Can Chronic Pain Patients Be Adequately Treated Using Generic Pain Medications to the Exclusion of Brand-Name Ones?

According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reports, approximately 8 in 10 prescriptions filled in the United States are for generic medications, with an expectation that this number will increase over the next few years. The impetus for this emphasis on generics is the cost disparity between them and brand-name products. The use of FDA-approved generic drugs saved 158 billion dollars in 2010 alone. In the current health care climate, there is continually increasing pressure for prescribers to write for generic alternative medications, occasionally at the expense of best clinical practices. This creates a conflict wherein both physicians and patients may find brand-name medications clinically superior but nevertheless choose generic ones. The issue of generic versus brand medications is a key component of the discussion of health payers, physicians and their patients. This review evaluates some of the important medications in the armamentarium of pain physicians that are frequently used in the management of chronic pain, and that are currently at the forefront of this issue, including Opana (oxymorphone; Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Malvern, PA), Gralise (gabapentin; Depomed, Newark, CA), and Horizant (gabapentin enacarbil; XenoPort, Santa Clara, CA) that are each available in generic forms as well. We also discuss the use of Lyrica (pregabalin; Pfizer, New York, NY), which is currently unavailable as generic medication, and Cymbalta (duloxetine; Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, IN), which has been recently FDA approved to be available in a generic form. It is clear that the use of generic medications results in large financial savings for the cost of prescriptions on a national scale. However, cost-analysis is only part of the equation when treating chronic pain patients and undervalues the relationships of enhanced compliance due to single-daily dosing and stable and reliable pharmacokinetics associated with extended-duration preparations using either retentive technologies or delayed absorption strategies. Medications given to chronic pain patients should be individualized to best serve analgesic needs and assure patient safety primarily, based on high levels of scientific and economic evidence. Decisions regarding utilization should not be made based solely on limited or faulty assessments of cost-benefit analyses.

Performance Analysis of Leica Biosystems Monoclonal Antibody Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Clone 73-10 on Breast, Colorectal, and Hepatocellular Carcinomas.

Programmed cell death receptor 1/Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint pathway is responsible for the control of immune cell responses. Immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-PD-L1 therapy, aids disease management and potentiates clinical outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the performance of the Leica Biosystems (LBS) USA FDA class I in vitro diagnostic monoclonal antibody (clone 73-10) to detect PD-L1 expression in breast, colorectal, and hepatocellular carcinomas compared with the class III FDA-approved PD-L1 detecting antibodies [SP263 (Ventana), 22C3 (Dako), and 28-8 (Dako)] using 208 unique tissue microarray-based cases for each tumor type. The interassay concordances between LBS 73-10 clone and other PD-L1 antibodies ranged from 0.59 to 0.95 Cohen kappa coefficient (K) and from 0.66 to 0.90 (K) for cutoff values of 1% and 50% tumor proportion score (TPS), respectively. The 73-10 clones showed inter-pathologist agreements ranging from 0.53 to 1.0 (K) and 0.34 to 0.94 (K) for cutoff values of 1% and 50% TPS, respectively. For the immune cell proportion score (IPS) using a cutoff of 1%, the Kappa coefficient of interassay concordances and inter-pathologist agreements ranged from 0.34 to 0.94. The 73-10 clone assay's sensitivity ranged from 78.3% to 100% (TPS ≥1%), 100% (TPS ≥50%), and 77.4% to 93.5% (IPS ≥1%), while its specificity was 97.9% to 100% (TPS ≥1%), 99.5% to 99.8% (TPS ≥50%), and 97.9% to 100% (IPS ≥1%). This exploratory evaluation of LBS 73-10 monoclonal antibody on a large set of breast, colorectal, and hepatocellular carcinomas showed the assay's technical performance is comparable to the FDA-approved companion/complementary diagnostics PD-L1 detection assays.