Colorectal cancer patients advocating screening to their siblings: a randomized behavioral intervention.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Siblings of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients are at increased risk of developing CRC, but screening rates remain low. Through a randomized behavioral intervention, this study aimed to determine whether patients can advocate screening to their siblings using a tailored educational package. METHODS: CRC survivors were recruited and randomized into relaying either tailored materials (intervention group) or existing national screening guidelines (control group) to their siblings. Siblings could respond to the study team if they were interested in learning about CRC screening. Study outcomes were patient advocacy rates (number of patients who had successfully contacted at least 1 eligible sibling) between groups and the proportion of eligible siblings who responded. RESULTS: Between May 2017 and March 2021, 219 CRC patients were randomized to the intervention (n = 110) and control (n = 109) groups. Patient advocacy rates were high and did not differ significantly between groups. However, only 14.3% of eligible siblings (n = 85) responded to the study team. Siblings of patients from the intervention group were more likely to respond (adjusted odds ratio, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.0; P < .05). Moreover, after controlling for potential confounders, siblings aged ≥60 years were significantly less likely to respond (adjusted odds ratio, .3; 95% confidence interval, .1-.7; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: CRC patients are willing advocates of screening, and siblings contacted by patients from the intervention group were also more likely to reach out to the study team. However, overall sibling response rates were low despite advocacy, suggesting that patient-led advocacy should at best be used as an adjunct to other, multipronged CRC screening promotion modalities.

COVID-19 not detected in peritoneal fluid: a case of laparoscopic appendicectomy for acute appendicitis in a COVID-19-infected patient.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 greatly affected millions and affected the way we practice with heightened posture in the way we treat surgical patients. Surgical consensus guidelines are recommending caution in the use of laparoscopy for the theoretical possibility of viral transmission from aerosolization of tissue and peritoneal fluid during surgery. However, there has yet to be proof of COVID-19 being present in peritoneal fluid, justifying the consensus statements. We aim to assess the presence of COVID-19 in peritoneal fluid. METHODS: We performed a laparoscopic appendicectomy for a COVID-19-infected patient with acute appendicitis. Peritoneal fluid and peritoneal washings were collected and sent for COVID-19 PCR. RESULTS: The peritoneal fluid sample collected on entry and at the end of the operation was negative for COVID-19 on PCR. The patient had an uneventful recovery from surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This case revealed that COVID-19 was not detected in peritoneal fluid and peritoneal washings in a patient infected with COVID-19. This study provides novel preliminary data in the investigation of COVID-19 transmission from laparoscopy-related aerosolization.

Study Protocol for the Use of Conventional Open Haemorrhoidectomy versus Laser Haemorrhoidoplasty in the Treatment of Symptomatic Haemorrhoids: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Haemorrhoids result in a variety of symptoms that cause significant patient anxiety. Treatment has long been associated with post-operative complications, which cause significant symptoms and may result in readmissions. The open conventional haemorrhoidectomy (COH) is still regarded as the gold standard treatment for non-circumferential grade II-IV haemorrhoids. Laser haemorrhoidoplasty (LAH) has recently been studied and the initial results appear promising. This study aims to compare these 2 techniques in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoids. We hypothesize that LAH has significantly less pain and bleeding and better quality of life (QoL) scores 1, 3 and 12 months post-operatively. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, single-centre clinical trial will be conducted. All patients aged between 21 and 90 years who present with symptomatic grade II-IV haemorrhoids will be recruited. Exclusion criteria include those who have had previous operations for haemorrhoids and those with an increased risk of bleeding. Data collected will include patient demographics, pre- and intra-operative characteristics of the haemorrhoids, operative details and post-operative pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, complications, readmissions, and haemorrhoid-specific QoL surveys. Primary outcome will be median post-operative pain VAS score on post-operative days (POD) 1-10. Secondary outcomes include operative duration, bleeding on the first 10 days post-operatively, readmissions, procedure-related complications (fistulation, incontinence, stenosis), QoL scores, and recurrence of symptoms up to 12 months. DISCUSSION: Results from this trial may demonstrate the superiority of LAH over COH in terms of post-operative pain and recovery. This would likely increase the adoption of LAH for the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoids. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered on 1/4/2020 at ClinicalTrials.gov. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04329364?term=NCT04329364&draw=2&rank=1.

