using 4 angles. The probability density of each angle was described using Kernel density estimation graphs. A multivariable analysis was used to study the association between the 4 angles and Tolat DRUJ types and other patient factors. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one patients (40%) had a wrist with type 1 DRUJ, 147 (39%) had a wrist with type 2 DRUJ, and 77 (21%) had a wrist with type 3 DRUJ. The measurements of the distal ulnar corner, volar ulnar corner, and DRUJ angulation were significantly different among each Tolat DRUJ type. The median lunate facet inclination, relative to the axis of the radial shaft, measured 14° (interquartile range, 12°-16°) across all the Tolat DRUJ types. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of Tolat type 1, 2, and 3 DRUJ was 40%, 39%, and 21%, respectively. The angles of the volar ulnar corner varied with each DRUJ type. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because the lunate facet inclination was relatively consistent among all the Tolat DRUJ types, this angle may be useful as a reference for "distal-first" distal radius volar plating.

A Quantitative Analysis of Subchondral Bone Density Around Osteochondritis Dissecans Lesions of the Capitellum.

PURPOSE: In capitellar osteochondritis dissecans (OCD), unstable lesions generally demonstrate signs of subchondral sclerosis. We postulate that OCD lesions have abnormal subchondral bone density. We aimed to quantify the subchondral bone thickness around OCD lesions using conventional computed tomography (CT) imaging. METHODS: This retrospective study included 15 patients with capitellar OCD (OCD group) and 12 patients with an unaffected radio-capitellar joint (control group). We constructed 3-dimensional humerus models using CT data and quantified the bone density with colored contour mapping to determine the subchondral bone thickness. We measured the thickness relative to the condylar height at the centroid and lateral, medial, superior, and inferior edge points of the OCD lesion, and compared the findings between the groups. We then correlated the CT measurements with the magnetic resonance imaging measurements. RESULTS: Subchondral bone thickness at the centroid and lateral, medial, superior, and inferior edges in the OCD group was significantly higher than that in the control group. Correlation analyses revealed that the magnetic resonance imaging measurements highly correlated with the CT subchondral bone measurements. CONCLUSIONS: We found that there is a zone of increased subchondral bone thickness around OCD lesions that should be considered during drilling, microfracture, or other reconstruction methods. We observed a high correlation with low errors between the measurements taken from conventional CT images and the measurements from magnetic resonance imaging, suggesting that both modalities are useful in clinical decision making. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic IV.

Long-Term Opioid Use Following Surgery for Symptomatic Neuroma.

BACKGROUND: Identifying patients at risk for prolonged opioid use following surgery for symptomatic neuroma would be beneficial for perioperative management. The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with postoperative opioid use of >4 weeks in patients undergoing neuroma surgery. METHODS: After retrospective identification, 77 patients who underwent surgery for symptomatic neuroma of the upper or lower extremity were enrolled. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) depression, Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score, and a custom medication questionnaire at a median of 9.7 years (range: 2.5-16.8 years) following surgery. Neuroma excision followed by nerve implantation (n = 39, 51%), nerve reconstruction/repair (n = 18, 23%), and excision alone (n = 16, 21%) were the most common surgical treatments. RESULTS: Overall, 27% (n = 21) of patients reported opioid use of more than 4 weeks postoperatively. Twenty-three patients (30%) reported preoperative opioid use of which 11 (48%) did not report opioid use for >4 weeks, postoperatively. In multivariable logistic regression, preoperative opioid use was independently associated with opioid use of >4 weeks, postoperatively (odds ratio [OR] = 4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.36-14.3, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Neuroma surgery reduces opioid use in many patients but patients who are taking opioids preoperatively are at risk for longer opioid use. Almost one-third of patients reported opioid use longer than 4 weeks, postoperatively.

Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction after distal radius tumor resection: Reoperation and patient reported outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to evaluate the rate of wrist joint preservation, allograft retention, factors associated with reoperation and to report the patient reported outcomes after osteoarticular allograft reconstruction of the distal radius. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified 33 patients who underwent distal radius resection followed by osteoarticular allograft reconstruction, including 27 giant cell tumors and 6 primary malignancies. Ten patients with a preserved wrist joint completed the QuickDASH, PROMIS-CA physical function, and Toronto extremity salvage score (TESS) at a median of 13 years postoperatively. RESULTS: The allograft retention rate was 89%, and an allograft fracture predisposed to conversion to wrist arthrodesis. The reoperation rate was 55% and 36% underwent wrist arthrodesis at a median of 4.2 years following index surgery. The use of locking plate fixation was associated with lower reoperation and allograft fracture rates. Patients reported a median QuickDASH of 10.2 (range: 0-52.3), a mean PROMIS physical function of 57.8 (range: 38.9-64.5) and the median TESS was 95.5 (range: 67.0-98.4). CONCLUSION: Osteoarticular allograft reconstruction results in acceptable long-term patient reported outcomes, despite a high revision rate. Allograft fixation with locking plates seems to reduce the number of reoperations and allograft fractures, along with reduction in wrist arthrodesis rates.

Factors associated with 30-day soft tissue complications following upper extremity sarcoma surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence of soft tissue complications following sarcoma surgery in the upper extremity is reportedly high. Therefore, this study assessed the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database to identify independent risk factors, while also reporting the incidence of soft tissue complications in the first 30 days after surgery. METHODS: A total of 620 patients that underwent surgical treatment for upper extremity sarcoma were included from the NSQIP database. Soft tissue complications were defined as surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, or soft-tissue related reoperations. Clinically relevant patient and treatment characteristics were selected and analyzed. RESULTS: The 30-day soft tissue complication rate was 4.7%. In the multivariable analysis, higher body mass index (p = .047) and longer operative times (p = .002) were independently associated with soft tissue complications. CONCLUSIONS: Higher body mass index and longer operative times are risk factors for soft tissue complications following upper extremity sarcoma surgery. The soft-tissue complication rate following resection of upper extremity tumors is low in this national cohort, possibly due to the relatively small tumor size and low prevalence of radiotherapy.

Long-term patient-reported outcome measures following limb salvage with complex reconstruction or amputation in the treatment of upper extremity sarcoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study compares long-term patient-reported outcomes between patients that underwent limb-salvage surgery with complex reconstruction by free or pedicled flap (LS) or amputation. Additionally, the need for revision surgery is compared. METHODS: A total of 43 patients were studied at a median follow-up of 9.54 years. Sixteen patients completed questionnaires regarding functional outcome and mental wellbeing. Functional outcomes were measured by using the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS), QuickDASH, and PROMIS Upper Extremity instruments. Mental wellbeing was assessed using the PROMIS Anxiety and Depression instruments. Revision surgery was assessed for the entire follow-up. RESULTS: The median TESS scores were 96.0 versus 71.7 (p = 0.034) and the PROMIS Upper Extremity scores were 50.1 versus 40.3 (p = 0.039) for the LS and amputation cohorts, respectively. No significant difference was found regarding symptoms of anxiety (52.7 vs. 53.8; p = 0.587) or depression (52.0 vs. 50.5; p = 0.745). Of the patients in the LS cohort 51.6% required at least one reoperation compared to 8.33% in the amputation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: LS surgery maintains functional benefits over amputation after almost a decade of follow-up. Still, mental wellbeing seems to be comparable between these patients, whereas LS procedures are associated with a sixfold increased need for reoperations.

Are Patient Expectations and Illness Perception Associated with Patient-reported Outcomes from Surgical Decompression in de Quervain's Tenosynovitis?

BACKGROUND: Psychological factors such as depression, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, pain anxiety, and more negative illness perceptions are associated with worse pain and function in patients at the start of treatment for de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Longitudinal studies have found symptoms of depression and pain catastrophizing at baseline were associated with worse pain after treatment. It is important to study patients opting for surgery for their condition because patients should choose surgical treatment based on their values rather than misconceptions. Psychological factors associated with worse patient-reported outcomes from surgery for de Quervain's tenosynovitis should be identified and addressed preoperatively so surgeons can correct any misunderstandings about the condition. QUESTION/PURPOSE: What preoperative psychosocial factors (depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, illness perception, and patient expectations) are associated with pain and function 3 months after surgical treatment of de Quervain's tenosynovitis after controlling for demographic characteristics? METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 164 patients who underwent surgery for de Quervain's tenosynovitis between September 2017 and October 2018 performed by 20 hand surgeons at 18 centers. Our database included 326 patients who underwent surgery for de Quervain's tenosynovitis during the study period. Of these, 62% (201 of 326) completed all baseline questionnaires and 50% (164 of 326) also completed patient-reported outcomes at 3 months postoperatively. We found no difference between those included and those not analyzed in terms of age, sex, duration of symptoms, smoking status, and workload. The mean ± SD age of the patients was 52 ± 14 years, 86% (141 of 164) were women, and the mean duration of symptoms was 13 ± 19 months. Patients completed the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), the VAS for pain and function, the Patient Health Questionnaire for symptoms of anxiety and depression, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale, the Credibility/Expectations Questionnaire, and the Brief Illness Perceptions questionnaire at baseline. Patients also completed the PRWE and VAS for pain and function at 3 months postoperatively. We used a hierarchical multivariable linear regression model to investigate the relative contribution of patient demographics and psychosocial factors to the pain and functional outcome at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: After adjusting for demographic characteristics, psychosocial factors, and baseline PRWE score, we found that only the patient's expectations of treatment and how long their illness would last were associated with the total PRWE score at 3 months postoperatively. More positive patient expectations of treatment were associated with better patient-reported pain and function at 3 months postoperatively (ß = -2.0; p < 0.01), while more negative patient perceptions of how long their condition would last were associated with worse patient-reported pain and function (timeline ß = 2.7; p < 0.01). The final model accounted for 31% of the variance in the patient-reported outcome at 3 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Patient expectations and illness perceptions are associated with patient-reported pain and functional outcomes after surgical decompression for de Quervain's tenosynovitis. Addressing misconceptions about de Quervain's tenosynovitis in terms of the consequences for patients and how long their symptoms will last should allow patients to make informed decisions about the treatment that best matches their values. Prospective studies are needed to investigate whether addressing patient expectations and illness perceptions, with decision aids for example, can improve patient-reported pain and function postoperatively in those patients who still choose surgery for de Quervain's tenosynovitis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Isolated type II SLAP tears undergo reoperation more frequently.

PURPOSE: There is discrepancy in the reported reoperation rate and factors associated with reoperation after type II SLAP repair. The aim was to determine the incidence and factors associated with unplanned reoperation and repair failure after type II SLAP repair. METHODS: Five-hundred and thiry-nine patients with SLAP repairs were identified from 2005 to 2016. Patient characteristics were recorded and subgroup analyses performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with unplanned reoperation and SLAP repair failure. RESULTS: Sixty-six of 539 patients (12%) had unplanned reoperation after SLAP repair. Additional procedures during SLAP repair were associated with fewer unplanned reoperations (OR 0.57; P = 0.046). Age < 40 was associated with unplanned reoperation (55% vs 40%; P = 0.032), but this was not an independent association. Forty-five of 539 patients (8.3%) had SLAP repair failure (defined by repeat SLAP repair or biceps tenodesis/tenotomy). Smoking (OR 3.1; P = 0.004) and knotless suture anchors (OR 3.4; P = 0.007) were associated with SLAP repair failure. Isolated SLAP repair was associated with SLAP repair failure (64% vs 46%; P = 0.020), but this was not an independent association. In those who did not have an isolated SLAP repair, knotless suture anchors (19% vs 3.4%; P = 0.024) were associated with repair failure. CONCLUSION: After type II SLAP repair, roughly 1 in 10 patients may undergo reoperation. Isolated SLAP repair is independently associated with unplanned reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Degenerative changes in the elbow joint after radial head excision for fracture: quantitative 3-dimensional analysis of bone density, stress distribution, and bone morphology.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: Some investigators speculate that excision may lead to elbow arthritis and associated problems; however, evidence supporting this theory is limited. It is hypothesized that radial head excision causes bone density changes as a result of asymmetrical stress distributions, consequently leading to osteophyte formation. In this study, we sought to quantitatively compare the 3-dimensional (3D) bone density and stress distributions between operative and nonoperative elbows in patients who underwent radial head excision. Furthermore, we aimed to quantify the bone morphologic changes using 3D models in the same cohort. METHODS: After retrospective identification, this study enrolled 6 patients who had undergone radial head excision for radial head fractures. We created 3D bone models using computed tomography data obtained from the injured and uninjured elbows. Humerus and ulna models were divided into anatomic regions, and the bone density of each region was assessed and described by its percentage of high-density volume (%HDV). We also constructed finite element models and measured the stress values in each region. Furthermore, we compared the bone morphology by superimposing the operative elbow onto the mirror image of the nonoperative elbow. RESULTS: The mean interval from radial head excision to examination was 8.4 ± 3.3 years. The %HDV on the operative side was higher than that of the nonoperative side at the anterolateral trochlea (77.5% ± 6.5% vs. 64.6% ± 4.0%, P = .028) and posterolateral trochlea (70.7% ± 7.8% vs. 63.1% ± 3.8%, P = .034) regions of the distal humerus. Reciprocal changes were observed in the proximal ulna, as %HDV was higher in the lateral coronoid (52.6% ± 9.6% vs. 34.2% ± 6.6%, P = .007). The stress distributions paralleled the bone density measurements. The operative elbows demonstrated an enlarged capitellum and a widened and deepened trochlea with osteophyte formation compared with the nonoperative side. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In elbows treated with radial head excision, we identified asymmetrical bone density and stress alterations on the lateral side of the ulnohumeral joint and bone morphologic changes across the joint. These data support the theory that radial head excision contributes to ulnohumeral arthritis over the long term.

Bone resorption of the greater tuberosity after open reduction and internal fixation of complex proximal humeral fractures: fragment characteristics and intraoperative risk factors.

HYPOTHESIS AND BACKGROUND: In complex proximal humeral fractures, bone resorption of the greater tuberosity is sometimes observed after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). However, this has not been well characterized, and risk factors for resorption are not completely understood. We aimed (1) to identify the risk factors associated with bone resorption of the greater tuberosity and (2) to quantify the geometric and bone density characteristics associated with bone resorption using 3-dimensional computed tomography models in complex proximal humeral fractures treated with ORIF. METHODS: We identified a retrospective cohort of 136 patients who underwent ORIF of 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures; greater tuberosity resorption developed after ORIF in 30 of these patients. We collected demographic, fracture-related, and surgery-related characteristics and performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors independently associated with the development of greater tuberosity resorption. Furthermore, we identified 30 age- and sex-matched patients by use of propensity score matching to perform quantitative fragment-specific analysis using 3-dimensional computed tomography models. After the fragment of the greater tuberosity was identified, the number of fragments, the relative fragment volume to the humeral head, and the relative bone density to the coracoid process were calculated. Measurements were compared between matched case-control groups. RESULTS: We found that an unreduced greater tuberosity (odds ratio [OR], 10.9; P < .001), inadequate medial support at the calcar (OR, 15.0; P < .001), and the use of an intramedullary fibular strut (OR, 4.5; P = .018) were independently associated with a higher risk of bone resorption. Quantitative fragment-specific analysis showed that greater tuberosities with a larger number of fragments (5 ± 2 vs. 3 ± 2, P = .021), smaller fragments (9.9% ± 3.8% vs. 18.6% ± 4.7%, P < .001), and fragments with a lower bone density (66.4% ± 14.3% vs. 88.0% ± 18.4%, P = .001) had higher rates of resorption. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: An unreduced greater tuberosity or inadequate medial support increases the risk of greater tuberosity resorption, as do a larger number of fracture fragments, smaller fragments, and lower bone density. Additionally, fibular strut grafting is an independent risk factor for tuberosity resorption. Further study is needed, but alternatives to strut grafting such as femoral head allograft may warrant serious consideration.

Factors associated with revision surgery for olecranon bursitis after bursectomy.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim of our study was to identify the factors associated with revision surgery after bursal excision in patients with olecranon bursitis. The secondary aims were to describe the revision rate after bursectomy and to assess which factors are associated with flap surgery after bursectomy and describe the most common complications after bursectomy of the olecranon bursa. METHODS: We included 191 adult patients with olecranon bursitis who underwent olecranon bursa excision between January 2002 and October 2018. Patients who were pregnant, patients with incomplete records of the primary surgical procedure, and patients who underwent bursectomy during elbow arthroplasty were excluded. After manual chart review, we found that 22 patients had undergone revision surgery. Bivariate analysis was performed to assess the association between revision surgery and patient characteristics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics. Additionally, we collected data regarding postoperative complications and intraoperative variables such as the use of drains, vacuum assisted closure therapy, and flap surgery. RESULTS: The overall revision rate in our cohort was 11.5% (22 of 191 patients). Bivariate analysis showed that patients who underwent revision surgery were more frequently women (P = .004), more often had a history of ipsilateral (P = .020) or contralateral (P = .012) olecranon bursitis, and more often received a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (P = .001) or diabetes mellitus (P = .019). The most common complications were delayed wound healing (n = 8, 4.2%) and osteomyelitis (n = 8, 4.2%). Flap surgery was performed in 5 patients (2.6%). Bivariate analysis showed that patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent flap surgery more frequently (P = .011). CONCLUSION: The revision rate after bursectomy for olecranon bursitis was 11.5% (22 of 191 patients). Patients with rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes mellitus, or a history of ipsilateral and contralateral olecranon bursitis and female patients underwent revision surgery after bursectomy for olecranon bursitis more frequently. In addition, patients with rheumatoid arthritis underwent flap surgery after bursectomy more frequently.

Factors Associated with Mortality and Amputation Caused by Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections of the Upper Extremity: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear what the exact short-term outcomes of necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTIs), also known and necrotizing fasciitis of the upper extremity, are and whether these are comparable to other anatomical regions. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess factors associated with mortality within 30-days and amputation in patients with upper extremity NSTIs. METHODS: A retrospective study over a 20-year time period of all patients treated for NSTIs of the upper extremity was carried out. The primary outcomes were the 30-day mortality rate and the amputation rate in patients admitted to the hospital for upper extremity NSTIs. RESULTS: Within 20 years, 122 patients with NSTIs of the upper extremity were identified. Thirteen patients (11%) died and 17 patients (14%) underwent amputation. Independent risk factors for mortality were an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of 3 or higher (OR 9.26, 95% CI 1.64-52.31) and a base deficit of 3 meq/L or greater (OR 10.53, 95% CI 1.14-96.98). The independent risk factor for amputation was a NSTI of the non-dominant arm (OR 3.78, 95% CI 1.07-13.35). Length of hospital stay was 15 (IQR 9-21) days. CONCLUSION: Upper extremity NSTIs have a relatively low mortality rate, but a relatively high amputation rate compared to studies assessing NSTIs of all anatomical regions. ASA classification and base deficit at admission predict the prognosis of patients with upper extremity NSTIs, while a NSTI of the non-dominant side is a risk factor for limb loss.

What Factors Are Associated With Response Rates for Long-term Follow-up Questionnaire Studies in Hand Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up studies are an important tool in the evaluation of orthopaedic illness and its treatment options. However, a patient's participation in a follow-up study may be affected by several factors, leading to variability in response rates and the risk of selection bias. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies? (2) What factors are associated with higher and lower response rates to research questionnaires? (3) What factors are associated with higher and lower contact, initial participation, and completion rates? METHODS: We included 798 adult patients who were enrolled in one of 12 questionnaire follow-up studies in the hand and upper extremity service of our institution. All included studies evaluated patient-reported outcomes for the surgical treatment of upper extremity conditions using questionnaires and all used the same enrollment design. Patients were invited by letter to ask if they would be willing to participate, and we informed them that they would be contacted by telephone at least three times if they did not respond to the letter. Patients were contacted at a median of 6.6 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7 to 11) after surgery. The successful response rate was 49% (390 of 798 patients). We manually reviewed records to collect data on patient characteristics, and we performed bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify factors associated with the contact rate (percentage of patients reached by either mail, phone, or email), initial response rate (percentage of reached patients who initiated participation), completion rate (percentage of patients who initiated participation and completed the entire follow-up questionnaire), and our primary outcome successful response rate (percentage of patients who were contacted and who completed the entire questionnaire). RESULTS: The average response rate in hand surgery questionnaire studies was 49% (390 of 798 patients). In the multivariable analysis, enrollment of women (odds ratio 1.43 [95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.97]; p = 0.031) was independently associated with higher response rates. On the contrary, a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.92 to 0.99]; p = 0.015) and multiple researchers contacting patients (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.37 to 0.71]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with lower response rates. The contact rate was higher for women (OR 1.46 [95% CI 1.03 to 2.06]; p = 0.034) and patients with higher income (OR 1.000007 [95% CI 1.000001 to 1.000013]; p = 0.019). The contact rate was lower in patients with a longer follow-up time from surgery (OR 0.93 [95% CI 0.90 to 0.97]; p = 0.001). The initial participation rate was lower when patients were contacted by multiple researchers (OR: 0.34 [95% CI 0.23 to 0.52]; p < 0.001). Studies with a lower number of questions (36; IQR 22 to 46) were completed more frequently than studies with a higher number of questions (51; IQR 39 to 67; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Studies assessing long-term outcomes that have a large proportion of men and longer follow-up time tend to have lower response rates. When performing a follow-up study, it seems beneficial to have one researcher contact the patients and use a shorter questionnaire. Results of this study can help clarify the response rates in hand surgery follow-up questionnaire studies and help with the planning of future follow-up studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prognostic study.

Obesity status is a risk factor for secondary surgery after neurolysis, direct nerve repair or nerve grafting in traumatic brachial plexus injury: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to investigate the association between obesity and the presence of secondary surgery following neurolysis, direct nerve repair, or nerve grafting in patients with traumatic brachial plexus injury. METHODS: In this retrospective chart review spanning two Level I medical centers in a single metropolitan area, 57 patients who underwent neurolysis, direct nerve repair, or nerve grafting for brachial plexus injuries between 2002 and 2015 were identified. Risk regression analysis was used to evaluate the association between obesity status and secondary surgery. RESULTS: After controlling for the confounding variables of age, high energy injury, associated shoulder dislocation and associated clavicle fracture using multivariate regression (risk regression), the risk ratio of secondary surgery in obese patients compared to non-obese patients was 6.99 (P = 0.028). The most common secondary surgery was tendon or local muscle transfer. CONCLUSIONS: There is an increased risk of secondary surgery in obese patients compared to non-obese patients of the same age and with the same severity of injury. The increased risk may be due to challenges related to powering a heavier upper extremity. A weight reduction program might be considered as part of the preoperative strategy.

Factors Associated With Reoperation and Conversion to Wrist Fusion After Proximal Row Carpectomy or 4-Corner Arthrodesis.

PURPOSE: Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and 4-corner arthrodesis (FCA) are common salvage procedures for the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse and scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse. This study aimed to assess rates of reoperation and conversion to wrist fusion and to assess the factors associated with reoperation and conversion to wrist fusion for patients treated with PRC and FCA. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed evaluating 266 adult patients undergoing PRC or FCA at a single institutional system from 2002 to 2016. Demographic data, patient- and injury-specific data, reoperation and conversion rates, and complications were collected. Potential factors associated with reoperation or wrist fusion were evaluated using a bivariate, followed by a multivariable, analysis. RESULTS: Reoperation was more commonly performed in FCA (34%) than in PRC (11%) (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.7-6.8) and occurred at a shorter postoperative interval. In a multivariable analysis for reoperation, manual labor was associated with reoperation in patients undergoing FCA (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.5-19.1). In those undergoing PRC, anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) and/or posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) neurectomy was associated with a lower rate of reoperation (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.57). In a multivariable analysis for conversion to wrist arthrodesis, intraoperative AIN and/or PIN neurectomy (OR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.57) was associated with a lower rate of conversion to wrist fusion, and smoking (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.8-13.5) was associated with a higher rate of conversion to wrist fusion. In the subanalysis of patients who underwent PRC, only AIN and/or PIN neurectomy was associated with lower rates of conversion to wrist arthrodesis (OR, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, we observed that AIN and/or PIN neurectomy reduced the risk of reoperation and conversion to wrist arthrodesis after PRC. Smoking increased the odds of conversion to wrist arthrodesis in the combined PRC/FCA cohort; however, it is unclear whether this was due to smoking itself or whether the indications for PRC or FCA were affected, leading to this result. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Giant Cell Tumors of the Upper Extremity: Predictors of Recurrence.

PURPOSE: Giant cell tumors (GCT) of the distal radius are thought to be more aggressive than in other locations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate factors associated with recurrence of GCTs in the upper extremity. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 82 patients who underwent primary surgical treatment for an upper extremity GCT. Tumors were located in the radius (n = 47), humerus (n = 17), ulna (n = 9), and hand (n = 9). Treatment consisted of either wide resection or amputation or intralesional resection with or without adjuvants. A multivariable logistic regression was performed including tumor grade, type of surgery, and tumor location, from which the percentage of contribution to the model of each variable was calculated. RESULTS: The recurrence rate after intralesional resection was 48%; after wide resection or amputation, it was 12%. Two patients developed a pulmonary metastasis (2.4%). In multivariable analysis, intralesional resection was independently associated with recurrence. Intralesional resection had a 77% contribution to predict recurrence and the distal radius location had a 16% contribution in the predictive model. CONCLUSIONS: As expected, intralesional resection was the strongest independent predictor of recurrence after surgical treatment for GCT. The distal radius location contributed to the prediction of giant cell tumor recurrence to a lesser extent. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic IV.

Outcomes and Complications Following Volar and Dorsal Osteotomy for Symptomatic Distal Radius Malunions: A Comparative Study.

PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes, functional outcomes, radiographic alignment, and complications of volar versus dorsal corrective osteotomies as the treatment for symptomatic distal radius malunions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent a distal radius corrective osteotomy with either a volar or dorsal approach and plating at 1 of 3 institutions between 2005 and 2017. Demographic data, type of surgical treatment, and radiographs were examined. Outcomes were Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) function scores and radius union scoring system as well as major and minor complications. RESULTS: We included 53 cases (37 volar osteotomies and 16 dorsal osteotomies). Postoperative follow-up from the time of surgery to last QuickDASH score was 84.6 months (range, 12-169.4 months). Compared with the dorsal osteotomy group, the volar osteotomy group demonstrated a better postoperative flexion-extension arc (94.9° vs 72.9°, respectively), pronation-supination arc (146.2° vs 124.9°, respectively), and last QuickDASH scores (6.65 vs 12.87), respectively. Radiographically, there was no difference noted in radial height, radial inclination, or volar tilt in the immediate postoperative and last radiographs. There was a higher rate of complications in the dorsal osteotomy group (8 cases [50% of patients]) compared with the volar osteotomy group (7 cases [18.9% of patients]), including a higher rate of hardware removal. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with symptomatic malunions of the distal radius, the volar and dorsal approaches both resulted in improvement in QuickDASH scores and range of motion. Volar plating resulted in slightly better QuickDASH scores and fewer complications compared with dorsal plating. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

What Is the Effect of Vitamin C on Finger Stiffness After Distal Radius Fracture? A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: It is proposed that vitamin C administration can reduce disproportionate pain and stiffness after distal radius fracture; however, randomized trials that tested this hypothesis have had inconsistent results. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Is administering vitamin C after distal radius fracture associated with better ROM, patient-reported upper extremity function, and pain scores? (2) What factors are associated with post-fracture finger stiffness and worse upper extremity function? METHODS: This is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, noncrossover study. Between August 2014 and July 2017, we approached 204 consecutive patients, of which 195 were eligible, and 134 chose to participate. Participants were randomized to receive once-daily 500 mg vitamin C (67 participants) or placebo (67 participants) within 2 weeks after distal radius fracture. All patients received usual care at the discretion of their surgeon. The mean age of participants was 49 ± 17 years, 99 patients (74%) were women, and 83 (62%) were treated nonoperatively. The primary outcome was the distance between the fingertip and distal palmar crease 6 weeks after fracture. This measure is easy to obtain and previously has been shown to correlate with aggregate ROM of all finger joints. The secondary outcomes were total active finger motion, total active thumb motion, upper extremity-specific limitations, and pain intensity.An a priori power analysis suggested 126 patients would provide 80% power to detect a difference of 2 cm (SD 4.0) fingertip distance to palmar crease with α set at 0.05 using a two-tailed Student's t-test. Accounting for 5% lost to followup, we included 134 patients.All analyses were intention-to-treat. Ten participants of the intervention group and five of the placebo group were lost to followup. Their missing data were addressed by multiple imputation, after which we performed linear regression analysis for our outcome variables. RESULTS: Administration of vitamin C was not associated with ROM, function, or pain scores at 6 weeks (distance to palmar crease: ß -0.23; 95% CI -1.7 to 1.2; p = 0.754; finger ROM: ß 4.9; 95% CI, -40 to 50; p = 0.829; thumb ROM: ß 0.98; 95% CI, -18 to 20; p = 0.918, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] score: ß 0.32; 95% CI, -2.6 to 3.2; p = 0.828; pain score: ß -0.62; 95% CI, -0.62 to 0.89; p = 0.729) nor at 6 months (PROMIS score: ß -0.21; 95% CI, -3.7 to 3.3; p = 0.904; pain score: ß 0.31; 95% CI, -0.74 to 1.4; p = 0.559). At 6 weeks, we found that more finger stiffness was mildly associated with greater age (ß -1.5; 95% CI, -2.8 to -0.083; p = 0.038). Thumb stiffness was mildly associated with greater age (ß -0.72; 95% CI, -1.3 to -0.18; p = 0.009) and strongly associated with operative treatment (ß -32; 95% CI, -50 to -13; p = 0.001). Greater pain interference was modestly associated with greater functional limitations at 6 weeks (ß -0.32; 95% CI, -0.52 to -0.12; p = 0.002) and 6 months (ß -0.36; 95% CI, -0.60 to -0.11; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin C does not seem to facilitate recovery after distal radius fracture, but amelioration of maladaptation to nociception (pain interference) merits greater attention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, therapeutic study.