Diabetes and hyperglycaemia among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 in Western Sydney: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes has been recognised as a major risk factor for COVID-19 mortality and hospital complications in earlier studies. AIMS: To examine the characteristics of hospitalised COVID-19 patients with diabetes and the impact of diabetes and hyperglycaemia on hospital outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Admission glucose levels, HbA1c, diabetes status and hospital outcomes were determined for subjects admitted from June to November 2021 by matching a pathology data set, a clinical data set and the hospital administrative database. The outcomes of interest were death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: There were 1515 individuals admitted with COVID-19 with 49 deaths (3.2%) and 205 (13.5%) ICU admissions. The median length of hospital stay was 3.7 days. Three hundred and ten patients (20%) had diabetes, with 46 (15%) newly diagnosed. Patients with diabetes had a higher mortality than patients who did not have diabetes (8% vs 2%, P < 0.001), were more likely to be admitted to ICU (20% vs 12%, P = 0.001) and have longer median LOS stay (6.6 (interquartile range (IQR) 2.9-12.5) vs 2.9 (IQR 0.5-7.1) days, P < 0.001). In multivariate models, neither diabetes nor admission glucose predicted death. Admission glucose level but not diabetes was an independent predictor of ICU admission and LOS. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of diabetes among patients hospitalised with COVID-19, with worse outcomes. In contrast to previous studies, the association of diabetes with mortality was not significant when adjusted for other variables. This is possibly related to the benefits of vaccination and current medical and ICU interventions.

Routine glucose assessment in the emergency department for detecting unrecognised diabetes: a cluster randomised trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether routine blood glucose assessment of patients admitted to hospital from emergency departments (EDs) results in higher rates of new diagnoses of diabetes and documentation of follow-up plans. DESIGN, SETTING: Cluster randomised trial in 18 New South Wales public district and tertiary hospitals, 31 May 2011 - 31 December 2012; outcomes follow-up to 31 March 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 18 years or more admitted to hospital from EDs. INTERVENTION: Routine blood glucose assessment at control and intervention hospitals; automatic requests for glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c ) assessment and notification of diabetes services about patients at intervention hospitals with blood glucose levels of 14 mmol/L or more. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: New diagnoses of diabetes and documented follow-up plans for patients with admission blood glucose levels of 14 mmol/L or more. RESULTS: Blood glucose was measured in 133 837 patients admitted to hospital from an ED. The numbers of new diabetes diagnoses with documented follow-up plans for patients with blood glucose levels of 14 mmol/L or more were similar in intervention (83/506 patients, 16%) and control hospitals (73/278, 26%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.83; 95% CI 0.42-1.7; P = 0.61), as were new diabetes diagnoses with or without plans (intervention, 157/506, 31%; control, 86/278, 31%; aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.83-2.80; P = 0.18). 30-day re-admission (31% v 22%; aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.86-2.09; P = 0.21) and post-hospital mortality rates (24% v 22%; aOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74-1.55; P = 0.72) were also similar for patients in intervention and control hospitals. CONCLUSION: Glucose and HbA1c screening of patients admitted to hospital from EDs does not alone increase detection of previously unidentified diabetes. Adequate resourcing and effective management pathways for patients with newly detected hyperglycaemia and diabetes are needed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611001007921.

Comparison of adverse pregnancy outcomes based on the new IADPSG 2010 gestational diabetes criteria and maternal body mass index.

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic criteria for gestational diabetes (GDM) have been controversial following the International Association for Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) 2010 recommendations to lower the diagnostic fasting blood sugar level threshold. AIM: To assess the pregnancy-related outcomes of women according to the different diagnostic criteria for GDM adjusting for body mass index categories. METHOD: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on 4081 pregnant women with positive 50 g glucose challenge test but without pre-gestational diabetes. Participants were grouped into four cohorts: no GDM (control group); GDM on Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy (ADIPS) 1998 criteria only (treated); GDM on IADPSG 2010 criteria only (untreated); and GDM on both criteria (treated). The association of each cohort with pregnancy outcome measures, including birthweight centile, delivery gestation, primary caesarean section, shoulder dystocia and stillbirth, together with the effect of obesity, were examined. RESULTS: Women diagnosed with GDM according to the IADPSG 2010 (untreated) but not the ADIPS 1998 criteria (treated) had an increased risk of being large for gestational age (LGA) (odds ratio (OR) = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.46-4.12, P = 0.001) and primary caesarean section (OR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.23-3.35, P = 0.006) compared to control women. Among the women in this untreated group and women without GDM, obese women had an increased risk of LGA (OR = 3.82, 95% CI: 2.87-5.10, P < 0.001), shoulder dystocia (OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.19, P = 0.04) and primary caesarean section (OR = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.26-2.10, P < 0.001), compared to those women of normal weight. These associations remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Untreated women who would be diagnosed with GDM using the new criteria have an increased risk of pregnancy complications, with maternal obesity having an even greater risk.

Dexamethasone-induced hyperglycaemia in COVID-19: Glycaemic profile in patients without diabetes and factors associated with hyperglycaemia.