Genome-wide association study identified copy number variants associated with sporadic colorectal cancer risk.

BACKGROUND: Multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. The role of structural or copy number variants (CNV) in CRC, however, remained unclear. We investigated the role of CNVs in patients with sporadic CRC. METHODS: A genome-wide association study (GWAS) was performed on 1000 Singapore Chinese patients aged 50 years or more with no family history of CRC and 1000 ethnicity-matched, age-matched and gender-matched healthy controls using the Affymetrix SNP 6 platform. After 16 principal component corrections, univariate and multivariate segmentations followed by association testing were performed on 1830 samples that passed quality assurance tests. RESULTS: A rare CNV region (CNVR) at chromosome 14q11 (OR=1.92 (95% CI 1.59 to 2.32), p=2.7e-12) encompassing CHD8, and common CNVR at chromosomes 3q13.12 (OR=1.54 (95% CI 1.33 to 1.77), p=2.9e-9) and 12p12.3 (OR=1.69 (95% CI 1.41 to 2.01), p=2.8e-9) encompassing CD47 and RERG/ARHGDIB, respectively, were significantly associated with CRC risk. CNV loci were validated in an independent replication panel using an optimised copy number assay. Whole-genome expression data in matched tumours of a subset of cases demonstrated that copy number loss at CHD8 was significantly associated with dysregulation of several genes that perturb the Wnt, TP53 and inflammatory pathways. CONCLUSIONS: A rare CNVR at 14q11 encompassing the chromatin modifier CHD8 was significantly associated with sporadic CRC risk. Copy number loss at CHD8 altered expressions of genes implicated in colorectal tumourigenesis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of serum procalcitonin levels to predict intra-abdominal infections after colorectal surgery.

PURPOSE: There has been much recent interest in the use of procalcitonin (PCT) as a marker of intra-abdominal infection (IAI) following colorectal surgery. However, the literature remains divided on the value of PCT in this setting. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the value of PCT in predicting IAI after colorectal surgery. METHODS: Systemic literature search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of PCT as a predictor for detecting IAI on postoperative days (POD) 3 to 5 following colorectal surgery. A meta-analysis was performed using random effect model and pooled predictive parameters as well as cut-off values for POD 3 to 5 were derived. RESULTS: Eight studies consisting 1629 patients were included. The pooled prevalence of IAI was 5.7% on POD 3, 9.7% on POD 4, and 6.3% on POD 5. The pooled AUC for POD 3 to 5 were 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.88), 0.79 (95% CI 0.64-0.93), and 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.97), respectively. The derived PCT cut-off values were 1.45 ng/ml on POD 3, 1.28 ng/ml on POD 4, and 1.26 ng/ml on POD 5. PCT had the highest diagnostic capability on POD 5 with diagnostic odds ratio of 32.9 (95% CI 15.01-69.88), sensitivity of 0.78 (95% CI 0.65-0.89), and specificity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.85-0.90). CONCLUSIONS: PCT is a useful diagnostic predictor of IAI after colorectal surgery. It has the greatest diagnostic accuracy on POD 5 and can help guide safe discharge of patients after colorectal surgery.

A Novel Derivation Predicting Survival After Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: Validation of a Prognostic Scoring Model and an Online Calculator to Provide Individualized Survival Estimation.

BACKGROUND: A prognostic scoring model has been devised previously to predict survival following primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and unresectable metastases. This has yet to be validated. OBJECTIVE: The main objectives of this study are to validate the proposed prognostic scoring model and create an interactive online calculator to estimate an individual's survival after primary tumor resection. DESIGN: Clinical data and survival outcomes of patients were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were categorized into good, moderate, or poor survivor groups based on the previously proposed scoring algorithm. Discrimination was assessed and recalibration was performed, with the recalibrated model implemented as an interactive Web application to provide individualized survival probability. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study included 324 consecutive patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma and unresectable metastases who underwent primary tumor resection between January 2008 and December 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measured was overall survival. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-four patients were included in the study. Median survival in the good, moderate, and poor prognostic groups was 56.8, 25.7, and 19.9 months (log rank test, p = 0.003). The κ statistic was 0.638 and RD was 0.101. Significant differences in survival were found between the moderate and good prognostic groups (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.51-5.15; p = 0.001) and between poor and good prognostic groups (HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.98-8.55; p < 0.001). The model was implemented as an interactive online calculator to provide individualized survival estimation after primary tumor resection (http://bit.ly/Stage4PrognosticScore). LIMITATIONS: Selection bias and single-center data preclude the generalizability of the proposed model. Information regarding the severity or likelihood of developing symptoms from the primary tumor were also not accounted for in the prognostic scoring model proposed. CONCLUSIONS: The prognostic scoring model provides good prognostic stratification of survival after primary tumor resection and may be a useful tool to predict survival after primary tumor resection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A330.

Short and long-term outcomes of a randomised controlled trial of vertical periumbilical wound versus transverse left iliac fossa wound for specimen retrieval in laparoscopic anterior resections.

BACKGROUND: The ideal incision for laparoscopic specimen extraction is not known. There has been no randomised study thus far evaluating extraction site in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The aim of our study was to compare post-operative outcomes, pain scores and quality of life scores of vertical periumbilical (VW) versus transverse left iliac fossa (TW) incisions for specimen extraction in laparoscopic anterior resections. METHODS: Using an assumption of pain score of 5 in the VW group versus pain score of 2 in the TW group, on day one post-operatively, and based on a 80% statistical power of analysis to achieve a statistical difference with reduction in pain scores, the sample size per arm calculated was 16. Forty patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection were randomised to VW (n = 20) or TW (n = 20). Primary endpoint was post-operative pain. Secondary endpoints were post-operative outcomes, wound cosmesis using Hollander Cosmesis Score and quality of life assessment using EQ-5D at 2 weeks and 2 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Median pain score on the first post-operative day was 2 in both groups (p = 0.360). There was no significant difference in wound infection rates, operative time or post-operative recovery. Cosmesis scores and EQ-5D scores were also similar in both groups. At a median follow-up of 30 months, the incidence of extraction site incisional hernia was similar. CONCLUSION: Transverse and vertical incisions in laparoscopic colorectal surgery have similar post-operative outcomes, with similar pain scores, cosmesis scores, quality of life scores and incisional hernia rates.

Clinical, MRI, and PET-CT criteria used by surgeons to determine suitability for pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent rectal cancers: a Delphi study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection with clear margins is the major predictor of long-term survival in recurrent rectal cancer. The extent of pelvic exenteration surgery depends on many factors including clinical and radiological criteria. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish which clinical, MRI, and PET criteria were considered important by surgeons who perform pelvic exenteration surgery, when assessing a patient with recurrent rectal cancer for pelvic exenteration surgery. DESIGN: A 2-stage Delphi study was conducted among an international panel of 36 colorectal surgeons recruited via a snowball-sampling method. Surgeons rated the importance of 99 clinical and radiological criteria by using a 9-point scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Consensus was attained when at least 85% of the panel rated criteria within 3 points. RESULTS: Clinical factors suggestive of systemic disease, symptoms of advanced local recurrence such as pain, surgical fitness, and cognitive impairment were considered important by the panel when considering suitability for surgery. Agreement regarding the indication for surgery was reached for 20 radiological factors. Strong agreement was achieved for factors associated with tumor involvement in the axial and anterior compartments. For only 16 of these 20 radiological factors was there an agreement that a clear resection margin was likely to be achieved. LIMITATIONS: Further rounds of Delphi may have yielded greater consensus. CONCLUSION: This study has identified a set of criteria considered by experts to be important in evaluating patients' suitability for pelvic exenteration surgery. Evaluation of these criteria is required to determine their clinical utility in predicting a negative resection margin at pelvic exenteration surgery.

Serum methylation levels of TAC1. SEPT9 and EYA4 as diagnostic markers for early colorectal cancers: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To identify methylated genes in serum with diagnostic potentials for early colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Serum methylation levels of up to 12 genes were measured in two sets of serum samples with the second set from 26 stage I CRC patients and 26 age/gender-matched controls. RESULTS: Serum methylation levels of TAC1, SEPT9, and EYA4 were significant discriminants between stage I CRC and healthy controls. Combination of TAC1 and SEPT9 rendered 73.1% sensitivity with 92.3% specificity. CONCLUSION: Serum methylation levels of TAC1. SEPT9 and EYA4 may be useful biomarkers for early detection of CRC though a validation study is necessary.

Appraisal of the LIFT and BIOLIFT procedure: initial experience and short-term outcomes of 33 consecutive patients.

PURPOSE: A new sphincter-saving technique known as the LIFT (ligation of intersphincteric tract) procedure has gained growing interest. Use of a bioprosthetic device has also been suggested to augment the LIFT procedure (BIOLIFT). This study evaluates outcomes of patients undergoing LIFT and BIOLIFT for repair of complex anal fistulae. METHODS: This study is a single-surgeon, single-centre retrospective review of a prospectively collected database. Study was conducted at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Department of Colorectal Surgery, Sydney, Australia, from May 2009 to April 2012. Thirty-three patients were evaluated. Twenty-nine LIFTs and five BIOLIFT procedures were evaluated. Primary success is defined as successful healing from initial procedure while secondary success is successful healing after management of failure or recurrence. RESULTS: In a cohort of predominantly female (67 %) and 94 % transsphincteric fistulae, primary success was 63 %. At a median follow-up of 20 weeks (6-81 weeks), there were 11 failures and one recurrence. The median time to failure/recurrence was 3 weeks (1-25 weeks). Six patients had a subsequent fistulotomy and three patients had a BIOLIFT for non-successful outcomes. The median follow-up for those with failures/recurrences is 60 weeks (range 20-76 weeks) and secondary success was 88 %. Post-operative anal manometry studies showed a 9 % reduction of resting and 11 % reduction of squeeze pressures but this was not statistically significant. There was also no post-operative incontinence. Anterior fistulas were noted do significantly worse (47%) compared with non-anteriorly located fistulas (84 %; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: LIFT and BIOLIFT procedures can be performed safely and effectively in a technically demanding study cohort of predominantly females with complex fistulas. Anterior fistulas have a higher risk of failure but present early and are amendable to repeat procedures. In particular, fistulotomies are useful in downstaged tracts and performing BIOLIFTs is an alternative in the management of LIFT failures and recurrences.

Conventional laparoscopic versus single-incision laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case cohort comparison of short-term outcomes in 144 consecutive cases.

BACKGROUND: Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a recent development of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal disease. The literature comparing it against conventional laparoscopic colectomy remains limited. METHODS: A retrospective case-cohort study compared the benefits and outcomes of SILS right hemicolectomy (SRH) with those of conventional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH). The medical records of consecutive patients from a prospectively collected database were reviewed. Demographic data, operative details, recovery parameters, and details of resected specimens were obtained and analyzed in an intention-to-treat manner. RESULTS: From January 2006 to March 2011, 104 elective LRHs (72 %) and 40 elective SRHs (28 %) were performed. The demographics for these two groups were comparable in terms of gender, age, ethnicity, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities and American Society of Anesthesiology score. As the records showed, 62 % of the LRHs and 57 % of the SRHs were performed for malignancies (p = 0.536). Seven of the LRH cases (7 %) were converted to open procedure, whereas two of the SILS cases (5 %) were converted. Three SILS cases (7 %) were completed with additional laparoscopic ports. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of wound length, mean operative time, lymph node clearance, or margins of resected specimen. The recovery parameters (pain score, hospital length of stay, and complications rate) also were equivalent between the two groups. CONCLUSION: As a feasible and safe procedure with early postoperative outcomes equivalent to those for LRH, SRH is a suitable alternative. The possible advantages of SILS over conventional laparoscopic surgery may be validated only with randomized controlled trials in the future.

