Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Performed Using a Three-Dimensional Exoscope.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a common neurosurgical procedure. Portions of the procedure, such as the discectomy, foraminotomy, graft placement, and plate placement, are often performed using operating microscopes to maximize visualization and minimize neurovascular injury. Although standard operating microscopes offer superb visualization, they lack ergonomic and educational utility. With modern advancements in digital imaging and stereopsis, there has been a surge of interest in evaluating modern exoscopes for their utility in cranial and spinal neurosurgery.1-3 In Video 1, we demonstrate the use of a commercial three-dimensional exoscope from skin incision through completion of a two-level ACDF. Both the lead surgeon and the assistant surgeon were able to maintain a neutral, ergonomic, and comfortable position throughout the surgery. Furthermore, we tested the utility of this technique in 15 patients undergoing ACDF (2 one-level, 9 two-level, 3 three-level, and 1 four-level). Mean (SD) overall operative time was 118 (34) minutes (2-level ACDF, 110 [12] minutes), and mean (SD) blood loss was 23 (8.0) mL. The Neck Disability Index score and visual analog scale score for neck pain improved significantly at 6 weeks postoperatively (from 59.6 [1.3] to 27.9 [3.0] and from 6.3 [1.0] to 2.5 [0.92], respectively; P < 0.001 for both). Thus, excellent clinical outcomes can be achieved using three-dimensional exoscopes with comparable operative time and blood loss compared with conventional surgical microscopes or loupes. Given the improved ergonomic and teaching potential of exoscopes, the use of three-dimensional exoscopes for neurosurgical and spine surgeries warrants further investigation.

Incidence of radiographic and clinically significant pneumothorax or hemothorax after thoracic discectomy via mini-open lateral retropleural approach without prophylactic chest tube placement.

OBJECTIVE: The mini-open lateral retropleural (MO-LRP) approach is an effective option for surgically treating thoracic disc herniations, but the approach raises concerns for pneumothorax (PTX). However, chest tube placement causes insertion site tenderness, necessitates consultation services, increases radiation exposure (requires multiple radiographs), delays the progression of care, and increases narcotic requirements. This study examined the incidence of radiographic and clinically significant PTX and hemothorax (HTX) after the MO-LRP approach, without the placement of a prophylactic chest tube, for thoracic disc herniation. METHODS: This study was a single-institution retrospective evaluation of consecutive cases from 2017 to 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed, including postoperative chest radiographs, radiology and operative reports, and postoperative notes. The presence of PTX or HTX was determined on chest radiographs obtained in all patients immediately after surgery, with interval radiographs if either was present. The size was categorized as large (≥ 3 cm) or small (< 3 cm) based on guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. PTX or HTX was considered clinically significant if it required intervention. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach. All patients were included. Twenty patients were men (67%), and 10 (33%) were women. The patients ranged in age from 25 to 74 years. The most commonly treated level was T11-12 (n = 11, 37%). Intraoperative violation of parietal pleura occurred in 5 patients (17%). No patient had prophylactic chest tube placement. Fifteen patients (50%) had PTX on postoperative chest radiographs; 2 patients had large PTXs, and 13 had small PTXs. Both patients with large PTXs had expansion on repeat radiographs and were treated with chest tube insertion. Of the 13 patients with a small PTX, 1 required 100% oxygen using a nonrebreather mask; the remainder were asymptomatic. One patient, who had no abnormal findings on the immediate postoperative chest radiograph, developed an incidental HTX on postoperative day 6 and was treated with chest tube insertion. Thus, 3 patients (10%) required a chest tube: 2 for expanding PTX and 1 for delayed HTX. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who undergo thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach do not develop clinically significant PTX or HTX. PTX and HTX in this patient population should be treated with a chest tube only when there are postoperative clinical and radiographic indications.

Anatomical Reduction of Spondylolisthesis Through Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation: An Intraoperative Technical Note.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of lumbar spondylolisthesis requires neural decompression, stabilization, and alignment restoration. Minimally invasive spine approaches offer a wide variety of advantages for spondylolisthesis management. This intraoperative note describes the treatment of L4-L5 lumbar spondylolisthesis with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PSF). METHODS: The surgical technique for treating L4-L5 lumbar spondylolisthesis using a minimally invasive approach with LLIF and percutaneous PSF is described. This operative technique is illustrated with figures, and an intraoperative case example of its application is described. RESULTS: LLIF with percutaneous PSF can be a safe, effective, and reliable option for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis when applied with appropriate surgical technique in a selected patient population. This technique is a valuable addition to the range of available spine surgical options. CONCLUSIONS: LLIF with percutaneous PSF can be an effective technique for treating lumbar L4-L5 spondylolisthesis.