FLT3-ITD and CEBPA Mutations Predict Prognosis in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Irrespective of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.

Cytogenetic and genetic changes have prognostic significance in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). In our study, we compared the cytogenetic changes and gene mutations (NPM1, CEBPA, DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, and C-KIT) with clinical outcomes in 1132 patients with AML enrolled at our center over a 10-year period. A total of 977 patients provided gene mutation data. There were subsets of patients who exhibited mutations in NPM1 (17.9%), CEBPA (16.4%), FLT3-ITD (18.5%), FLT3-TKD (3.9%), DNMT3A (8.6%), and C-KIT (8.8%). A total of 557 patients (49.2%) underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) as consolidation therapy. Multivariate analysis identified an adverse karyotype (hazard ratio [HR], 1.48; P = .001), the presence of FLT3-ITD (HR, 1.90; P < .001), and receipt of nonstandard first-line induction chemotherapy (HR, 1.45; P = .003) as significant risk factors for poor overall survival (OS), and the presence of CEBPAmut (HR, .42; P < .001) and receipt of HSCT (HR, .35; P < .001) as prognostic factors for favorable OS. In addition, the presence of FLT3-ITDmut (HR, 2.11; P < .001) was identified as an independent risk factor for poor disease-free survival (DFS), and receipt of HSCT was correlated with improved DFS (HR, .74; P = .046). Compared with chemotherapy as consolidation therapy, HSCT improved the prognosis and overcame the prognostic effect of karyotype from the initial diagnosis; however, the presence of FLT3-ITD or CEBPA mutation can predict prognosis in AML irrespective of HSCT.

Incidence, risk factors, and clinical significance of Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in myelodysplastic syndrome after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation is a life-threatening complication after allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). In this study, we investigated the characteristics of EBV reactivation in 186 consecutive myelodysplastic (MDS) patients who underwent allo-HSCT in our centre. In 35 patients (18.8%) who experienced EBV reactivation after allo-HSCT, the median onset was 53 days (range 4-381 days). The cumulative incidence of EBV reactivation at the first, sixth, and twelfth month after allo-HSCT was 10.7%, 15.1%, and 17.9%, respectively. Twenty-five patients (71.4%) received pre-emptive rituximab therapy, and no patients developed post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders. Stem cell source was proven to be a risk factor correlated with EBV reactivation. The cumulative incidence of relapse in the EBV-positive group was 11.4%, 25.2%, and 31.0% at the first, second, and third year after transplantation, respectively, being significantly higher than the corresponding 6.8%, 10.2%, and 10.2%, in the EBV-negative group (P = 0.014). Prognostic analysis showed that EBV reactivation was an independent risk factor for relapse-free survival (RFS). Patients in the EBV-positive group showed obviously shorter RFS than those in the EBV-negative group, with 3-year RFS of 62% and 85%, respectively (P = 0.017).

Clinical significance of FLT3-ITD/CEBPA mutations and minimal residual disease in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

PURPOSE: Genetic changes have prognostic significance in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML). We set out to evaluate the prognostic of 6 gene mutations in CN-AML. METHODS: We performed a mutational analysis and evaluated prognostic findings of six genes (NPM1, CEBPA, DNMT3A, FLT3-ITD, FLT3-TKD, and C-KIT) in 428 CN-AML patients at our center over 10 years. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients (65.9%) had at least one gene mutation, and the mutation frequencies were as follows: 29.7% (NPM1), 24.1% (CEBPA), 20.1% (FLT3-ITD), 4.0% (FLT3-TKD), 11.9% (DNMT3A), and 4.7% (C-KIT). Multivariate analysis indicated that FLT3-ITDmut and CEBPAwt were independent risk factors correlated with poor overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) of CN-AML. Compared with patients who received chemotherapy as consolidation, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) significantly improved OS of CN-AML patients. For standard/high risk patients, HSCT improved both OS and DFS. Combined analysis showed that patients with CEBPAmut/FLT3-ITDwt had the best prognosis, and patients with CEBPAwt/FLT3-ITDmut had the worst OS, with 3-year OS of only 44%. In 212 patients who received HSCT, FLT3-ITD/CEBPA mutations and minimal residual disease (MRD) were correlated with OS and DFS in univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found that HSCT significantly improves the prognosis of standard/high risk CN-AML patients with superior OS and DFS. Molecular marker analyses, especially combined analysis of the FLT3-ITD and CEBPA status revealed a correlation with the prognosis of CN-AML. For patients who have received HSCT, MRD before transplantation was a strong prognostic marker predicting patient outcome.

[Efficacy of Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Treatment of Intermediate Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia with Negative for FLT3-ITD, NPM1 or Biallelic CEBPA Mutation].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (hi-HSCT) HLA-matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (MSD-HSCT) and post-remission chemotherapy (PR-CT) in treatment of intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia with negative for FLT3-ITD, NPM1 or biallelic CEBPA mutation. METHODS: The clinical data of patients with intermediate risk NPM1wt/non-CEBPAdm/FLT3-ITDneg AML from October 2009 to May 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The overall survival rate of the patients treated with PR-CT, MSD-HSCT or hi-HSCT was 63.7%, 71.7%, 75.5%, respectively (P＜0.05); the disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 52.8%, 67.1%, 71.3% respectively (P＜0.001); the cumulative incidence of relapse was 24.7%, 16.9%, 14.4% respectively (P＜0.05); the non-relapse mortality was 26.2%, 17.3%, 14.4% reapectively (P＞0.05). The analysis of transplantation, related adverse events showed that II-IV grade of aGVHD in the MSD-HSCT group and hi-HSCT group was 48.9% and 45.6% respectively (P＞0.05); the extensive cGVHD event was 21.6% and 8.8% (P＜0.05) respectively. CONCLUSION: The efficiency of hi-HSCT and MSD-HSCT is superior to that of PR-CT for treatment of patients with intermediate risk NPM1wt/non-CEBPAdm/FLT3-ITDneg AML after CR1, there is no statistically significant difference in the efficiency of consolidatorg treatment and the transplantation-related mortality between hi-HSCT and MSD-HSCT.