Minimizing Surgeon Radiation Exposure During Operative Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons are exposed to high levels of radiation, which may lead to higher rates of cancer among orthopaedic surgeons. There are a series of techniques currently practiced to pin supracondylar humerus fractures including pinning the arm on the C-arm itself, using a plexiglass rectangle or a graphite floating arm board; however, the variation in radiation exposure to the surgeon is unknown. We aimed to determine how the position of the C-arm affects radiation exposure to the surgeon during the treatment of a pediatric supracondylar humerus fracture. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A simulated operating room was created to simulate a closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of a supracondylar humerus fracture. A phantom model was used to simulate the patient's arm. We assessed performing the procedure with the arm on plexiglass, graphite, or on top of the C-arm image receptor. The C-arm was positioned either with the source down and image receptor up (standard position) or with the source up and image receptor down (inverted position). Radiation exposure was recorded from levels corresponding to the surgeon's head, midline, and groin. The estimated effective dose equivalent was calculated to account for the varying radiation sensitivity of different organs. RESULTS: We found the effective dose equivalent, or the overall body damage from radiation, was 5.4 to 7.8% higher than the surgeon when the C-arm was in the inverted position (source up, image receptor down). We did not find any differences in radiation exposure to the surgeon when the arm was supported on plexiglass versus graphite. CONCLUSION: The C-arm positioned in the standard fashion exposes the surgeon to less damaging radiation. Therefore, when the surgeon is standing, we recommend using the C-arm in the standard position. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthopaedic surgeons who stand should use the C-arm in the standard position to pin supracondylar humerus fractures to lower the risk of ionizing radiation exposure.

Distal tibial osteotomy to address internal tibial torsion: Should the fibula be cut?

Background Rotational tibial osteotomy seeks to address pathologic tibial torsion. Inclusion of fibular osteotomy during this procedure remains controversial. This study aimed to determine how external rotation through a tibial osteotomy, with or without a fibular osteotomy, would influence tibiofibular joint congruity. Methods Eight cadaveric legs underwent distal tibial osteotomies. Pins were placed to designate neutral, 10°, 20°, 30° of external rotation. Computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed at each rotation without, then with a fibular osteotomy. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was performed prior to fibular osteotomy to confirm that ligaments remained intact. Custom software calculated tibial torsion using CT scan 3D reconstructions. Proximal tibiofibular joint rotation, distal tibiofibular gapping and ankle mortise were measured on each CT exam. Groups without and with fibular osteotomy were compared. Findings There was no difference between tibial osteotomy rotation magnitude with or without the fibular osteotomy (P = 0.2). The group without the fibular osteotomy had greater proximal fibular rotation at the tibiofibular joint at 20°, 30° (P < 0.05), greater posterior distal tibiofibular gap at 10°, 20°, 30° (P < 0.05) and less anterior distal tibiofibular gap at 20°, 30° (P < 0.05). The medial tibiotalar space was narrowed without the fibular osteotomy at 20°, 30° (P < 0.05) compared to pre-rotation. Interpretation Deformity at the proximal tibiofibular and ankle joints become most pronounced at >20° of tibial rotation without a fibular osteotomy. The first joint to be affected is the distal tibiofibular joint. To limit ankle and proximal tibiofibular articular deformation during tibia rotational osteotomy, a fibular osteotomy is recommended when correcting over 20° of rotation.

Juvenile Hallux Valgus.

Treatment of juvenile hallux valgus can be challenging. Initial treatment with conservative measures is appropriate until exhausted. Surgical treatment should be delayed until after skeletal maturity when possible. Before any intervention, a thorough understanding of the whole patient and any underlying systemic contributors to their hallux valgus, in addition to the radiographic foot parameters, is imperative. Careful and individualized surgical planning should be done to optimize results and decrease the risk for recurrence.