ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on Cancer Survivorship: promoting high-quality survivorship care and research in Europe.

BACKGROUND: The increased number of cancer survivors and the recognition of physical and psychosocial challenges, present from cancer diagnosis through active treatment and beyond, led to the discipline of cancer survivorship. DESIGN AND METHODS: Herein, we reflected on the different components of survivorship care, existing models and priorities, in order to facilitate the promotion of high-quality European survivorship care and research. RESULTS: We identified five main components of survivorship care: (i) physical effects of cancer and chronic medical conditions; (ii) psychological effects of cancer; (iii) social, work and financial effects of cancer; (iv) surveillance for recurrences and second cancers; and (v) cancer prevention and overall health and well-being promotion. Survivorship care can be delivered by structured care models including but not limited to shared models integrating primary care and oncology services. The choice of the care model to be implemented has to be adapted to local realities. High-quality care should be expedited by the generation of: (i) focused and shared European recommendations, (ii) creation of tools to facilitate implementation of coordinated care and (iii) survivorship educational programs for health care teams and patients. The research agenda should be defined with the participation of health care providers, researchers, policy makers, patients and caregivers. The following patient-centered survivorship research areas were highlighted: (i) generation of a big data platform to collect long-term real-world data in survivors and healthy controls to (a) understand the resources, needs and preferences of patients with cancer, and (b) understand biological determinants of survivorship issues, and (ii) develop innovative effective interventions focused on the main components of survivorship care. CONCLUSIONS: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) can actively contribute in the efforts of the oncology community toward (a) promoting the development of high-quality survivorship care programs, (b) providing educational material and (c) aiding groundbreaking research by reflecting on priorities and by supporting research networking.

Metabolic phenotypes of obesity: frequency, correlates and change over time in a cohort of postmenopausal women.

OBJECTIVE: The possibility that a subset of persons who are obese may be metabolically healthy-referred to as the 'metabolically healthy obese' (MHO) phenotype-has attracted attention recently. However, few studies have followed individuals with MHO or other obesity phenotypes over time to assess change in their metabolic profiles. The aim of the present study was to examine transitions over a 6-year period among different states defined simultaneously by body mass index (BMI) and the presence/absence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS). METHODS: We used repeated measurements available for a subcohort of participants enrolled in the Women's Health Initiative (N=3512) and followed for an average of 6 years to examine the frequency of different metabolic obesity phenotypes at baseline, the 6-year transition probabilities to other states and predictors of the risk of different transitions. Six phenotypes were defined by cross-tabulating BMI (18.5-<25.0, 25.0-<30.0, ⩾30.0 kg m-2) by MetS (yes, no). A continuous-time Markov model was used to estimate 6-year transition probabilities from one state to another. RESULTS: Over the 6 years of follow-up, one-third of women with the healthy obese phenotype transitioned to the metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO) phenotype. Overall, there was a marked tendency toward increased metabolic deterioration with increasing BMI and toward metabolic improvement with lower BMI. Among MHO women, the 6-year probability of becoming MUO was 34%, whereas among unhealthy normal-weight women, the probability of 'regressing' to the metabolically healthy normal-weight phenotype was 52%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated substantial change in metabolic obesity phenotypes over a 6-year period. There was a marked tendency toward metabolic deterioration with greater BMI and toward metabolic improvement with lower BMI.

Benefit/risk for adjuvant breast cancer therapy with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitor use by age, and race/ethnicity.

