Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Intern Emerg Med ; 2024 Jun 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850356

RESUMO

The management of patients with diverticular disease remains challenging. The aim of this national survey was to assess how gastroenterologists and general practitioners use rifaximin to manage diverticulosis and diverticular disease. Members of the Italian Association of Hospital Gastroenterologists and Endoscopists (AIGO) and the Italian Federation of General Practitioners (FIMMG) were invited to complete a 39-item online survey concerning the use of rifaximin in five clinical settings: (1) diverticulosis; (2) reducing symptoms in symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease; (3) reducing the occurrence of diverticulitis in patients with symptomatic uncomplicated diverticular disease (primary prevention); (4) reducing the recurrence of diverticulitis in patients with previous attacks of diverticulitis (secondary prevention); (5) treatment of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. A total of 1094 physicians completed the survey. Overall, 25.1%, 83.5%, 68%, 74.2%, and 63% of physicians prescribed rifaximin for the clinical settings 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. In each clinical setting, the dosage of rifaximin most frequently used was 800 mg/day, the most common duration of therapy was 7 days, and the cyclic administration of treatment (expressed in months) most frequently used was > 24 months. These results highlight that a reappraisal of the use of rifaximin in patients with diverticulosis and diverticular disease is required to reduce the gap between the evidence available and the daily clinical practice, optimizing also the use of healthcare resources.

2.
Curr Oncol ; 29(10): 7229-7244, 2022 09 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36290847

RESUMO

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine cancer that usually affects the elderly and immunosuppressed in sun-exposed areas. Due to its rarity, it is frequently unrecognized, and its management is not standardized across medical centers, despite the more recent availability of immunotherapy, with avelumab as first-line treatment improving the prognosis even in advanced stages of disease. We conducted a purpose-designed survey of a selected sample of physicians working in the Lazio region, in Italy, to assess their awareness and knowledge of MCC as well as their perspective on assisted diagnostic and therapeutic pathways. The Lazio region, and in particular Rome, is one of the most important academic and non- academic center in Italy dedicated to the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancer. A total of 368 doctors (including 100 general practitioners, 72 oncologists, 87 dermatologists, 59 surgeons, and 50 anatomopathologists) agreed to be part of this survey. Surgeons, oncologists, and dermatologists thought themselves significantly more updated on MCC than primary care physicians, but more than half of the interviewees are interested in CCM training courses and training with clearer and more standardized care pathways. Significant differences have been reported from survey participants in terms of multidisciplinary team set up for MCC management. The identification of specialized centers and the improvement of communication pathways among different specialties, as well as between patients and physicians, could be very beneficial in improving patients' journey modeling and starting a uniform diagnostic and therapeutic pathway for MCC patients in the new era of immunotherapies.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Humanos , Idoso , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/terapia , Carcinoma de Célula de Merkel/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Imunoterapia , Terapia Combinada
3.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 45(9): 780-4, 2011 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21918387

RESUMO

AIM: To assess the appropriateness of gastroprotection in nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users by primary care physicians. BACKGROUND: A gastroprotective therapy is advised in NSAID users who are at a high risk for developing gastrointestinal side effects. However, an inappropriate (overuse/underuse) prescription of gastroprotection has been reported. STUDY: This was a cross-sectional study in which a questionnaire was administered to consecutive NSAID users who visited routine primary care during a 1-week period. The presence of risk factors for NSAID-related gastrointestinal side effects and the eventual gastroprotective strategy used were registered. Gastroprotective therapy was considered appropriate/inappropriate according to the current guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 869 (25.3%) of 3,433 patients were on chronic NSAID therapy. Gastroprotection was performed in 593 (68.2%) NSAID users, and it was appropriate in only 299 (34.4%) cases. Specifically, an underuse of gastroprotective therapy was observed in 30.6% of ≥65-year-old, whereas an overuse occurred in 57.5% of <65-year-old patients without any risk factor. Concomitant therapy with either steroids [odds ratio (OR): 4.3] or anticoagulants (OR: 3.9), and >72 years of age (OR: 1.67) were significant predictive factors of inappropriate gastroprotection. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate use of gastroprotective therapy for NSAID users by primary care physicians needs to be promptly implemented, as its inappropriate use is noticeably increasing ethical and economic concerns.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Gastroenteropatias/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antiulcerosos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
4.
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev ; 24(4): 401-404, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28710676

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Hypertriglyceridemia (triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL) is a major cardiovascular risk factor. Despite the high incidence of this condition in the Italian population, epidemiological information remains limited. AIM: To analyze a large database of clinical charts from general practitioners in the Rome area of Italy. METHODS: In this study, the DATAMEG database of patients treated in the Rome area between 2000 and 2015 was analyzed. The database was searched for information on (1) all patients diagnosed with hypertriglyceridemia, (2) all prescriptions for the treatment of hypertriglyceridemia, and (3) all patients who had an acute myocardial infarction. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of hypertriglyceridemia was 4.4% (3647/82,595). Among patients followed from January 1, 2015 onwards, 2786/55,345 (5.0%) were diagnosed with hypertriglyceridemia. Of these, 418 (15.0%) received at least one prescription of triglyceride-lowering treatment. Over the same period, 1653 patients had at least three measurements of triglycerides ≥200 mg/dL, with only 357 (21.6%) receiving at least one prescription of triglyceride-lowering drugs in the year following the last measurement. Furthermore, 513 patients had at least one measurement of ≥500 mg/dL. Of these, only 246 (48.0%) received at least one prescription of triglyceride-lowering drugs in the year following the last measurement. In total, 3485 patients had an acute myocardial infarction (prevalence, 4.3%) in 2015. Of these, only 288 (8.3%) received at least one prescription of triglyceride-lowering drugs in the year following this event. CONCLUSION: These findings confirmed a pattern of inadequate treatment of hypertriglyceridemia in the Rome area.


