Association of CLABSI With Hospital Length of Stay, Readmission Rates, and Mortality: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: An evidence-based practice (EBP) approach to implementing change is relevant and pertinent to the strategy to improve outcomes for hospitalized patients with central venous catheters (CVC). As health systems endeavor to achieve the ambitious goals of improving the patient experience of care, improving the health of populations, and reducing the cost of health care, it is imperative to understand the impact of a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) on outcomes. AIMS: The purpose of the study was to contribute to the evidence of the association of CLABSI with the outcomes of hospital length of stay (LOS), readmission rates, and mortality rates for hospitalized patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted, including all hospitalized patients with a CVC within four hospitals in an integrated health system in northwest Ohio and southeast Michigan. The sample population was stratified into two groups, CLABSI and no CLABSI, and the outcomes of interest for each group were compared. RESULTS: The findings substantiate the association between CLABSI and the hospital mortality rate, LOS, and readmission. Patients with a CVC who develop a CLABSI were 36.6% more likely to die in the hospital and 37.0% more likely to be readmitted compared with patients with a CVC who did not develop a CLABSI. In addition, hospital LOS increased an average of 2 days compared with patients without CLABSI. This study evokes implications for EBP change to reduce the rate of CLABSI and for quality improvement during in-hospital care. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: There is an association between CLABSI and hospital mortality rate, LOS, and 30-day readmission outcomes, presenting a profound sense of urgency for EBP change. There were potential variances in processes or practice relative to insertion, maintenance, and removal in the hospitals studied, representing an opportunity to examine the best practices in the hospitals that are performing well. Implementation of EBP requires selecting effective and innovative strategies, with a focus on stakeholder involvement and needs.

Why Not Home?: A Study of the Impact of an Effort to Reduce Postacute Expenditures.

PURPOSE OF STUDY: Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) aiming to reduce healthcare expenditure adopt strategies targeting costly postacute service utilization, asking "why not home?" as a part of the hospital discharge planning paradigm. This study examined the impact of an interventional approach to implement evidence-based interventions to improve transitions of care to the least restrictive next site of care on the rate of skilled nursing facility (SNF) admissions per 1,000, SNF length of stay (LOS), and total SNF cost. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING: The impact of the interventional approach for an ACO-attributed Medicare population, analyzing Medicare Shared Savings Plan Part A and Part B beneficiary claims data, was examined. METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE: A pre-/postintervention analysis was conducted, for dates of service 12 months pre- and postintervention for patients admitted to any hospital within the integrated health care system. The outcome variables were defined as SNF admission rate, SNF LOS, cost of care (total SNF cost, SNF cost per admission), and hospital LOS prior to SNF discharge. RESULTS: There was early evidence of the effectiveness of the multifaceted interventions that involved the delivery of interprofessional team member education focused on the tenets of value-based care and discharging patients to the least restrictive setting, as appropriate. In the normalized data review, it was noted that the rate of SNF discharges per 1,000 patients changed from 73 per 1,000 patients in the preintervention period to 70 per 1,000 patients in the postintervention period. The total SNF cost in the postintervention period only increased by 3%, with a difference of $616,014, despite the 10% increase in the total ACO-attributed patient population during the same period. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: The results of this study imply that a multifaceted intervention with aims to shift the transitional care planning paradigm toward discharging to the least restrictive next site of care is an effective strategy for ACOs with aspirations to improve the utilization and expenditure in the postacute setting. The analyses suggest that providing education to interprofessional team members that reinforces the tenets of value-based care and the importance of asking, "why not home?" for every hospitalized patient, and leveraging technology-based insights positively impact discharge rates to SNF and other ACO outcomes.

Acute Care Management During a Pandemic.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: During the global pandemic of Covid-19, the hospital setting transitional care management was challenged by the complexities of the rapidly changing health care environment, requiring the implementation of an innovative approach to hospital discharge planning. The purpose of this article is to review the experiences of an integrated urban health system, exploring the strategic tactics to ensure effective communication between team members, patient and family engagement in discharge planning, establishing and maintaining trust, connecting patients to appropriate next level of care services, and providing transitional care management support. PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTINGS: The Covid-19 pandemic response stimulated the rapid transformation of the acute care management model amidst the tremendous challenge of meeting the discharge planning needs of the hospitalized population in one large, urban, integrated health care system. FINDINGS/CONCLUSIONS: Patients transitioning to the community setting following discharge are vulnerable and at risk for adverse sequelae, and transitional care management that does not end when the patient leaves the hospital setting is integral to promoting positive patient outcomes (Naylor, Aiken, Kurtzman, Olds, & Hirschman, 2011). The care management approach during the pandemic in one health care system precipitously shifted to an entirely virtual, remote model, and the team continued to provide transitional care support for hospitalized patients to avoid the common pitfalls that are associated with unfavorable outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE: The insights gleaned from one health system's experiences during the pandemic are transferable to other facets of care management in routine circumstances, with emphasis on the avoidance of the common care management snares that lead to less than optimal patient outcomes. The development and implementation of multifaceted interventions, with the goals of supporting health-promoting behavior changes and self-care capacity for at risk populations, are relevant in the current health care environment.

Association of Discharge Disposition with Outcomes.

Understanding the relationships between discharge disposition, readmissions, and cost of care is an important strategy for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) with aspirations to achieve shared savings. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study is to examine whether there is an association between the discharge dispositions of home with home health (HH) compared to skilled nursing facility (SNF) and the readmission rate and cost of care for Medicare ACO patients discharged from the hospital. The authors studied the variables associated with readmission rates and cost of care, including discharge disposition and risk score for 1151 patients attributed to an ACO. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, variables associated with increased risk for 30-day readmission were the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Category risk score and the discharge setting. Discharges to SNF were almost 5 times more likely to be readmitted to the hospital at 30 days compared to patients discharged to the HH setting. The cost of care is lower for the HH discharge disposition, with an $8678 per patient difference between the cost of care for patients discharged to HH and SNF levels of care. Findings from this study suggest that employing a transitional care planning approach that prioritizes discharging patients to the least restrictive next site of care, shifting patients from SNF disposition to HH as appropriate, is an effective strategy to improve readmission rates and cost of care.