In early adjuvant breast cancer trial reports, aromatase inhibitors more effectively reduced breast recurrence with lower risk of thromboembolic events and endometrial cancer than tamoxifen, while aromatase inhibitors had higher fracture and cardiovascular disease risk. We used data from updated patient-level meta-analyses of adjuvant trials in analyses to summarize the benefits and risks of these agents in various clinical circumstances. Baseline incidence rates for health outcomes by age and race/ethnicity, absent aromatase inhibitor, or tamoxifen use were estimated from the Women's Health Initiative. Aromatase inhibitor and tamoxifen effects on distant recurrence were obtained from a meta-analysis of the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) and Breast International Group (Big-1-98) clinical trials. Impact on other health outcomes were obtained from meta-analyses of randomized trials comparing aromatase inhibitor to tamoxifen use and from placebo-controlled chemoprevention trials. All health outcomes were given equal weight when modeling net benefit/risk for aromatase inhibitor compared to tamoxifen use by breast cancer recurrence risk, age (decade), race/ethnicity, hysterectomy (yes/no), and by prior myocardial infarction. Over a 10-year period, the benefit/risk index was more favorable for aromatase inhibitor than for tamoxifen as adjuvant breast cancer therapy in almost all circumstances regardless of patient age, race/ethnicity, breast cancer recurrence risk, or presence or absence of a uterus. Only in older women with prior myocardial infarction and low recurrence risk was an advantage for tamoxifen seen. Using a benefit/risk index for endocrine adjuvant breast cancer therapy in postmenopausal women, benefit was higher for aromatase inhibitor use in almost all circumstances.

Reliable evidence from placebo-controlled, randomized, clinical trials for menopausal hormone therapy's influence on incidence and deaths from breast cancer.

In an invited editorial, Dr Shapiro proposes that vaginal bleeding leading to unblinding and subsequent detection bias explains the breast cancer increase seen with estrogen plus progestin in the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) clinical trial (1) . In the context of a uniform detection program of protocol-mandated annual mammography and breast examinations, such a proposal is medically implausible. Dr Shapiro suggests detection bias would identify a larger number of 'slowly growing tumors that would otherwise remain clinically silent'. The findings of more advanced cancers with increased deaths from breast cancer in the estrogen plus progestin group refute this conjecture. During early post-intervention phases of both WHI hormone therapy trials, when breast cancer detection bias is asserted by Dr Shapiro because participants had been informed of randomization assignment, breast cancer incidence rates were lower (rather than higher) than during intervention. Thus, Dr Shapiro's claims are directly refuted by findings from the WHI randomized clinical trials. Health-care providers should be aware that randomized clinical trial evidence supports estrogen plus progestin increasing breast cancer incidence and deaths from breast cancer. In contrast, among women with prior hysterectomy, randomized clinical trial evidence supports estrogen alone reducing breast cancer incidence and deaths from breast cancer.

Health risks and benefits from calcium and vitamin D supplementation: Women's Health Initiative clinical trial and cohort study.

SUMMARY: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial randomly assigned 36,282 postmenopausal women in the U.S. to 1,000 mg elemental calcium carbonate plus 400 IU of vitamin D(3) daily or placebo, with average intervention period of 7.0 years. The trial was designed to test whether calcium plus vitamin D supplementation in a population in which the use of these supplements was widespread would reduce hip fracture, and secondarily, total fracture and colorectal cancer. INTRODUCTION: This study further examines the health benefits and risks of calcium and vitamin D supplementation using WHI data, with emphasis on fractures, cardiovascular disease, cancer, and total mortality. METHODS: WHI calcium and vitamin D randomized clinical trial (CT) data through the end of the intervention period were further analyzed with emphasis on treatment effects in relation to duration of supplementation, and these data were contrasted and combined with corresponding data from the WHI prospective observational study (OS). RESULTS: Among women not taking personal calcium or vitamin D supplements at baseline, the hazard ratio [HR] for hip fracture occurrence in the CT following 5 or more years of calcium and vitamin D supplementation versus placebo was 0.62 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 0.38-1.00). In combined analyses of CT and OS data, the corresponding HR was 0.65 (95 % CI, 0.44-0.98). Supplementation effects were not apparent on the risks of myocardial infarction, coronary heart disease, total heart disease, stroke, overall cardiovascular disease, colorectal cancer, or total mortality, while evidence for a reduction in breast cancer risk and total invasive cancer risk among calcium plus vitamin D users was only suggestive. CONCLUSION: Though based primarily on a subset analysis, long-term use of calcium and vitamin D appears to confer a reduction that may be substantial in the risk of hip fracture among postmenopausal women. Other health benefits and risks of supplementation at doses considered, including an elevation in urinary tract stone formation, appear to be modest and approximately balanced.

Fracture risk increases after diagnosis of breast or other cancers in postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative.

SUMMARY: Risk for falls and fractures increases after breast cancer or other cancer diagnosis in postmenopausal women. Factors other than falls may be the major causes for the increased fracture risk. INTRODUCTION: Cancer treatment and prognosis may have detrimental effects on bone health. However, there is a lack of prospective investigations on fracture risk among incident cancer cases. METHODS: In this study, postmenopausal women (N = 146,959) from the Women's Health Initiative prospective cohort, who had no cancer history at baseline, were followed for up to 9 years and classified into no cancer, incident breast cancer (BC) and incident other cancer (OC) groups. The main outcomes measured were incident fractures and falls before and after cancer diagnosis. Hazards ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed from Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: While hip fracture risk before a cancer diagnosis was similar between the no cancer and cancer groups, hip fracture risk was significantly higher after BC diagnosis (HR = 1.55, CI = 1.13-2.11) and the elevated risk was even more notable after OC diagnosis (HR = 2.09, CI = 1.65-2.65). Risk of falls also increased after BC (HR = 1.15, CI = 1.06-1.25) or OC diagnosis (HR = 1.27, CI = 1.18-1.36), but could not fully explain the elevated hip fracture risk. Incident clinical vertebral and total fractures were also significantly increased after OC diagnosis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Postmenopausal women have significantly elevated risks for falls and fractures after a cancer diagnosis. The causes for this increased risk remained to be investigated.

Hypogonadism in male patients with metastatic cancer prior to chemotherapy.

Gonadal hormonal function was assessed in 44 adult males with disseminated cancer prior to chemotherapeutic treatment of their cancer by determination of plasma testosterone, free testosterone, and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels. Low values for both testosterone (43% decreased) and free testosterone (66% decreased) were seen in this largely malnourished cancer population, in which 82% of patients were less than 90% of ideal body weight. Four patients of serum testosterone and LH were seen: (a) normal testosterone and normal LH (12 cases); (b) normal testosterone and high LH (13 cases), consistent with early primary hypogonadism; (c) low testosterone and high LH (10 cases), consistent with frank primary hypogonadism; (d) low testosterone and normal or low LH (9 cases), consistent with secondary hypogonadism. Significantly decreased ideal body weight was found in the group with low testosterone and low or normal LH level. We conclude that decreased gonadal hormone secretion is frequently seen in adult males with advanced cancer and malnutrition even prior to chemotherapy treatment.

Relationship of hepatic glucose production to growth hormone and severity of malnutrition in a population with colorectal carcinoma.

To define the influence of weight loss on the severity of metabolic abnormalities in patients with the same stage and primary site of cancer, hepatic glucose production (HGP) and nutritional status were determined in 44 patients with advanced, Stage D colorectal carcinoma and compared to values in seven cancer-free controls. The colorectal cancer patients were divided into three groups based upon percentage of ideal body weight. HGP was determined in all participants after an overnight fast by using a 3- or 4-h primed, continuous infusion of [6-3H]glucose. Fasting glucose, insulin, cortisol, thyroxine, triiodothyronine, and growth hormone values were also determined. Mean HGP was significantly elevated in colorectal carcinoma patients versus normal subjects (2.35 +/- 0.89 (SD) mg/kg/min versus 1.75 +/- 0.16; P less than 0.01). The most severely malnourished group (ideal body weight less than 90%) demonstrated the greatest increase in HGP (2.98 +/- 0.73 mg/kg/min). Growth hormone mean fasting levels were significantly elevated in the colorectal carcinoma population compared to the normal subjects (2.9 +/- 3.1 ng/ml versus 0.5 +/- 0.2; P less than 0.001). The most severely malnourished group also demonstrated the highest growth hormone levels. The rate of HGP was significantly correlated with fasting growth hormone levels (r = 0.71; P less than 0.001) and not significantly correlated to cortisol, insulin, thyroxine, triiodothyronine, or glucose levels in carcinoma patients. Thus, the elevation in HGP seen in patients with colorectal carcinoma is related to the severity of weight loss and is associated with elevations in fasting growth hormone.

Influence of hydrazine sulfate on abnormal carbohydrate metabolism in cancer patients with weight loss.

Thirty-eight patients with advanced cancer and weight loss were tested in a prospectively randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the influence of hydrazine sulfate on carbohydrate metabolism in cancer cachexia. All patients had an initial 3-day inpatient metabolic evaluation including: standard 5-hr p.o. glucose tolerance test, hormone studies, and total glucose production by infusion of [6-3H]glucose. After 30 days of treatment with capsules containing either placebo or hydrazine sulfate in a 60-mg, 3 times/day dosage, inpatient evaluation was repeated. A total of 62 metabolic inpatient evaluations were performed. The pretreatment characteristics of age, sex, prior therapy experience, nutritional parameters and tumor types were comparable in placebo and hydrazine treatment groups. On initial evaluation, abnormal glucose tolerance and increased glucose production were frequently seen. Serial assessment of glucose tolerance showed no improvement after 30 days of placebo treatment. However, the glucose tolerance was significantly improved in patients receiving 30 days of hydrazine sulfate [2-hr glucose; initial 169 +/- 24 (S.E.) mg/dl versus final 128 +/- 12 mg/dl; p less than 0.05]. In addition, the rate of total glucose production was significantly decreased after 30 days of hydrazine sulfate compared to placebo treatment (2.46 mg/kg/min versus 3.07 mg/kg/min, respectively; p less than 0.05). Toxic effects of hydrazine sulfate were minimal. Our results suggest that hydrazine sulfate can influence the abnormal carbohydrate metabolism associated with weight loss in patients with cancer.

Effects of tamoxifen adjuvant therapy and a low-fat diet on serum binding proteins and estradiol bioavailability in postmenopausal breast cancer patients.

Serum was collected at intervals from postmenopausal breast cancer patients to determine the effects of tamoxifen adjuvant therapy and a low-fat dietary intervention, alone and in combination, on sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations and circulating estradiol bioavailability. Serum corticosteroid-binding globulin and follicle-stimulating hormone were also assayed as indicators of patient compliance to tamoxifen therapy. The immunoreactive SHBG concentration was higher (P less than 0.001) in 22 patients who had been treated with tamoxifen for 6-36 weeks when first sampled, compared with 27 who were not receiving tamoxifen therapy. Tamoxifen also produced a reduction in the percentage non-protein-bound estradiol (P less than 0.001) and percentage albumin-bound estradiol (P less than 0.01), the two biologically available fractions, and a corresponding increase in the percentage SHBG-bound estradiol (P less than 0.01). A longitudinal study of 7 patients showed significant reductions in the percentage of albumin-bound estradiol and an increased percentage of SHBG-bound estradiol, after 3-6 months of tamoxifen; after 12-18 months there was also a significant decrease in the non-protein-bound estradiol fraction. We conclude that in postmenopausal breast cancer patients the redistribution of circulating estradiol, with reduced bioavailability, provides an additional mechanism to those demonstrated previously for the therapeutic activity of tamoxifen. Another 12 patients receiving tamoxifen and 8 who were not were followed for 6-12 months on a low-fat diet (fat comprised 20% of the total calories). The dietary intervention had no effect on the serum SHBG concentration or the estradiol distribution. Although tamoxifen increased the serum corticosteroid-binding globulin and partially suppressed the follicle-stimulating hormone concentrations, the responses obtained were less consistent compared with those of the SHBG levels.

Survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with either combination or sequential chemotherapy.

One hundred twenty-one patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the breast were randomized to concurrent combination therapy or single-drug chemotherapy administered sequentially. Although response frequency and duration of response were significantly increased in patients receiving the combination regimen, survival was not significantly prolonged when compared to those receiving sequential treatment. For the 69 patients free of liver metastasis, median survival was comparable in both treatment arms (14.4 months sequential versus 12.8 months combination). These results indicate that a large subset of patients with metastatic breast cancer may benefit from less aggressive therapeutic regimens. Furthermore, these results illustrate that conclusions of chemotherapy trials in breast cancer based only on response frequency and duration of response represent preliminary results subject to change when final survival information becomes available.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic effects of combined warfarin and 5-flourouracil in advanced colon cancer.

Twenty-five patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the colon were treated with 5-fluorouracil (FUra), 15 to 20 mg/kg/week i.v., plus warfarin p.o. at a dosage which maintains therapeutic levels of anticoagulation. Sixty-four % of patients achieved either objective response (20%) or stable disease (44%). Overall median survival was 19.2 months. Three patients (all with intraluminal lesions) developed gastrointestinal blood loss requiring transfusion and discontinuation of anticoagulation. The interaction between warfarin and FUra as measured by plasma levels was investigated in seven rabbits and three patients. Plasma samples were obtained for 2 hr after FUra administration, both before and after anticoagulation with warfarin. FUra was measured by gas chromatography, and warfarin was assayed using a thin-layer chromatographic fluorescence method. In rabbits, prolongation of FUra plasma t1/2 was seen with high (0.6 mg/kg/hr) but not low (0.025 mg/kg/hr) rates of warfarin infusion. In patients, FUra t1/2 was not changed by therapeutic warfarin anticoagulation. Thus, (a) plasma clearance interaction between FUra and warfarin does not occur in patients receiving therapeutic levels of anticoagulation; (b) FUra and warfarin anticoagulation can be safely given and frequently result in stable disease status for patients with advanced colon cancer. Further trials of this combination are warranted in adenocarcinoma of the colon.

Significance of relapse after adjuvant treatment with combination chemotherapy or 5-fluorouracil alone in high-risk breast cancer. A Western Cancer Study Group Project.

Beginning in 1974, patients undergoing mastectomy at high risk for recurrence (greater than or equal to 4 nodes positive; median, 9.4 positive; range, 4 to 28) were randomized after stratification for menopausal status and radiotherapy to receive either 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 500 mg/sq m i.v. every week) or cyclophosphamide, 400 mg/sq m; methotrexate, 30 mg/sq m; and 5-FU, 500 mg/sq m (CMF; all given i.v. every 2 weeks) in a 12-month program. All 62 patients remain evaluable with median follow-up now exceeding 70 months (range, 60 to 80 months). CMF significantly prevented early disease recurrence (97% relapse free on CMF versus 75% on 5-FU at 12 months; p less than 0.05) and demonstrated survival advantage during the initial 40-month follow-up. This significance was subsequently lost, and the percentages of relapse free and overall survival after 70 months are: (formula, see text) The apparently paradoxical relationship between relapse and survival on the 5-FU arm was related to survival after recurrence. Survival after recurrence was significantly longer on the 5-FU compared to the CMF arm (median of greater than 38 versus 10 months, respectively; p less than 0.01). These results suggest (a) long-term survival in adjuvant trials cannot be accurately predicted by short-term differences in relapse frequency, (b) survival after relapse may be influenced by the antecedent adjuvant therapy received, and (c) disease relapse does not necessarily preclude long-term survival.

Continuous Combined Estrogen Plus Progestin and Endometrial Cancer: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: While progestin addition to estrogen mitigates endometrial cancer risk, the magnitude of the effect on incidence, specific endometrial cancer histologies, and endometrial cancer mortality remains unsettled. These issues were assessed by analyses after extended follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized clinical trial evaluating continuous combined estrogen plus progestin use. METHODS: The WHI enrolled 16 608 postmenopausal women into a randomly assigned, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Women age 50 to 79 years with intact uteri with normal endometrial biopsy at entry were randomly assigned to once-daily 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen plus 2.5mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 8506) as a single pill or matching placebo (n = 8102). Follow-up beyond the original trial completion date required reconsent, obtained from 12 788 (83%) of surviving participants. Analyses were by intent-to-treat. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: After 5.6 years' median intervention and 13 years' median cumulative follow-up, there were fewer endometrial cancers in the combined hormone therapy compared with the placebo group (66 vs 95 case patients, yearly incidence, 0.06% vs 0.10%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48 to 0.89, P = .007). While there were somewhat fewer endometrial cancers during intervention (25 vs 30, respectively; HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.45 to 1.31), the difference became statistically significant postintervention (41 vs 65, respectively; HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.88, P = .008), but hazard ratios did not differ between phases (P difference = .46). There was a statistically nonsignificant reduction in deaths from endometrial cancer in the estrogen plus progestin group (5 vs 11 deaths, HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.22). CONCLUSION: In postmenopausal women, continuous combined estrogen plus progestin decreases endometrial cancer incidence.

A decade of breast cancer clinical investigation: results as reported in the Program/Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

PURPOSE: To test the hypothesis that clinical research results have driven changes in recent breast cancer management recommendations. METHODS: All breast cancer abstracts in the Program/Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) from 1984 to 1993 were prospectively reviewed in 31 areas and categorized by study type, study question, whether statistical significance was claimed, and whether the abstract was presented. RESULTS: Of 1,372 abstracts, 54% reported on prospective clinical trials (PCTs) and 17% on randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The total number of published abstracts progressively increased (from 87 in 1984 to 221 in 1993) and author citations nearly quadrupled (from 430 in 1984 to 1,642 in 1993, P < .01); however, RCTs have come to represent a smaller proportion of reports: 37% (33 of 89) in 1986 versus 10% (22 of 221) in 1993 (P < .001). The size of adjuvant-therapy RCTs has progressively increased (mean +/- SEM subjects/trial, 237 +/- 43 in 1984 to 874 +/- 374 in 1993), but has remained small in advanced-disease RCTs (mean +/- SEM subjects/trial, 145 +/- 25 in 1984 to 146 +/- 34 in 1993). For adjuvant therapy, 14 of 90 RCTs (with 51,207 patients) reported a significant (P < .05) survival benefit for investigational therapies (16%). For advanced-disease therapy, only three of 141 RCTs (with 26,281 patients) reported a significant (P < .05) survival benefit for investigational therapies (2%). Randomization was rarely used in trials of dose-intensity with blood-product support (zero of 86 trials) or locally advanced disease. CONCLUSION: For breast cancer ASCO abstracts in the past decade, we determined the following: (1) adjuvant trials have not infrequently supported study hypotheses; and (2) advanced-disease trials have consistently failed to identify new approaches with a significant impact on survival. These results suggest that a critical process evaluation of current policy and procedures involved in directing breast cancer research is warranted, especially for strategies in advanced disease.

Elements of informed consent for hormone replacement therapy in patients with diagnosed breast cancer.

PURPOSE: An approach to providing informed consent to breast cancer survivors considering hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is offered. METHODS: Current information on HRT, breast cancer, and chronic disease prevention is reviewed in the context of risks faced by women with resected breast cancer. RESULTS: Breast cancer patients, unwilling to trade symptom reduction for even a small increase in recurrence risk, are at substantially increased risk of death from breast cancer relative to other causes. Observational studies suggest that long-term HRT increases breast cancer development. The influence of HRT on the growth of established breast cancer has not been determined; however, estrogen reduction (oophorectomy) significantly reduces recurrence in premenopausal women, and current evidence cannot exclude a risk that HRT increases recurrence to the same degree. The following issues are of particular relevance to breast cancer survivors: HRT reduces mammographic sensitivity, increases thromboembolic events, and increases endometrial cancer risk. Although benefit for HRT is commonly inferred from observational studies, randomized trials of HRT on all-cause mortality have not been completed. For coronary heart disease prevention, an array of strategies independent of HRT are available, with some (tamoxifen, selective estrogen receptor modifiers [SERMs], diet, and exercise) likely to favorably influence breast cancer risk; for osteoporosis prevention, an array of strategies also are available, with some (bisphosphonates, tamoxifen, SERMs, and exercise) likely to favorably influence breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Current data preclude the generation of evidence-based guidelines for HRT use in breast cancer survivors, and clinical trials in this setting should be supported. However, given available therapeutic alternatives for menopausal symptom management and chronic disease prevention, breast cancer survivors should be offered HRT only with caution and with their full participation in the decision-making process.

Current attitudes and practice of American Society of Clinical Oncology-member clinical oncologists regarding cancer prevention and control.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: A nationwide needs assessment survey including a validated Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Attitude Inventory of 1,500 randomly selected American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-member clinical oncologists was conducted via a 67-item, mailed questionnaire to assess practice and attitudes regarding cancer prevention and control. RESULTS: Responses of 729 physicians from 48 states representing medical (57%), radiation (17%), surgical (16%), and pediatric oncology (6%), and hematology/other (4%) fields were obtained. Except for ambivalence regarding an important role for diet in cancer causation, cancer prevention and control recommendations were widely endorsed despite skepticism about their impact on reducing deaths from cancer. Surprisingly, a significantly (P less than .001) more favorable attitude for cancer prevention and control issues was found in physicians with greater than 20 years practice compared with younger oncology colleagues, as measured by a 22-item Cancer Prevention and Early Detection Attitude Inventory. Among all physicians, participation in cancer therapy trials exceeded that in cancer prevention and control trials (91% v 27%, P less than .01). Formal instruction during postgraduate training in cancer screening (34%) or prevention (23%) was received by few oncologists; nonetheless, 69% considered themselves a resource for cancer prevention and control issues in their practice communities. Of potential barriers to cancer prevention and control activity, only lack of patients without cancer (53%) and difficulty in including such activity economically into clinical practice (65%) were majority selections. Importantly, 64% agreed they could "motivate their patients to change lifestyle to reduce cancer risk." CONCLUSION: Clinical oncologists may represent a potential resource for implementation of cancer prevention and control objectives if economically feasible models for their use in practice settings can be identified.

American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on breast cancer risk reduction strategies: tamoxifen and raloxifene.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an evidence-based technology assessment to determine whether tamoxifen and raloxifene as breast cancer risk-reduction strategies are appropriate for broad-based conventional use in clinical practice. POTENTIAL INTERVENTION: Tamoxifen and raloxifene. OUTCOME: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefits. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for tamoxifen and raloxifene on the following topics: breast cancer risk reduction; tamoxifen side effects and toxicity, including endometrial cancer risk; tamoxifen influences on nonmalignant diseases, including coronary heart disease and osteoporosis; and decision making by women at risk for breast cancer. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. VALUES: More weight was given to publications that described randomized trials. BENEFITS/HARMS/COSTS: The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Working Group acknowledges that a woman's decision regarding breast cancer risk-reduction strategies will depend on the importance and weight attributed to the information provided regarding both cancer and non-cancer-related risks. CONCLUSIONS: For women with a defined 5-year projected risk of breast cancer of >/= 1.66%, tamoxifen (at 20 mg/d for up to 5 years) may be offered to reduce their risk. It is premature to recommend raloxifene use to lower the risk of developing breast cancer outside of a clinical trial setting. On the basis of available information, use of raloxifene should currently be reserved for its approved indication to prevent bone loss in postmenopausal women. Conclusions are based on single-agent use of the drugs. At the present time, the effect of using tamoxifen or raloxifene with other medications (such as hormone replacement therapy), or using tamoxifen and raloxifene in combination or sequentially, has not been studied adequately. The continuing use of placebo-controlled trials in other risk-reduction trials highlights the current unanswered issues concerning the use of such interventions, especially when the influence on net health benefit remains to be determined. Breast cancer risk reduction is a rapidly evolving area. This technology assessment represents an ongoing process with existing plans to monitor and review data and to update recommendations in a timely matter. (See VALIDATION: The conclusions of the Working Group were evaluated by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and by the ASCO Board of Directors. SPONSOR: American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Hydrazine sulfate influence on nutritional status and survival in non-small-cell lung cancer.

This randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical trial compares the influence on nutritional status and survival of hydrazine sulfate with placebo addition to cisplatin-containing combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The trial consisted of 65 patients with advanced, unresectable NSCLC who had had no prior chemotherapy, were at least partially ambulatory (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] performance status [PS] level 0-2), and who had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. All patients received the same defined combination chemotherapy (cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin) and the same defined dietary counseling with the addition of either three times daily oral hydrazine sulfate (60 mg) or placebo capsules. Hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo addition to chemotherapy resulted in significantly greater caloric intake and albumin maintenance (P less than .05). Considering all patients, survival was greater for the hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo group (median survival, 292 v 187 days), but the difference did not achieve statistical significance. In favorable PS patients (PS 0-1), survival was significantly prolonged (median survival, 328 days v 209 days; P less than .05) for hydrazine sulfate compared with placebo addition. In a multifactor analysis, PS, weight loss, and liver involvement were the final variables. Objective response frequency and toxicity were comparable on both arms. Hydrazine sulfate may favorably influence nutritional status and clinical outcome of patients with NSCLC. Further definitive studies of hydrazine sulfate addition to therapeutic regimens in NSCLC are warranted.