AIMS: To evaluate glycaemic profiles of COVID-19 patients without diabetes receiving dexamethasone and determine factors associated with hyperglycaemia. METHODS: All subjects without pre-existing diabetes receiving dexamethasone 6 mg for COVID-19 in a non-critical care setting were identified. Glucose profiles were obtained from capillary blood glucose (BG). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with dexamethasone-induced hyperglycaemia (BG ≥ 10 mmol/L). RESULTS: Of 254 subjects, 129 (50.8%) were male with age 51.1 ± 18.2 years and weight 89.7 ± 26.3 kg. Hyperglycaemia post-dexamethasone occurred in 121 (47.6%). Glucose excursions began within three hours (6.8 ± 1.4 mmol/L pre-dexamethasone vs 8.7 ± 2.4 mmol/L at ≤ 3 h, p < 0.001) and peaked at 7-9 h (10.5 ± 2.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001 vs pre-dexamethasone). BGs post-intravenous were higher than post-oral administration for the initial six hours. Hyperglycaemic subjects were older (57.8 ± 17.5 years vs 45.0 ± 16.6 years, p < 0.001), had higher initial glucose (6.3 ± 1.0 vs 5.9 ± 0.9 mmol/L, p = 0.004), higher HbA1c (5.8 ± 0.3% [40 ± 3.5 mmol/mol] vs 5.5 ± 0.4% [37 ± 4.1 mmol/mol], p < 0.001) higher C-reactive protein (CRP) (100 ± 68 vs 83 ± 58 mg/L, p = 0.026), and lower eGFR (79 ± 17 vs 84 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.045). Mortality was greater in the hyperglycaemia group (9/121 [7.4%] vs 2/133 [1.5%], p = 0.02). Age, HbA1c and CRP were independently associated with hyperglycaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Half of subjects without diabetes experienced hyperglycaemia post-dexamethasone for COVID-19, peak occurring after 7-9 h. Age, HbA1c and CRP were associated with hyperglycaemia.

Multifocal insulinoma secondary to insulinomatosis: persistent hypoglycaemia despite total pancreatectomy.

SUMMARY: Insulinomatosis is a rare cause of hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia. The ideal management approach is not known. A 40-year-old woman with recurrent symptomatic hyperinsulinaemic hypoglycaemia was diagnosed with an insulinoma. A benign 12 mm pancreatic head insulinoma was resected but hypoglycaemia recurred 7 years later. A benign 10 mm pancreatic head insulinoma was then resected but hypoglycaemia recurred within 2 months. Octreotide injections were trialled but exacerbated hypoglycaemia. After a 2-year interval, she underwent total pancreatectomy. A benign 28 mm pancreatic head insulinoma was found alongside insulin-expressing monohormonal endocrine cell clusters (IMECCs) and islet cell hyperplasia, consistent with a diagnosis of insulinomatosis. Hypoglycaemia recurred within 6 weeks. There was no identifiable lesion on MRI pancreas, Ga-68 PET or FDG PET. Diazoxide and everolimus were not tolerated. MEN-1 testing was negative. Insulinomatosis should be suspected in insulinomas with early recurrence or multifocality. De novo lesions can arise throughout the pancreas. Extensive surgery will assist diagnosis but may not provide cure. LEARNING POINTS: Insulinomas are usually benign and managed surgically. Insulinomatosis is characterised by multifocal benign insulinomas with a tendency to recur early. It is rare. Multifocal or recurrent insulinomas should raise suspicion of MEN-1 syndrome, or insulinomatosis. Insulinomatosis is distinguished histologically by insulin-expressing monohormonal endocrine cell clusters (IMECCs) and tumour staining only for insulin, whereas MEN-1 associated insulinomas stain for multiple hormones. The ideal treatment strategy is unknown. Total pancreatectomy may not offer cure.

Diabetes case finding in the emergency department, using HbA1c: an opportunity to improve diabetes detection, prevention, and care.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the efficacy of routine glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing to detect undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes in an urban Australian public hospital emergency department (ED) located in an area of high diabetes prevalence. METHODS: Over 6 weeks, all patients undergoing blood sampling in the ED had their random blood glucose measured. If ≥5.5 mmol/L (99 mg/dL), HbA1c was measured on the same sample. HbA1c levels ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) and 5.7-6.4% (39-46 mmol/mol) were diagnostic of diabetes and prediabetes, respectively. Hospital records were reviewed to identify patients with previously diagnosed diabetes. RESULTS: Among 4580 presentations, 2652 had blood sampled of which 1267 samples had HbA1c measured. Of these, 487 (38.4%) had diabetes (either HbA1c≥6.5% or a prior diagnosis), and a further 347 (27.4%) had prediabetes. Among those with diabetes, 32.2% were previously undiagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Routine HbA1c testing in the ED identifies a large number of people with undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes, and provides an opportunity to improve their care.

Maintaining bone health in patients with prostate cancer.

Loss of bone mineral density with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer is well recognised, with significant loss of bone mineral density (BMD) occurring within 12 months of starting therapy. With ADT, annual loss of BMD is about 2%-8% per year at the lumbar spine and 1.8%-6.5% at the hip; the loss appears to continue indefinitely while treatment continues, and there is no recovery after therapy is ceased. 19.4% of men surviving at least 5 years after diagnosis of prostate cancer have a fracture if treated with ADT compared with 12.6% of men not receiving ADT; this is equivalent to one additional fracture for every 28 men treated with ADT. Vitamin D deficiency exacerbates the development of osteoporosis, so vitamin D status should be evaluated before commencing ADT in men with prostate cancer. Treatment with bisphosphonates (zoledronate, pamidronate and alendronate) in men treated with ADT have been shown to prevent bone loss in prospective studies and to increase BMD in one randomised controlled trial; bisphosphonates have not been shown to prevent fractures in men with prostate cancer. Further prospective trials are required to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates in men with prostate cancer who require treatment with ADT. All doctors need to take an active role in monitoring bone health in patients with prostate cancer requiring ADT.