RESUMO
Background: A deltoid rupture can result in significant losses of shoulder function, and in the setting of a rotator cuff tear, the deltoid serves as the sole abductor of the shoulder. Deltoid ruptures can be secondary to trauma, a consequence of massive rotator cuff tears, or a result of postoperative complications. There is a paucity of literature on the management of deltoid ruptures. In this systematic review, we aim to report on the incidence of deltoid ruptures, the surgical treatment options, and the outcomes following operative treatment. Methods: A literature search was conducted on February 1, 2023 on MEDLINE and Google Scholar. Titles and abstracts were screened and the full text versions of articles that met criteria were reviewed. Criteria for inclusion included peer-reviewed studies evaluating the outcomes following surgical treatment of deltoid ruptures (direct repair, mobilization, reconstruction, and pedicled pectoralis transfer, with or without a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty). Secondary outcomes included incidence and causes of deltoid ruptures. Results: A total of 101 studies were retrieved. After review and additional studies identified from reference lists, a total of 14 studies were included in the review. The incidence of deltoid ruptures ranged from 0.3% to 7%, and large, full-thickness rotator cuff tears were found to be a significant risk factor. Surgical treatment options for deltoid ruptures include direct repair, rotationplasty, and pedicelled muscle-tendon transfers; and when indicated, these procedures can be paired with a reverse total shoulder replacement. Postoperatively, the operative extremity should be immobilized in the position of least tension (forward flexion and abduction, 30°-70°) for 4-8 weeks. Most patients in this systematic review who underwent surgical treatment of their deltoid rupture had significant improvements in pain and mean postoperative forward elevation and abduction above 90°. Discussion: The current available literature demonstrates that direct deltoid repair, rotationplasty, or reconstruction (muscle tendon transfer) with or without a concomitant reverse total shoulder arthroplasty can be an acceptable treatment option in patients with deltoid defects and massive rotator cuff tear. The average shoulder flexion and abduction increased postoperatively with improvements in pain.
RESUMO
Introduction: Migraines are the leading cause of disability in the United States, and the use of non-pharmaceutical treatments like osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) has shown promise. Despite its potential, the lack of mechanistic understanding has hindered widespread adoption. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of OMT in treating acute migraines and unravel its underlying mechanisms of action. Methods: Female rats were subjected to a "two-hit" approach to induce migraine-like pain. This involved bilateral injections of Complete Freund's Adjuvant (CFA) into the trapezius muscle (1st hit) followed by exposure to Umbellulone, a human migraine trigger, on Day 6 post-CFA (2nd hit). Soft tissue and articulatory techniques were applied to the cervical region for acute abortive or repeated prophylactic treatment. Cutaneous allodynia and trigeminal system activation were assessed through behavioral tests and immunohistochemical staining. Results: Following Umbellulone inhalation, CFA-primed rats exhibited periorbital and hind paw allodynia. Immediate application of OMT after Umbellulone inhalation as an abortive treatment partially alleviated cutaneous allodynia. With OMT applied thrice as a prophylactic measure, complete suppression of tactile hypersensitivity was observed. Prophylactic OMT also prevented the increase of c-fos signals in the trigeminal nucleus caudalis and the elevation of calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in trigeminal ganglia induced by CFA and Umbellulone exposure at 2â h post-inhalation. Discussion: These findings provide mechanistic insights into OMT's migraine-relief potential and underscore its viability as a non-pharmacological avenue for managing migraines.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Femoral neck stress fractures (FNSFs) are a unique injury pattern not commonly treated in the civilian trauma population; however, it is particularly high with military trainees engaged in basic combat training. To date, no study has surveyed a population of military orthopedic surgeons on treatment preferences for military service members (SMs) with FNSF. QUESTIONS: We aim to evaluate the extent of clinical equipoise that exists in the management of these injuries, hypothesizing that there would be consensus in the factors dictating surgical and non-surgical intervention for FNSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 27-question survey was created and sent to U.S. military orthopedic surgeon members of the Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons. The survey was designed in order to gather the experience among surgeons in treating FNSF and identifying variables that play a role in the treatment algorithm for these patients. In addition, seven detailed, clinical vignettes were presented to further inquire on surgeon treatment preferences. Binomial distribution analysis was used to evaluate for common trends within the surgeon's treatment preferences. RESULTS: Seventy orthopedic surgeons completed the survey, the majority of whom were on active duty status in the U.S. Military (82.86%) and having under 5 years of experience (61.43%). Majority of surgeons elected for a multiple screw construct (92.86%), however the orientation of the multiple screws was dependent on whether the fracture was open or closed. Management for compression-sided FNSF involving ≥50% of the femoral neck width, tension-sided FNSF, and stress fractures demonstrating fracture line progression had consensus for operative management. Respondents agreed upon prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip if the following factors were involved: Complete fracture (98.57%), compression-sided fracture line >75% (88.57%), compression-sided fracture line >50-75% with hip effusion (88.57%), contralateral tension-sided fracture (87.14%), and compression-sided fracture line >50-75% (84.29%). An FNSF < 50% on the contralateral femoral neck or a hip effusion was indeterminate in surgeons indicating need for prophylactic fixation. Majority of surgeons (77.1%) utilized restricted toe-touch weight-bearing for postoperative mobility restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Consensus exists for surgical and non-surgical management of FNSF by U.S. military orthopedic surgeons, despite the preponderance of surgeons reporting a low annual volume of FNSF cases treated. However, there are certain aspects in the operative and non-operative management of FNSF that are unanimously adhered to. Specifically, our results demonstrate that there is no clear indication on the management of FNSF when an associated hip effusion is involved. Additionally, the indications for surgically treating contralateral FNSF are unclear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.