Mismatch repair deficiency screening via immunohistochemical staining in young Asians with colorectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of mismatch repair deficiency in colorectal cancer (CRC) in young people remains unknown in Asians. The present study assessed the clinicopathological features and efficacy of immunohistochemistry screening for Lynch syndrome in young Asian CRC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a retrospective review conducted in Singapore General Hospital between January 2006 and December 2010 of 240 unrelated patients under the age of 50. All patients had immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for mismatch repair proteins in resected CRC specimen data retrieved from a prospective computerized database. RESULTS: A total of 21 % (n = 51) of the patients had abnormal IHC staining. Loss of staining for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 proteins was observed in 10, 4, 6, and 13 % of tumors, respectively. Of the 22 patients who had abnormal staining of MLH1, 13 had concomitant abnormal staining for PMS2. One tumor specimen had abnormal staining in all four proteins. If the Amsterdam criteria alone were to be used, 86 % (n = 44) of the cohort would have not been detected for mismatch repair gene defects. CONCLUSIONS: The overall burden of germline mismatch repair deficiency in the Singapore population may be as high as 21 %. The Amsterdam criteria alone are inadequate to detect Lynch syndrome patients. The use of IHC staining of at least four mismatch repair proteins is a useful screening strategy for Lynch syndrome diagnosis. Routine screening of mismatch repair deficiency may be recommended for all young Asian CRC patients.

Dynamic Reconstruction of Anal Sphincter with Camera Shutter Style Double-Opposing Gracilis Flaps.

Fournier's gangrene is a life-threatening infection which requires prompt recognition, early surgical debridement of unhealthy tissue, and initiation of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Relook debridement are usually performed until all the devitalized tissue has been removed. Involvement of the anal sphincter may result in significant morbidity such as permanent incontinence. Dynamic reconstruction of the anal sphincter has always been one of the holy grails in the field of pelvic reconstruction. We demonstrate a new method of camera shutter style double-opposing gracilis muscle flaps that allows dynamic sphincteric function without the need for electrostimulation. The bilateral gracilis muscles are inset in a fashion that allows orthograde contraction of the muscle to narrow and collapse the neoanal opening. With biofeedback training, the patient is able to regain dynamic continence and return to function without a stoma. There was also no need for neurotization or microsurgery techniques to restore sphincteric function to the anus. The patient was able to reverse his stoma 14 months after the initial insult and reconstruction with biofeedback training without the use of electrostimulation.

Close distal margins do not increase rectal cancer recurrence after sphincter-saving surgery without neoadjuvant therapy.

PURPOSE: The oncological results of close distal resection margins (DM) have been mixed due to variations in perioperative treatment protocols and surgical expertise. With the increased application of sphincter-saving surgery in the management of rectal cancer, "close shave" DM is an increasingly encountered phenomenon. Our center aims to examine the oncological outcomes of "close shave" DM in the absence of neoadjuvant therapy in the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. METHODS: A prospective database of 320 patients who underwent curative surgical resection for primary rectal cancer between 1999 and 2007 was reviewed. One hundred forty-eight patients had "close shave" DM (DM <1 cm) and 70 (22 %) patients had stage 1, 102 (32 %) patients had stage 2, and 148 (46 %) patients presented with stage 3 disease. Median follow-up was 45 months. RESULTS: The overall recurrence rate for the entire study cohort was 29 % (n = 94), with 6.6 % of patients developing locoregional recurrence. Recurrence was noted to be significantly associated with decreasing circumferential resection margin (p = 0.008) and increasing American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (p < 0.001). Five-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with DM <1 cm was 75.6 % and is higher compared to patients with longer DM (p = 0.041). Multivariate analysis showed that CSS was worsened with T stage, N stage, and perineural invasion status. Decreasing DM, however, was not significantly associated with poorer CSS or recurrence rates. CONCLUSION: Close distal resection margins do not negatively impact long-term disease control, even without the use of neoadjuvant therapy, provided that safe, optimal surgical resection is performed. Circumferential radial margin may be a more important indicator for outcomes.

Evaluation of laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery in elderly patients more than 70 years old: an evaluation of 727 patients.

BACKGROUND: With longer life expectancy, surgeons can expect to operate on older patients. Laparoscopic colorectal (LC) surgery has been demonstrated to be superior to open surgery. Controversy persists, however, regarding benefits of LC in the elderly due to increase in operative time. The aim of our study was to compare short-term outcomes of LC versus open colorectal (OC) surgery in elderly patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients ≥70 years old that underwent elective LC between 2005 and 2008 were compared with controls who underwent OC. Data was extracted from a prospectively collected database. RESULTS: Seven hundred and twenty-seven patients underwent colorectal resection in this study period (LC n = 225, OC n = 502). The laparoscopic arm was characterised by shorter incisions (LC 6.0 cm vs. OC 12.0 cm, p < 0.001) but longer operating times (LC 125 min vs. OC 85 min, p < 0.001). Median use of narcotics and length of stay were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (LC 2 days vs. OC 3 days, p < 0.001 and LC 6 days vs. OC 7 days, p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in median recovery of bowel function (LC 4 days vs. OC 4 days, p = 0.14) and post-operative morbidity (p = 0.725). Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower in the laparoscopic arm (LC 1.3% vs. OC 4.6%, p = 0.03) CONCLUSION: This is the largest series from a single institution comparing LC and OC in elderly patients. In our series, LC in elderly patients was safe and not associated with a higher morbidity. LC was also associated with less narcotic use and shorter length of stay.

Full-Dress Rehearsals with Actual Non-Infected Patients Builds Confidence and Familiarity - An Experience from Singapore during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE: COVID-19 has spread throughout the world with merciless pace. Personal protective equipment (PPE) is required to protect healthcare workers from contracting the virus. The authors evaluated the use of full-dress rehearsals (FDR) to familiarize staff with protocols and equipment that are not often use otherwise. METHODS: A single institution in Singapore performed FDR with noninfected patients for endoscopy after refresher courses with PPE were conducted. FDRs were conducted between February and March 2020, during the initial phase of the COVID-19 outbreak. The FDRs involved all phases of endoscopy. Statistics from the FDRs were compared against baseline procedure statistics. A self-administered survey was conducted for the procedurists after the FDRs. RESULTS: A total of 26 FDRs were conducted and 20 (77%) completed the survey. Among all the FDRs conducted, there was a slight increase in duration for colonoscopy FDRs (21.5 min vs 20.0 min, p = 0.22). There were no complications. All respondents had a good experience (score rating of 4-5/5).On qualitative analysis, the themes identified were:FDRs provided a good opportunity to have hands-on familiarization of the equipment on top of routine refresher training.Participants were cognizant of the ongoing outbreak and the evolving threat.Safety measures were reinforced.Procedurists who acknowledged weaknesses, requested for more training. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation training with patients provides participants with a level of realism that is critical for rapid learning. In crisis management, the most effective protocol familiarization is important to instill confidence in the PPE, workflows and healthcare partners.

Perceptions of healthcare workers in high-risk areas of a Singapore hospital during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study.

Introduction: There is worldwide concern over the psycho-emotional impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers (HCWs). This study aimed to elicit HCWs' perceptions of the adequacy of protective measures in high-risk clinical areas and the factors associated with these perceptions. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in April 2020. An anonymous electronic survey was sent via email to operating theatre (OT) and intensive care unit (ICU) staff of Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore. Results: Of the 358 eligible participants, 292 (81.6%) responded to the survey. 93.2% of the participants felt that precautionary measures at work were sufficient and 94.9% acknowledged that adequate training was provided. More than 60% of the participants opined that their chances of contracting COVID-19 were moderate to high. Female gender, nursing occupation and duration of service <10 years were significantly associated with increased fear of contracting COVID-19, less control over occupational exposure and lower perceived need to care for COVID-19 patients. Having young children at home did not significantly affect these perceptions. The most important ICU precautions were availability of personal protective equipment outside the rooms of COVID-19 positive patients (95.3%) and having visitor restrictions (95.3%). The most important OT measures were having a dedicated OT for COVID-19 positive patients (91.2%) and having simulation as part of protocol familiarisation (91.7%). Conclusion: Overall, there was high confidence in the adequacy of COVID-19 protective measures to prevent healthcare transmission in Singapore. The pandemic had a lower degree of psycho-emotional impact on HCWs here as compared to other countries.