Assuntos
Hipertrigliceridemia/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Bases de Dados Factuais , Medicina Geral , Humanos , Hipertrigliceridemia/sangue , Hipertrigliceridemia/diagnóstico , Hipertrigliceridemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/diagnóstico , Infarto do Miocárdio/prevenção & controle , Prevalência , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Cidade de Roma/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Triglicerídeos/sangue
5.
Dig Liver Dis ; 49(5): 535-539, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28089214

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Data on chronic pancreatitis prevalence are scanty and usually limited to hospital-based studies. AIM: Investigating chronic pancreatitis prevalence in primary care. METHODS: Participating primary care physicians reported the prevalence of chronic pancreatitis among their registered patients, environmental factors and disease characteristics. The data were centrally reviewed and chronic pancreatitis cases defined according to M-ANNHEIM criteria for diagnosis and severity and TIGAR-O classification for etiology. RESULTS: Twenty-three primary care physicians participated in the study. According to their judgment, 51 of 36.401 patients had chronic pancreatitis. After reviewing each patient data, 11 turned out to have definite, 5 probable, 19 borderline and 16 uncertain disease. Prevalence was 30.2/100.000 for definite cases and 44.0/100.000 for definite plus probable cases. Of the 16 patients with definite/probable diagnosis, 8 were male, with mean age of 55.6 (±16.7). Four patients had alcoholic etiology, 5 post-acute/recurrent pancreatitis, 6 were deemed to be idiopathic. Four had pancreatic exocrine insufficiency, 10 were receiving pancreatic enzymes, and six had pain. Most patients had initial stage and non-severe disease. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating the prevalence of chronic pancreatitis in primary care. Results suggest that the prevalence in this context is higher than in hospital-based studies, with specific features, possibly representing an earlier disease stage.


Assuntos
Pancreatite Crônica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Insuficiência Pancreática Exócrina/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Médicos de Atenção Primária/organização & administração , Prevalência , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
6.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 17(8): 563-70, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26154338

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated whether a home telehealth (HT) system enabling the patient to monitor body weight, blood glucose values, and blood pressure values, associated with remote educational support and feedback to the general practitioner, can improve metabolic control and overall cardiovascular risk in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, compared with usual practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-group (1:1), open-label, multicenter study conducted in general practice. Follow-up was for 12 months. RESULTS: Overall, 29 general practitioners enrolled 302 patients (153 assigned to the HT group and 149 to the control group). Use of the HT system was associated with a statistically significant reduction in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels compared with the control group (estimated mean difference, 0.33±0.1; P=0.001). No difference emerged as for body weight, blood pressure, and lipid profile. The proportion of patients reaching the target of HbA1c <7.0% was higher in the HT group than in the control group after 6 months (33.0% vs. 18.7%; P=0.009) and 12 months (28.1% vs. 18.5%; P=0.07). As for quality of life (evaluated with the 36-item Short Form health survey), significant differences in favor of the HT group were detected as for physical functioning (P=0.01), role limitations due to emotional problems (P=0.02), mental health (P=0.005), and mental component summary (P=0.03) scores. A lower number of specialist visits was reported in the telemedicine group (incidence rate ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.01; P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Use of the HT system was associated with better metabolic control and quality of life; a marginally nonsignificant lower resource utilization was also documented. No impact was documented on blood pressure, lipid profile, and body weight.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/etiologia , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemetria/métodos , Idoso , Glicemia/análise , Pressão Sanguínea , Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/métodos , Peso Corporal , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Cardiomiopatias Diabéticas/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Medicina Geral/métodos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Lipídeos/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Inquéritos e Questionários , Telemedicina/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
Intern Emerg Med ; 7(4): 331-5, 2012 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21451987

RESUMO

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may cause gastroduodenal ulcers and its complications. Helicobacter pylori infection is recognized as an additional risk factor for ulcer development, its eradication in NSAIDs users being recommended. In this cross-sectional study, during a 1-week period, consecutive patients who were routinely visiting in 58 primary care clinics were enrolled. A questionnaire was used to collect clinical data on the patients who were chronically taking NSAIDs. Patients with age >65 years, a personal history of peptic ulcer, concomitant therapy with steroids, anti-coagulants, multiple NSAIDs, or relevant co-morbidities were considered at high risk for NSAIDs gastroduodenal complications. Data on H. pylori infection management were collected. Overall, H. pylori was searched for in 140 (16.1%) out of 869 patients receiving chronic NSAID therapy, and it was eventually cured in 43 (72.9%) of the infected cases. In detail, H. pylori status was not investigated in 670 (77.1%) of those patients at high risk of NSAID-related gastroduodenal lesions, including 516 patients ≥65 years old, and 154 younger, but with at least 1 adjunctive risk factor. In addition, 234 (35%) of these high-risk patients were not receiving any gastric mucosa protection. Our data find that H. pylori infection is investigated in fewer than one of every five NSAID-user patients in primary care. The low alertness towards such an infection in these patients suggests a need for prompt implementation of current guidelines.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/efeitos adversos , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/induzido quimicamente , Úlcera Péptica/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA