Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng ; 71(6): 1993-2000, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38277250

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) modeling can improve surgical targeting by quantifying the spatial extent of stimulation relative to subcortical structures of interest. A certain degree of model complexity is required to obtain accurate predictions, particularly complexity regarding electrical properties of the tissue around DBS electrodes. In this study, the effect of anisotropy on the volume of tissue activation (VTA) was evaluated in an individualized manner. METHODS: Tissue activation models incorporating patient-specific tissue conductivity were built for 40 Parkinson disease patients who had received bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS. To assess the impact of local changes in tissue anisotropy, one VTA was computed at each electrode contact using identical stimulation parameters. For comparison, VTAs were also computed assuming isotropic tissue conductivity. Stimulation location was considered by classifying the anisotropic VTAs relative to the STN. VTAs were characterized based on volume, spread in three directions, sphericity, and Dice coefficient. RESULTS: Incorporating anisotropy generated significantly larger and less spherical VTAs overall. However, its effect on VTA size and shape was variable and more nuanced at the individual patient and implantation levels. Dorsal VTAs had significantly higher sphericity than ventral VTAs, suggesting more isotropic behavior. Contrastingly, lateral and posterior VTAs had significantly larger and smaller lateral-medial spreads, respectively. Volume and spread correlated negatively with sphericity. CONCLUSION: The influence of anisotropy on VTA predictions is important to consider, and varies across patients and stimulation location. SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the importance of considering individualized factors in DBS modeling to accurately characterize the VTA.


Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Doença de Parkinson/fisiopatologia , Anisotropia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Idoso , Modelos Neurológicos , Núcleo Subtalâmico/fisiopatologia , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagem , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Condutividade Elétrica
2.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord ; 121: 105959, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38246833

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that intrinsic auricular muscle zones (IAMZ) stimulation alleviates motor features of Parkinson disease (PD). METHODS: A randomized, blinded, active sham-controlled pilot trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and dose-response-time curve of Earstim using a 3-treatment, 3-period crossover design in PD patients experiencing OFF time on levodopa. Treatments were: short (20-min) IAMZ stimulation; long (60-min) IAMZ stimulation; and 20-min active sham stimulation of non-muscular areas. Assessment time points were: prior to treatment, and 20, 40, 60, 90, and 120 min after treatment onset. Primary safety endpoints were adverse events frequency and severity. Primary efficacy endpoint was the change in MDS-UPDRS motor score at 20 min after treatment onset in the IAMZ treatment groups versus sham. RESULTS: Forty-six individuals consented; 38 were randomized (average age 64 years, 65 % male, mean 8.2 years from diagnosis). No serious adverse events or significant device-related events occurred. At 20 min after treatment onset, motor improvements did not differ between IAMZ treatments versus sham. However, at 60 min after treatment onset, motor improvement peaked on IAMZ treatments compared to sham (difference: 3.1 [-5.9 to 0.3], p = 0.03). While the difference in 120-min AUC change between IAMZ treatments versus sham was not significant, the short-stimulation IAMZ treatment showed the largest aggregate motor score improvement (AUC = -456 points, 95 % CI -691 to -221) compared to sham. CONCLUSION: Earstim was well-tolerated. The greatest motor improvement occurred at 60 min after stimulation onset in the short-stimulation IAMZ treatment, and supports its further study to alleviate OFF periods.


Assuntos
Doença de Parkinson , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Músculos , Doença de Parkinson/terapia , Projetos Piloto , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA