Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Med J Aust ; 207(9): 382-387, 2017 Nov 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29092704

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To describe trends in the age-specific incidence of serogroup B invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in Australia, 1999-2015. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Analysis in February 2017 of de-identified notification data from the Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System of all notifications of IMD in Australia with a recorded diagnosis date during 1999-2015.Major outcomes: IMD notification rates in Australia, 1999-2015, by age, serogroup, Indigenous status, and region. RESULTS: The incidence of meningococcal serogroup B (MenB) disease declined progressively from 1.52 cases per 100 000 population in 2001 to 0.47 per 100 000 in 2015. During 2006-2015, MenB accounted for 81% of IMD cases with a known serogroup; its highest incidence was among infants under 12 months of age (11.1 [95% CI, 9.81-12.2] per 100 000), children aged 1-4 years (2.82 [95% CI, 2.52-3.15] per 100 000), and adolescents aged 15-19 years (2.40 [95% CI, 2.16-2.67] per 100 000). Among the 473 infants under 2 years of age with MenB, 43% were under 7 months and 69% under 12 months of age. The incidence of meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) disease prior to the introduction of the MenC vaccine in 2003 was much lower in infants than for MenB (2.60 cases per 100 000), the rate peaking in people aged 15-19 years (3.32 per 100 000); the overall case fatality rate was also higher (MenC, 8%; MenB, 4%). The incidence of MenB disease was significantly higher among Indigenous than non-Indigenous Australians during 2006-2015 (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 3.8; 95% CI, 3.3-4.5). CONCLUSIONS: Based on disease incidence at its current low endemic levels, priority at risk age/population groups for MenB vaccination include all children between 2 months and 5 years of age, Indigenous children under 10 years of age, and all adolescents aged 15-19 years. Given marked variation in meningococcal disease trends over time, close scrutiny of current epidemiologic data is essential.


Assuntos
Meningite Meningocócica/epidemiologia , Havaiano Nativo ou Outro Ilhéu do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Meningite Meningocócica/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Meningocócicas/imunologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neisseria meningitidis/classificação , Sorogrupo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Med J Aust ; 207(9): 396-400, 2017 Nov 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29092707

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate trends in the proportion and severity of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) attributable to Streptococcus pneumoniae (pneumococcus) in Australians aged 18 years and over. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review with unpublished data from the largest study. DATA SOURCES: Multiple key bibliographic databases to June 2016. STUDY SELECTION: Australian studies on the aetiology of CAP in adults. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the 12 studies identified, pneumococcus was the most common cause of CAP. Four studies were assessed as being of good quality. Participants in two studies were predominantly non-Indigenous (n = 991); the proportion of pneumococcal CAP cases declined from 26.4% in 1987-88 to 13.9% in 2004-06, and the proportion with bacteraemia decreased from 7.8% to 3.8%. In two studies with predominantly Indigenous participants (n = 252), the proportion with pneumococcal bacteraemia declined from 6.8% in 1999-2000 to 4.2% in 2006-07. In the largest study (n = 885; 2004-06), 50.8% (60/118) of pneumococcal CAP occurred in people who were ≥ 65 years old. Among patients aged ≥ 65 years, intensive care unit admission and death were more common in patients who were ≥ 85 years old compared with younger patients (12.5% v 6.8%; 18.8% v 6.8% respectively), and also more common in the 19 patients with bacteraemia than in those without it (15.8% v 2.6%; 10.5% v 7.9% respectively). Of 17 cases of bacteraemia serotyped, 12 were due to 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (13vPCV) serotypes and three to additional serotypes in 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (23vPPV). CONCLUSIONS: Available data suggest that the proportion of CAP attributable to pneumococcus (both bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic) has been declining in Australian adults. Should 13vPCV replace the 23vPPV currently funded by the National Immunisation Program for persons aged ≥ 65 years, surveillance to track non-bacteraemic pneumococcal CAP will be essential to evaluate the impact.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia Pneumocócica/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Sorotipagem , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Adulto Jovem
4.
Med J Aust ; 200(2): 112-5, 2014 Feb 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24484116

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact and effectiveness of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine (23vPPV) in ≥ 65-year-old Australians in the context of concurrent 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (7vPCV) use in infants. DESIGN, PATIENTS AND SETTING: Ecological analysis of trends in invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) notification rates and vaccine effectiveness estimation using the screening method, using data on Australians aged ≥ 65 years (23vPPV funded) and 50-64 years (23vPPV not funded). INTERVENTION: National 23vPPV program for people aged ≥ 65 years and national 7vPCV program for infants, both commencing in 2005. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: IPD incidence rate ratios, 2002-2004 to 2010-2011, and 23vPPV effectiveness against 23vPPV-type IPD. RESULTS: The proportion of people aged ≥ 65 years who were vaccinated within the previous 5 years in jurisdictions excluding Victoria ranged from 41% to 64% over the study period, with no clear trend over time. Incidence rate ratios in the ≥ 65-year age group were 0.11 (95% CI, 0.09-0.14) for 7vPCV serotypes, 1.64 (95% CI, 1.41-1.91) for 23vPPV-non-7vPCV serotypes and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.67-2.57) for non-23vPPV serotypes. The incidence rate ratio for total IPD was 0.65 (95% CI, 0.59-0.71) for people aged ≥ 65 years, and 0.80 (0.71-0.90) for people aged 50-64 years. The estimate of 23vPPV effectiveness was 61.1% (95% CI, 55.1%-66.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The greater reduction in IPD among ≥ 65-year-olds compared with 50-64-year-olds did not reach statistical significance. However, vaccine effectiveness was significant. Greater reductions in IPD in ≥ 65-year-olds would be expected from the indirect effects of using 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in infants (introduced for Australian infants in 2011) and an increase in 23vPPV coverage.


Assuntos
Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Streptococcus pneumoniae/imunologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Austrália/epidemiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle
5.
N S W Public Health Bull ; 18(7-8): 133-6, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17854543

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Q fever remains an important occupational zoonosis in rural Australia. Although Q fever vaccine is recommended in high-risk occupational groups, its availability has been limited in recent years. METHOD: A literature review of the efficacy of the human Q fever vaccine registered in Australia was conducted. RESULTS: Seven relevant vaccine efficacy studies were identified but no large double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled studies have been conducted. Vaccine efficacy has ranged from 83-100% but limitations of study designs hamper a precise estimate of vaccine efficacy. CONCLUSION: Despite the shortcomings of efficacy studies, the Q fever vaccine available in Australia has considerable protective benefit in established high-risk environments, particularly of an occupational nature.


Assuntos
Vacinas Bacterianas/farmacologia , Coxiella burnetii/imunologia , Coxiella/imunologia , Programas de Imunização , Febre Q/prevenção & controle , Animais , Austrália , Humanos , Saúde Ocupacional , Febre Q/imunologia , Medição de Risco , População Rural , Zoonoses
6.
PLoS One ; 7(10): e46509, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23082123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Influenza is an important cause of morbidity and mortality for frail older people. Whilst the antiviral drug oseltamivir (a neuraminidase inhibitor) is approved for treatment and prophylaxis of influenza during outbreaks, there have been no trials comparing treatment only (T) versus treatment and prophylaxis (T&P) in Aged Care Facilities (ACFs). Our objective was to compare a policy of T versus T&P for influenza outbreaks in ACFs. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed a cluster randomised controlled trial in 16 ACFs, that followed a policy of either "T"-oseltamivir treatment (75 mg twice a day for 5 days)-or "T&P"-treatment and prophylaxis (75 mg once a day for 10 days) for influenza outbreaks over three years, in addition to enhanced surveillance. The primary outcome measure was the attack rate of influenza. Secondary outcomes measures were deaths, hospitalisation, pneumonia and adverse events. Laboratory testing was performed to identify the viral cause of influenza-like illness (ILI) outbreaks. The study period 30 June 2006 to 23 December 2008 included three southern hemisphere winters. During that time, influenza was confirmed as the cause of nine of the 23 ILI outbreaks that occurred amongst the 16 ACFs. The policy of T&P resulted in a significant reduction in the influenza attack rate amongst residents: 93/255 (36%) in residents in T facilities versus 91/397 (23%) in T&P facilities (p=0.002). We observed a non-significant reduction in staff: 46/216 (21%) in T facilities versus 47/350 (13%) in T&P facilities (p=0.5). There was a significant reduction in mean duration of outbreaks (T=24 days, T&P=11 days, p=0.04). Deaths, hospitalisations and pneumonia were non-significantly reduced in the T&P allocated facilities. Drug adverse events were common but tolerated. CONCLUSION: Our trial lacked power but these results provide some support for a policy of "treatment and prophylaxis" with oseltamivir in controlling influenza outbreaks in ACFs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: [corrected] Australian Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12606000278538.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Serviços de Saúde para Idosos/estatística & dados numéricos , Influenza Humana/tratamento farmacológico , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Oseltamivir/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Austrália/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Influenza Humana/epidemiologia , Influenza Humana/virologia , Masculino , Modelos Biológicos , Oseltamivir/administração & dosagem , Oseltamivir/efeitos adversos , Características de Residência/estatística & dados numéricos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA