Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 48(4): 221-7, 2004 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15062913

RESUMO

We evaluated the reliability of the new Phoenix system (Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Sparks, Md.) in species-level identification and detection of oxacillin (methicillin) resistance among 493 staphylococcal isolates (Staphylococcus aureus, n = 223; coagulase-negative staphylococci, CoNS, n = 270) recovered from patients with bacteremia. Identification results were concordant with those of the ID 32 STAPH system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) for 100% of S. aureus (223/223) and 97.4% (263/270) of CoNS isolates. For S. aureus isolates, Phoenix oxacillin-susceptibility results fully concurred with those of mecA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (reference method): 96 mecA-positive isolates identified as resistant, 127 mecA-negative strains as susceptible. Two of the 210 mecA-positive CoNS isolates were misclassified as susceptible by the Phoenix (sensitivity 99%, positive predictive value 97.6%). Five of 60 mecA-negative CoNS isolates were classified as resistant by the Phoenix (specificity 91.7%; negative predictive value 96.5%). The Phoenix system can provide accurate and reliable identification of methicillin-resistant staphylococci responsible for bloodstream infections.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Resistência a Meticilina , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Coagulase/metabolismo , Humanos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana/métodos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/genética
2.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 23(3): 254-61, 2004 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15164966

RESUMO

The Italian Epidemiological Survey evaluated antibiotic susceptibility of non-fermentative Gram-negative bacilli isolated from inpatient respiratory-tract specimens collected throughout Italy during 1997-1999. The minimal inhibitory concentrations of 14 antibiotics for 1474 Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, 307 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains and 114 Acinetobacter baumannii strains were determined in 57 clinical microbiology laboratories by means of a standardised micro-dilution method. The most active drugs against P. aeruginosa isolates were meropenem (81% susceptible) and amikacin (80% susceptible). Imipenem and meropenem proved to be the only agents active against A. baumannii isolates, although 13 and 16%, respectively, of strains were resistant to these drugs. Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (TMP-SMZ) showed activity only against S. maltophilia isolates (83% susceptible). A total of 185 multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates (resistant to piperacillin, ceftazidime, gentamicin, and imipenem) were found. Resistance rates and trends showed consistent regional variations, including sharp increases from 1997 to 1999 in imipenem resistance among P. aeruginosa isolates from central and southern Italy.


Assuntos
Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/isolamento & purificação , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Infecções Respiratórias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Respiratórias/microbiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/microbiologia , Acinetobacter baumannii/efeitos dos fármacos , Acinetobacter baumannii/isolamento & purificação , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/epidemiologia , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Itália/epidemiologia , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Pseudomonas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Infecções por Pseudomonas/microbiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efeitos dos fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/isolamento & purificação , Infecções Respiratórias/epidemiologia , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/efeitos dos fármacos , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/isolamento & purificação
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(4): 1463-8, 2003 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12682131

RESUMO

Production of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) is an important mechanism of beta-lactam resistance in Enterobacteriaceae: Identification of ESBLs based on phenotypic tests is the strategy most commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories. The Phoenix ESBL test (BD Diagnostic Systems, Sparks, Md.) is a recently developed automated system for detection of ESBL-producing gram-negative bacteria. An algorithm based on phenotypic responses to a panel of cephalosporins (ceftazidime plus clavulanic acid, ceftazidime, cefotaxime plus clavulanic acid, cefpodoxime, and ceftriaxone plus clavulanic acid) was used to test 510 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis, Providencia stuartii, Morganella morganii, Enterobacter aerogenes, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Citrobacter freundii, and Citrobacter koseri. Of these isolates, 319 were identified as ESBL producers, and the remaining 191 were identified as non-ESBL producers based on the results of current phenotypic tests. Combined use of isoelectric focusing, PCR, and/or DNA sequencing demonstrated that 288 isolates possessed bla(TEM-1)- and/or bla(SHV-1)-derived genes, and 28 had a bla(CTX-M) gene. Among the 191 non-ESBL-producing isolates, 77 isolates produced an AmpC-type enzyme, 110 isolates possessed TEM-1, TEM-2, or SHV-1 beta-lactamases, and the remaining four isolates (all K. oxytoca strains) hyperproduced K1 chromosomal beta-lactamase. The Phoenix ESBL test system gave positive results for all the 319 ESBL-producing isolates and also for two of the four K1-hyperproducing isolates of K. oxytoca. Compared with the phenotypic tests and molecular analyses, the Phoenix system displayed 100% sensitivity and 98.9% specificity. These findings suggest that the Phoenix ESBL test can be a rapid and reliable method for laboratory detection of ESBL resistance in gram-negative bacteria.


Assuntos
Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Enterobacteriaceae/classificação , beta-Lactamases/metabolismo , Algoritmos , Cefalosporinas/farmacologia , Enterobacteriaceae/efeitos dos fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimologia , Humanos , Focalização Isoelétrica , Itália , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Fenótipo , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico , beta-Lactamases/genética
4.
J Clin Microbiol ; 41(9): 4259-63, 2003 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12958254

RESUMO

Staphylococci are an increasing cause of bloodstream infections. Rapid reliable identification of these organisms is essential for accurate diagnosis and prompt effective treatment. We evaluated the ability of the VITEK 2 system (bioMérieux, Inc, Hazelwood, Mo.) to identify these organisms rapidly and accurately. A total of 405 clinically relevant nonduplicate staphylococcal isolates (Staphylococcus aureus, n = 130; coagulase-negative staphylococci, n = 275) collected from blood cultures were tested. VITEK 2 results were considered correct when they were identical to those furnished by the comparison method based on the ID 32 STAPH system (bioMérieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France) plus supplementary manual testing. When discrepancies occurred, isolate identity was verified by molecular typing. The VITEK 2 correctly identified 387 (95.6%) isolates at the species level: 379 (including all but one [99.2%] of 130 S. aureus isolates and 249 of 275 [90.5%] coagulase-negative isolates) were identified by the automated reading; for the other eight, supplemental tests suggested by the manufacturer had to be used. Only one strain (0.2%) was misidentified (Staphylococcus hominis as Staphylococcus epidermidis), and four (1%), all S. epidermidis, were not identified. For the remaining 13 strains (including 10 S. hominis), the VITEK 2 system was unable to discriminate among two species, and no supplemental tests were suggested for conclusive identification. Over 90% of results were obtained within 4 h. These results suggest that the VITEK 2 system can provide rapid, accurate, and reliable species-level identification of staphylococci responsible for bloodstream infections, although there is room for improvement in the identification of certain coagulase-negative species, especially S. hominis.


Assuntos
Bacteriemia/diagnóstico , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Staphylococcus/isolamento & purificação , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA